South Park episode on Facebook that just aired yesterday: http://www.southparkstudios.com/episodes/267112
― ksh, Thursday, 8 April 2010 13:13 (sixteen years ago)
Oh boy, I wasn't sure to post this here or in the "list and define savages" thread
some background:a random chick liked my friend's status, so i started a conversation:
http://imm.io/jou
immediately after this i added her. she accepted, and i commented on the blurb in her newsfeed about "Stephanie and David are now friends":
http://imm.io/jow
then she sent me this message:http://imm.io/joz
― Cunga, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 23:49 (sixteen years ago)
some background:a random chick liked my friend's status, so i started a conversation:http://i42.tinypic.com/bhdq9d.jpg
immediately after this i added her. she accepted, and i commented on the blurb in her newsfeed about "Stephanie and David are now friends":http://i40.tinypic.com/33fessw.jpg
then she sent me this message:http://i40.tinypic.com/nlv7nl.jpg
― Cunga, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 23:52 (sixteen years ago)
http://i41.tinypic.com/w5o4z.jpg
― Cunga, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 23:56 (sixteen years ago)
hahahaha omg
brilliantly revealed btw, love the image-free first post
― pretty girl, filking a clown (acoleuthic), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 23:59 (sixteen years ago)
xpost. unbelievably, she gave him a nice reply back
http://i44.tinypic.com/16bafrc.jpg
and he answered with this:
http://i44.tinypic.com/14jz3nk.jpg
― Cunga, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 00:01 (sixteen years ago)
neil strauss has so goddamn much to answer for
― pretty girl, filking a clown (acoleuthic), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 00:05 (sixteen years ago)
I left out this winner of a quote(s):
additional info:her statuses are about her falling for tools and dumb guys who treat her like shit, so she's probably not a real winner herself. but i also think she's desperate/dumb enough to fuck the guy (me) from this scenario.
...
how the fuck do you convince a girl you're not creepy anyway? it seems like anything else i would have said could have been taken as creepy.
― Cunga, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 00:12 (sixteen years ago)
Can somebody help me out here? Is 14,000 a lot of friends for a company/organisation to have on Facebook? Need some idea of the numbers different companies can attract.ta
― Pete W, Friday, 16 April 2010 15:12 (sixteen years ago)
that's a lot ime, unless we're talking coke or something?
― just darraghmac tbh (darraghmac), Friday, 16 April 2010 15:14 (sixteen years ago)
It's the PFA.
― Pete W, Friday, 16 April 2010 15:15 (sixteen years ago)
more people need to gawp at those messages/posts Cunga has kindly relayed to us
― maybe rabbits feel the need to play up their 'lynchian' qualities (acoleuthic), Friday, 16 April 2010 15:16 (sixteen years ago)
really depends on the size/scope/appeal of the company - thats a good number for a small business - 10k is a significant milestone as facebook offers some pro features at that point
― ice cr?m, Friday, 16 April 2010 15:17 (sixteen years ago)
lol coke has 5m+
well suuure, if you want to offer popularity as some sort of indicator of success.
me and TK red lemonade know better
― just darraghmac tbh (darraghmac), Friday, 16 April 2010 15:19 (sixteen years ago)
The thing with Coke, though, is that most people are probably fans of the PRODUCT more so than the COMPANY -- though in some cases it's probably hard to separate the two.
― HOOS zing-steen (jaymc), Friday, 16 April 2010 15:22 (sixteen years ago)
<3 coke the company, their accounts rock
― just darraghmac tbh (darraghmac), Friday, 16 April 2010 15:22 (sixteen years ago)
supply chain is like WHOA
― ice cr?m, Friday, 16 April 2010 15:24 (sixteen years ago)
was looking at their org chart lately, ws that silo look they rockin
― just darraghmac tbh (darraghmac), Friday, 16 April 2010 15:26 (sixteen years ago)
UPDATESSSSSSSS
http://i41.tinypic.com/30sep12.jpg
― Cunga, Friday, 16 April 2010 19:50 (sixteen years ago)
http://i42.tinypic.com/2iav3bn.jpg
UNBELIEVABLE.
http://i43.tinypic.com/2yk1fs7.jpg
― Cunga, Friday, 16 April 2010 19:55 (sixteen years ago)
WELL, the date went alright i think. i had a great time, and i thought she did, too. but then when i said "we should do this again!" there was slight resignation in her voice with "oh, yea." i'm really fucking bad at reading social situations, so i'm not sure if i misread her having fun or if it was the way she said "oh, yea" that i missed.
i'd say there's a 30% chance of a second date. time will tell.
one time i had an impulse to go into the most embarrassing store i knew and buy the most embarrassing shirt i could find. hence the twilight shirt from hot topic.
and i wore a polar bear shirt instead. same vein, but less gay. i'm not convinced the clothes had much to do with it. we talked about religion, politics, and my complete sexual history. and most of those topics were her idea. she'd asking something, i'd say a little about a given topic, then wait for a response to make sure i hadn't gone too far. sure enough, she was playing right along with the conversation! i really don't know why she didn't want a second date; i'm trying really hard to think if it was something i did.
― Cunga, Friday, 16 April 2010 19:58 (sixteen years ago)
just a lil dude thinkin too much baout things
― all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Friday, 16 April 2010 20:01 (sixteen years ago)
hang on, wha-
if she's the sort of chick who bought his BS, she ain't the sort of chick worth dating
― maybe rabbits feel the need to play up their 'lynchian' qualities (acoleuthic), Friday, 16 April 2010 20:04 (sixteen years ago)
unless you're this guy and in it for the stats :(
He came thisclose to wearing a Twilight shirt on the date. I am tempted to post the picture.
― Cunga, Friday, 16 April 2010 20:07 (sixteen years ago)
not heard it called that before
xpost
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Friday, 16 April 2010 20:07 (sixteen years ago)
― Cunga, Friday, 16 April 2010 20:10 (sixteen years ago)
ok are you getting this all from a) 4chan or b) somethingawful
― maybe rabbits feel the need to play up their 'lynchian' qualities (acoleuthic), Friday, 16 April 2010 20:11 (sixteen years ago)
kinda confused by the concept of 'the stats' being a more likely explanation for a dude tryin to get laid than, y'know, gettin laid.
― just darraghmac tbh (darraghmac), Friday, 16 April 2010 20:13 (sixteen years ago)
oh come on it's clearly a prestige thing
― maybe rabbits feel the need to play up their 'lynchian' qualities (acoleuthic), Friday, 16 April 2010 20:15 (sixteen years ago)
also next-level black-ops creepy and i hope she realises this ASAP
marc loi-y jagger rides again
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Friday, 16 April 2010 20:19 (sixteen years ago)
Always good to abstractly defend a chick and call her "not worth dating" at the same time.
― Ponies are horse children (Abbott), Friday, 16 April 2010 20:21 (sixteen years ago)
how has marc loi not made his way to ilx yet? ilx is the #1 result for his name.
― iatee, Friday, 16 April 2010 20:21 (sixteen years ago)
Yes, I'm sure he would find us on that Google search and think 'what a welcoming community, why haven't I joined them?'
― Ponies are horse children (Abbott), Friday, 16 April 2010 20:22 (sixteen years ago)
SOrry, I'm being an unfunny wise ass.
Oh what do I know, maybe she's having fun with him - she certainly seems self-aware enough to treat the whole thing as a joke, or a game. I was just lashing out at all of this because it's so fucking obvious and lame.
― maybe rabbits feel the need to play up their 'lynchian' qualities (acoleuthic), Friday, 16 April 2010 20:26 (sixteen years ago)
Well done to everybody involved, you're sure giving us all a lot to think about!
welll I didn't quite mean 'become a regular' xp
― iatee, Friday, 16 April 2010 20:27 (sixteen years ago)
And it was a very personal 'not worth dating'. I like people to be fun, but I don't want someone who'll buy a very smarmy PUA move hook, line and sinker. Maybe this is naive of ME but this show of 'initiative' on the dude's part falls the wrong side of opportunism and the right side of plain manipulative. I don't like my women malleable.
― maybe rabbits feel the need to play up their 'lynchian' qualities (acoleuthic), Friday, 16 April 2010 20:29 (sixteen years ago)
Oh, just fucking ban me already, I've got a bad cold and I'm pissed off
― maybe rabbits feel the need to play up their 'lynchian' qualities (acoleuthic), Friday, 16 April 2010 20:30 (sixteen years ago)
Just to clarify, I found these highly amusing in a grotesque way until today's updates, where they actually had a date and he started talking about probabilities as if she was some sort of commodity. Then it became sad. The girl needs to fucking shut that wanker down.
― maybe rabbits feel the need to play up their 'lynchian' qualities (acoleuthic), Friday, 16 April 2010 20:39 (sixteen years ago)
If I were her I would totally have gone out with this guy. why because he is interesting. This is not PUA stuff iirc.
― quincie, Friday, 16 April 2010 20:52 (sixteen years ago)
Of course whether or not I'm worth dating is an open question.
― quincie, Friday, 16 April 2010 20:55 (sixteen years ago)
poll
― maybe rabbits feel the need to play up their 'lynchian' qualities (acoleuthic), Friday, 16 April 2010 20:58 (sixteen years ago)
about whether you'd have gone out with this guy, I mean
ok there's mitigation in the fact she spoke to the mutual friend first, ignore me i'm a mess
― maybe rabbits feel the need to play up their 'lynchian' qualities (acoleuthic), Friday, 16 April 2010 21:05 (sixteen years ago)
mitigation for her, i mean. and i feel bad for the 'not worth dating' line - that was hot-headed ranting and has no place on '"Can I say you're my girlfriend on Facebook?"'. dude's still deeply suspect
― maybe rabbits feel the need to play up their 'lynchian' qualities (acoleuthic), Friday, 16 April 2010 21:08 (sixteen years ago)
cruising facebook for my future wife see u in 2018 when i find some1 who doesn't laff at me
― Phoenix in Flight (Cattle Grind), Friday, 16 April 2010 21:17 (sixteen years ago)