The dying days of the Fourth Reich: it's the 2007 AUSTRALIAN FEDERAL ELECTION

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1402 of them)

Yeah cause no one really understands it anyway innit. They'd rather be told they were getting a new school or something.

Trayce, Friday, 19 October 2007 10:14 (sixteen years ago) link

ABC headline:

Coalition, Labor tax policies 'virtually the same'

Exactly the headline the ALP wanted.

Autumn Almanac, Friday, 19 October 2007 13:27 (sixteen years ago) link

No comments about the debate yet?

Kate, non masonic, Sunday, 21 October 2007 12:22 (sixteen years ago) link

i didn't watch it, how was it?

electricsound, Sunday, 21 October 2007 13:00 (sixteen years ago) link

roffle, channel 9 used the "worm" and had the plug pulled by the authorities!

haitch, Sunday, 21 October 2007 14:47 (sixteen years ago) link

Howard's people pulled the plug through the ABC and the Press Club.

Today watch Howard deny any knowledge of it.

Oh and Kate, Rudd won the debate convincingly. Howard's performance was utterly appalling. All he did was sling mud at Rudd and avoid questions. I mean REALLY avoid questions. Even Rudd pulled him up on it about four times, right in the middle of the debate. By contrast, Rudd pointedly answered questions and avoided negativity for the most part.

Autumn Almanac, Sunday, 21 October 2007 21:35 (sixteen years ago) link

From the SMH

http://www.smh.com.au/news/National/Howard-Rudd-face-off-in-election-debate/2007/10/21/1192940904527.html

"According to the Nine Network's controversial "worm", Mr Rudd won the debate with 65 per cent of viewers' approval, compared to Mr Howard's 29 per cent.

The worm tracked the reaction of 90 swinging voters in Nine's Sydney studios to the leaders' comments."

Swinging voters eh? They swing on a zephyr. They're like Melbourne weather.

moley, Sunday, 21 October 2007 21:47 (sixteen years ago) link

Started the debate, expecting to switch off after about 20 minutes, but stayed to the end. Quite interesting. Rudd looked comfortable, upbeat, mostly on top of things. Howard looked distinctly uncomfortable the whole time, avoided answering direct questions repeatedly, and his own questions to Rudd were feeble. He looked, as my wife said, like a bad-tempered little boy being forced to do something he really didn't want to.

James Morrison, Monday, 22 October 2007 01:10 (sixteen years ago) link

Didn't he? He waved his arms around loads as well.

I expected Howard to do less well than Rudd, but I didn't expect him to be the angry quivering mess that he was. Really, really frustrated and not in any way cogent.

And yeah, his questions to Rudd were bloody stupid. The one about Rudd and Bush: what the fuck was he (or his people) thinking?? Boughing under pressure is understandable, but these questions were written before the debate; what this tells me is that Howard's got bugger-all to use against Rudd and is just desperate.

Howard's weird and dopey closing statement was another wasted opportunity. Teaching history in schools, what the fuck?? How is that in any way a closing statement? This was written in advance as well, and betrays a government in freefall.

Howard's six-week campaign was designed to expose Labor's mistakes before voting day, but I suspect it'll backfire significantly.

Autumn Almanac, Monday, 22 October 2007 01:21 (sixteen years ago) link

What bothers me about this whole Howard's version of Australia's history thing is the potential for it to be some insipid watered down version of events where the white man did no wrong and everything was just dandy. Goodness knows the current curriculum (at least here in QLD) glosses over all the bad stuff enough already.

Kate, non masonic, Monday, 22 October 2007 01:29 (sixteen years ago) link

Yyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyep.

I wouldn't trust that prick to spell the word indigenous, let alone mount a truly unbiased and sensible history agenda for kids. Evidently brainwashing adults through the Murdoch press is not enough.

Autumn Almanac, Monday, 22 October 2007 01:38 (sixteen years ago) link

Have we had this? Old, but Rudd interviewing Rudd:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KHPij5Q9geQ

S-, Monday, 22 October 2007 03:45 (sixteen years ago) link

What about Rudd eating his ear wax?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3aQ8YiIV1AI

Kate, non masonic, Monday, 22 October 2007 04:03 (sixteen years ago) link

I am NOT going to click on that.

moley, Monday, 22 October 2007 04:05 (sixteen years ago) link

I was disappointed Rudd didn't let Mr Hat say anything.

SeekAltRoute, Monday, 22 October 2007 04:11 (sixteen years ago) link

"Prime Minister John Howard has denied any responsibility for a decision to pull the Nine Network's broadcast feed during the live televised leaders' debate."

http://www.theage.com.au/news/federalelection2007news/i-didnt-kill-worm-pm/2007/10/22/1192940956744.html

moley, Monday, 22 October 2007 06:16 (sixteen years ago) link

Gee there's a surprise. It's like TAMPA never happened.

Autumn Almanac, Monday, 22 October 2007 06:21 (sixteen years ago) link

Kev's getting cocky.

Autumn Almanac, Monday, 22 October 2007 23:40 (sixteen years ago) link

Newspoll shows Labor on 58% TPP to Liberal's 42%, and Rudd on 50% as preferred leader to Howard's 37%. Thereby eliminating last week's perceived Liberal 'comeback' in the polls. WATCH YOUR GOVT BLOW ONE (1) FUSE AND GO KRAZY.

Autumn Almanac, Monday, 22 October 2007 23:48 (sixteen years ago) link

They're getting desperate, aren't they? Next thing you know, a Jewish Sudanese bloke will have burnt down the Reichstag Parliament House.

King Boy Pato, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 10:50 (sixteen years ago) link

Yeah but moley, the grannies are all voting for him anyway so I don't know how much difference that's going to make.

Oh and yes, fake terrorism threats are ready to pounce. Just wait for it.

Autumn Almanac, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 11:49 (sixteen years ago) link

70% of the Labor front bench is ex-union officials.

Autumn Almanac, Wednesday, 24 October 2007 00:26 (sixteen years ago) link

The poster of Christopher Pyne in our local supermarket has had the added speech bubble "I eat poo!" for 3 weeks now, and nobody has taken it down. This amuses me beyond all reasonable bounds.

James Morrison, Wednesday, 24 October 2007 00:29 (sixteen years ago) link

Brilliant.

He sounds like his throat is lined with poo when he talks, so perhaps it counts as substantiated recourse.

Autumn Almanac, Wednesday, 24 October 2007 00:32 (sixteen years ago) link

Do you think Rudd will match the pensioner spendfest?

moley, Wednesday, 24 October 2007 00:47 (sixteen years ago) link

Indubitably.

Autumn Almanac, Wednesday, 24 October 2007 00:48 (sixteen years ago) link

Yesterday's Newspoll showed -- for the first time -- Rudd gaining on Howard in terms of economic approval. He absolutely does not want to lose this momentum, however transient it might have been. Economic management wins elections in this country, fact.

Autumn Almanac, Wednesday, 24 October 2007 00:50 (sixteen years ago) link

70% of the Labor front bench is ex-union officials.

Did I read somewhere that the appropriate response to this is that the liberal front bench is dominated by silver spoon private school nancies who have never done a hard day of work in their lives?

badg, Wednesday, 24 October 2007 00:52 (sixteen years ago) link

Pretty much.

Also that 70% figure is wrong, as Costello admitted on national television on Sunday morning. Not that it's stopped the bastards using it ever since with increasing saturation.

By the criterion these arsewipes are using, *I* was a union official because I was a member of student union.

Autumn Almanac, Wednesday, 24 October 2007 00:54 (sixteen years ago) link

Wasn't joining the student union compulsory up until a few years ago?

badg, Wednesday, 24 October 2007 03:06 (sixteen years ago) link

Yep. Not that it stops Howard et al calling me an ex-union official.

Autumn Almanac, Wednesday, 24 October 2007 03:11 (sixteen years ago) link

btw I adore the thread title.

Autumn Almanac, Wednesday, 24 October 2007 03:12 (sixteen years ago) link

By christ if I really was a union official I would have banned hacky sack on the lawn outside the arts common room.

badg, Wednesday, 24 October 2007 03:25 (sixteen years ago) link

If I were a union official I would've banned meetings to discuss the end of year office party using STRONGARM tactics if necessary.

moley, Wednesday, 24 October 2007 04:05 (sixteen years ago) link

^^^ THIS

haitch, Wednesday, 24 October 2007 04:16 (sixteen years ago) link

I MEAN CHRIST I AM ONLY HERE TWO DAYS A WEEK NOW AS IT IS, YOU THINK I HAVE TIME TO PUT ASIDE MY REAL WORK AND ATTEND A MEETING FOR A PARTY THAT NO BASTARD IS EVER HAPPY WITH JUST SO I CAN GET THE BLAME FROM VARIOUS DEPARTMENTS, YEAH THX.

haitch, Wednesday, 24 October 2007 04:27 (sixteen years ago) link

Imagine what it would be like if Labor got in with its OMG GIANT UNION SPATULA.

Autumn Almanac, Wednesday, 24 October 2007 04:33 (sixteen years ago) link

In fact I'm tempted to start a picture thread depicting the disastrous consequences of union power.

Autumn Almanac, Wednesday, 24 October 2007 04:38 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.happyworker.com/smile/be-a-happy-worker-m.jpg

Kate, non masonic, Wednesday, 24 October 2007 04:55 (sixteen years ago) link

That happy worker in the cubicle on the far right is checking ILX!

badg, Wednesday, 24 October 2007 05:13 (sixteen years ago) link

Which one, Snooze Bloke or Cheeseburger Girl?

King Boy Pato, Wednesday, 24 October 2007 06:19 (sixteen years ago) link

TS: Snooze Bloke or Cheeseburger Girl?

moley, Wednesday, 24 October 2007 07:05 (sixteen years ago) link

Remember those ads where various worker bots are relieved that they can ring the fairness hotline and have their contracts assessed under the 'Fairness Test'. What a joke. My partner rang that hotline yesterday because she'd been asked to sign a 2 page contract which effectively had her as a contractor working a 60 hour week for this company. The first thing that happened was that a recorded message told her that nothing she was told could be relied on as legal advice. The second thing that happened was that she was put on to a 19 year old stoner who told her 'Gee, I don't know. You're a props builder? I don't know. Do you carry things or build things? Both? Well which one, it can't be both! Maybe you should have a look at our website. Hang on, I'll speak to me supervisor. *click*'

moley, Wednesday, 24 October 2007 22:48 (sixteen years ago) link

Sounds fair.

Autumn Almanac, Wednesday, 24 October 2007 23:09 (sixteen years ago) link

Last month my work compulsorily sent us all an official government information bulletin explaining the fairness test and what our rights are. The salient points were (a) the bulletin contained fuck-all information, providing only the useless phone number that your partner called and (b) IT WAS OBVIOUS POLITICAL CAMPAIGNING. Even the HR manager who sent it agreed that it was just an ad for the government.

Autumn Almanac, Wednesday, 24 October 2007 23:13 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.theage.com.au/ffximage/2007/10/25/wbRATES_wideweb__470x314,0.jpg

loooooooooool

haitch, Thursday, 25 October 2007 00:31 (sixteen years ago) link

70% of a Labor government would be former trade union officials.

Autumn Almanac, Friday, 26 October 2007 23:40 (sixteen years ago) link

But did any of them live at home until 32 like our beloved PM?

King Boy Pato, Saturday, 27 October 2007 07:12 (sixteen years ago) link

"70% of a Labor government would be former trade union officials."

That ain't the half of it - 100% of ANY Rudd cabinet, INCLUDING the PM, the Deputy PM, the Treasurer, the Foreign Minister and the Attorney General, would ALL be CARD CARRYING MEMBERS of the AUSTRALIAN LABOR PARTY!!!!!!!!

Fred Nerk, Saturday, 27 October 2007 07:56 (sixteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.