Nathan Barley comes to TV

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1029 of them)
momus is otm throughout this thread.

the show reminded me of the Sleazenation offices so badly i thought i was living through a flashback.

stevie (stevie), Sunday, 13 February 2005 19:53 (nineteen years ago) link

> I nearly switched off when Broadcast came on.

why? the Broadcast was being, er, broadcast by Pingu, the only sympathetic character in the whole thing.

are Banksy and the rathergood videos people going to be happy being lumped in with this lot? do you think they agreed to it or is it just another case of NB stealing / doing bad versions of things that are (were) innovative?

(teardrop explodes' sleeping gas in there right at the very end too.)

koogs (koogs), Monday, 14 February 2005 08:34 (nineteen years ago) link

I liked it a lot. i thought it was true. dan ashcroft is a tragic figure because although he is bright enough to know they're all idiots, he has nothing better to say than that (iow he = charlie brooker). pingu is the typical graduate intern-guy and is as hateable as everyone else.

that one of morris's touchstone themes seems to be "fuck the world for it is infested w.ppl self-convinced they're at the cutting-edge-of-where-it's-at but not (=A), at the expense of the ppl who ARE at the cutting-edge-of-where-it's-at (=B)" - but actually the overlooked victims are all the ppl nowhere near the CEoWIA (i mean, whether or not you grant this mythical beast walks the earth anyway, or is worth seekin out) (=C)

ie it (unintentionally) fosters a dubious gradient B » A » C

otm, but isn't the gradient is more c>b>a??

Henry Miller, Monday, 14 February 2005 10:05 (nineteen years ago) link

So what's the signifigance of CAB (Cookd and Bombd)?

Masked Gazza, Monday, 14 February 2005 10:12 (nineteen years ago) link

to me the engine of barleyism is class, the mandarin class of barley allows him connections and money that ordinary people don't have access to, hence his ability to survive and prosper in a creative industry without suffering the consequences of his total mediocrity. hence also brooker's rage (with brooker here cast as the 'ordinary people' without the opportunities and privileges, who can't just 'play' at having jobs).

and class is seemingly absent from this series. everyone has a normal south eastern accent, not really posh, not really not; just that some of them mysteriously have more money than others. so straight away the great big thumps morris throws in the direction of barley are great big thumps at nothing very substantial.

the bikes were good though

debden, Monday, 14 February 2005 10:42 (nineteen years ago) link

posh people don't all have posh accents though. some of the most media-privileged people with the best connects didn't go to public school. they just mysteriously have money and connections. i did think barley himself needed a slightly posher accent but dan ashcroft is spot-on.

Henry Miller, Monday, 14 February 2005 10:44 (nineteen years ago) link

Something just clicked in my mind about this show while I was reading this thread. I think it might be about boredom. Someone mentioned Pingu and why he stayed at this place when Nathan was being nasty to him. And I twigged - it's because he hasn't got anything else to do. He gets to play with shockwave and while away the hours. Being in a pit of despair is preferential to boredom.

Then I thought about Ashcroft. He's also bored with his life - surrounded by fevered egos, yet a fevered ego himself. The only difference is that he's aware of it, which makes it more tragic. The boredom of his own existence saps his energy, making it impossible for him to leave, yet loathing himself since he has to stay. He lurches from vitriolic attacks at everyone around him, to BECOMING like those around him.

And then I thought about NB. He's bored, so he tries to make everyone's life more interesting, including his own. He's in a state of blissful ignorance, and sees himself as above the grey soup he looks down upon, not realising that it's just greyness that he spits out himself.

Momus makes a point about there being so much going on in the frames - the clever little design points, the split-second in-jokes. Now imagine if your whole life was like that - everything you saw, heard or did was loaded and marked for your attention. In the same way that if everything is marked in Bold, nothing is highlighted, if everything is interesting, nothing interests you. Which can only lead to boredom. Maybe that's at the heart of it all.

Or maybe they are just caricatures of 5yr old stereotypes, monkey-dancing for our amusement in a tirade of cheap shots and barely funny metaphors, looking up from a mud splattered face as the dotcom-bashing zeitgeist zooms into the past. I guess time will tell.

Johnney B (Johnney B), Monday, 14 February 2005 10:46 (nineteen years ago) link

also, the world of barley is not an inclusive one, as we see in the series with the rather gentle example of him refusing to make his assistant coffee. the TVGoHome barley is a cruel, selfish little twerp rather than the likeable prat of morris's series. he visits eastern european prostitutes in their 'tear stained boudoirs'. there is a very nasty world of social hierarchies that doesn't seem to be evident in the channel 4 barley; the barley of TVgoHome would not put up stickers in a newsagent, even as a sub-banksy trick; too democratic, not exclusive enough.

debden, Monday, 14 February 2005 10:48 (nineteen years ago) link

why didn't Dan's sister walk horrified out of Trashbat Towers after seeing poor Pingu electrocuted is what i'm wondering

Alienus Quam Reproba (blueski), Monday, 14 February 2005 10:51 (nineteen years ago) link

xxpost
Bring back national service.

Masked Gazza, Monday, 14 February 2005 10:52 (nineteen years ago) link

I liked the bikes too, and Nathan Barley greeting everyone as "my nigga". Also I'm bored with vitriol and nastiness so the fact that this was comparatively gentle was a bonus. Fuck all that "Nighty Night", oooooooooohhh we're so dark and scary shit.

Dadaismus (Dada), Monday, 14 February 2005 10:59 (nineteen years ago) link

the other point is that nathan barley is not actually that succesful. in tvgohome he constantly flits, like a braying dog in a manger, between creative projects which, under his aegis, will never take off or succeed.

i didn't want this to be dark and scary, agreed, that is quickly becoming very undergraduate. i thought it might be more of a chance for some good satirical class war, though, which it wasn't. i have a feeling the character of barley will become increasingly objectionable as the series goes on, though.

debden, Monday, 14 February 2005 11:04 (nineteen years ago) link

i actually thought ashcroft was the most annoying character of all; sympathising with style journalists who are weary of all the froth is about as easy as feeling sorry for ageing rock stars who make albums about how empty fame is.

debden, Monday, 14 February 2005 11:06 (nineteen years ago) link

the TVGoHome barley is a cruel, selfish little twerp rather than the likeable prat of morris's series

I didn't think he came across as likeable at all on the TV.

caitlin (caitlin), Monday, 14 February 2005 11:08 (nineteen years ago) link

i suppose i liked the incidental things: a sunday newspaper running 'what's on michael portillo's ipod?'.

Miles Finch, Monday, 14 February 2005 11:10 (nineteen years ago) link

... which is exactly what sunday newspapers do run

Dadaismus (Dada), Monday, 14 February 2005 11:11 (nineteen years ago) link

it's funny cuz it's true

Miles Finch, Monday, 14 February 2005 11:13 (nineteen years ago) link

Some of the reviews in the papers were funny because it was obvious the critics were a bit uneasy about how accurate it was about their lives/work and their friends/colleagues' lives/work

Dadaismus (Dada), Monday, 14 February 2005 11:15 (nineteen years ago) link

I actually twigged the other day exactly what I didn't like about the programme. Like I said, it wasn't even Nathan Barley or any of the "Idiots" who offended me - they were too comic to have any emotional loadedness. The person who irritated me the most was actually Dan Ashcroft - the person I suppose we're supposed to identify with or something.

People have talked on this thread about his "banging his head against the glass ceiling" or brought up class issues or whatever. And I'm sure that Ashcroft went away from his Weekend on Sunday "death" with the same ideas that ILXors have about what caused his downfall - when really, it was nothing to do with the Class Ceiling or whathaveyou at all - it was his own bloody hubris! Going in to an interview woefully unprepared, as if all he has to do to get a job is Make The Decision To Sell Out - and his reputation from his column/blog/fanzine and the Powers That Be will just Be Recognised as genius.

Rather than that he was asked to Pitch, and he just *couldn't*. Even a media dummy like me knows that going to a paper or magazine interview without a Pitch is like going to an office job interview and refusing to take a test in Excel. What did he expect?

So without anyone to actually empathise with in the experience, it just becomes like The Office - an exercise in pointless cruelty which just isn't particularly funny or enjoyable to me.

Kate Kept Me Alive! (kate), Monday, 14 February 2005 11:17 (nineteen years ago) link

... all that "this might make for uncomfortable viewing in the weeks ahead"..................... errrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr, maybe for you mate but not for the rest of us (xpost)

I don't see the class thing at all, with regard to Dan Ashcroft - why are people assuming is he a more working class character, just because he has a Northern accent?!?!??!

Dadaismus (Dada), Monday, 14 February 2005 11:21 (nineteen years ago) link

kate, dan is not a class warrior, he's clearly one of them (his old university friend is fixing him a job at the weekend on sunday). why do you need to identify? it's satire. who was there to be identified with in 'the day today'?

Henry Miller, Monday, 14 February 2005 11:23 (nineteen years ago) link

Because that is how I read/watch texts. If I can't find someone to empathise or identify with, it's quite difficult for me to become engaged with the story. If something is just wall to wall unpleasantness, I don't have much incentive to carry on watching. It becomes meaningless and relentless if I can't sympathise with anyone in a story.

Kate Kept Me Alive! (kate), Monday, 14 February 2005 11:36 (nineteen years ago) link

> why didn't Dan's sister walk horrified out of Trashbat Towers after
> seeing poor Pingu electrocuted is what i'm wondering

this was the disappointing thing about her, that she seemed to fall for NB's self promotion and sub-dirty sanchez japes.

> it just becomes like The Office - an exercise in pointless cruelty

i saw it as someone who was so cocksure of himself getting hoist by his own petard. comeuppance rather than cruelty. the whole series seems to be full of people full of themselves and oblivious to how people outside their small social groups see them.

the pinball machine / office chaos thing hit a nerve - every hour or so someone here will start throwing foam footballs around. nothing more disturbing than things flying through your peripheral vision when you're trying to concentrate.

koogs (koogs), Monday, 14 February 2005 11:39 (nineteen years ago) link

The sister character is totally lame and unbelievable (so far)

Dadaismus (Dada), Monday, 14 February 2005 11:41 (nineteen years ago) link

people assume ashcroft is less posh cos he has no money ("i'll get this... lend me a tenner?"). kate otm, though, he is irritating cos he's so passive and shiftless, and you sense a certain arrogance behind it. maybe he will be galvanised into brutal reprisals in future episodes, though.

xpost

debden, Monday, 14 February 2005 11:41 (nineteen years ago) link

The only thing that really hit a nerve for me was actually the editor at the Weekend On Sunday - the way he picked up a guitar - EXACTLY THE SAME BLOODY WHITE STRAT THAT MY COLLEAGUE AT THE AD AGENCY USED TO PLAY - and started fiddling around with it to show "Look how cool and creative I am I can fiddle with this guitar while talking to you like you're boring me or something". That was like nerves on a blackboard to me.

Kate Kept Me Alive! (kate), Monday, 14 February 2005 11:45 (nineteen years ago) link

ha ha
that was good, if they'd given him a ponytail it would have been a bit too much, but the white strat was devastating

debden, Monday, 14 February 2005 11:47 (nineteen years ago) link

"nerves on a blackboard". Great!

Dadaismus (Dada), Monday, 14 February 2005 11:47 (nineteen years ago) link

Dan is THE PREACHER MAN in the next episode, and doesn't enjoy the messianic role one bit.

Momus (Momus), Monday, 14 February 2005 11:56 (nineteen years ago) link

(I'm also looking forward to Nathan Barley adopting Celtic Leprechaun chic, as seen for a split second half way through the trailer. Does this mean he's in a Fake Folk phase?)

Momus (Momus), Monday, 14 February 2005 12:00 (nineteen years ago) link

It's just a tartan hat, man.

The Leprechaun Police. (afarrell), Monday, 14 February 2005 12:05 (nineteen years ago) link

Faux Folk? You mean like half of ILM?

Dadaismus (Dada), Monday, 14 February 2005 12:05 (nineteen years ago) link

Kate is OTM in some ways and off the mark in others, I feel. The characters were too over-the-top and caricatured to be actually hateable - like a less funny version of Derek's doomed flatmates in Zoolander. Although the tiny hat was a masterstroke (the incidental bits were so much funnier than the main wedge of the thing, I found).

She's off the mark in comparing NB to The Office as "an excercise in pointless cruelty". The Office wasn't pointless cruelty, it was perfectly emotionally pitched, you found yourself really caring about these atrocious or pathetic characters - Brent finally getting the sack dressed as an emu etc.

Ditto Spaced, possibly a better reference point here - I watched the opening, scene-setting epsiode of that yesterday and it was a great example of how to move all the main characters into position and yet do it properly. You had a handle on the characters from day one - I'm none the wiser about some of the people in NB - especially the women who have next to no personality. Likewise the episode where Daisy has the interview at Flaps magazine, and they go to Vulva's performance art thing = better satire than anything in the first episode of NB. Modifying the Nipper's OTM comment upthread, its also a bit like an episode of Spaced where everyone is Twist (the worst character in that series by some way).

Dada - no, you're not supposed care about anyone or anything in the Day Today or Brasseye, and both programmes are far the better for that, because they are not character-led sitcom. NB defineably is, satirical or otherwise, and I'm not convinced Morris is any good at it.

I've got a bit of a bone to pick with the 'Dan as viewer identification character' thing as well. Perhaps, in that NB is 'Losing My Edge' satire, its designed to appeal to the very people its satirising. All the Idiots think Dan's 'Idiots' piece is wonderful, oblivious to the fact its them he's attacking. But the fact is that the Idiots piece is rubbish, its lame student comment section quality at best - Dan is a pretty talentless hack as clearly shown by the interview scene (best bit of the episode I thought). He has nothing to offer the world other than his opposition to it, this mix of bitterness and ill-deserved conceit. He's not much better than the people he's surrounded by - playing Cock Muff Bumhole after a couple of drinks etc.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 14 February 2005 12:20 (nineteen years ago) link

matt's last par = otm.

Henry Miller, Monday, 14 February 2005 12:22 (nineteen years ago) link

Dada - no, you're not supposed care about anyone or anything in the Day Today or Brasseye, and both programmes are far the better for that, because they are not character-led sitcom.

Did I say anything about this? I'm all sixes and sevens today.

Dadaismus (Dada), Monday, 14 February 2005 12:25 (nineteen years ago) link

He has nothing to offer the world other than his opposition to it

Spot on. As much as the Nathan Barleys are stereotype of the whole meeja scene, so are the Dan Ashcrofts - so WAY above it all... and equally as tragic.

Huey (Huey), Monday, 14 February 2005 12:25 (nineteen years ago) link

Sorry Dada - I'd conflated a bit of Henry's "why do you need to identify?" post with an argument we were having in the pub last night. Don't know where your name came from.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 14 February 2005 12:38 (nineteen years ago) link

well put Matt, Dan is no hero!

Alienus Quam Reproba (blueski), Monday, 14 February 2005 13:08 (nineteen years ago) link

but he may still become the hero. Charlie Brooker thinks he's The One!

Alienus Quam Reproba (blueski), Monday, 14 February 2005 13:09 (nineteen years ago) link

It's interesting that Dan Ashcroft's look is pretty much grebo-gonzo. He's a sharp stylish yoof commentator in his magazine logo, but in real life he's gone to seed a bit, let his hair grow. He sort of reminds me of an American rock critic (when he's not reminding me of John Peel, Moliere's Misanthrope, etc etc). Those people (I don't know, is Metzger one of them?) who are dug so deep into their trade that they have to keep doing it, despite mounting revulsion and diminishing touch. If there's a 'machismo of competence' in the American male psyche, there's also a 'machismo of revulsion'. These things both work with a certain image of masculinity. What doesn't work so well is gushy enthusiasm, which is a gay attribute. Think Warhol, for whom everything was 'Great'. Warhol was like a supportive wife to a whole scene of attention-seekers, and his enthusiasm was an extremely clever pose. So who in NB is enthusiastic in this clever, Warholian way? Actually, the Idiots themselves are. They're happy, positive, encouraging even when attacked, creative and productive. They are, as Darwin would say, adapted and fit for their ecological niche.

Another thing just occurred to me. There are black characters in this, but no gay characters. How would the satire be different if, say, Nathan Barley were gay?

Momus (Momus), Monday, 14 February 2005 13:11 (nineteen years ago) link

oh, yeah 'gay attributes', nice. what are 'black attributes' while we're here?

Henry Miller, Monday, 14 February 2005 13:17 (nineteen years ago) link

What, being gay is an identity without attributes?

Momus (Momus), Monday, 14 February 2005 13:20 (nineteen years ago) link

i'm sure Barley's sexuality will be questioned/compromised at some point in the series. it's Sitcom Law.

Alienus Quam Reproba (blueski), Monday, 14 February 2005 13:22 (nineteen years ago) link

there are non-enthusiastic gay people. being gay does not shape your whole persona, any more than being straight does. in any case only barley was revealed as being straight in ep one -- there may well be gay characters.

Henry Miller, Monday, 14 February 2005 13:23 (nineteen years ago) link

So who in NB is enthusiastic in this clever, Warholian way? Actually, the Idiots themselves are. They're happy, positive, encouraging even when attacked, creative and productive.

yeh but unlike Warhol there is nothing at all clever about these Idiots (stating the obvious here?)

Alienus Quam Reproba (blueski), Monday, 14 February 2005 13:24 (nineteen years ago) link

There are black characters in this, but no gay characters. How would the satire be different if, say, Nathan Barley were gay?

the two things continue to be bugbears - attention is drawn to the ethnicity thing only because of Nathan's use of 'my nigga' on anyone (regardless of their ethnicity), otherwise it would be completely irrelevant i think. i expect there will be some sort of 'faux pas' re homosexuality/phobia to come that will draw the second thing to attention also (as with The Office et al).

Alienus Quam Reproba (blueski), Monday, 14 February 2005 13:28 (nineteen years ago) link

there may well be gay characters.

I suspect that even two nothing sacred 'comedy terrorists' like Brooker and Morris will not go there. It's a lot more acceptable to 'bash' hipsters in a sitcom than it is to bash obviously gay characters. Hipsters have been designated 'okay to hate' in our culture.

The shot near the beginning of episode one, where Dan looks up the street and sees a guy with flip flops on his ears. Dan looks with withering scorn. Now, what if Flip Flop Guy were mincing, or butch or some other gay signifier (a 'big ole bear')? Dan's withering scorn would be... well, simple homophobia, wouldn't it?

Momus (Momus), Monday, 14 February 2005 13:29 (nineteen years ago) link

morris has been there before. didn't day today have that whole 'this week's gay motorways...' thing?

these comments on 'NB' are considerably more interesting and entertaining than the show itself.

Pete W (peterw), Monday, 14 February 2005 13:33 (nineteen years ago) link

also, something about Dan Ashcroft makes me think of Jacques Perretti.

Pete W (peterw), Monday, 14 February 2005 13:34 (nineteen years ago) link

those 'gay signifiers' belong to police academy films. morris has spoofed aspects of gay culture before i think -- but in any case spoofing cultural faux-pas is not like spoofing sexual orientation.

re peretti -- i said that!

Henry Miller, Monday, 14 February 2005 13:34 (nineteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.