The Matrix Reloaded (full spoilers)

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (408 of them)
If there is a One, there will be a Zero. I think.
Probably called Ozer or somefink.

Simeon (Simeon), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 11:10 (twenty-three years ago)

if Zion and the earth surface are also part of the Matrix then i hope the next film doesnt end with the survivors walking into bright light ala Cube and we don't know what they're walking into. then again it would be kinda cool if we never do find out if they've escaped the Matrix or not and their fate is to continue exploring their surroundings once the machines are destroyed (what might also be interesting is if rather than have the machines destroyed entirely, they are able to convince the sentient machines that their existence is somewhat futile when they lack 'soul' and they should just go back to being slaves i.e. take the independent will of the machines away as they took it away from the humans, hopefully creating another moral headfuck, altho it might also be nice if they explore AI more i.e. a lot further than Kubrick/Spielberg did and the whole idea of 'the machine with a soul')

stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 11:33 (twenty-three years ago)

One of the key points of the problem of not trusting ones senses is one can never trust our senses. If the plot was to finally create an autonomous, self replicating articficial intelligence then maybe Agent SMith has made that evolutionary leap.

Who says the computers / we have soul?

Pete (Pete), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 11:37 (twenty-three years ago)

is the ultimate goal of AI to determine whether machines can 'inherit' something as profound and intangible as a soul/spirit? the curiosity seems to eclipse the real need/purpose to do that in accordance with moral issues mapped out over the years, as with cloning humans...but one good thing about The Matrix is it pushes those questions (of which many seem actually quite new) to the forefront unlike any other artefact in pop culture. the films can provide the platform for the writers and directors to pose fundamental questions about existence, as Spielberg does (although he seems more concerned with human/spirituality/religious issues rather than the sheer notion of existence/reality itself)

the possibly great/bad thing about The Matrix is that it may actually kill off the whole 'gung-ho dystopian future sci-fi' genre, taking it to its peak visually if nothing else. there may be a few more Philip K Dick adaptations to be made perhaps, but with The Matrix seemingly aiming to corner the market by encompassing so many divisions (sci-fi, kung-fu, general action) its currently hard to imagine future films being able to match this for thrills alone. certainly they could offer more intricate stories with better characterisation, dialogue etc. and genuine suspense/mystery in a tradition of horror, sci-fi horror and more psychological thrillers (because you're never actually really SCARED when watching The Matrix, unlike Alien or even Event Horzion or whatever). and while stuff like X-Men and Star Wars will be able to survive, what about another 'from nowhere' success like the Matrix happening? have the Warchowskis spoiled it for everyone/anyone else in this respect?

stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 11:49 (twenty-three years ago)

The only real investment you have in Reloaded is to see where they are going with the story. The stakes seem wholy irrelevant - from Morpheous's messianistic mmbo-jumbo to the Keymaker (where is the gatekeeper?) . We are told they have to save Zion - which they fail to do. They fail hugely, there are now about 20 people left IN THE WORLD (or is it 23?) And I don't care.

I think we will see from nowhere stuff again - of course we will. Its hard to get by the current studio system, but any film which was initially produced by Joel Silver will never be from completely nowhere.

Pete (Pete), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 11:59 (twenty-three years ago)

It's entirely possible that The Matrix couldn't get made now anyway. There's a lot less money falling from the skies than 4 years ago.

They fail hugely, there are now about 20 people left IN THE WORLD (or is it 23?)

No, that was the other door. There's sill a quarter of a million left.
And the movie's not over.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 12:02 (twenty-three years ago)

what about all the humans in the pink pods? are they still alive?

will Neo and the Architect really never meet again as the Architect states?

how will the Oracle appear in the next film as the actress who played her has died?

if the Agent Smith phenomena never occurred in previous matrices, what has changed? and that bit where he says to Neo 'I watched you die...' was interesting, he was surprised Neo was still alive just as much as Neo was surprised Agent Smith was still alive. there must be something in this, especially as it has not been explained HOW Agent Smith survived...has it?

so i eventually figured the guy at the end on the table adjacent to Neo was Bain (i know i'm fick but bear with me)...but is this the same guy who cut his hand and was going to kill Neo in Zion? they look different...and Bain looks a lot like Cypher (some people have been saying it actually IS Cypher) but really it is Agent Smith who possessed Bain's body via the telephone at the start yes? so now one Agent Smith is in the 'mezzanine Matrix' while all the copies are still in the official Matrix...yes?

stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 12:15 (twenty-three years ago)

Didn't Zion fall? Or just all the ships protecting it.

Pete (Pete), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 12:21 (twenty-three years ago)

No, neither. They have 24 hours left at the end of the film.

Bain is also the guy who tried to convince his captain (to volunteer to follow Morpheus?).

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 12:27 (twenty-three years ago)

I seem to remember someone mentioning that there were still 24 hours left to save Zion.

Sommermute (Wintermute), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 12:27 (twenty-three years ago)

Bah crosspost.

Sommermute (Wintermute), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 12:29 (twenty-three years ago)

I cannot fathom the people who say they hated this movie.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 12:54 (twenty-three years ago)

I specifically can't fathom people who say the can't see the point of the Agent Smith fight. Were they watching a different piece of celluloid?

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 13:41 (twenty-three years ago)

Neo can bend the Matrix to ridiculous lengths; he can't break it. He fights hand-to-hand if he doesn't have a gun because it's easier to manipulate the non-sentient portions of the Matrix. The one time he did directly influence a sentient part of the Matrix, he created a virus (Agent Smith).

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 13:47 (twenty-three years ago)

THANK YOU DAN.

teeny (teeny), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 13:49 (twenty-three years ago)

Dan - how much of that justification comes from you and how much is there in the film. (I fear much much more is the former). The reason it is in the film is because it is quite a cool fight sequence.

What has happened to the hundreds of Smith clones? What does he want with Neo.

Pete (Pete), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 13:52 (twenty-three years ago)

one thing i like thinking about is how much The Matrix follows old video game rules rather than film rules...Neo vs 100 Smiths happens surprisingly early in the film, as if it was the boss at the end of the first level (although Neo had already fought the Oracle's aide just minutes beforehand). often in games the first round boss is somehow linked to the greater adversary you will encounter at the end of the game e.g. the patterns of attack, the very nature of the boss character. it would appear that Neo is to take on the Smith legion again in the next film in some capacity so maybe there's some intention there, a hint at whats to come, as well as just the 'showcase/practice' idea i mentioned earlier.

stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 13:53 (twenty-three years ago)

The reason it is in the film is because it is quite a cool fight sequence.

but why is it not towards the end? esp. as the fight scenes after are inferior. there are genuine logical reasons for this fight happening at the time it did in the film it would seem - i hope so anyway

stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 13:56 (twenty-three years ago)

Why I love the Wachowskis: someone at some point described a world where your senses were artificially imposed, and (I like to think) they thought about it for a second, turned to each other and yelled "super kung fu!".

Both Neo and the Agents being faster than bullets also provides the only good reason ever for a fight to start with guns and end with punching.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 13:57 (twenty-three years ago)

there are genuine logical reasons for this fight happening at the time it did in the film it would seem - i hope so anyway

Yes, there is a reason. It's called pacing a six hour film. These two movies are one long film that is cut in half. They were shot as one film. They were edited as one film. They were written as one film. Therefore, anything that seems inconsistent or unsatisfactory or unexplained, will probably be explained at the conclusion of this one film (esp. seeing as how the wack-owskis are fond of exposition).

jm (jtm), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 14:03 (twenty-three years ago)

Surely Keanu will wake up at the end of the final film and see Bobby Ewing in his shower.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 14:07 (twenty-three years ago)

The logical reason is the previous hour or so in Zion (has that name for the city not come back and bitten them yet) and the previous circular "I know something you don't know" conversation with the Oracle are so boring that we need something to lift us out of it. This fight is not at the end as it is pointless - nopthing is gained by Smith's motivation is a mystery and he isn't strictly preventing Neo from doing anything. (Why is he stopping him going to THE DOOR - never clear).

Pete (Pete), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 14:08 (twenty-three years ago)

Actually, I figured out what bugs me most about this movie. Yes, I think the plot sucks and it was actually pretty boring, but what really got my goat is the crescendoing sounds of french horns everytime Neo stops some bullets or flys or everytime Trinity jumps out a window. You know what sound I'm talking about. It's like the "whoa, INTENSE" sound.

Mandee, Tuesday, 27 May 2003 14:14 (twenty-three years ago)

The mainframe door? I think Smith's motivation is self-preservation.

teeny (teeny), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 14:15 (twenty-three years ago)

I cannot fathom the people who say they hated this movie.

That shitty shitty dialog (dude, I've read Plato too), the unconscionably horrible soundtrack, and the fact that the movie spent 60% of its time shoring up plot holes -- the 40% action scenes were pretty cool, I'll admit, but that hasn't saved the Star Wars movies from sucking either. I'm convinced that they didn't originally mean there to be a sequel, otherwise this pile would've been enjoyable.

Aaron W (Aaron W), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 14:38 (twenty-three years ago)

Yeah, only one week at #1. Only grossed $210 Million in 9 days. Ha.

Stuart (Stuart), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 14:42 (twenty-three years ago)

Pete: my "justification" is all over both of the films! It's all in the fact that in both movies, we only see Neo directly manipulate a sentient being once and that's when he blows up Smith at the end of the first movie; the rest of the time he's fighting hand-to-hand and distorting the physics of himself and inanimate objects.

Smith is trying to stop Neo from getting to THE DOOR because he's trying to kill Neo. If Neo makes it to THE DOOR, he gets away. Surely that was patently obvious...? Why is Smith trying to kill Neo? Because Smith hates Neo and has been trying to kill him since the first movie.

Aaron: In most movies, taking time to explain the world the movie takes place in is looked upon as "exposition" and "character development", not "shoring up plot holes". Really, the only plot hole I can think of was never explained (Where did Neo's precognitive dream about Trinity's shooting come from? How is it that what happened was EXACTLY what he dreamed about?); everything else was consistent with what both movies have presented to us so far (and they might explain the dream thing in the next movie, seeing as they explained the Oracle in this one and she was the only part of the first movie that I had problems with).

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 14:43 (twenty-three years ago)

Dan your justification for the justification makee no sense (you're just using induction, just because something has happened in a particular way does not mean that this has happened for a reason). When Neo "destroys" Smith in movie one no mention is made of how hard this is - indeed it is seen as the fruition of his powers. Equally Smith's attacking Neo in the first film cannot be called hatred, he is doing his Matrix defined job. After being resurrected, free himself from his own programmed constraints and with new abilities it would seem less likely that he would want to destroy Neo, as Neo may have the answer to why he is the way he is. Why is he trying to kill Neo - especially as he has now found out (from film one) that this in all likelihood cannot be done. None of what you have said above has been told to us you have mad ethe assumption as to why Neo doesn't use his powers in certain ways merely from observing him not using them, which therefore cannot be used to justify it.

And since the thrust of the initial movie seemed to be to free people from the Matrix, they don't seem to be doing it much (except in a bit of backstory exposition).

Pete (Pete), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 15:03 (twenty-three years ago)

Equally Smith's attacking Neo in the first film cannot be called hatred, he is doing his Matrix defined job.

But the first film goes out of it's way to point out that he's not just doing his job: he really hates them. The sensual world is having an effect on him.

(except in a bit of backstory exposition).

I don't think you'd be happier if they added another 10 minutes of Neo freeing someone else. I could be wrong.

Though I think the Wachowski's are cheating by using stuff outside the film to fill in gaps: I think the kid who idolises Neo was freed in one of the Animatrix shorts.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 15:13 (twenty-three years ago)

Yeah, what was up with that kid? My friend remarked at that point that he felt like he'd missed a couple movies in between (like he was watching Matrix 7)--I guess he actually did if the kid was part of those shorts.

slutsky (slutsky), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 15:17 (twenty-three years ago)

Dan your justification for the justification makee no sense (you're just using induction, just because something has happened in a particular way does not mean that this has happened for a reason).

Agreed. My hypothesis works, though, and I will stand by it until the movie explicitly tells me something different.

When Neo "destroys" Smith in movie one no mention is made of how hard this is - indeed it is seen as the fruition of his powers.

Don't you see the contradiction inherent in that statement? If it's so easy for Neo to destroy sentient objects in the Matrix, why did it take him until the end of the movie to figure out how to do it? Furthermore, why didn't he hunt down the Agents that ran away and blow them up, too?

Equally Smith's attacking Neo in the first film cannot be called hatred, he is doing his Matrix defined job.

??? Did you sleep through the scene in the first movie near the end where Smith is torturing Morpheus, telling him that humanity is a sickness, that he wished that the machines didn't have to sully themselves by living off of the humans, etc? Smith's entire character is a bundle of xenophobic bile directed at the human race.

After being resurrected, free himself from his own programmed constraints and with new abilities it would seem less likely that he would want to destroy Neo, as Neo may have the answer to why he is the way he is.

At what point in the movie did Smith appear unclear as to what he was or, more to the point, care about what he was beyond knowing the he was a self-replicating virus?

Why is he trying to kill Neo - especially as he has now found out (from film one) that this in all likelihood cannot be done.

He's trying to kill Neo because he hates humanity. He's trying to kill Neo because he didn't finish the job the first time around. Notice that Neo never had to fight off a gigantic swarm of Agents before this movie; it's not clear at all that the right number of Smiths couldn't take him out, particularly if they could keep him from flying.

None of what you have said above has been told to us you have mad ethe assumption as to why Neo doesn't use his powers in certain ways merely from observing him not using them, which therefore cannot be used to justify it.

There's a strong possibility that Neo has been exploding Agents willy-nilly up until this movie and it's only after being confronted by Agent Smith saying, "Thanks for turning me into a virulent virus!" in the playground that he stopped.

And since the thrust of the initial movie seemed to be to free people from the Matrix, they don't seem to be doing it much (except in a bit of backstory exposition).

Deeply unfair criticism; they explicitly say in the movie that they've freed more people in six months than they have in six years and that's what the humans the primary justification for the attack on Zion is. Furthermore, Neo has that kid whom he saved following him around like a mad prohpet, all of those people in Zion keep sending him offerings, at least one of the kids from the first movie has been brought out of the Matrix and is in Zion (hence the spoon), etc. The entire point of the second movie is the setup of the final confrontation, not the (comparatively) mundane tastk of busting people out of the Matrix; we saw how that all worked in the first film, who needs to see it again?

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 15:23 (twenty-three years ago)

at least that was fun to watch

I mean, in the first movie there were a lot of great visual ideas--the super-scary shot of the humans in the pods, the telephone stuff, the bullet-dodging--and in reloaded they really didn't come up with anything to match that, or even bother to show us again the stuff that made the matrix universe fun to watch.

slutsky (slutsky), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 15:28 (twenty-three years ago)

All of a sudden all I can think of is Muad'Dib (Keanu Reeves vs. Kyle McLachlan FITE).

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 15:32 (twenty-three years ago)

at least one of the kids from the first movie has been brought out of the Matrix and is in Zion (hence the spoon), etc.

Wouldn't that spoon kid already have been rescued from the Matrix prior to the first film? Wasn't he at the Oracle's house as a potential One? Wasn't Neo's real body rescued before he went there?

Eyeball Kicks (Eyeball Kicks), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 15:34 (twenty-three years ago)

at least that was fun to watch

And the freeway sequence wasn't?

Anyway, they DID show the telephone stuff and the bullet-dodging, plus they added the ghost programs, the flying sequences and its attended buggering of Matrix physics and the endlessly multiple Agent Smith.

Wouldn't that spoon kid already have been rescued from the Matrix prior to the first film?

That occured to me after I hit "Submit", yes.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 15:35 (twenty-three years ago)

i THINK THAT mORPHEUS IS THEE BADDIE aND IN LEAGUE WIV THEE oRACLE AND aLSO THEE aRCHITECT -- i THINK aGENT sMITH IS a 'gOOD' gUY AND HAS BEEN ALL ALONG!!!!!! (gOOD GUY INSOFAR AS HE HATES THEE MATRIX)

jUST LOOK AT zION, THEE PLACE IS LIKE A JAIL!! WTF, iT SUx0r big-time!!!! zION MUST BE DESTROYED B/C IT IS THE PRISON FOR HUMANz0r! mORPHEUS IS THE FIERY ORATOR WHO KEEPS PEEPS BELIEVING IN THEE CAUSE, WHICH WE NOW KNOW IS FUTILE ANYWAY! JUST DANCE AND FUCK YOU STUPID HUMANGZ, THERE'S NO 'pROBLEM' HERE IN YOUR JAIL!!

HE MUST BE DESTROYED!!!!!

hAHAHAHA CORNEL WEST!

jUST aNOTHER oNE-zERO (tracerhand), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 15:37 (twenty-three years ago)

aND WHAT IS UP WITH THE "RED pILL" THE ORACLE OFFERS NEO??????

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 15:38 (twenty-three years ago)

The Oracle offered Neo licorice. She ate the red pill herself.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 15:39 (twenty-three years ago)

No, you're right Dan (in places) but I suppose it wasn't the film I wanted to see. I suppose one thing which has hithertoo been left a bit up in the air is the difference between a program being run in the matrix (a la Smith) and the "machines" using the humang batteries. It strikes me that Smith as a self aware pprogramme in the first film must have been torn between the idea that he was programmed to hate humans (which he is pretty much) and absolutely reliant on them (since without humans the need for the Matrix is removed and it will be shut down). Smith seems to me therefore to be an ambivalent third force. And surely he isn't trying to kill Neo, rather take him over (and in the process perhaps gain his powers, and his exit to the outside world and poorly done earlier (poorly done in the film - the connection between the bloke in the Matrix, to the potential assasin is never made clear).

It is unclear what "the machines" will do when they get to Zion. Destroy it, or try to somehow re-enslave them.

I suppose this may be my big problem ith the whole affair now we've got to the second film. There is no obvious reasoning behind the intellignce. Where's the bad guy?

Pete (Pete), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 15:40 (twenty-three years ago)

Well, they did show us both the telephone stuff and the bullet dodging, but the fact is, it's not as impressive the second time around.

I agree about the humans in pods: it was the standout shot of the first movie. They may have been hoping for the same effect looking down the bore of Zion with all the crossing pathways: nope.

As far as visual spectacle goes, I'll have to repeat myself: irrespective of plot reasons for the Burly Brawl or issues with CGI, if you thought the fight was boring, you were watching a different movie.

(bah crosspost)

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 15:41 (twenty-three years ago)

plus they added the ghost programs

You mean Slimer?

slutsky (slutsky), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 15:42 (twenty-three years ago)

Andrew I'm with you in re that shot of Zion, which looked like a blurry digitally-enhanced matte painting--a real "so what?" shot.

slutsky (slutsky), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 15:43 (twenty-three years ago)

All of a sudden all I can think of is Muad'Dib (Keanu Reeves vs. Kyle McLachlan FITE)

Thanks for the thought! I just started wondering why I compared Matrix Reloaded to The Hidden upthread.

Sommermute (Wintermute), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 15:43 (twenty-three years ago)

DIY Slimer x 2.

Pete (Pete), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 15:43 (twenty-three years ago)

Doesn't Smith say something about being 'free' and yet still tied to his programming (destroying Neo)?

Jordan (Jordan), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 15:45 (twenty-three years ago)

And surely he isn't trying to kill Neo, rather take him over (and in the process perhaps gain his powers, and his exit to the outside world and poorly done earlier (poorly done in the film - the connection between the bloke in the Matrix, to the potential assasin is never made clear).

Color me jumping-to-conclusions but I assume the takeover process is fatal. I think Smith definitely wants access to Neo's powers but it's unclear whether subsuming Neo would leave his abilities intact.

I didn't think the first takeover was handled poorly at all; he kept popping enough at enough intervals to remind the audience that he was still there and still a potential source of trouble. (In fact, the end was a complete anti-climax in the sense that I knew who the survivor was going to be.)

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 15:49 (twenty-three years ago)

The Muad'dib comparison's not bad, and relates to why the Architect
offers Neo a choice: he can't do what the system needs him to do if his future is locked down.

I like the idea of Agent Smith as anti-hero, and am sort of hoping for that in the next film. Or to be surprised. Which is why I like this film: unlike the first one, I had no idea what the Big Suprise was when I entered the cinema.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 15:50 (twenty-three years ago)

I like the idea of Agent Smith as anti-hero

Straight up hero, surely. (This is about the time I just need to admit I'm a Hugo Weaving fan.)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 15:54 (twenty-three years ago)

Oh I assume the takeover process is fatal. But this is a different motivation for wanting to "kill" Neo.

In the end I though poorly paced, poorly organised, little natural flow from the previous movie (starting with a dream sequence / really long flashback/flash forward was clumsy) and the ball park shifted without the average viewer being give the chance to ask why.

Pete (Pete), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 15:55 (twenty-three years ago)

What does the red pill do, anyway, it prepares your body for the shock of not being in the matrix or summat right? So why does the Oracle need it, if she's a computer program?

ALSO!@!!! Totally Agreed re: Agent Smith being the most interesting. SO - fans of the interesting, tell me this: why duz he say "to himself", upon replicating thee guy w/the phone (who we assume he has "taken over" somehow in Zion later?) "It happened just like before." "Well, ALMOST." * grins wickedly *

I thought it wasn't great. Yeah yeah we get another one soon to explane questionZ0r but eh? Are you kidding?? We are talking about THIS ONE! Thee problem was no suspense. In the first one we get Mr. Anderson crouching in his cubicle, or the crew of the Nebuchadnezzar trying not to sneeze, classic farce stuff: I hope they won't find me/us! Nothing like that here.

I think it would be funny if Neo had to go back to thee Matrix every once in awhile to call his Mom. I mean WTF, he doesn't care at all?? Maybe it's all a game, but that's still a real humang being "playing the part" of his mummy!

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 15:57 (twenty-three years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.