Inception (with implanted spoilers)

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (2475 of them)

SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER (OK can someone MARK THE THREAD TITLE AS *SPOILERS* cuz this is getting old)

did anybody else think the scene of Leo/Cotillard on the train tracks was a real pretty scene? that scene stuck with me a lot, with her face on the tracks looking at him.

San Te, Saturday, 17 July 2010 13:27 (fifteen years ago)

I think the fact that it's never really discussed what Caine is an academic of suggests the whole thing is a dream, too.

I'd like to see a screenshot of his chalkboard.

rent, Saturday, 17 July 2010 13:28 (fifteen years ago)

Yes, I thought it was lovely in strange way. xp

ô_o (Nicole), Saturday, 17 July 2010 13:29 (fifteen years ago)

Caine teaches Theory of Breakfast Cereal 101

San Te, Saturday, 17 July 2010 13:30 (fifteen years ago)

OK can someone MARK THE THREAD TITLE AS *SPOILERS* cuz this is getting old

The movie's out! Fair game at this point; if you click on the thread and think we're not going to be talking about it then good grief.

Ned Raggett, Saturday, 17 July 2010 13:31 (fifteen years ago)

Spoilers
X
X
Cld well be something in the mumbling as signifier. About the only clearly enunciated scene was when Leo met Michael Caine, and came over all Leo and "it's my ONLY CHANCE so I MUST DO IT".

Snowscape: reminded me of CoD4. I thought it was going to be a deliberate gag at expense of games-playing young billionaire waster's subconscious.

stet, Saturday, 17 July 2010 13:31 (fifteen years ago)

xpost True, I'm still gunshy after on Yahoo message boards in 1999 people were crying that we ruiend the Sixth Sense ending for them. their sadness was so real :((((((

San Te, Saturday, 17 July 2010 13:33 (fifteen years ago)

re: the mumbling, I don't know that we aren't overstating it a bit. other than a few things Watanabe's character said as the old man, I pretty much made out most everything that was said, and generally in movies there are always a few mumbled lines.

San Te, Saturday, 17 July 2010 13:34 (fifteen years ago)

I'm still gunshy after on Yahoo message boards in 1999 people were crying that we ruiend the Sixth Sense ending for them. their sadness was so real :((((((

That should have been the first real indication that M. Night was bad for people in general.

Ned Raggett, Saturday, 17 July 2010 13:35 (fifteen years ago)

M. Night is the Jose Lima of movie directing

San Te, Saturday, 17 July 2010 13:40 (fifteen years ago)

can you not spoil the ending of sixth sense in the inception thread please? still got it to watch

hi I'm tyler farrar, quitter of team garmin-transitions (cozen), Saturday, 17 July 2010 13:40 (fifteen years ago)

Rosebud was Bruce willis's sled

San Te, Saturday, 17 July 2010 13:41 (fifteen years ago)

you bast!

hi I'm tyler farrar, quitter of team garmin-transitions (cozen), Saturday, 17 July 2010 13:47 (fifteen years ago)

too much exposition, and a little too little clarity about what was going on from time to time.

― I’ll put you in a f *ckin Weingarten you c*nt! (history mayne), Friday, July 16, 2010 7:38 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Suggest Ban

it occurs to me that ~this is what dreams are like~ lots mental energy expended scrambling to explain nonsensical logic - most of the dialog was exposition but then yr still left going UH YEAH GUYS SYNCHRONIZED KICKS OKAYY - which is pretty hilarious and clever

one point of frustration - the leo incepted mol w/a dangerous concept in limbo reveal couldve been pretty weighty if they hadnt fucking given it away by having him say 'inception is possible, i incepted mol this one time lol' like just have him say 'its possible' or whatever - this bothered me

there were some nice meta touches that played symbiotically w/dreamscape constructs - like the ice comandos layout was so bond/video game overtly action movie to the point of being corny BUT then i mean juno grew up watching that shit so of course its gonna look like that BUT its also an irl action movie BUT then WHAT IS IRL LOL

tbf i couldve done w/90% less gunshots - its cowardly hedging against the sweet psychological imaginarium imo - tho i did v much enjoy the line 'his projections have become militarized' lol 'weve seen this before'

ps i dress beautifully IN MY DREAMS

ice cr?m, Saturday, 17 July 2010 13:49 (fifteen years ago)

max, what adjectives are you warehousing in case any beyond "sweet" are needed for films w/ actual substance?

― kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Friday, July 16, 2010 9:09 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

hay morbs i made this thread for commenting on maxs gawker work, which imo is somewhow a fundamental betrayal of ilx I LOVE CRICKET: THE CHINATOWN OF ILX: THE CHINATOWN OF ILX > GAWKER hope to see u there

ice cr?m, Saturday, 17 July 2010 13:51 (fifteen years ago)

After he said his cliche-o-rama bit about one last mission and then he could get back to his family, I kind of gave up and concentrated on my ice-cream.

Madchen, Saturday, 17 July 2010 13:54 (fifteen years ago)

o hai

ice cr?m, Saturday, 17 July 2010 13:55 (fifteen years ago)

in dreams 'you never know how you got there' w/all the exposition the dream warrior history was never explained past 'developed by the military for training purposes'

ice cr?m, Saturday, 17 July 2010 14:01 (fifteen years ago)

one point of frustration - the leo incepted mol w/a dangerous concept in limbo reveal couldve been pretty weighty if they hadnt fucking given it away by having him say 'inception is possible, i incepted mol this one time lol' like just have him say 'its possible' or whatever - this bothered me

well, tbrr (or not ha), uh, i didn't rly get how leo incepted mol when they were in limbo. what does that entail? how? incepting cilian murphbro entailed all kinds of charadery and inventing situations etc. how did he trick is missus. also, you know, it's just an idea. in fifty years you'd prolly incept loads of ideas into yr significant other, right?

I’ll put you in a f *ckin Weingarten you c*nt! (history mayne), Saturday, 17 July 2010 14:05 (fifteen years ago)

That's what she...um, never mind.

Ned Raggett, Saturday, 17 July 2010 14:06 (fifteen years ago)

also, has Leo's voice changed yet?

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 17 July 2010 14:06 (fifteen years ago)

tbf i incept people all the time irl 'hay we should go see that new what is dreams movie' 'o ok sure'

ice cr?m, Saturday, 17 July 2010 14:07 (fifteen years ago)

he actually uses a kind of minnesotan thing here. an odd choice but effective.

xpost

I’ll put you in a f *ckin Weingarten you c*nt! (history mayne), Saturday, 17 July 2010 14:07 (fifteen years ago)

him: "maybe there is no real"
her: "wow i'd never thought of that before"
him: "clearly you never went to college"

I’ll put you in a f *ckin Weingarten you c*nt! (history mayne), Saturday, 17 July 2010 14:08 (fifteen years ago)

'lets put our heads on the train tracks now lol ok u crazy frickin hot french one'

ice cr?m, Saturday, 17 July 2010 14:13 (fifteen years ago)

Anna Kalolina

A bit I remembered in talking with the folks I saw this with last night -- I was actually pleasantly surprised by a couple of things that didn't happen, most especially (in light of Haas's character at the start) what I was convinced was going to be one of the team members turning to out be an antagonist/fifth column/inside man type. So when the team saw it all the way through as far as they could when I had been primed for Page or Gordon-Levitt or somebody to reveal their true colors, that was unexpected enough, and made Haas a red herring.

Related to that was Cotillard's character since I figured her first appearance and actions was explained away by her being his opposite in the employ of Saito, so the slow degradation of assumptions that followed was a good touch. Like much of the movie at base it wasn't a groundbreaking move by any means but it was nicely handled.

Ned Raggett, Saturday, 17 July 2010 14:52 (fifteen years ago)

i thought that about edith piaf too ned!

and mayne, i agree that the hallway fight scene was good, definitely the best in the movie. the moombassa stuff / van chase was pretty weak tho

bothered me a bit how they played so fast and loose with the time differential between the different layers - if they were really on different clocks the gravity shifts wouldnt be so sudden, etc. but i was generally ok with it, it was for a reason.

i thought for a movie the last hour of which takes place with characters simultaneously in a dream, in a dream within a dream, in a dream within a dream within a dream, and in a sort of ur-dream limbo, it was pretty clear what was going on. some of the details about what when where with the kicks and all that i glossed over.

al-goreda (s1ocki), Saturday, 17 July 2010 16:13 (fifteen years ago)

as for the last shot im betting it was jsut nolan's idea of a funny joke on the audience, which it was

al-goreda (s1ocki), Saturday, 17 July 2010 16:14 (fifteen years ago)

it was def clear what was going on (a second viewing was surprising to me at how neatly interlocked the whole premise was during the last 30 minutes), but the mystery ending kinda calls many earlier details into question.

San Te, Saturday, 17 July 2010 16:16 (fifteen years ago)

maybe it was a bad move to retrospectively muddle an otherwise admirably clear complicated movie

al-goreda (s1ocki), Saturday, 17 July 2010 16:20 (fifteen years ago)

tbh i would have felt a little cheated if there wasnt some kind of GOTCHA/OR IS IT...? ending

max, Saturday, 17 July 2010 16:27 (fifteen years ago)

feel like that was an admission that there is no figuring it out, jus a trippy movie abt dreams

ice cr?m, Saturday, 17 July 2010 16:38 (fifteen years ago)

well that could have been done in a disclaimer at the end

al-goreda (s1ocki), Saturday, 17 July 2010 16:50 (fifteen years ago)

Inception: the Unbreakable cut.

Ned Raggett, Saturday, 17 July 2010 16:57 (fifteen years ago)

If Shamwow had directed this Michael Caine would have explained to the audience how this was all a dream at the end.

ô_o (Nicole), Saturday, 17 July 2010 17:02 (fifteen years ago)

I think the idea is supposed to be, "it's not important whether or not the top keeps spinning, cuz Leo accomplished what he set out to." Still unnecessary, though.

Simon H., Saturday, 17 July 2010 17:13 (fifteen years ago)

then they should have put THAT on a title card at the end

al-goreda (s1ocki), Saturday, 17 July 2010 17:23 (fifteen years ago)

If only movies were more like NES games.

Simon H., Saturday, 17 July 2010 17:44 (fifteen years ago)

_____________________________________________
| JUST A CRAZY MOVIE ABT DREAMS N SHIT |
_____________________________________________

ice cr?m, Saturday, 17 July 2010 17:46 (fifteen years ago)

See, right there, it's the snow fortress after global warming:

http://nedmartin.org/amused/pics/panel_14.gif

Ned Raggett, Saturday, 17 July 2010 17:54 (fifteen years ago)

broken link - MUST BE A DREAM

al-goreda (s1ocki), Saturday, 17 July 2010 18:17 (fifteen years ago)

The projector broke midway through my screening, and someone predictably (but amusingly) yelled "it was all a dream!"

Simon H., Saturday, 17 July 2010 18:18 (fifteen years ago)

and how do u know it WASNT?

al-goreda (s1ocki), Saturday, 17 July 2010 18:19 (fifteen years ago)

The dream is coming from inside the message board.

Ned Raggett, Saturday, 17 July 2010 18:21 (fifteen years ago)

I was thinking they need to make a version of this movie about alcoholics, called Ginception

latebloomer, Saturday, 17 July 2010 18:31 (fifteen years ago)

SPOILER SPOILER DO WE HAVE TO KEEP DOING THIS OR IS IT NOW ASSUMED THAT WE'RE SPOILING

I really liked how the three dream levels were happening at different speeds: three-pronged stories (see Traffic, etc.) usually do it with color or film quality, so having the speeds be the central thing was pretty ingenious.

In the end, to make a big generalization, I think movies about dreams are too meta to engage me fully. Good movies work like dreams, anyway. Same trouble I had with Synechdoche and Jacob's Ladder: if it feels like none of this might be real, then the stakes disappear and even the fundamentals of suspending disbelief and seeing characters as characters goes away. It ends up feeling more like video-game logic than dramatic logic.

So I spent the first half admiring it more than enjoying it, and not trusting that anything I was seeing was actually part of an actual plot. But I left wanting to see it a second time, just to reconcile the first 15 minutes with the last.

gato busca pleitos (Eazy), Saturday, 17 July 2010 22:15 (fifteen years ago)

SPOILER

Can i just say that the thing i really liked was the way they got around the stando bipartite climax, that is, i assumed there would have to be a second attempt at dreaming that they would have to go into where they would have to be winging it, but instead they had the option of going deeper into the dream world so that each reality had to be passed back through.

Also thought he kindof gave himself a get out of jail card w/ regard the emotional sterility w/ the ciaran murphy plot where his emotional journey is itself just an object of their tactics, manipulations and mechanisms just as theirs are to the film. Like he was stating pretty outright that the whole thing was just an elaborate contraption.

plax (ico), Saturday, 17 July 2010 22:23 (fifteen years ago)

this was amaaaaazing but

fuckin everyone mumbled in this movie

― max

felt like i missed a lot of dialogue.

just1n3, Saturday, 17 July 2010 22:32 (fifteen years ago)

Too drawn out for me ...and two sections I really hated: the snow section and the CGI city bit that Leonardo had created with his wife.

Bob Six, Saturday, 17 July 2010 22:55 (fifteen years ago)

I'm sure I'll hate this movie

is breads of india still tite (admrl), Saturday, 17 July 2010 23:08 (fifteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.