Yeah yeah sorry, I was thinking more about countering people's squickness than about presenting a scientific defense. I mean, I'm pretty sure the minds of those who are grossed out aren't going to be changed by an economics lecture, however enlightening the lecture might be in its own right.
― Laurel, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 19:58 (eighteen years ago)
bill magill is nude spock
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 19:58 (eighteen years ago)
xp to blog: urgh
A) Your safe word is "Please Stop Daddy" B) No touching Daddy's cock with your hands, only your mouth. C) You always massage Daddy's balls while you're sucking his dick.
― milo z, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 19:59 (eighteen years ago)
I 'pologize if my inner-professor child poked his wee noggin out.
― libcrypt, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 20:00 (eighteen years ago)
lock sex
― Just got offed, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 20:02 (eighteen years ago)
Nah, no harm. I think thread is increasingly pointless, esp if our one confesser is a troll to start with.
― Laurel, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 20:02 (eighteen years ago)
One? Andi confessed, didn't he?
― libcrypt, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 20:03 (eighteen years ago)
She. And she's about as dependable as the other one.
― Laurel, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 20:04 (eighteen years ago)
Wow, I was hoping there would be something here that turned my stomach a little more. And calling your sex partner 'Mommy' or 'Daddy' certainly fits the bill!
No. No, I don't love it when they call me 'Big Poppa.'
― Oilyrags, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 20:05 (eighteen years ago)
OMG c'mon now. Do not use this thread to pass judgement on people's personal sex practices, okay? Jesus christ.
― Laurel, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 20:06 (eighteen years ago)
I remember andi doing the suicide troll thing, but I thought he was a he and that maybe trollishness had subsided.
― libcrypt, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 20:06 (eighteen years ago)
How are you going to coerce people into doing something they wouldn't normally do without removing the opportunity to do something else?
Furthermore, if you reread what I wrote, I never attributed that argument to you; I attacked your assertion that it was a good argument and stated why I disagreed.
Massive xposts but if everyone else gets to bask in the inanity of their own masturbatory typing, I do too.
― HI DERE, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 20:08 (eighteen years ago)
I am going to be really disappointed if ILX turns into that guy I used to know who said "But I can't dump (my really stupid girlfriend), how will I ever again find someone who'll dress up in little costumes??" First of all, that is the least of your problems. Second, if they sell it in Frederick's of Hollywood, it's not that kinky.
― Laurel, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 20:08 (eighteen years ago)
Andi isn't a she, he's a goth-boy.
― jaymc, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 20:09 (eighteen years ago)
i know a girl who appeared on an episode of real sex. she was my roomate for about a year and...definitely had some sex addiction issues, would go to those types of parties and troll craigslist casual encounters, and be fine and not feel any guilt and be confident that she was having fun. i never judged her for this, even though it would make me really squeemish if i thought about it to much.
to my knowledge, she only had sex for money a few times, and after each one got extremely depressed and violent towards friends. even though she chose to do it and had so much sex that she "might as well get paid for it" it still made her feel x330243 worse about herself than a casual encounter/one night stand where no money was exchanged.
i know that doesn't apply to everyone, but i think there are usually awful consequences to your psyche/idea of self when you receive money for sex, and the whole idea of getting off on that is a bit creepy to me. i think maybe there should be shame involved for men who pay for sex, cos there definitely is shame, publicly and privately, for the women.
― bell_labs, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 20:10 (eighteen years ago)
ILX loves you, never fear, whether you dress up in little costumes or not.
― libcrypt, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 20:10 (eighteen years ago)
(xpost) I think it's the whole "getting used" bit; I know singers who are violently opposed to getting paid to sing because they feel it would ruin their enjoyment of their art.
― HI DERE, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 20:12 (eighteen years ago)
Are there two Andis? Because those WDYLL photos were...kind of clearly a girl, I thought?
― Laurel, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 20:14 (eighteen years ago)
Are you thinking andi mags, Laurel?
― libcrypt, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 20:15 (eighteen years ago)
(xpost) Haven't you seen "Silence of the Lambs"?
― HI DERE, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 20:15 (eighteen years ago)
Not a troll. And I don't know what nude spock means. I don't really think I have anything to "confess".
x-posts
― Bill Magill, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 20:16 (eighteen years ago)
I think that for the most part, we can agree that adults should be allowed to engage in consensual sex acts for money given certain protections and restrictions.
But agreeing to that isn't the same thing as agreeing that prostitution, the way it's put into practice right now, (certainly in the US) is O.K. I think most of us can agree that current (mostly illegal and "underground" prostitution) is far too exploitative, abusive and/or physically and emotionally harmful to the prostitutes to be "O.K." for people to visit.
In fact, those two positions (in theory, prostitution is O.K.; the way is it currently practiced, it is not) in a lot of ways lead into one another, i.e., prostitution is crepey the way it is now (illegal), so maybe we should legalize it.
― max, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 20:16 (eighteen years ago)
bill "nude spock" means, do you like to have sex with prostitutes while you wear vulcan ears, y/n?
― Mr. Que, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 20:17 (eighteen years ago)
Hey, I'm not stupid or insane (much), I know that pet names and fantasies are harmless. I know that fulfilling fantasies through role-playing is harmless. But still, when fantasy role-playing gets into simulations of pedophilia and incest I get squicked, and I said so. I'm pretty sure I didn't say anyone should be shamed by their fantasies, or go to jail for them, or even care what I think. So, if this is a big problem for you, please give me your arguments in favor of pedophilia and incest. Or climb a tree. Whatevs.
― Oilyrags, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 20:17 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.the-spine.com/wp-content/uploads/2006/10/tcspock.jpg
BAN MR. QUE
― HI DERE, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 20:18 (eighteen years ago)
whuh? why? did i post tubgirl accidentally again?
― Mr. Que, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 20:18 (eighteen years ago)
hahahaha no but that was awesome
― HI DERE, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 20:19 (eighteen years ago)
I think I might be, JMC.
On all other points, you are all fucking nutters (except max and bell b/c I love her). Oily, wtf are you even TALKING ABOUT?? If I cared to deal with your post srsly, I would be giving you my arguments in favor of FULFILLING FANTASIES, as you yourself just allowed for, not arguing for real-life rape/pedo/incest. Everyone is getting all emo'ed up here and being retarded.
― Laurel, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 20:20 (eighteen years ago)
on every ilx thread: someone accused of being nude spock not knowing who nude spock is
― jhøshea, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 20:20 (eighteen years ago)
Que, you're getting banned because those are obviously FERENGI ears, not VULCAN.
(ps ban me)
― HI DERE, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 20:21 (eighteen years ago)
Also Laurel, you know that max restated exactly what I said to libcrypt, which, when I said it, made you go "UGH YOU PEOPLE ARE SO BORING", right?
― HI DERE, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 20:22 (eighteen years ago)
hahaha i had to google FERENGI, a good time though
PROSTITUTES
http://www.threatlab.com/albums/Defcon-X/ferengi_jpg.jpg
― Mr. Que, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 20:22 (eighteen years ago)
fantasies are one thing, putting them to the woman you just hired to blow you in those terms is another
― milo z, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 20:23 (eighteen years ago)
Oh, Dan, you're not crazy. The economics convo at least made sense.
― Laurel, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 20:23 (eighteen years ago)
prostitution is like the drug war: it should be legal but that doesn't mean it's 'good,' just that it's hugely more damaging and expensive to police than any real utility we get back by doing so, to no real effect.
― gff, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 20:27 (eighteen years ago)
http://onewholeclove.typepad.com/one_whole_clove/images/palmier
― gabbneb, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 20:29 (eighteen years ago)
i would eat that
― carne asada, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 20:37 (eighteen years ago)
rub-n-tug's = crazy prevalent in this town, and socially acceptable in a lot of circles.
― gr8080, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 20:42 (eighteen years ago)
i was apparently living right next to one of those places and didn't even know it until they got raided
― carne asada, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 20:49 (eighteen years ago)
I don't really buy this. Unlike prostitution, drugs are G*R*A*T*E.
― The Real Dirty Vicar, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 20:50 (eighteen years ago)
Can you get the clap from doing drugs?
― HI DERE, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 20:50 (eighteen years ago)
if you know a way to get a coronary embolism or grievous brain damage from paid sex, i'd like to subscribe to your newsletter
― gff, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 20:55 (eighteen years ago)
besides, that's not the point. spending tons of public $$$ and ruining lives to clamp down on supply when there's really no way to alter constant insatiable demand, is the problem. with both.
― gff, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 20:57 (eighteen years ago)
I grew up a block from a place that got raided for rub'n'tugs and was only shut down about a year after I moved away. Dude had a good thing going for 10 years.
― milo z, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 21:01 (eighteen years ago)
the space is now a wedding chapel/reception place
same diff
― HI DERE, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 21:03 (eighteen years ago)
http://images.amazon.com/images/P/0671021311.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
― sanskrit, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 21:33 (eighteen years ago)
Those women aren't being "exploited", they're raking in the dough, and seem to love what they do.
Uh-huh. Just keep telling yourself that, big boy.
They're also hideous looking. If that's the most attractive woman you can get, I don't blame you for having to buy "it", buddy.
― u s steel, Monday, 23 March 2009 15:03 (seventeen years ago)
'can get' is really not fitting in with that sentiment.
― Anthony, I am not an Alcoholic & Drunk (darraghmac), Monday, 23 March 2009 15:15 (seventeen years ago)