The long overdue _Blade Runner_ thread

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1963 of them)
gump's message isn't shallow, it's just poisonously wrong. schmaltz by itself isn't a crime, it depends on what medicine you're cramming down people's throats with it.

fortunate hazel (f. hazel), Monday, 17 April 2006 07:31 (twenty years ago)

"the personal is political".

idiot.

vahid (vahid), Monday, 17 April 2006 07:31 (twenty years ago)

hmmm ... i wonder if we had a t/s: ET vs bladerunner which would win??

-- vahid (vfoz...), April 17th, 2006.

well, Blade Runner. but i love grand, impersonal sci-fi visions.

i like ET a lot though, it's the best kind of "saccharine", because it earns the tears and it comes from a genuine emotional place and understanding of being a kid.

latebloomer's jazz oddysey brought to you by kellog's corn flakes (latebloomer), Monday, 17 April 2006 07:33 (twenty years ago)

you don't like "caring"? maybe that's why people think you're a creep?

People think I'm a creep because I'm socially inept, not because I'm stupid.

Gilbert O'Sullivan (kenan), Monday, 17 April 2006 07:33 (twenty years ago)

well, i try to avoid both.

yeah, latebloomer, see where i'm coming from, we get to see the man-child get shot but we don't get to see deckard crying over his dead electric sheep? weak priorities, dude.

vahid (vahid), Monday, 17 April 2006 07:34 (twenty years ago)

eh, sorry i called you a creep. that was uncalled for. you're a champ.

vahid (vahid), Monday, 17 April 2006 07:38 (twenty years ago)

i understand where you're coming from: the sheep ommission is kind of regrettable. but Blade Runner for me is seperate from the book. it's really a different entity and focuses on different aspects of the same subject matter. it turned into something else along the way.

latebloomer's jazz oddysey brought to you by kellog's corn flakes (latebloomer), Monday, 17 April 2006 07:38 (twenty years ago)

lol at Gilbert O'Sullivan 3000000 times as ever

did spielberg have anything to do w/ gump?

RJG (RJG), Monday, 17 April 2006 07:40 (twenty years ago)

nothing, i believe, other then being a close associate of zemeckis.

latebloomer's jazz oddysey brought to you by kellog's corn flakes (latebloomer), Monday, 17 April 2006 08:02 (twenty years ago)

"Sushi. That's what my ex-wife called me; cold fish"
"Ex-cop, ex-Blade Runner... ex-killer"

I really want to watch this now but I don't own it. Like a fool I'm forever waiting for the never-come 2/3 disc spesh edish. But even then I'd miss the voiceover.

"Gaff had been there and let her live. Fours years he figured; he was wrong. I don't know how long we'll have together - who does?"
*Music swells*

David Orton (scarlet), Monday, 17 April 2006 10:13 (twenty years ago)

Like a fool I'm forever waiting for the never-come 2/3 disc spesh edish.

I hear you there. (I do own the current DVD, at least.)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 17 April 2006 11:42 (twenty years ago)

i think that the (upcoming?) dvd should have a function where u can switch the ford commentary on or off at will. surely that's what dvd technology was made for?

u know we had to wait years in the uk for a proper cd release of the soundtrack. was it the same everywhere else too? over here there was only some silly ass orchstral version availabale instead, up until 1994 when the proper thing came out. easily my favourite soundtrack disc ever.

truly a crime that there isn't some triple dvd thing going on. a *crime*.

piscesboy (piscesboy), Monday, 17 April 2006 11:42 (twenty years ago)

i assume they will release it next year so they can do all sorts of fancy marketing around it being the "25th anniversary" and all...

Know what a turtle is Leon? Same Thing.

Rob Bolton (Rob Bolton), Monday, 17 April 2006 12:04 (twenty years ago)

This is easily still one of my favourite movies of all time. I do kind of understand vahid's criticisms, and I do accept I am still appreciating it through adolescent eyes, but at the end of the day, DAMN, it just looks SO good.

I think what I loved most was the "near-reality" of it. Sure, it was way in the future, there were flying cars, etc, but it somehow looked plausible and real - rain, crowded streets packed with advertising messages, etc. Which reminds me - why has no-one made umbrellas with the neon shaft? I'd totally use one of those. Sometimes I walk through Chinatown in Toronto and get a very BR vibe...

Biggest thing that used to baffle me was the replicant count conversation at the police station, the cop saying six "skin jobs" escaped, and then later there was a disrepancy between his and Deckard's 'count'... I'm having trouble remembering it all now (been a while), but I never really straightened that out in my head, since it didn't seem to add up (is that more "Deckard is a replicant" stuff?).

There are some pretty OTT cheesy lines in the script, mainly the police/crime story element - "You're not cop you're little people", etc. But there is just soooo much else to love about this film.

Live... in the offworld colonies!

Rob Bolton (Rob Bolton), Monday, 17 April 2006 12:16 (twenty years ago)

this is such a paltry film - it's barely science fiction - the effects are banal at best - and what it functions much better as is a critique of late C20science meets capitalism, via an incredible rip off of fritz lang's metroplois and a million and one bad, voice over narrated detective crime flicks, mixed with a smidgen of oh so scary eye spoodge make up and gymnastics (because androids dream of high bars). Ford calls in his performance after Star Wars and Apocalypse Now, marking the beginning of the line that stretches right up to Anne Heche's labia major, and the characters themselves are emptier than a lone star crate at Dubya's ranch.
what's good here is not much at all except atmospherics - everything else wasx done much better later on or before (concise I know, but I'm thinking aliens or even empire strikes back in terms of cities, mind you dark city took blade runner for a romp - I'm surprised ridly didn't sue for outright theft) but it's a movie for bad lonely autumn nights before you disocver decent movies, or at least ones that attempt instead of copulate themselves in self congratulatory psuedo intelligencia's leaking anal wounds.

Queen Gforvagina not for vangelis, Monday, 17 April 2006 12:20 (twenty years ago)

wow

Rob Bolton (Rob Bolton), Monday, 17 April 2006 12:36 (twenty years ago)

Blade Runner really just introduces robots that can pass for human; the rest of the technology is window dressing. Kael's piece almost rings true when she tries to crack jokes about replicants -- Blade Runner is a movie about replicants, for replicants. That's why it works, because the "CAN YOU SEE?!?" moment is so subtle that many people missed it. Any character worth empathizing with in the film (Deckard, Rachel, Roy) is a replicant. Deckard's boss is off cracking jokes about taking out "skinjobs," Tyrell is cold and manipulative and ever-so self-congratulatory, and everyone else blends into the background.

vahid, I can see your point about the nerdy focus on certain elements in this film or Dick's relatively unrelated work, but I really don't think absence of empathy with women is evidence of misogyny.

mike h. (mike h.), Monday, 17 April 2006 13:00 (twenty years ago)

u know we had to wait years in the uk for a proper cd release of the soundtrack. was it the same everywhere else too?

Yup.

Biggest thing that used to baffle me was the replicant count conversation at the police station, the cop saying six "skin jobs" escaped, and then later there was a disrepancy between his and Deckard's 'count'... I'm having trouble remembering it all now (been a while), but I never really straightened that out in my head, since it didn't seem to add up (is that more "Deckard is a replicant" stuff?).

You really need to read the Sammon book, m'friend. ;-) (In brief -- originally there were a total of sex replicants; the first to die, Mary, was to have died 'naturally' in the company of the rest as an introduction to the film. The second died in the attack on Tyrell Corporation, and the rest are in the film. They recorded a loop at the time to fix it, but the results didn't look good on-screen in terms of lip-movement and synchronization.)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 17 April 2006 13:12 (twenty years ago)

NED YR FREUDIAN SLIP IS SHOWING

Jordan (Jordan), Monday, 17 April 2006 13:15 (twenty years ago)

raggett_realdoll.jpg

-+--++-, Monday, 17 April 2006 13:16 (twenty years ago)

I gotta get me one of those.

Anyway, Vahid's got a lot of good points. In flipping through the Sammon book again last night I remembered how Scott and company's areas of critique-as-such re: society, sexism, etc. were so encoded into the film or presented so flatly/subtly that whatever meaning was intended was by and large lost -- no matter what Scott implies or has said, I don't think it's strictly the audience's fault for missing much of it, narration or no narration. The film's not unsuccessful for all that, I feel.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 17 April 2006 13:16 (twenty years ago)

ihttp://www.tyrell-corporation.pp.se/gallery/albums/Misc-Pictures/BladeR09.sized.jpg

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 17 April 2006 13:29 (twenty years ago)

(I love it when Queen G delurks.)

(I like Blade Runner a lot but I haven't really thought about it in years.)

Dan (Old School) Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 17 April 2006 13:33 (twenty years ago)

I love it when Queen G delurks.

Yeah, I was gonna say -- blast from the past!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 17 April 2006 13:34 (twenty years ago)

One little titbit: Harrison Ford, who has famously grumbled about Blade Runner since day one, recently said in an interview with Jonathan Ross that "I've made my peace with the movie" - but still critisised the studio for their interferance and making him do the voiceover.

xp: nice pic, Ned.

David Orton (scarlet), Monday, 17 April 2006 13:44 (twenty years ago)

Thank ya.

I remembered one other thing from the book just now -- Hauer apparently was the one with the idea for the dove as well.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 17 April 2006 13:45 (twenty years ago)

THANK YOU RJG FOR CALLING THE SPIELBERG/FORREST GUMP THING. I thought I was fucking eating crazy pills or something that ppl were letting that slide. Are you all so terrible at reading comprehension?? ;_;

I like Blade Runner a lot better than quite a few of the films on vahid's list, but that's because I don't like sci fi.

Allyzay Rofflesbot (allyzay), Monday, 17 April 2006 13:51 (twenty years ago)

hmmm ... i wonder if we had a t/s: ET vs bladerunner which would win??

The winner would be The Thing... Funny thing is that all three movies were released within a couple weeks of each other in 1982.

The replicants, future noir, and story elements of Blade Runner are mostly irrelevant and exist mainly to give us a tour of the future-possible city of Los Angeles. Blade Runner's real success and endurance is as a urban theory/sociology touchstone - fast forwarding through 50 years of suburban paranoia, white flight, and displaced racial anger. Which is what the best science fiction does anyway...

I saw BR the day it opened in Newport Beach - LA's own "off world colony" and it really fucked with people's heads with maximum disorientation. The California Republican fear of Japanese investment, Mexican immigration, and civic squalor was right out in front. It's impossible to write anything about the future of Los Angeles without namechecking BR.

And people were surprised that E.T. was the more successful movie that year?

LOL Thomas (Chris Barrus), Monday, 17 April 2006 13:51 (twenty years ago)

what's good here is not much at all except atmospherics - everything else wasx done much better later on or before

everything else was done later on or before, but not better. the city comes down from lang, sure, but is anyone seriously going to argue that metropolis is a better movie?

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Monday, 17 April 2006 13:53 (twenty years ago)

blade runner rips off metropolis in the best way. it is a good rip off.

s1ocki (slutsky), Monday, 17 April 2006 13:55 (twenty years ago)

Besides, not like they were hiding it. And it's not like anyone ripped off Blade Runner in turn or anything. ;-)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 17 April 2006 13:56 (twenty years ago)

you can't make up an idea

RJG (RJG), Monday, 17 April 2006 13:57 (twenty years ago)

it's a pretty braindead criticism.

s1ocki (slutsky), Monday, 17 April 2006 13:57 (twenty years ago)

When I saw the workprint of BR on the first release in 1993, I flipped out when I recognized a track from My Life In The Bush Of Ghosts playing during the bar scene. I always wish they had kept it in the final release.

LOL Thomas (Chris Barrus), Monday, 17 April 2006 14:01 (twenty years ago)

1993? Couple of years earlier, surely -- I remember the stories about the Nuart screenings when I was at UCLA.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 17 April 2006 14:02 (twenty years ago)

You're right.. It was 1991... (I was still at UCI)

LOL Thomas (Chris Barrus), Monday, 17 April 2006 14:05 (twenty years ago)

i assume they will release it next year so they can do all sorts of fancy marketing around it being the "25th anniversary" and all...

Rob, looks like you're onto something:

31st January 2006

The Digital Bits has reported on an official Warner's press conference:

"And finally, here's a bit of news that's going to get a lot of you excited (and I made a point to specifically ask about this title, believe me)... Ridley Scott's Blade Runner (1982) is currently on track for release as a multi-disc special edition in time for its 25th anniversary in 2007. The release is far from certain (as usual, there's a lot more that I can't post about this title yet - think of the old saying, "Loose lips sink ships"), but Warner says that work is proceeding, most of the key players are involved and things are "looking good" for release next year. We'll see."

2nd February 2006

As the century has progressed I got a bit tired of saying there is no BR:SE news, but as BR DVD restocking has gradually been diminishing in various regions and I have heard the usual odd rumours, I've been preparing a proper update of this page this week to go along with the sitewide update I'm doing. Then the above announcement was made. But let us put it in context - it came at the end of a press conference where many definite Warner releases for 2006/7 were being announced. This comment about Blade Runner is almost an afterthought - sort of an, "I can't say anything definite, but we're still trying and keeping the hope alive". In other words, not much more than the comment made below almost two years ago. So don't get too excited. 2007 is the 25th aniversary of the release of Blade Runner of course, which is added incentive, but we thought it would be released for the 20th anniversary, so it is still wait and see what happens at the moment.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 17 April 2006 14:07 (twenty years ago)

That "workprint" version (which apparently was the same as the 1982 "sneak preview" cut which confused all the audiences) is still my favorite cut.

I hate that stupid unicorn scene.

LOL Thomas (Chris Barrus), Monday, 17 April 2006 14:08 (twenty years ago)

The "On The Edge Of Blade Runner" BBC documentary is worth the download too... The torrent of it is floating around out there.

LOL Thomas (Chris Barrus), Monday, 17 April 2006 14:10 (twenty years ago)

Scott's indicated that the Workprint would be in any final release of the DVD, so that's good -- it's actually the one version I haven't seen, to my memory. That link I just put in indicates the BBC doc would be as well.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 17 April 2006 14:11 (twenty years ago)

THANK YOU RJG FOR CALLING THE SPIELBERG/FORREST GUMP THING.

you both need to pay attention... i said close encounters of the third kind was the forrest gump of sci-fi. close encounters was directed by spielberg.

fortunate hazel (f. hazel), Monday, 17 April 2006 19:39 (twenty years ago)

as opposed to zemekis, who directed gump and also back to the future, which somehow beats blade runner for some people.

mike h. (mike h.), Monday, 17 April 2006 19:50 (twenty years ago)

SORRY ALLY

RJG (RJG), Monday, 17 April 2006 20:03 (twenty years ago)

it's hard to imagine how they could have telegraphed the message "DECKERT IS A REPLICANT" any clearer than the edward james olmos character placing the unicorn origami figure outside his apartment.

this didn't mean anything until the movie was recut to have the unicorn dream in it though.

kyle (akmonday), Monday, 17 April 2006 20:13 (twenty years ago)

AND THE VOICEOVER ARGH

Fight the Real Enemy -- Tasti D-Lite (ex machina), Monday, 17 April 2006 20:22 (twenty years ago)

RJG don't be sorry.

f.h., hence my reading comprehension comment! Go back and read what vahid was replying to when he started on his "SO AND SO CAN DO THIS BUT SPIELBERG CAN'T?" thing (hint: "2. trivializing history"). C'mon guys.

RJG I kiss u still.

Back to the Future...huh.

Allyzay Rofflesbot (allyzay), Monday, 17 April 2006 20:25 (twenty years ago)

I mean, I did read that you made a terrible and inept comparison, don't worry.

Allyzay Rofflesbot (allyzay), Monday, 17 April 2006 20:25 (twenty years ago)

Thankfully I only ever saw a voiceover version once.

"Sushi...raw fish."

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 17 April 2006 20:25 (twenty years ago)

all this time i thought forrest gump was spielberg! oh well, i think the point still stands.

vahid (vahid), Monday, 17 April 2006 20:32 (twenty years ago)

phew : )

RJG (RJG), Monday, 17 April 2006 20:34 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.