abortion classic or dud?

I was kind of hoping she got knocked up & shilled out the $1000s to have that many really for real terminations. I would be impressed by anyone who managed to successfully get pregnant that many times in a year.

Which herbs was she taking? A lot of traditional abortifacients-tansy and pennyroyal, for example-are actually poisons that make the body so sick that it miscarries to save resources for itself. Rue and juniper are the safest, IIRC, but they are a little chancy.

i don't think she really took anything, and this says she didn't even use real blood http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yale_student_abortion_art_controversy

yeah but I'm pretty sure those statements were made under pressure by the academy - IRL she seemed like the kind of person daft enough to actually carry it out (NB I have only met her like, once or twice)

Herbs as dangerous as henbane have been used in the past for, ah, "stoppages" or "promoting menustration."

it really hits the endowment & giving rates pretty hard when one of your students is getting national news coverage for making herself bleed a lot

if we lived in a fantasy world where some scientific test existed to say that "at 16 weeks the embryo does BLANK and is ~sentient~" then we'd probably all feel a lot better about drawing some hard and fast rules about the timing of abortions. since we don't, though, the only hard and fast rules we can draw are "abortions: y/n". if you believe that a woman's right to control her body is sacrosanct (and, similarly, that ANY person's right to medical privacy is inviolable), then you circle "y" and off we go.

This is pretty much how I view it and it is why I am 100% pro-choice at any point during the pregnancy and for any reason.

That art student girl was a fucking idiot. smdh.

thought the art student project was kind of ballsy and hilarious frankly

me too kinda

cant remember if im supposed to kneejerk hate art students or kneejerk defend them tho

HAMMER4U MAX

http://www.bengreenfieldfitness.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/reflex-hammer.jpg

eh I thought that abortion arts thing had potential, but the girl was pretty stupid - really hate it when you justify doing outrageous things by saying "well I just wanted to start a discourse about aborton", artists should never talk about their own work

also caving in to the corporation means you're just not really into it

lol art-school chicks are always up to that sort of thing, chick obv didn't ACTUALLY do all that, it was a performance

if i hated shit made by ppl who were inarticulate abt their own art i dont think i would like any art at all

and if i hated artists who backed down when push came to shove i dont think i would like any art at all

I don't know. I just sorta find that kind of shock value performance art more annoying than anything else.

stando-art school bullshit shouldnt really be taken that srsly tbh, only reason there isnt a story like this every week is because they are boring, not bc they're not happening and instigating 3rd level local "controversy"

well it's probably different for you guys cause you're on the outside looking in. she just kinda gave off the vibe of a space cadet and it was kinda like really, the national media are getting their rocks off over her?

and I realize where you're coming from max but to me it was just evidence that she wasn't really committed to the idea or her art - it was kind of like, even she knew it was a half-assed idea that she pulled out of her ass cause she needed to do a senior project, and she caved immediately once they threatened to prevent her from graduating. if you really think your art is worthwhile then stand your ground imo.

also the medium of presentation was such obfuscating bullshit too, project it from a VHS tape onto four plastic sheets hung in the shape of a cube?? did you happen to take polaroids or 8mm film too?? are you going to paste the negatives onto the plastic sheets?

but yeah if I knew bernard sumner I probably wouldn't like new order so

i wish i could say this was the worst ive heard

im not really invested in defending this "as art"--just think its easy to be dismissive & jaded abt art students & "manufactured controversy"

yah Im dismissive & jaded abt nearly everything so

~would that my eyes could see again~

im dismissive and jaded abt dismissive jadedness

classic!

― as a dude (goole), Tuesday, December 2, 2008 1:44 PM (1 year ago) Bookmark Suggest

haha

all im saying is that a controversy like this just needs the right moment to go viral, there's a confluence of reasons why that story got blown up, but really it was not because it was that sensational, just because it got picked up at the right moment and carried. Sounds like a bad art project that was being lol controversial, and saying that they are ten-a-penny in art school (an atmosphere where paul mccarthy, marina abramovich etc are like old masters at this stage) is not so much jaded as taxonomic tbh. her story got picked up, was easily used to illustrate a partic. point conserves had about the insane primitivism of liberal values wrt the life of the unborn, and so it seemed obvious that once it entered into an area of discourse ie conservative blogs/news shows/chat radio etc that are not usually keeping up to date with the local art scene, that due to its novelty and, due to perspective, novel shock value, the story grew legs.

Sure the girl went back on whether or not it was real. She was just some girl with a not so great idea that got caught in a larger media whirlwind than she bargained on from the bubble of her artschool/scene and when faced with that I mean, she probably just didn't want to have to explain to her parents why the money spent ontuition was now wasted. A lot of people do just go to art school w/o any long term goals of being artists, or realise that their commitment was not what they thought it was when they were 18. Holding some girl accountable for her artistic integrity under those circumstances just seems ridic naive imo.

yeah i dont think we disagree i think u are just being meaner about it than i am

i have a lot more *baggage* in this are than u tho

booming post IKR

to clarify though, I don't really care that she went back on her stance or tried to have it both ways, it just annoyed me when people held her up as a serious or good or interesting artist or w/e given her waffling - I'm not hatin the playa I'm hatin the game

ah yeah i guess i only basically read negative cov'g of her, like either she was some kind of godless babykiller or she was a dumb art student, and i felt bad, she was just some kid who wanted 2 make art~~

anyway apparently she's getting a ph.d in performance studies @ nyu so good on her, have a nice life~

just a girl with a dream~~2 make art~~and abort her fetus

for real tho, it is. i'm going to go on in dorm-room fashion for a while, sorry

lately tho, i've been thinking that the "is it really a ~person~?" line kind of misses the point. let's say a fetus is life, of some kind. it is living tissue, and its status as potential human life differentiates it from, say, your dog, or a rare tree, or i dunno a kobe ribeye or some other kind of "valued" organic life or product-of-life.

so, then, abortion has to be viewed as, yes, some kind of killing. it is distinct from a medical procedure like getting a bunion removed or something.

the rejoinder, then, is, so what. what difference does it make? really, what different world are we in, were a woman to be refused an abortion? or to have one? which world is better or worse?

i think human agency, increased human potential, human freedom-of-action, are the closest thing we have to a measure of "absolute good" there is. and i don't think this a "matter of principle," unverifiable, i think places and times where abortions are available and being performed are better places to live for everyone. that's correlation, of course.

Aimless position "abortion = dud, the right to one = classic" makes no sense to me. by nature, we are not free. nature is not liberating, and our creator hasn't granted us anything much good (the founding fathers are wrong about this). we have had the technical expertise to reach into pretty simple but fundamental processes of reproduction for a long time, and that's good. abortion is classic! the right to have one, that is, the ability to cease to be pregnant without the state messing with you, is a secondary question, and subject to argument.

yeah that's p much what i was trying to say, booming post

i actually don't follow that post at all, not "i dont agree with it" but I could def. use a bit of clarification.

yeah same here tbh, i think i agree though?

unless i'm missing something, i think aimless just meant that no woman wants an abortion just like no woman wants a root canal. in that sense, they're not "classic" like a cold glass of lemonade on a hot day is. goole seems to be applying the "classic" label to humankind's ability to perform an abortion, humankind's willingness to make the right to abort law, and the act of undergoing the procedure itself, which is really detrimental to our effective "classic or dud?" rhetorical approach to analyzing the worthiness of things

yeah that's about it.

I agree with both of them tbh.

I recently walked one of the ppl I'm working with through the entire thing from finding out she was pregnant to picking her up after the procedure and am about to do the same with another girl this week. I can't even imagine the sort of shitstorm that would have happened in either of these two girls' lives had this not been an option for them and shudder to think of either of them trying to parent another person at this point. Classic classic classic imo.

the thread title is framed awkwardly for the reasons aimless mentions. i think it would be more accurate to say "the right to have an abortion -- classic or dud," or something similar.

i haven't read many posts on the thread, so apologies if my point has already been made 10K times (and i'm guessing it has). it's just that the framing of the thread title jumps out at me every time i see it bob to the top of the "new answers" page.

don't think it's meant to be taken literally iirc imo lmbao

i know. it just seems so strangely-worded to me.

the thread title is framed awkwardly for the reasons aimless mentions.

I miss anthony as much for the o_O thread titles he would come up with as for anything else.

Search Results

what, thats a 100 000 a tube (dan flavin and auctions) (started by Anthony Easton on board I Love Everything on May 3, 2005)

there is a risk of the iowa pork queen being run out of buisness, this made me sad, so i wrote a poem about it (started by Anthony Easton on board I Love Everything on Jun 6, 2005)

which states are part of new england (started by Anthony Easton on board I Love Everything on Jan 30, 2006)

i know this dress is ugly, but is it also conceptually brilliant (started by Anthony Easton on board I Love Everything on Feb 2, 2006)

does anyone know how gives these fuckers money (started by Anthony Easton on board I Love Everything on Feb 7, 2006)

first three posts on that flavin thread are so classic!

unless i'm missing something, i think aimless just meant that no woman wants an abortion just like no woman wants a root canal. in that sense, they're not "classic" like a cold glass of lemonade on a hot day is. goole seems to be applying the "classic" label to humankind's ability to perform an abortion, humankind's willingness to make the right to abort law, and the act of undergoing the procedure itself, which is really detrimental to our effective "classic or dud?" rhetorical approach to analyzing the worthiness of things

― iiiijjjj, Sunday, April 4, 2010 1:56 PM (1 hour ago)

yeah but (and i am about to get into some serious, never-had-an-abortion projecting here, so bear with me) i think the distinction i'm trying to make is that while sure no one likes undergoing any medical procedure, an abortion is something that a woman undergoes because [insert any reason here], just like endodontic therapy is something a patient undergoes to prevent/eliminate infection of the root canal or surrounding tissue. consensual medical procedures are remedies that are imo themselves inherently good. i don't think this was aimless's intention at all but i'm just kinda reacting to my own perception of its framing as a "necessary evil."

and yeah didn't read posts above re: framing - agree it's awkwardly worded but i think we're all on the same page

iirc imo lmbao

― iiiijjjj, Sunday, April 4, 2010 1:11 PM (5 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

laughing my booming ass off?