― miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Friday, 20 August 2004 14:58 (twenty-one years ago)
― Cathy (Cathy), Friday, 20 August 2004 15:02 (twenty-one years ago)
― g--ff (gcannon), Friday, 20 August 2004 15:05 (twenty-one years ago)
OTM.
i can't really participate in this thread objectively, as i'm an alien/aliens obsessive. but Alex, you ARE SO FUCKING WRONG!
ripley's character "humorless and wooden"? echhh. she is traumatized, she narrowly escaped being killed by a space monster. she is the only one who realizes how much of a threat the alien really represents, and she is exasperated by the marines and the company's incompetence. to her this is serious shit, the stakes are just too high if the aliens spread. and i think sigourney weaver nails this perfectly.
newt annoying? i've always thought that newt was one of the least annoying child characters in a movie like this. she doesn't even have that many lines!
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Friday, 20 August 2004 15:24 (twenty-one years ago)
btw everybody I saw Sigourney at the Belmont last year and she's still SUPREMELY BEAUTIFUL at like 56 or whatever.
― hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 20 August 2004 15:28 (twenty-one years ago)
No I'm not, actually. You're just a fanboy in denial.
she doesn't even have that many lines!
One doesn't need lots of lines to be annoying.
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 15:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 15:40 (twenty-one years ago)
why did i become a fanboy in the first place then, hmm?
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Friday, 20 August 2004 15:44 (twenty-one years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 20 August 2004 15:45 (twenty-one years ago)
― miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Friday, 20 August 2004 15:46 (twenty-one years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 20 August 2004 15:47 (twenty-one years ago)
― miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Friday, 20 August 2004 15:47 (twenty-one years ago)
― miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Friday, 20 August 2004 15:48 (twenty-one years ago)
― miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Friday, 20 August 2004 15:49 (twenty-one years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 20 August 2004 15:52 (twenty-one years ago)
― amateur!!!st, Friday, 20 August 2004 15:56 (twenty-one years ago)
― amateur!!st, Friday, 20 August 2004 15:58 (twenty-one years ago)
"But why would a space-age forklift come equipped with one?"
welding?
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Friday, 20 August 2004 15:58 (twenty-one years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 20 August 2004 16:01 (twenty-one years ago)
I was about to say! Tom, trust me, it's worth it.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 20 August 2004 16:06 (twenty-one years ago)
Perhaps, like I was, you were intrigued by the first film. Unlike me, however, your blind devotion to the promise of the first one makes you overlook the flaws of the second. ps. tiny pedantry from earlier - the new Exorcist movie is a prequel. ?
Duly noted, Stence. But why do we need one of those either?
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 16:13 (twenty-one years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 20 August 2004 16:13 (twenty-one years ago)
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Friday, 20 August 2004 16:15 (twenty-one years ago)
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Friday, 20 August 2004 16:16 (twenty-one years ago)
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Friday, 20 August 2004 16:20 (twenty-one years ago)
― rrrobyn (rrrobyn), Friday, 20 August 2004 16:24 (twenty-one years ago)
True, but von Sydow isn't playing said character. I believe the guy playing him is the advanced-Calculus genius from Eastern Europe with the fancy scarf that pals around with Robin Williams in Good Will Hunting. To which I say: why?
The Exorcist is fine where it is. Leave it there.
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 16:25 (twenty-one years ago)
― rrrobyn (rrrobyn), Friday, 20 August 2004 16:36 (twenty-one years ago)
― ())(())()()()(()(LASER)()()()LA(Z)E(R)()()()((L)()()(A)(S(E)R()()()) (ex machina, Friday, 20 August 2004 16:38 (twenty-one years ago)
because von Sydow is 80billyion years old and this is supposed to be about him as a young priest, duh!
― hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 20 August 2004 16:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 20 August 2004 16:41 (twenty-one years ago)
― TOMBOT, Friday, 20 August 2004 16:52 (twenty-one years ago)
― rrrobyn (rrrobyn), Friday, 20 August 2004 16:55 (twenty-one years ago)
― TOMBOT, Friday, 20 August 2004 16:57 (twenty-one years ago)
i do not quite understand the profound awe that blade runner inspires in so many people.
― amateur!!!st, Friday, 20 August 2004 16:57 (twenty-one years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 20 August 2004 16:58 (twenty-one years ago)
― TOMBOT, Friday, 20 August 2004 16:58 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 20 August 2004 16:59 (twenty-one years ago)
ps. in the future all ships will have flimsy subway-grate floors and people will still use those hanging lamps that mechanics use to look at your engine when the hood's up.
― hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 20 August 2004 17:02 (twenty-one years ago)
― rrrobyn (rrrobyn), Friday, 20 August 2004 17:04 (twenty-one years ago)
Weirdly enough, I've read this. And I also have nothing to add to this thread kthxbye!
― Homosexual II (Homosexual II), Friday, 20 August 2004 17:10 (twenty-one years ago)
― Homosexual II (Homosexual II), Friday, 20 August 2004 17:12 (twenty-one years ago)
― cºzen (Cozen), Friday, 20 August 2004 17:12 (twenty-one years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 20 August 2004 17:15 (twenty-one years ago)
― cºzen (Cozen), Friday, 20 August 2004 17:17 (twenty-one years ago)
― rrrobyn (rrrobyn), Friday, 20 August 2004 17:20 (twenty-one years ago)
― cºzen (Cozen), Friday, 20 August 2004 17:23 (twenty-one years ago)
― Gear! (Gear!), Friday, 20 August 2004 17:23 (twenty-one years ago)