2008 Primaries Thread 2: THE QUICKENING

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (7160 of them)

That Chris Matthews ran this story (and Bill O'Reilly, Brian Williams, etc) suggests how much the punditocracy feasts on minutiae to keep itself entertained. Honestly, I wouldn't have cared had HRC been the one accused. These things keep the political classes entertained. I didn't give a damn about her LBJ remark either.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 01:49 (eighteen years ago)

want some NRO fun? the only way that obama's mama and obama's daddy could have married would be that they was COMMIENISTS!

OH LAWD THERE'S STILL COMMUNISTS EVERYWHERE

kingfish, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 01:52 (eighteen years ago)

actually kingfish i think that's an interesting piece, and one that might very likely be true. now as to its RELEVANCE that's a whole other deal, but certainly the circumstances of interracial relationships during that time frame are interesting, especially considering the obvious cultural opposition that they faced (and still face).

YGS, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 01:58 (eighteen years ago)

the guy who originally said those words suggested he use them

and not to be all cap'n-save-a-O, but I wonder how much of Patrick's speech was informed by Obama's ideas, if they are in fact as close as both parties are suggesting.

will, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:00 (eighteen years ago)

#
# Seniors: Clinton 60%, Obama 39%

loldsters

deej, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:01 (eighteen years ago)

both msnbc and ccn wont call it for obama but theyre saying he has a lead based on exit polls - i dont think ive heard them use this formulation before - its either calling it from exit polls or wait and see

jhøshea, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:02 (eighteen years ago)

xpost

I wouldn't be surprised if Patrick's speech was informed but the same ideas, but that line was pretty solid. you can hear the response in the crowd when Obama uses it.

I don't know. just thought it was kind of lame. probably because I saw the clips in succession on a talk show. If it were merely explained to me, or I read about it, the effect wouldn't have been the same.

Benjamin-, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:08 (eighteen years ago)

mccain launching scare campaign 08 right now

YGS, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:12 (eighteen years ago)

Man, this article. I know BritBart is a Drudge cohort, but this one appears to be from the AP wire. And two lines in it are amazing:

• Obama leading in Wisconsin over a “fading Hillary Rodham Clinton”
• Obama is “cut(ting) deeply into Clinton's political bedrock”

If that's the way the media stories read coming out of Wisconsin, it may be too late for HRC.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:14 (eighteen years ago)

mccain launching scare campaign 08 right now

What's he saying?

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:14 (eighteen years ago)

i dont think ive heard them use this formulation before - its either calling it from exit polls or wait and see

no, they've said that before. they may be waiting for a few preliminary results to confirm - when they've called it before, hasn't it been in low-number caucuses? while the impulse is usually to be first, my cynical side says they're gonna wait a little while to keep the people who would turn their tv's off when the result is announced. guess is they know he won from the exits alone, but are gonna wait

gabbneb, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:16 (eighteen years ago)

he's talking about the growing threat against american lives, how leadership is called for and how "others" just want to sit down and make out with terror-supporters and bomb our allies.

YGS, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:16 (eighteen years ago)

What's he saying?

My friends. My friends, my friends. My friends.

Clay, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:17 (eighteen years ago)

basically it's bush since 9/11/rudy guliani's oh-so-successful campaign tactics

YGS, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:17 (eighteen years ago)

For such a "straight-talking maverick," McCain sure poaches the George W. Bush neocon playbook liberally.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:17 (eighteen years ago)

now dig at michelle obama -- "i am proud to be an american [unlike that bitch]"

YGS, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:18 (eighteen years ago)

Clay, that's why I can't watch McCain's speeches. That phrase makes me crazy.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:18 (eighteen years ago)

oh my golly! He just totally did the John Locke from L O S T. "Don't tell me what we can't do."

Clay, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:19 (eighteen years ago)

and msnbc projects obama to win wisconsin

YGS, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:19 (eighteen years ago)

Wait, you're kidding. He implied that she's an ungrateful traitor?

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:19 (eighteen years ago)

he did. the right is clamoring about this today. she made this "i am finally proud of my country" twice now in speeches, and so she is now indicative of blame-america-first liberals. as if african-american women have been living in an american utopia these past 222 years.

YGS, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:21 (eighteen years ago)

Yeah Daniel, the "my friends" thing -- which he just seems to be ramping up more and more every speech I end up seeing -- is so grating. Something about how terribly sincere he seem, while it being such a disingenuous thing to say.

Clay, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:21 (eighteen years ago)

CNN just projected for obama as well.

Clay, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:22 (eighteen years ago)

Just tuned in (then off). One of the TV chatterheads says that, inside the McCain camp, their main strategy is to (a) position McCain as "The Patriot" versus Obama "The Confused Youngster" and (b) portray Obama as being to the left of M. Dukakis and G. McGovern.

It will be an ugly -- and familiar -- type of GE.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:22 (eighteen years ago)

BARACK OBAMA: AMERICA'S MOST LIBERAL SENATOR.

Clay, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:23 (eighteen years ago)

Yeah, that will be the line. That any "Blame America First," "Pessimist," "Not A War Hero," "Defeatist," and so forth.

Ugly. But Obama's the kind of candidate who can overcome it.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:25 (eighteen years ago)

my biggest obama fear, btw, is mcgovern-related: when everyone loved mcgovern it was because he was the anti-candidate, a non-pol who talked straight, obsessed with decency and honesty, etc. and so when the eagleton mess started and he waffled a bit, it suddenly made him seem more like a politician (which of course he always was) and less like a real movement leader.

what it also did was give the press a big opening to attack him. the halo was gone, and suddenly he was a bumbler, just another washington rat like all the rest. when obama flubs -- and of course he will -- he will similarly get hit hard, much harder than mccain, just because the expectations are so much higher. as much as the press has really aided him so far, it can easily destroy him as well.

YGS, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:26 (eighteen years ago)

It would seem like it'll be that vs. "McCain is a Bush proxy" / "More of the same here and abroad" which should at least keep Obama coming across as less of an attack artist.

xpost.

Clay, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:27 (eighteen years ago)

I hear you, YGS, but I think Obama's more savvy -- and far more charismatic -- than McGovern.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:27 (eighteen years ago)

barack obama = black osama. end of story.

burt_stanton, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:28 (eighteen years ago)

i cant see that "what a liberal he is!!" thing working v well, just like how during the confirmations of alito + roberts their reasonableness under fire from dem pols belied their actual nuttiness (esp in the case of alito)

deej, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:28 (eighteen years ago)

Besides, as between Obama and McCain, I think it far more likely that McCain will make flubs and flip-flops, which Obama can exploit. And, FWIW, I don't think McCain has ever been tested in the way he'll be tested by Obama.

And all this from somebody (me) who thinks McCain will be the favorite in a GE against Obama.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:29 (eighteen years ago)

(McCain was tested by GWB, but that's a very -- very -- different kind of test. Obama won't win by secretly accusing McCain of having an illegimate black baby).

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:30 (eighteen years ago)

Remember the throngs of Republicans who were all like "I kinda like this McGovern guy"?

gabbneb, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:34 (eighteen years ago)

actually, gabbneb, mcgovern did VERY well with hardhats/wallace supporters in the beginning for this very reason

YGS, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:35 (eighteen years ago)

aka democrats?

gabbneb, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:36 (eighteen years ago)

obama already has a Dem problem, just like McCain has a GOP problem

gabbneb, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:37 (eighteen years ago)

Sorry, what do you mean?

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:38 (eighteen years ago)

(i.e., what's Obama's Dem problem?)

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:38 (eighteen years ago)

some democrats aren't gonna be comfortable voting for him?

gabbneb, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:38 (eighteen years ago)

fuck 'em

gbx, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:39 (eighteen years ago)

that's what i say

gabbneb, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:39 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uOYbFADoINE

deej, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:40 (eighteen years ago)

Why? Because he's black? Because he's liberal? Because he's cool and detached?

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:40 (eighteen years ago)

because he's black and/or too young

gabbneb, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:40 (eighteen years ago)

guys he's a muslim

gbx, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:41 (eighteen years ago)

do you want a president sworn in on the koran???

gbx, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:41 (eighteen years ago)

his nomination'll be a good way to axe the fucking lame dead wood from the plodding bulk of the toothless donkey party

remy bean, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:42 (eighteen years ago)

i tried to sink another metaphor into that sentence, but i couldn't

remy bean, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:42 (eighteen years ago)

he's gonna make nancy reagan wear a burkha!!!

YGS, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:43 (eighteen years ago)


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.