never read her before but the article julio linked to above is witless eg "Radiohead and Björk, Ross's favourite examples from the million-selling end of the avant garde, are by no means the twin apexes of intelligent rock music."
― Ward Fowler, Friday, 21 May 2010 15:49 (sixteen years ago)
'Pretty much anything' but this, then?
Would look at anything else of hers, as long as its not about classical or jazz - I am open minded like that. xp
― xyzzzz__, Friday, 21 May 2010 15:51 (sixteen years ago)
Cultural journalists (if that's what she is) and non-music arts critics generally know nothing about classical or jazz or music in general
― Wenlock & Mandelson (Tom D.), Friday, 21 May 2010 15:54 (sixteen years ago)
I wasn't reading her opinion as if she was trying to be an expert on a genre I liked, tbf, but I always enjoy her writing. Would commission.
― when the fertilizer hits the ventilator (suzy), Friday, 21 May 2010 16:02 (sixteen years ago)
to be fair, Labour could do worse than rebrand themselves Forgiveness Political Party
― Dan, Dan, DARRAGH (acoleuthic), Friday, 21 May 2010 16:05 (sixteen years ago)
Sure. She made it clear that she was not an expert and I like that but I guess whenever I glance over a writer going on a jazz/classical excursion it is frustrating to latch onto and look for what you know and like in it, rather than have a go at different types of music for the unique properties it might offer.
― xyzzzz__, Friday, 21 May 2010 16:17 (sixteen years ago)
Lost a lot of time to this http://random-guardian.appspot.com/
― stet, Friday, 21 May 2010 18:16 (sixteen years ago)
tried it and got the pavement article...
― koogs, Friday, 21 May 2010 19:56 (sixteen years ago)
god that costner article is appalling....like she never once proves his motives are bad or wrong. i read that he has invested about 24m in this project, even if it is a heap of bollocks at least he's trying. also the southerners/incest line in it is just jan moir level.
― I see what this is (Local Garda), Saturday, 22 May 2010 10:38 (sixteen years ago)
This is good: http://guardian.gyford.com
― James Mitchell, Wednesday, 9 June 2010 11:40 (sixteen years ago)
ok wtf at this
http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/lostinshowbiz/2010/jun/17/jordan-alex-reid-wedding
this column is bad enuf when marina hyde is doing it
idk why the guardian is doing lame whogivesashit.jpg celebrity gossip anyway
also, the gingham shirt done up to the top button... im just not seeing it
― ultra nate dogg (history mayne), Friday, 18 June 2010 10:03 (sixteen years ago)
Well it's either that or repping for a Tory government so they might as well become Now
― Higuain in the Membrane (Noodle Vague), Friday, 18 June 2010 10:06 (sixteen years ago)
you don't? seriously???
― progressive cuts (Tracer Hand), Friday, 18 June 2010 10:24 (sixteen years ago)
It is a fair question really. How much impact do you think the Graun's Jordan coverage has on its circulation?
― Higuain in the Membrane (Noodle Vague), Friday, 18 June 2010 10:26 (sixteen years ago)
very little
pageviews, quite a lot
― progressive cuts (Tracer Hand), Friday, 18 June 2010 10:29 (sixteen years ago)
http://guardian.gyford.com/
i REALLY like this
i dunno. the guardian's celeb coverage takes a sort-of-not-really-but-really "we're above all this" tone (even though they aren't) which i doubt is that appealing to people googling "jordan". or are its core readers just getting thicker? ah, now i see it.
― ultra nate dogg (history mayne), Friday, 18 June 2010 10:42 (sixteen years ago)
people googling 'jordan' aren't rly going to notice an 'above all this tone'?
― Remember when Mr Banhart was a replicant? (darraghmac), Friday, 18 June 2010 10:51 (sixteen years ago)
"above all, tits" tone
― Higuain in the Membrane (Noodle Vague), Friday, 18 June 2010 10:53 (sixteen years ago)
you're thinking of img search, really
― Remember when Mr Banhart was a replicant? (darraghmac), Friday, 18 June 2010 10:55 (sixteen years ago)
http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/blog/2010/jul/02/welcome-to-guardian-co-uk-for-former-times-readers
This is very possibly the smuggest thing I have ever read.
― Vulvuzela (Matt DC), Monday, 5 July 2010 13:08 (sixteen years ago)
News blog – most commented
1. 1. Lady Gaga tops 10m Facebook fans (44)
― nakhchivan, Monday, 5 July 2010 13:09 (sixteen years ago)
As this is a sales pitch, I've been asked to mention that the new Oxford Book of Parodies says I'm one of Britain's best parodists, dead or alive. You can work out which.
jesus effing christ
― j/k lol simmons (history mayne), Monday, 5 July 2010 13:12 (sixteen years ago)
oh god just stopped reading now
― j/k lol simmons (history mayne), Monday, 5 July 2010 13:13 (sixteen years ago)
if i were an ex-times reader i'd probably be getting out my bank card
£2 a week isn't *that* much
― j/k lol simmons (history mayne), Monday, 5 July 2010 13:15 (sixteen years ago)
yeah
the times is shit tho
disregarding all the terrible blogs (easily done), the guardian website is pretty good
― nakhchivan, Monday, 5 July 2010 13:21 (sixteen years ago)
If I were a Times reader I'd be jumping ship to the Telegraph website really.
― Vulvuzela (Matt DC), Monday, 5 July 2010 13:24 (sixteen years ago)
We've never quite understood your fascination with Giles Coren, especially as his much more talented sister Victoria writes for us twice (yes twice) a week, but each to their own
― Ismael Klata, Monday, 5 July 2010 13:28 (sixteen years ago)
that's probably true
they both appear to be fairly dreadful ppl
― nakhchivan, Monday, 5 July 2010 13:35 (sixteen years ago)
lol ismael
we don't really "get" why you plebs like jon gaunt, especially as we have richard littlejohn
― j/k lol simmons (history mayne), Monday, 5 July 2010 13:37 (sixteen years ago)
Victoria *is* nicer - friend has known her since childhood, friend is not fan of brother.
― Vuvuzilla (suzy), Monday, 5 July 2010 13:40 (sixteen years ago)
Victoria's pretty fucking obnoxious in her own right. And Giles is a better writer. But also restaurants >>>>> poker.
― Vulvuzela (Matt DC), Monday, 5 July 2010 13:42 (sixteen years ago)
victoria is definitely the better (and more sympathetic) writer
― لوووووووووووووووووووول (lex pretend), Monday, 5 July 2010 13:53 (sixteen years ago)
though does ilx think anyone is a good writer anywhere? like even most of the mentions of marina hyde are people slagging her off
― لوووووووووووووووووووول (lex pretend), Monday, 5 July 2010 13:55 (sixteen years ago)
Marina Hyde is also kind of smug and not very funny.
― Vulvuzela (Matt DC), Monday, 5 July 2010 13:56 (sixteen years ago)
you see? sorry if you don't think marina hyde is an incredible writer then we have very different ideas of what good writing is.
― لوووووووووووووووووووول (lex pretend), Monday, 5 July 2010 13:57 (sixteen years ago)
I think we evidently have very different ideas of what "incredible writing" is.
― Vulvuzela (Matt DC), Monday, 5 July 2010 13:59 (sixteen years ago)
yeah m hyde can def write
― nakhchivan, Monday, 5 July 2010 13:59 (sixteen years ago)
As baronet's daughters go, I'll take her over Sam Cam any day.
― Vuvuzilla (suzy), Monday, 5 July 2010 14:00 (sixteen years ago)
like not thomas de quincey level but for sure better than david brooks or shaun custis
― nakhchivan, Monday, 5 July 2010 14:00 (sixteen years ago)
You know the reaction you get with stand-up comedians? That's the reaction I get with Marina Hyde.
― Vulvuzela (Matt DC), Monday, 5 July 2010 14:00 (sixteen years ago)
^^observational comedy
― nakhchivan, Monday, 5 July 2010 14:01 (sixteen years ago)
i have even read marina hyde on f***ball, that's how much i love her writing
― لوووووووووووووووووووول (lex pretend), Monday, 5 July 2010 14:01 (sixteen years ago)
I think the answer is maybe no! I get the impression people here find the column format pretty insufferable? (I do too but I don't read a news-source so it's not really relevant)
― Gravel Puzzleworth, Monday, 5 July 2010 14:06 (sixteen years ago)
Her tone worked great for the political diaries she used to write. "Aren't these politicians ridiculous" is a lot more fun for me than "aren't these celebrities ridiculous." But maybe this is just a way of saying the better her subject matter the better she is.
― progressive cuts (Tracer Hand), Monday, 5 July 2010 14:07 (sixteen years ago)
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/jul/03/conservatives-cameron-labour-blair/print
― nakhchivan, Monday, 5 July 2010 14:08 (sixteen years ago)
There are columnists and writers I like a lot in the Guardian/Observer - David Conn, Will Hutton, Deborah Orr, David Mitchell, Nancy Banks Smith, Andrew Rawnsley has his moments.
What I don't like about Guardian columnists in general, and Marina Hyde in particular, is the combination of faux-mateyness and "we are so above this, aren't we?" Also she is NOT FUNNY, which surely is the point in the first place?
― Vulvuzela (Matt DC), Monday, 5 July 2010 14:10 (sixteen years ago)
That said I don't think I can remember an essentially frivolous Guardian column annoying me as much as this crap Philip Roth from the Independent.
― Vulvuzela (Matt DC), Monday, 5 July 2010 14:12 (sixteen years ago)
matt dc otfm
i did like marina hyde more back in the day, but seems really full of herself now. also giving a shit about celebrities/pretending to give a shit about celebrities/being ironic about giving a shit about celebrities/etc. is really something i don't give a shit about.
― j/k lol simmons (history mayne), Monday, 5 July 2010 14:12 (sixteen years ago)
Piers. Morgan.
― I am utterly and abjectly pissed off with this little lot (Tom D.), Monday, 5 July 2010 14:13 (sixteen years ago)