Yeah there were plenty of big pay-off lines that Smith just managed to get a piece of rather than hit square on the nose. The one that sticks out for me is "Oh Winston, you beauty!" which he just sort of bellows. I have to admit missing Tennant at that point. He would have allowed the new facts to settle in, eyes growing wider, and whispered it.
― Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 10:21 (sixteen years ago)
"It also helps that people aren't looking to the Doctor as some kind of saviour who will inevitably turn up and make everything okay."
although the previous ep had already re-established the royalty know who the doctor are bit.
― Britain's Obtusest Shepherd (Alan), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 10:30 (sixteen years ago)
Yeah there were plenty of big pay-off lines that Smith just managed to get a piece of rather than hit square on the nose. The one that sticks out for me is "Oh Winston, you beauty!" which he just sort of bellows. I have to admit missing Tennant at that point.
Too much of a Tennant line for me, that one. Part of the problem with episiodes like this is that the writers are writing in the dark a bit and are still have the last Doctor in mind quite a lot. You'd expect Smith's Doctor to come out a lot more in the Moffatt episodes and he's already doing that. The early Tennant episodes suffered from this quite a bit too, in that he still felt a bit not-quite-Ecclestone.
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 10:45 (sixteen years ago)
yeah thought of Tennant too re 'you byowty'
if Moffat going to get thru a whole series without anyone actually getting killed I wonder. surely he has to cave in soon. the odd thing about the Angels is that they have this angry demonic face when attacking but they're not actually killing or eating anyone (i can't actually remember what they get out of sending people back in time, some weird energy buzz?.
silly but what if the Doctor being not in his usual reality explained why he wasn't around for Torchwood: Children Of Earth lol (doesn't really make sense but)
― mdskltr (blueski), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 11:09 (sixteen years ago)
Perhaps this episode was shot earlier than the previous one, because his performance seemed much less confident.
Yeah, they shot episodes 2 through 4 or 5 before they shot the first one so he would have a good grasp on what he was doing when he debuted.
― Gee, Officer (Gukbe), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 11:12 (sixteen years ago)
Seems to have a catchphrase already, though: something like "Hah-harhhhhhh!" He's said it every episode.
― Chuck_Tatum, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 11:29 (sixteen years ago)
"if Moffat going to get thru a whole series without anyone actually getting killed I wonder"
well ppl died in the Gatiss ep (well 2 guards on screen, and radio operator's husband/boyf), or do you just mean Moff's own stories?
― Britain's Obtusest Shepherd (Alan), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 11:31 (sixteen years ago)
just his own yes. he is writing the next two right? the ordering of all this seems strange on that basis. after Daleks and WAs so early what's left for the 2nd half of the series? oh yeah, Silurians and Cybermen, and that deadly monster Van Gogh.
― mdskltr (blueski), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 11:39 (sixteen years ago)
I've been sort of expecting MORE DALEKS as the WWII was just a way to get the 'but how did...' stuff out of the way for a big story, but with any luck it's actually a way of putting off a big dalek story til next year.
― Britain's Obtusest Shepherd (Alan), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 11:49 (sixteen years ago)
need multicoloured collectable daleks at start of series rather than end of series, as any BBC Worldwide merchandiser kno
― Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 12:56 (sixteen years ago)
Don't think they need the crack in time as an excuse to bring back the Cybermen, given that the original Mondas Cyberman are presumably still around somewhere?
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 13:00 (sixteen years ago)
don't go there, sister. (here be raston warrior robots)
― Britain's Obtusest Shepherd (Alan), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 13:01 (sixteen years ago)
wish they would write out RTD's shite clompy Cybermen and their shite parallel universe and their shite fake Davros in favor of OG spooky Cybermen, but we already saw clompy cybertools in the end-of-ep-1 trailer.
SBed Mrs Chuck btw.
― longer lasting, thicker electrons (sic), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 13:46 (sixteen years ago)
Female viewers: Oh, my womanly intuition allows me to notice that Amy's own womanly intuition has picked up on the distress of the lady communications officer.
Male viewers: ARE THEY GOING TO LEZ UP?
They had mobile phones with colour screens and hi-res cameras and Facebook on 'em in the '90s round your way?
It could be that it's a '90s universe where they'd been stealing the technology from another, more advanced universe, or I could be getting my SF shows mixed up.
― Daleks in NYC (Leee), Thursday, 22 April 2010 01:26 (sixteen years ago)
The bit of Cyberman preview they showed looked as though it was in Stonehenge> I'm guessing there'll be some sort of Cybermen as Knights of the Round Table thing.
― Attention please, a child has been lost in the tunnel of goats. (James Morrison), Thursday, 22 April 2010 02:08 (sixteen years ago)
Silver Nemesis 2?
― JimD, Thursday, 22 April 2010 07:08 (sixteen years ago)
Also Amy fending one off with a flaming torch suggests low-tech.
― BTW, I'm frightfully middle-class (chap), Thursday, 22 April 2010 08:04 (sixteen years ago)
I've only just watched the Victory of the Daleks episode. Yeah, I thought Mark Gattis' shouty script was more suited to David "YOU BEAUTYYYY-AH!" Tennant, and the RTD era in general. It was all a bit breathlessly crash-bang-wallop, though I don't think Tennant could've pulled off holding the daleks at bay with a Jammie Dodger quite as well as Smith managed.
I loved the idea of the daleks being used as a WWII war machine, pity we never got a shot of them being used in a battle or anything but, hey, budget cuts.
Looking forward to the rest of the series, the episode that's intriguing me most of all atm is:
BIG SPOILER DELETED
― New Hors d'œuvre (DavidM), Thursday, 22 April 2010 08:07 (sixteen years ago)
uh please don't do that here
― longer lasting, thicker electrons (sic), Thursday, 22 April 2010 09:07 (sixteen years ago)
Deleted the spoiler, people can click the link if they want to know.
― Matt DC, Thursday, 22 April 2010 09:09 (sixteen years ago)
Too late, I saw it, need some sort of fiendish alien mind eraser to forget it now
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Thursday, 22 April 2010 09:10 (sixteen years ago)
Episode 11 sounds like it'll bring the lolz though.
― Matt DC, Thursday, 22 April 2010 09:13 (sixteen years ago)
sadface @ spoiler
― the big pink suede panda bear hurts (ledge), Thursday, 22 April 2010 09:22 (sixteen years ago)
Best bit on that Radio Times link is where someone complains that Amy Pond saying "Oi! Churchill" is "not very respectful".
― ithappens, Thursday, 22 April 2010 10:35 (sixteen years ago)
Matt DC, a big fan of James Corden ;-)
i've no idea what that spoiler was - even after following the link :-(
― Britain's Obtusest Shepherd (Alan), Thursday, 22 April 2010 11:21 (sixteen years ago)
It was the synopsis of episode 7 that Steven Moffat gave to the Radio Times to publish. Not exactly a spoiler, unless you want to go into each episode knowing nothing (good luck with that).
― New Hors d'œuvre (DavidM), Thursday, 22 April 2010 11:31 (sixteen years ago)
I'm guessing it's a good thing that I don't know who James Corden is.
― ô_o (Nicole), Thursday, 22 April 2010 13:10 (sixteen years ago)
You do: he is the fat guy in The History Boys.
― yes we kenya (suzy), Thursday, 22 April 2010 13:12 (sixteen years ago)
Amy Pond saying "Oi! Churchill" is "not very respectful"
It's true though. I dunno - out of nowhere it's like Amy turned into some kind of bantering lager lout.
― Tracer Hand, Thursday, 22 April 2010 13:54 (sixteen years ago)
Car insurance reference?
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Thursday, 22 April 2010 13:59 (sixteen years ago)
Hah, didn't get that but it's totally obvious.
― Matt DC, Thursday, 22 April 2010 14:02 (sixteen years ago)
next season, an adventure with Admiral Nelson is a dead cert now.
― Britain's Obtusest Shepherd (Alan), Thursday, 22 April 2010 14:32 (sixteen years ago)
the final regeneration
http://retroyakking.today.com/files/2009/01/aleksandr_the_meerkat.jpg
― mdskltr (blueski), Thursday, 22 April 2010 14:43 (sixteen years ago)
out of nowhere it's like Amy turned into some kind of bantering lager lout.
You'd expect a stripper to be a bit more comely and reserved.
― broad layering (onimo), Thursday, 22 April 2010 14:45 (sixteen years ago)
she doesn't strip, just kisses
― mdskltr (blueski), Thursday, 22 April 2010 14:46 (sixteen years ago)
all i expected is for her to be sort of the same person she was in the previous two episodes!
― Tracer Hand, Thursday, 22 April 2010 14:47 (sixteen years ago)
Maybe was a wee bit shy for a week or two as she's new to all this timey wimey malarkey and she's letting her true self come through now?
― broad layering (onimo), Thursday, 22 April 2010 14:51 (sixteen years ago)
I still haven't got a handle on any kind of definable personality for her.
― Matt DC, Thursday, 22 April 2010 15:35 (sixteen years ago)
Hey, she may have felt a bit self-conscious in prior episodes, what with gallivanting around in nought but her nightie.
― Daleks in NYC (Leee), Thursday, 22 April 2010 21:10 (sixteen years ago)
honestly i didn't have a problem with her in the episode, but if in fact that episode was meant for Tennant/Donna, that would make a lot of sense
sure she does
― Nhex, Thursday, 22 April 2010 21:14 (sixteen years ago)
Not exactly a spoiler, unless you want to go into each episode knowing nothing (good luck with that).
Thanks!
― longer lasting, thicker electrons (sic), Thursday, 22 April 2010 23:20 (sixteen years ago)
if in fact that episode was meant for Tennant/Donna, that would make a lot of sense
ooh that's right, RTD chucked this episode and went with "Fires of Pompeii" instead. I thought Amy felt off in this episode, that would explain it.
Speaking of filming order upthread, this upcoming two-parter was the first thing they filmed. It'll be interesting to see how everyone comes off.
― the international mooncake trade (reddening), Friday, 23 April 2010 01:50 (sixteen years ago)
Interesting. Definitely preferred Pompeii, if for no other reason but for that conversation at the end with Donna about fixed events and when it's okay to change history, something that's been basically ignored since the reboot started w/the exception of "Father's Day".
Btw, I knew practically nothing about this season until I saw the bits in the teaser after the first episode, so I'm still pretty in the dark - definitely appreciate keeping the spoiler talk out.
― Nhex, Friday, 23 April 2010 02:06 (sixteen years ago)
This episode and the last one have covered that ground a bit as well. Think Smith's Doctor will be a lot less cavalier about messing with things than Tennant's was.
Thought the Pompeii one was ropey, much preferred this one. Don't understand why Gatiss seemingly never uses Doctor Who to indulge his really dark side though.
― Matt DC, Friday, 23 April 2010 15:23 (sixteen years ago)
Still, the opening few episodes are always pretty lightweight, we're approaching the point where things should get really good now.
Like...scary death angel statue good?
― kissogram powers (Abbott), Friday, 23 April 2010 15:25 (sixteen years ago)
("Yes, Abboitt." "ok thx.")
(^^^me talking to my animus what is named "abboitt," pretty stupid name but what can a lady do.)
― kissogram powers (Abbott), Friday, 23 April 2010 15:26 (sixteen years ago)
Not really looking forward to more River Song tbh. If she were just a shade less smug I wouldn't mind her.
― ô_o (Nicole), Friday, 23 April 2010 15:45 (sixteen years ago)
Liked River Song, and actually thought she'd make a good female Doctor. (Initially, I thought the twist was that she was a future regeneration -- has this plot ever been done?)
― Chuck_Tatum, Friday, 23 April 2010 16:02 (sixteen years ago)