o hai
― ice cr?m, Saturday, 17 July 2010 13:55 (fifteen years ago)
in dreams 'you never know how you got there' w/all the exposition the dream warrior history was never explained past 'developed by the military for training purposes'
― ice cr?m, Saturday, 17 July 2010 14:01 (fifteen years ago)
one point of frustration - the leo incepted mol w/a dangerous concept in limbo reveal couldve been pretty weighty if they hadnt fucking given it away by having him say 'inception is possible, i incepted mol this one time lol' like just have him say 'its possible' or whatever - this bothered me
well, tbrr (or not ha), uh, i didn't rly get how leo incepted mol when they were in limbo. what does that entail? how? incepting cilian murphbro entailed all kinds of charadery and inventing situations etc. how did he trick is missus. also, you know, it's just an idea. in fifty years you'd prolly incept loads of ideas into yr significant other, right?
― I’ll put you in a f *ckin Weingarten you c*nt! (history mayne), Saturday, 17 July 2010 14:05 (fifteen years ago)
That's what she...um, never mind.
― Ned Raggett, Saturday, 17 July 2010 14:06 (fifteen years ago)
also, has Leo's voice changed yet?
― kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 17 July 2010 14:06 (fifteen years ago)
tbf i incept people all the time irl 'hay we should go see that new what is dreams movie' 'o ok sure'
― ice cr?m, Saturday, 17 July 2010 14:07 (fifteen years ago)
he actually uses a kind of minnesotan thing here. an odd choice but effective.
xpost
― I’ll put you in a f *ckin Weingarten you c*nt! (history mayne), Saturday, 17 July 2010 14:07 (fifteen years ago)
him: "maybe there is no real" her: "wow i'd never thought of that before" him: "clearly you never went to college"
― I’ll put you in a f *ckin Weingarten you c*nt! (history mayne), Saturday, 17 July 2010 14:08 (fifteen years ago)
'lets put our heads on the train tracks now lol ok u crazy frickin hot french one'
― ice cr?m, Saturday, 17 July 2010 14:13 (fifteen years ago)
Anna Kalolina
A bit I remembered in talking with the folks I saw this with last night -- I was actually pleasantly surprised by a couple of things that didn't happen, most especially (in light of Haas's character at the start) what I was convinced was going to be one of the team members turning to out be an antagonist/fifth column/inside man type. So when the team saw it all the way through as far as they could when I had been primed for Page or Gordon-Levitt or somebody to reveal their true colors, that was unexpected enough, and made Haas a red herring.
Related to that was Cotillard's character since I figured her first appearance and actions was explained away by her being his opposite in the employ of Saito, so the slow degradation of assumptions that followed was a good touch. Like much of the movie at base it wasn't a groundbreaking move by any means but it was nicely handled.
― Ned Raggett, Saturday, 17 July 2010 14:52 (fifteen years ago)
i thought that about edith piaf too ned!
and mayne, i agree that the hallway fight scene was good, definitely the best in the movie. the moombassa stuff / van chase was pretty weak tho
bothered me a bit how they played so fast and loose with the time differential between the different layers - if they were really on different clocks the gravity shifts wouldnt be so sudden, etc. but i was generally ok with it, it was for a reason.
i thought for a movie the last hour of which takes place with characters simultaneously in a dream, in a dream within a dream, in a dream within a dream within a dream, and in a sort of ur-dream limbo, it was pretty clear what was going on. some of the details about what when where with the kicks and all that i glossed over.
― al-goreda (s1ocki), Saturday, 17 July 2010 16:13 (fifteen years ago)
as for the last shot im betting it was jsut nolan's idea of a funny joke on the audience, which it was
― al-goreda (s1ocki), Saturday, 17 July 2010 16:14 (fifteen years ago)
it was def clear what was going on (a second viewing was surprising to me at how neatly interlocked the whole premise was during the last 30 minutes), but the mystery ending kinda calls many earlier details into question.
― San Te, Saturday, 17 July 2010 16:16 (fifteen years ago)
maybe it was a bad move to retrospectively muddle an otherwise admirably clear complicated movie
― al-goreda (s1ocki), Saturday, 17 July 2010 16:20 (fifteen years ago)
tbh i would have felt a little cheated if there wasnt some kind of GOTCHA/OR IS IT...? ending
― max, Saturday, 17 July 2010 16:27 (fifteen years ago)
feel like that was an admission that there is no figuring it out, jus a trippy movie abt dreams
― ice cr?m, Saturday, 17 July 2010 16:38 (fifteen years ago)
well that could have been done in a disclaimer at the end
― al-goreda (s1ocki), Saturday, 17 July 2010 16:50 (fifteen years ago)
Inception: the Unbreakable cut.
― Ned Raggett, Saturday, 17 July 2010 16:57 (fifteen years ago)
If Shamwow had directed this Michael Caine would have explained to the audience how this was all a dream at the end.
― ô_o (Nicole), Saturday, 17 July 2010 17:02 (fifteen years ago)
I think the idea is supposed to be, "it's not important whether or not the top keeps spinning, cuz Leo accomplished what he set out to." Still unnecessary, though.
― Simon H., Saturday, 17 July 2010 17:13 (fifteen years ago)
then they should have put THAT on a title card at the end
― al-goreda (s1ocki), Saturday, 17 July 2010 17:23 (fifteen years ago)
If only movies were more like NES games.
― Simon H., Saturday, 17 July 2010 17:44 (fifteen years ago)
_____________________________________________| JUST A CRAZY MOVIE ABT DREAMS N SHIT |_____________________________________________
― ice cr?m, Saturday, 17 July 2010 17:46 (fifteen years ago)
See, right there, it's the snow fortress after global warming:
http://nedmartin.org/amused/pics/panel_14.gif
― Ned Raggett, Saturday, 17 July 2010 17:54 (fifteen years ago)
broken link - MUST BE A DREAM
― al-goreda (s1ocki), Saturday, 17 July 2010 18:17 (fifteen years ago)
The projector broke midway through my screening, and someone predictably (but amusingly) yelled "it was all a dream!"
― Simon H., Saturday, 17 July 2010 18:18 (fifteen years ago)
and how do u know it WASNT?
― al-goreda (s1ocki), Saturday, 17 July 2010 18:19 (fifteen years ago)
The dream is coming from inside the message board.
― Ned Raggett, Saturday, 17 July 2010 18:21 (fifteen years ago)
I was thinking they need to make a version of this movie about alcoholics, called Ginception
― latebloomer, Saturday, 17 July 2010 18:31 (fifteen years ago)
SPOILER SPOILER DO WE HAVE TO KEEP DOING THIS OR IS IT NOW ASSUMED THAT WE'RE SPOILING
I really liked how the three dream levels were happening at different speeds: three-pronged stories (see Traffic, etc.) usually do it with color or film quality, so having the speeds be the central thing was pretty ingenious.
In the end, to make a big generalization, I think movies about dreams are too meta to engage me fully. Good movies work like dreams, anyway. Same trouble I had with Synechdoche and Jacob's Ladder: if it feels like none of this might be real, then the stakes disappear and even the fundamentals of suspending disbelief and seeing characters as characters goes away. It ends up feeling more like video-game logic than dramatic logic.
So I spent the first half admiring it more than enjoying it, and not trusting that anything I was seeing was actually part of an actual plot. But I left wanting to see it a second time, just to reconcile the first 15 minutes with the last.
― gato busca pleitos (Eazy), Saturday, 17 July 2010 22:15 (fifteen years ago)
SPOILER
Can i just say that the thing i really liked was the way they got around the stando bipartite climax, that is, i assumed there would have to be a second attempt at dreaming that they would have to go into where they would have to be winging it, but instead they had the option of going deeper into the dream world so that each reality had to be passed back through.
Also thought he kindof gave himself a get out of jail card w/ regard the emotional sterility w/ the ciaran murphy plot where his emotional journey is itself just an object of their tactics, manipulations and mechanisms just as theirs are to the film. Like he was stating pretty outright that the whole thing was just an elaborate contraption.
― plax (ico), Saturday, 17 July 2010 22:23 (fifteen years ago)
this was amaaaaazing but
fuckin everyone mumbled in this movie
― max
felt like i missed a lot of dialogue.
― just1n3, Saturday, 17 July 2010 22:32 (fifteen years ago)
Too drawn out for me ...and two sections I really hated: the snow section and the CGI city bit that Leonardo had created with his wife.
― Bob Six, Saturday, 17 July 2010 22:55 (fifteen years ago)
I'm sure I'll hate this movie
― is breads of india still tite (admrl), Saturday, 17 July 2010 23:08 (fifteen years ago)
i didn't hate it but tried to take a nap in the middle of it. i liked the collapsing buildings. it was about 30 minutes too long.
― the girl with the butt tattoo (harbl), Sunday, 18 July 2010 00:03 (fifteen years ago)
this was really great but yeah, coulda tightened up the last 30 mins with the snow army and yet a whole nuther level. no mumbling in the Cinemark as they had it cranked up to 20
they also showed the trailer to Shamalamadingdong's Devil which looks godawful and had the whole theater groaning in unison when we learned it was his.
― nu jack schwing on me nutz (herb albert), Sunday, 18 July 2010 00:39 (fifteen years ago)
quite entertaining!
i thought the following things were kind of funny: using michael caine in the vaguely maternal stern but forgiving wise man role again, using edith piaf as signal music when US audiences know mlle cotillard for that role, and giving joseph gordon loveitt all the crazy wirework fight scenes
― ultimate worrier (goole), Sunday, 18 July 2010 03:05 (fifteen years ago)
oh and wtf are you guys on about w/ "spy who loved me", the snow scenes were a straight rip of the snow level in MW2 right down to the rifle leo was using
― ultimate worrier (goole), Sunday, 18 July 2010 03:07 (fifteen years ago)
nah fuck that...they were bond/goldeneye
― I see what this is (Local Garda), Sunday, 18 July 2010 03:08 (fifteen years ago)
hm yeah the base itself wasn't very MW2...
― ultimate worrier (goole), Sunday, 18 July 2010 03:14 (fifteen years ago)
thought the whole thing was fairly good but had that feel of a movie people say "oh wow this was amazing" about without actually being able to rationally explain why diff stuff happened...not sure it'd all hold up to much analysis.
― I see what this is (Local Garda), Sunday, 18 July 2010 03:21 (fifteen years ago)
the simultaneous timeline stuff was brilliantly done tho, and the way the whole thing made you confused as to what was reality and what was a dream was quite effective. by the end i was trying to remember which layer was actually the top one...
― I see what this is (Local Garda), Sunday, 18 July 2010 03:22 (fifteen years ago)
i was never really confused as to which was which tbh, they always made it pretty plain... except for maybe the ending. which i guess you could interrupt as, leo never got out of the "deep" final dream layer state he went down in to find cillian murphy and he's still there. that would be my "alt" explanation.
― al-goreda (s1ocki), Sunday, 18 July 2010 03:24 (fifteen years ago)
Just exited the theater. Good for summer fare, but I think the longer term appraisal will be not great. Stylistically a bit slipshod, and not in ways motivated by the plot. (Spoilers) As video game levels I'd prefer to spend more time in zero-gravity hotel elevator and less time in snow prison FPS. The Mol background doesn't add the gravitas Nolan thinks it does. Same film with one less dream recursion would be tighter and require less exposition. And DiCaprio still thinks squinting is an emotion.
Would watch Existenz over this - JJ Leigh groks fantasy dream femme way better than M Cotillard.
― ὑστέρησις (Sanpaku), Sunday, 18 July 2010 03:27 (fifteen years ago)
everyone can stop saying spoilers now
― al-goreda (s1ocki), Sunday, 18 July 2010 03:29 (fifteen years ago)
nah i mean i knew what was reality and a dream but by the end i felt the sheer amount of levels made it sort of convoluted in a way that made the dreams vs reality theme heighten in a good way.
― I see what this is (Local Garda), Sunday, 18 July 2010 03:36 (fifteen years ago)
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_R5WS6_kmmTI/RglCKlg1zqI/AAAAAAAACek/h05pzWVIBz4/s400/jennifer_jason_leigh_gallery_14.jpgAren't you dying to see what's so special about the special? ...
― ὑστέρησις (Sanpaku), Sunday, 18 July 2010 03:41 (fifteen years ago)
This was great and i'm pretty thankful that i got to see an original mega-budget sci-fi actioner this summer rather than the thousandth iteration of a franchise. Long may it continue.
― Number None, Sunday, 18 July 2010 04:08 (fifteen years ago)
The whole movie took place inside an I Phone
― San Te, Sunday, 18 July 2010 04:53 (fifteen years ago)
― just1n3
amazing movie. it didnt drag in any way for me (partially thanks to my cleverly timed pee break where I probably didnt miss much)having a huge screen and giant rumbling bass effects to accompany the higher symphonic music kept my attention. plus they were all "we have to hurry" the whole time so the general pacing was pretty upbeat.
however, our projector was extremely out of focus as soon as they started rolling the previews. me and some people went out there and told them to fix it. they had it fixed pretty quickly but I could tell it was a shabby fixing because there was a distinct blur around all the text in the previews. This bothered me enough to tell a manager about it and get free re-admit passes for my whole family. My older sister was like "everything looked great I don't know what your talking about. So what if the credits looked a little blurry". Ehhh, maybe it didn't bother her because she didn't notice and have this problem in the back of her subconscious during the whole movie. I dunno, have any of you ever been bothered by a bit of blur when the projector is slightly off-focus?
Plus the lady next to me had on one of those jangly bracelets that make a lot of high pitched clanky noise everytime she moved her hand... and she answered her phone during the movie and was on it for like half a minute.
― serious nonsense (CaptainLorax), Sunday, 18 July 2010 05:25 (fifteen years ago)