DEM not gonna CON dis NATION: Rolling UK politics in the short-lived Cleggeron era

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (7011 of them)

oh great, xp.

caek, Wednesday, 12 May 2010 12:49 (sixteen years ago)

I don't think there is any moral ground for them to insist on a fixed term and those margins when their authority is this shaky - it would feel more legitimate after a normal result.

sharia twain (suzy), Wednesday, 12 May 2010 12:50 (sixteen years ago)

yeah, fixed terms and enhanced majorities is the kind of thing you should have a much, much more explicit mandate for.

caek, Wednesday, 12 May 2010 12:53 (sixteen years ago)

xp to myself
And then read this published in March. Sums up the reasons for it happening and the reasons it might not work quite well. (PDF file alert)
http://www.centreforum.org/assets/pubs/a-lib-con-trick.pdf

Ned Trifle II, Wednesday, 12 May 2010 12:53 (sixteen years ago)

Iain Duncan Smith! It's like they're playing the worst game of Fantasy Football ever.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 12 May 2010 13:01 (sixteen years ago)

was in parliament working for the LDs when the orange book came out, so i've read it. will read that pdf on the train home.

but my point was that, whatever clegg's natural affinities are (and i don't disagree that they are more con than labour), with labour showing zero flexibility and LD + lab + sdlp still being short of a majority, i don't think his personal preferences came into it.

caek, Wednesday, 12 May 2010 13:03 (sixteen years ago)

Where can find more on this 55% for No Confid motion / four-year fixed term stuff? Because if that's passed (and even if it's a free vote and half the LDs vote against it, it'll pass), we need to wheel Rifkind out again to see if he'd like to reframe his Mugabe comments of Monday. Truly outrageous.

Michael Jones, Wednesday, 12 May 2010 13:05 (sixteen years ago)

Mr Hague told BBC Radio 4's Today programme a five-year fixed-term parliament had been introduced to help guarantee stability: "We have done everything possible to lock ourselves together to avoid the dangers of instability and haggling that are of course present in any hung parliament."

The BBC has learned that the only way to remove a government before the five years is up would be in a vote of confidence backed by 55% of MPs. Current rules are that the votes of 50% of MPs, plus one, can remove a government.

is all i've seen.

caek, Wednesday, 12 May 2010 13:06 (sixteen years ago)

mugabe endorsed the tories, game recognize game.

joe, Wednesday, 12 May 2010 13:07 (sixteen years ago)

Fixed term parliament is the worst thing about it.

― Matt DC, Wednesday, May 12, 2010 1:56 PM (11 minutes ago) Bookmark

otm

Greatest contributor: (history mayne), Wednesday, 12 May 2010 13:07 (sixteen years ago)

55% would require every single LibDem to rebel plus a handful of Tories as well, right? If that goes ahead we are actually stuck with them for five years.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 12 May 2010 13:09 (sixteen years ago)

what if the lib dems refused to pass a tory budget? it wouldn't meet the new no confidence rules, but if you can't pass a budget you can't govern. they'd be forced to have an election anyway, right?

joe, Wednesday, 12 May 2010 13:11 (sixteen years ago)

WHAT THE FUCK

The Clegg Effect (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 12 May 2010 13:12 (sixteen years ago)

Still sounding too ridiculous that they would get such a major reform through without anyone having mentioned it before the election or anything. Tell me there is some way that this might not happen. Or at the very least that people will be outrageously pissed off and make it known in some exciting way.

xylyl syzygy (a passing spacecadet), Wednesday, 12 May 2010 13:15 (sixteen years ago)

i can see the logic of fixed-term parliaments in theory, but introducing FIVE-year terms with such a weak mandate is some bullshit

لوووووووووووووووووووول (lex pretend), Wednesday, 12 May 2010 13:15 (sixteen years ago)

they're about to make a statement together which this will presumably be in

caek, Wednesday, 12 May 2010 13:16 (sixteen years ago)

also, this purports to be the lib-con agreement http://liberalconspiracy.org/2010/05/12/exclusive-was-this-the-con-lib-agreement/

لوووووووووووووووووووول (lex pretend), Wednesday, 12 May 2010 13:16 (sixteen years ago)

And there it is. Christ, needs to be a front-page splash in Mirror, Graun, Indie, whoever else will fucking listen... They have changed the bloody rules because they fell short of the winning post. You can remain in government with 293 seats, effectively.

Michael Jones, Wednesday, 12 May 2010 13:21 (sixteen years ago)

theresa may also women's minister wonder why

conrad, Wednesday, 12 May 2010 13:22 (sixteen years ago)

"freedom, fairness and responsibility"

sounds like one and a half a piece

conrad, Wednesday, 12 May 2010 13:23 (sixteen years ago)

NEEDS ODD COUPLE THEME INTRO MUSIC

tweedledee and tweedledem (suzy), Wednesday, 12 May 2010 13:24 (sixteen years ago)

gl'uk

Black IP's (darraghmac), Wednesday, 12 May 2010 13:24 (sixteen years ago)

You can remain in government with 293 seats, effectively.

doesn't this benefit the opposition too tho, potentially?

mdskltr (blueski), Wednesday, 12 May 2010 13:24 (sixteen years ago)

ironically, nagl uk

Black IP's (darraghmac), Wednesday, 12 May 2010 13:25 (sixteen years ago)

NEEDS ODD COUPLE THEME INTRO MUSIC

― tweedledee and tweedledem (suzy), Wednesday, 12 May 2010 13:24 (28 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

Nah, use the "Terry and June" one.

Mark G, Wednesday, 12 May 2010 13:25 (sixteen years ago)

use THE HORST WESSEL SONG more like

Greatest contributor: (history mayne), Wednesday, 12 May 2010 13:26 (sixteen years ago)

"What'll I do...when you...are gone away...and I...am blue, what'll I do..."

mdskltr (blueski), Wednesday, 12 May 2010 13:26 (sixteen years ago)

Next poll?

Mark G, Wednesday, 12 May 2010 13:27 (sixteen years ago)

"It's cold outside, there's no kind of atmosphere..."

mdskltr (blueski), Wednesday, 12 May 2010 13:27 (sixteen years ago)

Are they still campaigning? What is this risible shit?

The Clegg Effect (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 12 May 2010 13:29 (sixteen years ago)

god bless hooky street

conrad, Wednesday, 12 May 2010 13:30 (sixteen years ago)

"Everybody needs good neighbours, with a little understanding, you can find the perfect blend..."

James Mitchell, Wednesday, 12 May 2010 13:32 (sixteen years ago)

"We have agreed to establish a commission to consider the ‘West Lothian question’."
oh godddddd

stet, Wednesday, 12 May 2010 13:33 (sixteen years ago)

These press questions are total softballs!!!

The Clegg Effect (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 12 May 2010 13:34 (sixteen years ago)

any sign of a proper inquiry on iraq?

Black IP's (darraghmac), Wednesday, 12 May 2010 13:34 (sixteen years ago)

god bless hooky street

no inheritance tax, no STV
no money back, no guarantee?

xylyl syzygy (a passing spacecadet), Wednesday, 12 May 2010 13:35 (sixteen years ago)

Good election to lose ha fucking ha

Coalition (Remix) (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 12 May 2010 13:36 (sixteen years ago)

Black or White?
Rich or Poor?

Mark G, Wednesday, 12 May 2010 13:36 (sixteen years ago)

like everything in section 10 except Mail-pleasing "mechanism to prevent proliferation of criminal offences"

stet, Wednesday, 12 May 2010 13:36 (sixteen years ago)

(two questions from the Bullingdon club application form)

xpost Myself!

Mark G, Wednesday, 12 May 2010 13:37 (sixteen years ago)

so weird

conrad, Wednesday, 12 May 2010 13:37 (sixteen years ago)

xxxp We'll cut public services by the score!

he speak the frenche as the Frenches himselves (snoball), Wednesday, 12 May 2010 13:37 (sixteen years ago)

itv in with the first question

stet, Wednesday, 12 May 2010 13:39 (sixteen years ago)

C4 surely? It was Gary Gibbon.

tweedledee and tweedledem (suzy), Wednesday, 12 May 2010 13:39 (sixteen years ago)

"new politics" such a fucking meaningless soundbite

لوووووووووووووووووووول (lex pretend), Wednesday, 12 May 2010 13:40 (sixteen years ago)

first actual question i mean, not a "so will you be awesome?". probably because they're pissed off that they're not getting ad reform out of ofcom

stet, Wednesday, 12 May 2010 13:40 (sixteen years ago)

The parties will bring forward early legislation to introduce a power of recall, allowing voters to force a by-election where an MP was found to have engaged in serious wrongdoing and having had a petition calling for a by-election signed by 10% of his or her constituents.

*cough* back door General Election *cough*

this skit is ba-na-nas (onimo), Wednesday, 12 May 2010 13:40 (sixteen years ago)

*cough*Clegg in trouble then*cough*

Coalition (Remix) (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 12 May 2010 13:41 (sixteen years ago)

10% of constituents? So that's about a fifth of voters in most seats. The larks that could cause, especially on a tiny majority like this.

stet, Wednesday, 12 May 2010 13:45 (sixteen years ago)

This 55% thing is making my head explode.

These laughing buffoons in the press gallery are fucking contemptible.

The Clegg Effect (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 12 May 2010 13:45 (sixteen years ago)


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.