OKCupid.com, Pt.2- Afterparty! Hotel lobby! REMIX!

Message Bookmarked

Bookmark Removed

Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (444 of them)

View Previous Page...

JOOOOOIIIIIN USSSSSSSSS!!!!!

― dog latin (dog latin), Wednesday, 9 June 2004 20:30 (twenty-two years ago)

http://www.okcupid.com/profile?tuid=8084906394157780152

this girl just messaged me, saying that i'm probably her soulmate.

― lauren (laurenp), Wednesday, 9 June 2004 20:55 (twenty-two years ago)

Perhaps she is!

― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Wednesday, 9 June 2004 20:57 (twenty-two years ago)

i'm a bit nervous that she's a "swinger."

― lauren (laurenp), Wednesday, 9 June 2004 20:58 (twenty-two years ago)

They are often fine people!

― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Wednesday, 9 June 2004 20:59 (twenty-two years ago)

http://www.gocollect.com/images/WaltDisneyArtClassics/300/41158.jpg

― RJG (RJG), Wednesday, 9 June 2004 21:03 (twenty-two years ago)

Dammit. I think I just found my soulmate but she's a) living in San Diego and b) in a relationship. Figures.

I'm spectatorr

― Aaron W (Aaron W), Thursday, 10 June 2004 02:02 (twenty-two years ago)

this girl just messaged me, saying that i'm probably her soulmate.

her boyfriend's screenname is a Get Up Kids reference. Be scared.

― miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Thursday, 10 June 2004 02:11 (twenty-two years ago)

it could be a roger bannister reference...

― CarsmileSteve (CarsmileSteve), Thursday, 10 June 2004 07:49 (twenty-two years ago)

I got a mail. I am checking it now.

― Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 10 June 2004 10:40 (twenty-two years ago)

it's taking a while. perhaps I should hit refresh.

― Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 10 June 2004 10:40 (twenty-two years ago)

it's playing hard to get.

― cozen (Cozen), Thursday, 10 June 2004 10:41 (twenty-two years ago)

it was not what I had hoped

― Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 10 June 2004 10:46 (twenty-two years ago)

sounds about right.

― mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 10 June 2004 10:49 (twenty-two years ago)

I have just joined this thing. What do I do now? I am high_heels, like the blog I never did.

― Madchen (Madchen), Thursday, 10 June 2004 13:26 (twenty-two years ago)

answer lots of dumb questions, send out lots of wooes and messages to pretty girls/handsome boys, sit back and wait. and wait...

then quit.

― Ste (Fuzzy), Thursday, 10 June 2004 13:37 (twenty-two years ago)

neither of my new girlfriends have responded to my messages :(

― ron (ron), Thursday, 10 June 2004 14:29 (twenty-two years ago)

I wish instead of "woo"ing someone you could "shark" them.

― roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Thursday, 10 June 2004 14:34 (twenty-two years ago)

I've getting mail mostly from American girls, and woos mostly from bisexual/gay guys (though there was that "Succubus" from Holland, and a couple more girls). I guess this thing is working, since most of the girls that have mailed me have sounded rather interesting (no goths, thankfully), and I've mailed them back too. I haven't answered any of the wooers, because I don't no what to say to them - "gee, thanks for the woo"? Apparently you cannot put any text with your woo; I prefer those who take the time to write something.

― Tuomas (Tuomas), Thursday, 10 June 2004 14:40 (twenty-two years ago)

Okay, I can handle this Texan chick being more intelligent, better looking, and better at sports than me - but better music taste?! That's just not fair!

― dog latin (dog latin), Thursday, 10 June 2004 14:45 (twenty-two years ago)

Honestly, I'm surprised how many mails I have received, even though I've approached only one person myself.

― Tuomas (Tuomas), Thursday, 10 June 2004 14:48 (twenty-two years ago)

Nobody likes you anymore, Tuomas.

― nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 10 June 2004 16:00 (twenty-two years ago)

[As for me the first person I bothered wooing turned out to (a) know people I know + (b) be mildly famous.]

― nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 10 June 2004 16:01 (twenty-two years ago)

524 questions answered, it's calling me selfish now, geez.

― jel -- (jel), Thursday, 10 June 2004 17:08 (twenty-two years ago)

Yes, well you could be out helping the poor children instead of arsing around answering 524 questions on the internet.

― N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 10 June 2004 17:14 (twenty-two years ago)

I suspect if someone woos you then you woo them back if you're interested and then they write you a message. It's sort of like making eye contact.

― Casuistry (Chris P), Thursday, 10 June 2004 17:16 (twenty-two years ago)

There are so many questions on there that don't have how I would answer them as one of the choices, it's really starting to piss me off.

― nickalicious (nickalicious), Thursday, 10 June 2004 17:17 (twenty-two years ago)

Whatever. rjg woo'd my crush and now they are exchanging messages. What does this say?

― Carey (Carey), Thursday, 10 June 2004 17:18 (twenty-two years ago)

There's a similar thing on my favourite dating site - a wink. You get this smiley thing. I just reply saying thanks, and being encouraging if I like their profile, or not if I don't, as I would with any message, though it gives you little to work with.

― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Thursday, 10 June 2004 17:18 (twenty-two years ago)

Regarding that questions thing, here's an example:

Honestly, which has shaped the course of world events more, love or hate?

O Love
O HATE

I want to answer this question with "greed". WTF.

― nickalicious (nickalicious), Thursday, 10 June 2004 17:29 (twenty-two years ago)

in my selfish rage, I deleted my account. Maybe I'll start again, but I dunno.

― jel -- (jel), Thursday, 10 June 2004 17:35 (twenty-two years ago)

one of my matches says that it might take a month or more for him to respond to people, and adds that more creative messages will see a more timely response. wtf? you're here for my entertainment, pal, not the other way around!

― lauren (laurenp), Thursday, 10 June 2004 17:40 (twenty-two years ago)

maybe he has to write with pen and ink responses on parchment, and said it by pigeon.

― jel -- (jel), Thursday, 10 June 2004 17:42 (twenty-two years ago)

What a prick! I still haven't responded to any of my woos or messages except those from people on ILE, so I can't really talk.

― N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 10 June 2004 17:43 (twenty-two years ago)

am making new profile now.

― jel -- (jel), Thursday, 10 June 2004 17:46 (twenty-two years ago)

I have responded to few, and had few responses. it seems the world is a snobby place.

― Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 10 June 2004 17:49 (twenty-two years ago)

I am puzzled by Jel's attempts to model himself on Sisyphus.

― N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 10 June 2004 17:51 (twenty-two years ago)

That's good, you should put that in your profile, Ronan.

― Casuistry (Chris P), Thursday, 10 June 2004 17:55 (twenty-two years ago)

I don't know, it's weary enough already, according to N.

― Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 10 June 2004 17:58 (twenty-two years ago)

I actually just meant it's sad (a little bit only) how much better than everyone else everyone else thinks they are.

― Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 10 June 2004 17:59 (twenty-two years ago)

I thought I said 'full of yourself', not weary.

― N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 10 June 2004 18:00 (twenty-two years ago)

Does 'weary' mean something else in Ireland?

― N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 10 June 2004 18:00 (twenty-two years ago)

I think you might have said "weary", though that may have been gareth, on AIM. I apologise if it wasn't you.

― Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 10 June 2004 18:01 (twenty-two years ago)

missing from the first list:

Matos W.K.: spongiex75
Ken Chu: kenjuggle
TOMBOT: tombot
Michael Daddino: JohnAgar
Nickalicious: nickalicious
Trayce: trayceee

― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Thursday, 10 June 2004 18:05 (twenty-two years ago)

I just logged in to find Todd Swiss's picture on the front page!

― Matt DC (Matt DC), Thursday, 10 June 2004 18:32 (twenty-two years ago)

i am now flyingcar

― jel -- (jel), Thursday, 10 June 2004 18:34 (twenty-two years ago)

yes, i did put a new photo up, now its off the front page though, boo for me

― todd swiss (eliti), Thursday, 10 June 2004 19:56 (twenty-two years ago)

My matches with the new lists:
Matos 79% (given that he is straight, this is rather high, I'd have thought)
Ken 74% and only 70% friend - this seems low, since we are friends.
Tombot 68%
Michael D 72% (too low, surely?)
Nickalicious 83% (that's more like it)
Trayce 85% (hurrah!)

― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Thursday, 10 June 2004 20:17 (twenty-two years ago)

perhaps I should use all my extra woos to woo-stalk someone.

― got you all in check (teeny), Thursday, 10 June 2004 20:33 (twenty-two years ago)

Martin, I decided to reanswer the questions in a bit more honest way, and now you're a 95% match for me! I doubt anyone can come up with a higher number than that.

(My username is still "lixenixen", if you want to check it the other way around.)

― Tuomas (Tuomas), Thursday, 10 June 2004 20:59 (twenty-two years ago)

Skipping 344 messages at this point... Click here if you want to load them all.

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.