― Many Coloured Halo (Dee the Lurker), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 18:31 (twenty-two years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 18:33 (twenty-two years ago)
I would say that everyone has at least one positive attribute.
― Nicolars (Nicole), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 18:35 (twenty-two years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 18:36 (twenty-two years ago)
But bodies are lumpy. That's what they do. I mean, it's OK to want to reduce the lumpiness, but it'll never be totally gone, and it's ok!
Also, check this out: http://homepage.mac.com/gapodaca/digital/digital.html
― Casuistry (Chris P), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 18:40 (twenty-two years ago)
― JuliaA (j_bdules), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 18:40 (twenty-two years ago)
Anyway, Tuomas seems to have fled the thread.
― Skottie, Tuesday, 4 November 2003 18:42 (twenty-two years ago)
― Skottie, Tuesday, 4 November 2003 18:43 (twenty-two years ago)
And the general reaction we get when people see the pictures is "wow, you're right, they actually are all beautiful if you give them permission to be!"
(n.b. if there are regulars here who would like to see the URL where we've got a bunch of them, email me privately--I just don't want it posted/circulated in public.)
― Douglas (Douglas), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 18:43 (twenty-two years ago)
Don't know about that. I've never seen any of my male friends naked, but every girl I've ever known has seen every female friend of hers naked.
Call me a modest American, but I don't ever want to see my dad's cock. It has nothing to do with religion or morality or whatever. It has everything to do with the fact that it's my DAD for chrissakes.
But why do you feel this way? Such an attitude doesn't come from nowhere.
We don't know why, but we think nudity is always about sex (speaking of the population in general).
Because in America that's the only time people ARE nude, in everyday life and in TV/movies. The two are so closely associated because there is no other situation where two people are nude around one another than during sex.
― oops (Oops), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 18:45 (twenty-two years ago)
And another thing...my body ain't lumpy!
Oh, give it time.
― Casuistry (Chris P), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 18:47 (twenty-two years ago)
― Skottie, Tuesday, 4 November 2003 18:48 (twenty-two years ago)
― Skottie, Tuesday, 4 November 2003 18:49 (twenty-two years ago)
Good link, Chris.
― JuliaA (j_bdules), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 18:49 (twenty-two years ago)
Casuistry seems to be OTM a lot on this thread. Which, btw, I fail to see how it is work un-safe.
― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 18:49 (twenty-two years ago)
Did someone linkify the Tom of Finland picture? That's the only non-worksafe thing (so far, eep).
― Casuistry (Chris P), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 18:50 (twenty-two years ago)
― Skottie, Tuesday, 4 November 2003 18:53 (twenty-two years ago)
― Annouschka (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 19:00 (twenty-two years ago)
― cinniblount (James Blount), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 19:02 (twenty-two years ago)
― Annouschka (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 19:03 (twenty-two years ago)
― cinniblount (James Blount), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 19:05 (twenty-two years ago)
― Skottie, Tuesday, 4 November 2003 19:07 (twenty-two years ago)
― Annouschka (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 19:07 (twenty-two years ago)
― cinniblount (James Blount), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 19:08 (twenty-two years ago)
yeah, and a lot of people have terrible eyesight too... where's the national crisis over that?
i'll shut up now.
― Annouschka (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 19:08 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 19:08 (twenty-two years ago)
― cinniblount (James Blount), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 19:09 (twenty-two years ago)
― oops (Oops), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 19:10 (twenty-two years ago)
― cinniblount (James Blount), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 19:10 (twenty-two years ago)
― Skottie, Tuesday, 4 November 2003 19:11 (twenty-two years ago)
― cinniblount (James Blount), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 19:12 (twenty-two years ago)
― Skottie, Tuesday, 4 November 2003 19:12 (twenty-two years ago)
Also, glasses = sexxy. No, make that sexxxy.
― Casuistry (Chris P), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 19:13 (twenty-two years ago)
― cinniblount (James Blount), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 19:13 (twenty-two years ago)
― cinniblount (James Blount), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 19:14 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 19:14 (twenty-two years ago)
< /apu>
― teeny (teeny), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 19:15 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ed (dali), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 19:15 (twenty-two years ago)
― cinniblount (James Blount), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 19:17 (twenty-two years ago)
― Skottie, Tuesday, 4 November 2003 19:17 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nicolars (Nicole), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 19:18 (twenty-two years ago)
Douglas, I read "compliment" as "complaint" and I was thinking, "Douglas is a jerk and his friends are masochists." Heh heh, whoopsie.
― Jeanne Fury (Jeanne Fury), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 19:18 (twenty-two years ago)
― Skottie, Tuesday, 4 November 2003 19:18 (twenty-two years ago)
Fun, with burning eyes and nowhere to hang your glasses?
― Nichole Graham (Nichole Graham), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 19:19 (twenty-two years ago)
― oops (Oops), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 19:20 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ed (dali), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 19:20 (twenty-two years ago)
― cinniblount (James Blount), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 19:26 (twenty-two years ago)
― Douglas (Douglas), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 19:26 (twenty-two years ago)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A30524-2003Oct28.html
― mookieproof (mookieproof), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 19:26 (twenty-two years ago)