― scott seward, Friday, 6 April 2007 22:03 (nineteen years ago)
― Eisbaer, Friday, 6 April 2007 22:07 (nineteen years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 6 April 2007 22:08 (nineteen years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 6 April 2007 22:09 (nineteen years ago)
― gershy, Friday, 6 April 2007 22:12 (nineteen years ago)
― gabbneb, Friday, 6 April 2007 22:15 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 6 April 2007 22:15 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 6 April 2007 22:16 (nineteen years ago)
― DavidM, Friday, 6 April 2007 22:21 (nineteen years ago)
― Pleasant Plains, Friday, 6 April 2007 22:26 (nineteen years ago)
― scott seward, Friday, 6 April 2007 22:30 (nineteen years ago)
― Bob Six, Friday, 6 April 2007 23:53 (nineteen years ago)
― dan selzer, Saturday, 7 April 2007 00:36 (nineteen years ago)
― Rotgutt, Saturday, 7 April 2007 00:46 (nineteen years ago)
― scott seward, Saturday, 7 April 2007 00:48 (nineteen years ago)
― Eisbaer, Saturday, 7 April 2007 00:50 (nineteen years ago)
― chaki, Saturday, 7 April 2007 00:54 (nineteen years ago)
― Oilyrags, Saturday, 7 April 2007 01:08 (nineteen years ago)
― scott seward, Saturday, 7 April 2007 01:17 (nineteen years ago)
― milo z, Saturday, 7 April 2007 01:17 (nineteen years ago)
― milo z, Saturday, 7 April 2007 01:18 (nineteen years ago)
― scott seward, Saturday, 7 April 2007 01:32 (nineteen years ago)
― earlnash, Saturday, 7 April 2007 02:44 (nineteen years ago)
― scott seward, Saturday, 7 April 2007 02:51 (nineteen years ago)
― tremendoid, Saturday, 7 April 2007 03:01 (nineteen years ago)
― lfam, Saturday, 7 April 2007 03:01 (nineteen years ago)
― Eisbaer, Sunday, 15 April 2007 00:11 (nineteen years ago)
― DavidM, Sunday, 15 April 2007 19:46 (nineteen years ago)
― JW, Sunday, 15 April 2007 19:50 (nineteen years ago)
― Eisbaer, Monday, 16 April 2007 01:22 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius, Monday, 16 April 2007 13:29 (nineteen years ago)
― dan selzer, Monday, 16 April 2007 15:00 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius, Monday, 16 April 2007 15:08 (nineteen years ago)
Watching Dirty Harry on cable right now. Such a great movie...
― Elvis Telecom, Saturday, 2 February 2008 05:34 (eighteen years ago)
i've just watched all five this week (got the box set for xmas).
first three- great. dead pool- fun.
i can't believe someone up there repping for sudden impact, which we watched for twenty minutes then had to turn off.
― darraghmac, Saturday, 2 February 2008 13:57 (eighteen years ago)
ha i bought that box for my brother for his birthday
tcm were showing them all a few weeks back and it was the first time i'd seen sudden impact, and yeah agreed wtf? that film is just rong
dead pool also gets a wtf for the rc car chase
― DG, Saturday, 2 February 2008 14:01 (eighteen years ago)
yeah, but a fun wtf.
main difference in cool btwn first three and the last two- terrific seventies jazzy music vs awful eighties synth shite.
i'm not usually so tuned in to soundtrack but it really stood out watching them all in a row.
― darraghmac, Saturday, 2 February 2008 14:04 (eighteen years ago)
he has ahnold's terminator sunglasses in the last two though
― DG, Saturday, 2 February 2008 14:06 (eighteen years ago)
Schifrin's soundtrack is pretty essential
― Elvis Telecom, Sunday, 3 February 2008 18:17 (eighteen years ago)
Ultimate Dirty Harry box set on the way
― Elvis Telecom, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 08:38 (eighteen years ago)
way to make my christmas present obselete :(
anyway, the ultimate box set would leave out the one made just to keep his lame girlfriend happy, no?
― darraghmac, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 14:15 (eighteen years ago)
Missed this, but I don't agree that Million Dollar Baby, True Crime, or The Bridges of Madison County suck badly--quite the contrary, even if you feel that the difference between good people and bad people is drawn too starkly in Million, and if True Crime feels improbable (it's supposed to), and if Bridges of Madison County worships Meryl Streep (I thought the ending particularly was beautifully played). Space Cowboys and Blood Work are harmlessly fun bad movies, and A Perfect World and In the Line of Fire don't suck as badly as most films of their respective genres, FWIW. My personal favorite is True Crime, but I'm a sucker for so much of that movie: The interview with the prisoner where he takes one-word notes for his "color piece," the fact that he's just the worst father in the world, the performance of the wrongfully accused, etc...
― Pete Scholtes, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 19:49 (eighteen years ago)
I like In the Line of Fire a lot too.
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 20:02 (eighteen years ago)
I would have voted Magnum Force, had I voted. I love the Dirty Harry movies. May not get the box set though, a man's gotta know his limitations.
― Bill Magill, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 21:43 (eighteen years ago)
this would have been a hard poll for me. i love Magnum Force, High Plains Drifter, and Unforgiven, in such different ways.
― rockapads, Thursday, 20 March 2008 03:49 (eighteen years ago)
Clint on politics, Spike Lee, Harry Callahan, and everything
― Elvis Telecom, Friday, 6 June 2008 19:10 (eighteen years ago)
shame on a nigga who try to run game on a nigga
― Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved, Friday, 6 June 2008 19:46 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.thebadandugly.com/2009/03/14/first-look-the-human-factor/
― Dr Morbius, Monday, 16 March 2009 14:16 (seventeen years ago)
watched "heartbreak ridge" today & it was fuckin awesome
― johnny crunch, Sunday, 26 April 2009 18:48 (seventeen years ago)
^^New directorial effort Juror #2 trailer
― Charlie Hair (C. Grisso/McCain), Tuesday, 1 October 2024 23:30 (one year ago)
I’m a little surprised no one here was talking about juror #2. I guess I am part of the problem considering I just watched it for the first time now
I thought it was fantastic. aside from the indelicate racial politics in the jury room, I thought it was a really piercing study of morality and the nature of redemption, and, with the caveat that I’ve never served on one, likely a very realistic depiction of the grasp an average jury has of their instructions, which is horrifying obviously.
really powerful final scene!
― brony james (k3vin k.), Saturday, 30 August 2025 12:42 (nine months ago)
Not your fault, because there's no way around it, but another one of those figures still worthy enough to warrant a thread bump but also old enough to make your heart skip a beat when you see it bumped.
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 30 August 2025 12:45 (nine months ago)
His best since Sully, though some of the dialogue is straight outta Matlock. I wonder whether Eastwood’s TV-indebted blocking eulogizes an extinct era of competence or shows a reluctance to further murk the script.
― hungover beet poo (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 30 August 2025 12:50 (nine months ago)
He seems like a director who often embraces the "good enough" efficiency model of filmmaking, which indeed does owe a debt to television.
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 30 August 2025 12:55 (nine months ago)
Straight outta Matlock, crazy motherfucker called Eastwood
― I fresh like botti (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 30 August 2025 12:56 (nine months ago)
Might be time for a re-poll. Dude was old when this thread started, but he's made dozens of films (well, at least 1.1 dozen) since, some of which might well make a run at the spaghetti westerns.
― henry s, Saturday, 30 August 2025 12:59 (nine months ago)
I would have voted for “White Hunter Black Heart”
― birdistheword, Saturday, 30 August 2025 18:39 (nine months ago)
A poll of films he's directed might be interesting. Or just post-Unforgiven films.
He was my favorite movie star when I was a kid -- I've seen pretty much everything up to the 90s but nothing since. I have no idea if any of his later films are at all worthwhile. He still often makes some box-office at least.
― Kim Kimberly, Saturday, 30 August 2025 19:22 (nine months ago)
Worth watching: A Perfect World, The Bridges of Madison County, Mystic River, Letters from Iwo Jima, American Sniper, Sully, Juror #2. I don't defend each item; Mystic River and American Sniper have developments and overtones that at times make me ill. But I can't think of another Hollywood director this century who'd try.
― hungover beet poo (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 30 August 2025 19:50 (nine months ago)
"Mystic River and American Sniper have developments and overtones that at times make me ill"
this times a thousand for American Sniper, which to me is indefensible garbage
― vodkaitamin effrtvescent (calzino), Saturday, 30 August 2025 19:54 (nine months ago)
What's defensible: Bradley Cooper, on the hunt for a subtler movie; his best work imo.
― hungover beet poo (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 30 August 2025 20:01 (nine months ago)
I'm kind of indifferent to him nowadays but when Lalo Schifrin died I watched some Dirty Harry clips which got me remembering some of the good stuff he'd done. Also talk of Escape from Alcatraz in the news, lol.
― Kim Kimberly, Saturday, 30 August 2025 20:15 (nine months ago)
Also thanks Alfred that's a useful response.
― Kim Kimberly, Saturday, 30 August 2025 20:17 (nine months ago)
i think mystic river is a good deal better than described there tbh
gran torino makes the list, but has a lot more asterisks against it- its a throwback to a classic 80s clint performance/movie archetype and so jarring in the ways in which aspects of that just cannot work now, and worth acknowledging that some of it nevertheless does work just as well as ever.
― tuah dé danann (darraghmac), Saturday, 30 August 2025 22:12 (nine months ago)
^^ exactly my response re Mystic River.
― hungover beet poo (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 30 August 2025 22:31 (nine months ago)
He also likes to cast non-professional actors and goes for a certain “naturalism” in terms of directing actors… which I think might have a tendency to result in work that is maybe unintentionally reflexive of other media? Like if the actors’ performances come out of their familiarity with related genres (e.g. Matlock in re Juror #2), then he just goes with that rather than be more authoritarian?
― sarahell, Saturday, 30 August 2025 22:51 (nine months ago)
morgan freeman has some good video clips out there about how clint treats actors like horses (what it turns out to mean is rather more than clint directs his projects as if horses were on set which is either a post hoc rationalisation of his approach or fairly sensible depending on whether you prefer to print the legend or not,)
― tuah dé danann (darraghmac), Sunday, 31 August 2025 00:24 (nine months ago)
idk you gotta be gentle with horses
― hungover beet poo (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 31 August 2025 00:33 (nine months ago)
Tom Hanks talking about that.
― Kim Kimberly, Sunday, 31 August 2025 00:39 (nine months ago)
Watched "Juror #2" on a plane not so long ago. The "dialogue is straight outta Matlock" thing is true (well I guess, I don't think I've ever actually watched a full episode of Matlock), it looks and feels very much like a TV movie, in that none of the characters feel even remotely like real people, but this weirdly makes the movie better I think? The whole movie just seems so efficient and straight to the point. I highly recommend it.
― silverfish, Tuesday, 2 September 2025 19:10 (nine months ago)
also watched on a plane!
― brony james (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 3 September 2025 07:46 (nine months ago)
I'd never seen "High Plains Drifter" before, but really liked it. It's a weird little movie, basically a parable that also works as a sly subversion.
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 4 October 2025 13:11 (eight months ago)
I remember seeing it as part of a series of Clint Eastwood westerns on television, sandwiched between The Outlaw Josey Wales and Pale Rider. They were the slices of bread and Drifter was the filling. What kind of filling? Salami and Vegemite, microwaved for a few seconds. God, I love salt. Wales is more quotable. Rider is better-looking but I barely remember anything about it, although it feels like a different take on the same idea.
Drifter on the other hand is much more vivid. Although I was left wondering how audiences in the 1970s reacted to the sexual assault scene early in the film. It feels completely out of place in the film and also in Eastwood's filmography - as if he was trying to show that the character is a hard-ass, but he took it much too far. If it was supposed to make him come across as an arse the rest of the film undermines this by making him the star. It doesn't even fit into the "punishing the town" theme because it happens in private and the victim didn't appear to be part of the conspiracy against him.
I remember when the Star Wars prequels came out, if George Lucas was thinking of Drifter when he tried to tell the tale of how a little boy turned into Darth Vader. If he had modelled his storyline on that film the results would have been much better.
― Ashley Pomeroy, Saturday, 4 October 2025 22:39 (eight months ago)
There are some takes that Pale Rider is a sequel to High Plains Drifter in the slight supernatural take on the stranger.
― earlnash, Sunday, 5 October 2025 00:53 (eight months ago)
It's bizarre to find out that the scriptwriter of High Plains Drifter was inspired by the murder of Kitty Genovese in 1964. I'd have to watch the film again to see what the connection is.
I'm sure there is an Italian western with the same premise of High Plains Drifter that predates it, but I can't think of which one it is right now.
― Josefa, Sunday, 5 October 2025 04:03 (eight months ago)
I think this is the connection (from wiki):
Two weeks after the murder, The New York Times published an article claiming that thirty-seven witnesses saw or heard the attack, and that none of them called the police or came to her aid...The incident prompted inquiries into what became known as the bystander effect, or "Genovese syndrome," a social psychological theory that states that individuals are less likely to offer help to a victim in the presence of other people.
Anyway, the premise of "High Plains Drifter" is kind of ingenious. And it was neat to see Anthony James pop up. I mostly recognize him from a "Naked Gun" movie, but Clint drew him out of retirement and cast him in "Unforgiven" decades after this movie. Also, some fun trivia: "It is notable that Anthony James's first and last major film appearances were each in Academy Award-winning films for Best Picture."
― Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 5 October 2025 13:01 (eight months ago)
Pale Rider felt creaky to me the one time I saw it (admittedly, on commercial TV) but this kinda makes me want to revisit it. And yeah, HPD rocks.
― She's the Tariff (cryptosicko), Sunday, 5 October 2025 14:08 (eight months ago)
Pale Rider has some great location footage, nb this is going to be a huge image because I can't use Imgur:https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BNjYzNWEyODEtNzMzMy00Y2VjLTk3YzAtZmExNDE0YzljZjY3XkEyXkFqcGc@._V1_.jpghttp://www.dvdbeaver.com/film2/DVDReviews40/pale%20rider/large/large%20pale%20rider%20blu-ray12.jpg
It also has really subdued lighting - seemingly no lighting at all - which must have looked weird in the 1980s but feels refreshingly modern. In comparison Heaven's Gate looks nice but the use of fog filters and ND filters dates it to the 1970s.
There weren't very many mainstream Hollywood Westerns in the 1980s. Silverado, Young Guns, and that was about it until Dances with Wolves came along. It was one of those dead genres, like the sung-through musical or the World War Two film. It's just a shame that Pale Rider wasn't a better film.
― Ashley Pomeroy, Sunday, 5 October 2025 18:33 (eight months ago)
I didn't dig Pale Rider the last time I saw it. Felt ... dull?
― Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 5 October 2025 18:36 (eight months ago)
watched pale rider last night, was blindsided by just how good it looks (had not seen this thread until now). kind of the default clint eastwood western besides that but man the production design and landscape photography carries it. definitely adding it to my 'good movies to zone out to' list
― ciderpress, Saturday, 25 October 2025 16:35 (seven months ago)
His son says he has retired
https://www.worldofreel.com/blog/2026/5/31/happy-birthday-clint-eastwood
― Alba, Tuesday, 2 June 2026 12:43 (five days ago)
And at a mere 96, what is he going to do with all his spare time?
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 2 June 2026 12:56 (five days ago)
Talk to chairs
― Cow_Art, Tuesday, 2 June 2026 13:07 (five days ago)
Manoel de Oliveira completed six more feature-length films after he turned 96, (and was actually completing one a year going back to 1988!) on top of ten shorts and documentaries. I haven't seen many of these, but The Strange Case of Angelica from 2010 (completed when he was 101!) remains a favorite, one of the greatest films he ever made.
I don't believe any filmmaker of merit was going to match Oliveira, but it wouldn't have surprised me if Eastwood came close. He had a good shot at that, but when Zaslav came aboard Warner Bros., he immediately pushed back on the support Eastwood had enjoyed in the past - it wasn't enough to stop him from making films, but it likely made things more difficult. (Haven't seen all of his recent work, but the last ones I caught were Richard Jewell and Cry Macho, and I thought both had plenty of merit, enough to make them worth seeing. Juror #2 had its fans too, but I missed what was a paltry, brief theatrical release and haven't been motivated enough to stream it, especially since I don't have HBO Max or whatever it's called now.)
― birdistheword, Tuesday, 2 June 2026 23:56 (five days ago)
It's better than the last two.
― boners for bombs (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 3 June 2026 00:01 (four days ago)
Actually just checked and Juror #2 was the ONLY movie he was able to make under Zaslav, who was incredulous that WB financed Cry Macho (before he became CEO) and snapped at the other executives who defended their decision, telling them "we don't owe him anything."
― birdistheword, Wednesday, 3 June 2026 00:09 (four days ago)