32.3
― quiz show flat-track bully (darraghmac), 23 February 2010 16:48 (3 weeks ago) Bookmark
30.1 :D
― DarraghmacKwacz (darraghmac), Monday, 22 March 2010 16:19 (sixteen years ago)
29.5
― kingkongvsgodzilla, Friday, April 11, 2008 3:21 PM (1 year ago) Bookmark
28.1
― kingkongvsgodzilla, Monday, 22 March 2010 16:22 (sixteen years ago)
24.7Need to get rid of belly though, too much beer and food.
― not_goodwin, Monday, 22 March 2010 16:25 (sixteen years ago)
look at that blubber fly. muscle mass plays havoc with bmi accuracy.i'm about 19 too, none of that pesky muscle to bother me. i'm sure i was perfectly healthy when i was around the 18 mark, though. but i guess that diet of chocolate and crisps w/ dip has done wonders for me.― Merdeyeux, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 19:12 (1 year ago) Permalink
i'm about 19 too, none of that pesky muscle to bother me. i'm sure i was perfectly healthy when i was around the 18 mark, though. but i guess that diet of chocolate and crisps w/ dip has done wonders for me.
― Merdeyeux, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 19:12 (1 year ago) Permalink
now 20.8. Most of that 1.8 in the belly. :'(
― FC Tom Tomsk Club (Merdeyeux), Monday, 22 March 2010 16:28 (sixteen years ago)
25. Used to be 20. Like six months ago. I feel fat.
― Nathalie (stevienixed), Monday, 22 March 2010 17:54 (sixteen years ago)
18.9
― 404s & Heartbreak (jim in glasgow), Monday, 22 March 2010 18:39 (sixteen years ago)
i'm six foot 3 and somewhat shy of 11 stone.
― 404s & Heartbreak (jim in glasgow), Monday, 22 March 2010 18:40 (sixteen years ago)
about a year and a half ago was 22.7. Lost about 2 stone. Fat, there wasn't and isn't much muscle on me.
― 404s & Heartbreak (jim in glasgow), Monday, 22 March 2010 18:41 (sixteen years ago)
Not sure how this happened, but I've lost about 20 lbs. within the last two years and am now "normal weight."
22.6 now.
― kate78, Monday, 22 March 2010 18:47 (sixteen years ago)
18.7
― henry s, Sunday, 25 April 2010 02:01 (sixteen years ago)
18.7 too
long streak of piss....
― sonofstan, Sunday, 25 April 2010 07:03 (sixteen years ago)
heh...my dad says "tall drink of water", but I like "long streak of piss" better"...
― henry s, Sunday, 25 April 2010 13:22 (sixteen years ago)
man if were 18.7 i'd weigh < 120lb which is just bananas.
currently riding at ~23 but i'm pretty sure my legs are throwing the estimate way off
― GREAT JOB Mushroom head (gbx), Sunday, 25 April 2010 13:42 (sixteen years ago)
22.6. Down from 24.3 a few months ago. Thanks running, you're finally helping.
― Jeff, Sunday, 25 April 2010 14:35 (sixteen years ago)
Move over BMI, there's a new sheriff in town:
BMI or Body Mass Index, a ratio of weight to height, has long been considered one of the best measures for assessing overall health risk.Getting your BMI into a healthy range used to be considered a top health priority. However, recent research shows that there is a new sheriff in town: your waist-to-height ratio (WHtR). Studies now indicate that WHtR is a much better measure than BMI for assessing obesity and cardiovascular risk.
http://www.livestrong.com/article/93638-whtr-the-new-determinant-health-risk/
― _▂▅▇█▓▒░◕‿‿◕░▒▓█▇▅▂_ (Steve Shasta), Wednesday, 12 May 2010 06:11 (sixteen years ago)
BMI or Body Mass Index, a ratio of weight to height, has long been considered one of the best measures for assessing overall health risk.
GRRRRR HULK SMASH
(ss i know you're not saying this, but goddamn am i tired of hearing it)
― all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Wednesday, 12 May 2010 06:13 (sixteen years ago)
This is great because I go from "Overweight" on the BMI scale to "Extremely Slim" on the WHtR scale.
No longer am I penalized for being athletic.
― _▂▅▇█▓▒░◕‿‿◕░▒▓█▇▅▂_ (Steve Shasta), Wednesday, 12 May 2010 06:15 (sixteen years ago)
exactly!
― all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Wednesday, 12 May 2010 06:16 (sixteen years ago)
BMI applied to individuals is just grrrrr arrrgh.
i am only healthy.
now shasty nobody was actually penalizing you. did nutrition nazis take away dessert or something?
― fat mantis (Hunt3r), Wednesday, 12 May 2010 06:26 (sixteen years ago)
cause i'll take that dessert if u not eating it
― fat mantis (Hunt3r), Wednesday, 12 May 2010 06:27 (sixteen years ago)
22.4
― naus, Wednesday, 12 May 2010 06:28 (sixteen years ago)
23.7
― a black white asian pine ghost who is fake (Telephone thing), Wednesday, 12 May 2010 06:33 (sixteen years ago)
WHtR: 45.4545454545…
― naus, Wednesday, 12 May 2010 06:38 (sixteen years ago)
19.2
― Curt1s Stephens, Friday, April 11, 2008 7:14 PM (2 years ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
I am now 23.2
― liberté, égalité, fatalité, flawless victoré (crüt), Wednesday, 12 May 2010 08:18 (sixteen years ago)
Read somewhere that ideal WtHR was 1:3 please tell me that isn't the accepted wisdom
― Black IP's (darraghmac), Wednesday, 12 May 2010 09:13 (sixteen years ago)
Well, if you're 6' tall and have a 24" waist, there should be cause for concern.
WOMEN • Ratio less than 35: Abnormally Slim to Underweight • Ratio 35 to 42: Extremely Slim • Ratio 42 to 46: Healthy • Ratio 46 to 49: Healthy• Ratio 49 to 54: Overweight • Ratio 54 to 58: Seriously Overweight • Ratio over 58: Highly ObeseMEN • Ratio less than 35: Abnormally Slim to Underweight • Ratio 35 to 43: Extremely slim • Ratio 43 to 46: Healthy • Ratio 46 to 53: Healthy, Normal Weight • Ratio 53 to 58: Overweight • Ratio 58 to 63: Extremely Overweight/Obese • Ratio over 63: Highly Obese
MEN • Ratio less than 35: Abnormally Slim to Underweight • Ratio 35 to 43: Extremely slim • Ratio 43 to 46: Healthy • Ratio 46 to 53: Healthy, Normal Weight • Ratio 53 to 58: Overweight • Ratio 58 to 63: Extremely Overweight/Obese • Ratio over 63: Highly Obese
― naus, Wednesday, 12 May 2010 16:48 (sixteen years ago)
Whoo, downgraded to merely overweight.
― tokyo rosemary, Wednesday, 12 May 2010 17:18 (sixteen years ago)
i was downgraded from "normal" to "extremely slim" ?
― an outlet to express the dark invocations of (La Lechera), Wednesday, 12 May 2010 17:21 (sixteen years ago)
still hovering around the 30.1 range on BMI, bang on 50 on WtHR, wouldn't mind a little improvement on both tbh but WIP
― Black IP's (darraghmac), Thursday, 13 May 2010 11:23 (sixteen years ago)
just had my body fat measured. either they're wrong or my brain is made of flab.
― kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 21 October 2010 17:41 (fifteen years ago)
https://i.imgur.com/bR1yDJv.png
― deepfake chopra (unregistered), Thursday, 8 April 2021 02:41 (five years ago)
22.0 (shrugs) ― Aimless, Tuesday, February 23, 2010
presently 22.5
― Judge Roi Behan (Aimless), Thursday, 8 April 2021 03:57 (five years ago)
23.8
Thats the last time I weighed myself, I think I may be less heavy now but probably not much.
It's OK, anyway
― Mark G, Thursday, 8 April 2021 09:00 (five years ago)
24.5 = normal (just)
since xmas i now fast walk 4km a day (40 mins), and that has definitely helped me get back down to my usual 75kg as i had put on a couple of red wine enhanced kilos over lockdown.but seems like the daily walk has helped me find the balance between enjoying wine and exercise.
― mark e, Thursday, 8 April 2021 11:51 (five years ago)
I think BMI is not considered pretty meaningless
― Blues Guitar Solo Heatmap (Free Download) (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Thursday, 8 April 2021 12:42 (five years ago)
er NOW considered
18.4. I've somehow lost wait during the pandemic.
― Alba, Thursday, 8 April 2021 12:46 (five years ago)
and the ability to spell
BMI is such an inaccurate tool it can't be used for any purpose that requires real data.
― Judge Roi Behan (Aimless), Thursday, 8 April 2021 17:56 (five years ago)
Reminds me of this: A man in his 30s with no underlying health conditions was offered a Covid vaccine after an NHS error mistakenly listed him as just 6.2cm in height.
Liam Thorp was told he qualified for the jab because his measurements gave him a body mass index of 28,000.
― Andy the Grasshopper, Thursday, 8 April 2021 18:07 (five years ago)
25.8. Technically overweight. Can't escape my family legacy of thicc thighs.
― lukas, Thursday, 8 April 2021 18:35 (five years ago)