but hey gbx, it only ends once..
― she started dancing to that (Finefinemusic), Thursday, 25 February 2010 19:17 (sixteen years ago)
Just watched the end of the final season of the Wire, so now I'm expecting the Lost finale will be similar with suggestion of new people taking over old roles etcand lots of lingering shots of Baltimore.
― Not the real Village People, Thursday, 25 February 2010 19:37 (sixteen years ago)
Jacob will be sorry he made up all that bullshit!
― Philip Nunez, Thursday, 25 February 2010 19:49 (sixteen years ago)
i just want to know what the island is and why it moves
― david cam'ron (tpp), Thursday, 25 February 2010 19:55 (sixteen years ago)
the only thing we're going to learn by the end of all this is why we hate these characters so much. lindelof and cuse are so delusional that we watch this show for character development. i'm sure they thought we'd get all choked up at the jack and his kid stuff...
― shite new answers (cutty), Thursday, 25 February 2010 20:01 (sixteen years ago)
I dunno, a lot of the things they introduced as character development turned out to be plot devices.
― Philip Nunez, Thursday, 25 February 2010 20:04 (sixteen years ago)
nah i'm into character development. as long as the character is kate and the development is death
― david cam'ron (tpp), Thursday, 25 February 2010 20:04 (sixteen years ago)
Like:Jack is a man, but his kid is a white Walt.Walt. White. Man
Walt Whitman.
― Philip Nunez, Thursday, 25 February 2010 20:05 (sixteen years ago)
I would like to reiterate that Sawyer shooting Kate down on the escape fantasy bs last week (or whenever it was) was awesome.
― mh, Thursday, 25 February 2010 20:06 (sixteen years ago)
― david cam'ron (tpp), Thursday, February 25, 2010 3:04 PM (33 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
agree
― max, Thursday, 25 February 2010 20:38 (sixteen years ago)
"Like:Jack is a man, but his kid is a white Walt.Walt. White. Man
Walt Whitman."
Had a totally hysterical Black Dynamite LOL moment with this.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Thursday, 25 February 2010 20:40 (sixteen years ago)
Did anyone else feel like the pacing was really ... weird with this ep? Felt really rushed, like they were trying to sell too many things and not developing any one of them satisfyingly.
Jacob is beginning to really, really annoy me. It seems like he's training Jack to want to kill him, again. At this point I can totally see how MIB would want to take out anybody associated with him.
I laughed long and hard at this
― Brakhage, Thursday, 25 February 2010 21:39 (sixteen years ago)
this son of jack's is the same one he accused his dad of conceiving with his ex-wife from happy gilmore right? i'm a bit confused cos they way he said "i'd be a terrible dad" to hurley in the jungle didnt seem wryly regretful or secretive or anything.
don't really get what the deal is with jack's dad either since youre getting both apparitions of the dead and corporeal bodysnatching on the island. if he's a ghost why bother with his corpse being missing? if his body was taken over, by jacob presumably, then why wasn't jacob still in it? guhh.
― r|t|c, Friday, 26 February 2010 00:19 (sixteen years ago)
Jack is his own grandpa.
― Spinspin Sugah, Friday, 26 February 2010 00:25 (sixteen years ago)
also the specificity of jacob asking them to dial 108 would suggest that yeah someone new is coming to the island rather than it just being a longwinded ruse? but then lostpedia says that 108.WALLACE was already crossed out so fuck knows.
― r|t|c, Friday, 26 February 2010 00:26 (sixteen years ago)
please let it be billy dee
― "I get through more mojitos.." (bear, bear, bear), Friday, 26 February 2010 00:38 (sixteen years ago)
the funny thing about lost is how it's all about mystery and revelations or the anticipation of them and how slow and painful and obvious 99% of it is. not obvious like predictable necessarily but obvious like "yeah the wee dad at the recital is the samurai... ...yes we know... ...look it's obvious it's him the kid's japanese and the guy with his back to us is short and has the samurai hairdo... ...come on... ...yes it's the samurai we know... ...still got his back to us... ...still got the hairdo... ...yes... ...oh jack's walked past him and the samurai's said something to him and yes it's the samurai". so many rubbish and meaningless reveals have panned out like that and you spot it immediately and get bored almost even more immediately. actually that's not the funny thing it's one of the crap things.
― conrad, Friday, 26 February 2010 01:23 (sixteen years ago)
jack's dad has been taken over by smokey, obviously, not jacob. claire mentioned her father, pretty obv not jacob.
i agree with cutty above, the idea it's primarily a character based drama (which just happens to be set on a mysterious island with a gigantic monster made of black smoke and endless mysteries) is fucking moronic and smacks of writer arrogance.
― I see what this is (Local Garda), Friday, 26 February 2010 01:33 (sixteen years ago)
"oh why do you plebs care about the island, it's about the characters!"
conrad otm sadly, i think they've gotten worse for doing this. we see flocke's feet as he approaches jin and claire in the tent. it's obviously him. but then when we see his face there's the 'surpriiiise/dramatic revealing moment' music. same when ben turned to locke in last week's in the staff common room.
― mdskltr (blueski), Friday, 26 February 2010 01:34 (sixteen years ago)
jack's dad has been taken over by smokey, obviously, not jacob.
well Ilana said he is now stuck in Locke's body, apart from when he is smoke. so if he was using Christian before Locke, why switch? and why did Christian's body disappear when Locke's didn't. Something to do with being on Jacob's list maybe?
― mdskltr (blueski), Friday, 26 February 2010 01:36 (sixteen years ago)
same when ben turned to locke in last week's in the staff common room.
yeah but who expected ben to strangle locke last season!
― shite new answers (cutty), Friday, 26 February 2010 02:02 (sixteen years ago)
Jack was born around 65 iirc. It's fuzzy logic, but I read someones observations that at the time of the 1977 bomb, jack's appendix scar was about three years old, which would place the surgery (linearlyish) in 74 which corresponds roughly with his mom saying he was "7 or 8."
― she started dancing to that (Finefinemusic), Thursday, February 25, 2010 8:57 AM (12 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
this really interests me, the idea that things that happened differently in the flash-sideways timeline could correspond in some weird ways to things that happened to them after the time jumps
― some dude, Friday, 26 February 2010 02:08 (sixteen years ago)
I'm with conrad on all these other-timeline "connections." They surely won't be important at the end; it seems they're only there to throw the Losties more bones to play with. But I did lol at Ben being fussy about the coffee maker in the teacher's room, even though the long reveal was stupid.
― nickn, Friday, 26 February 2010 02:14 (sixteen years ago)
http://i50.tinypic.com/2lk475l.jpg
― ^^potentially not true at all, sry^^ (Z S), Friday, 26 February 2010 17:18 (sixteen years ago)
the island wanted him to wear a bra
― mdskltr (blueski), Friday, 26 February 2010 17:23 (sixteen years ago)
I wanted more ANSWERS this season, not more questions about Jack's undergarments
― ^^potentially not true at all, sry^^ (Z S), Friday, 26 February 2010 17:25 (sixteen years ago)
It totally was a character-based drama once upon a time - I'm thinking the first season when every flashback was a massive revelation. They've got stupider and more impulsive and more unrealistic since the writers decided they wanted to start massively advancing the plot.
― Matt DC, Friday, 26 February 2010 17:28 (sixteen years ago)
I mean, 99% of the problem with the characterisation in Lost is the reasoning behind their stupid impulses - Jack smashing up the lighthouse, Juliet at the end of last season, everything Kate has done in about three years etc.
― Matt DC, Friday, 26 February 2010 17:29 (sixteen years ago)
It totally was a character-based drama once upon a time - I'm thinking the first season when every flashback was a massive revelation.
this isnt really 'character-based' in the way i assume ppl are talking about--yes characters are involved but theyre just plot vehicles; the revelations are interesting not because we care about the characters but because they advance the plot or our understanding of it
― max, Friday, 26 February 2010 17:31 (sixteen years ago)
Yeah I mean it's not Mad Men put it that way.
― Matt DC, Friday, 26 February 2010 17:34 (sixteen years ago)
feels like the Temple is the last place for everyone on the island to go and where everyone will end up e.g. surely Jack will ignore Jacob and go back to the temple to wescue Kate and co zzz. i would still like Widmore to return to the island for a real showdown with Ben, parallel to some kind of battle between Jacob and Smokey.
― mdskltr (blueski), Friday, 26 February 2010 17:34 (sixteen years ago)
if only when they'd gone back to the 50s we'd had christina hendricks riding around the island on kate's horse, smoking.
― mdskltr (blueski), Friday, 26 February 2010 17:36 (sixteen years ago)
ANNOUNCEMENT - CALL FOR PITCHES - MAX AND LAMP FILM PRODUCTION COMPANY LLC
― epic board man (history mayne), Friday, 26 February 2010 17:53 (sixteen years ago)
From The Onion AV Club today:
The departing cast of Lost is hot property now as new series look to cast their pilots. But it has only ever been a dream of Lost fans that Terry O’Quinn and Michael Emerson, the squirrely dynamic duo with more onscreen chemistry than any of the show’s romantic pairings, would once again be paired together in a new project post-Lost. All manner of spin-offs and Odd Couple-esque scenarios have been proposed by fans, particularly after a recent episode which spawned wishes for a spin-off exploring John Locke and Benjamin Linus as high school teachers in the alternate reality. Other farcical ideas have ranged from live-action Bert and Ernie to a slash-fiction inspired romantic pairing. So what are the odds, really, that Emerson and O’Quinn will ever chew the scenery of a new set together again?Apparently the odds are pretty favorable Terry O'Quinn as TV Guide reports he is shopping around what they’re calling a “TNT-type” series he has penned for himself and Emerson to star in as suburban hitmen with domestic difficulties. TV Guide doesn’t reveal the show’s details per O’Quinn’s request, but it’s noted that he has spoken to Lost executive producer J.J. Abrams about the idea, and also said, “I really hope this works out because Michael would be in his prime in this. We’d play kind of awkward partners.”
Apparently the odds are pretty favorable Terry O'Quinn as TV Guide reports he is shopping around what they’re calling a “TNT-type” series he has penned for himself and Emerson to star in as suburban hitmen with domestic difficulties. TV Guide doesn’t reveal the show’s details per O’Quinn’s request, but it’s noted that he has spoken to Lost executive producer J.J. Abrams about the idea, and also said, “I really hope this works out because Michael would be in his prime in this. We’d play kind of awkward partners.”
― El Poopo Loco (Pancakes Hackman), Friday, 26 February 2010 18:02 (sixteen years ago)
it's called l o s t not s a d h o r s e s
― abanana, Friday, 26 February 2010 18:20 (sixteen years ago)
a michael emerson + terry o'quinn show would retroactively redeem every bad thing lost has ever done imo.
― bro, I am chagrin (reddening), Friday, 26 February 2010 19:46 (sixteen years ago)
i'd start referring to nikki and paulo as "an interesting experiment" and the bai ling episode as "an underrated attempt at minimalism" as a sign of my gratitude.
― bro, I am chagrin (reddening), Friday, 26 February 2010 19:50 (sixteen years ago)
So Claire is Rousseau now? Nice to see her again.
― You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike. (hugo), Friday, 26 February 2010 20:07 (sixteen years ago)
nice to see you again as well, hugo
― ere, Friday, 26 February 2010 20:46 (sixteen years ago)
for some reason lost seasons seemingly always start out with everyone running around the jungle, making a big fuss about nothing very interesting. hopefully soon they'll have everyone settle down (prob at the temple, as everyone has pointed out).
and i'm glad someone else is wondering about why christian's body disappeared but john's didn't, as that's been bothering me for a while.
― phantompenguin, Friday, 26 February 2010 22:32 (sixteen years ago)
dogen and co seem to think the temple is safe from smokey (even tho it seems clear the temple was previously smokey's home e.g. the french team's experience and ben being judged) but jacob seems to know that it isn't and neither side is bothering to explain why.
― mdskltr (blueski), Friday, 26 February 2010 22:41 (sixteen years ago)
Difference between temple and the passageways near it (where we've seen smokey) IMO
― she started dancing to that (Finefinemusic), Friday, 26 February 2010 22:52 (sixteen years ago)
if they can build an electric fence that smokey can't pass through, shouldn't they be able to make a smokey weapon?
― phantompenguin, Friday, 26 February 2010 23:02 (sixteen years ago)
As implied when Locke started stacking the bodies of the Jacob cult people a few episodes ago, it seems like Smokey does steal the bodies and then reuse them - same with Team Rousseau. The real Locke's body was locked in the steel casket the whole time, so maybe he couldn't get it - or maybe it had something to do with this current permanent transformation/leader loophole business.
Dharma was the people with the crazy tech/sonar fence, Jacob people seemed to generally be anti-technology. Or maybe they just prefer weird ash.
― Nhex, Friday, 26 February 2010 23:47 (sixteen years ago)
i finally get why the others death rite sent the bodies out to sea
― ere, Saturday, 27 February 2010 01:29 (sixteen years ago)
the "permanent" transformation apparently happened with the death of jacob, since smokey appeared in the form of Alex right before that.
― abanana, Saturday, 27 February 2010 01:36 (sixteen years ago)
woah yeah good call (xpost)
― some dude, Saturday, 27 February 2010 01:37 (sixteen years ago)
xp re: alex oooh good pt - didn't put that together
― Nhex, Saturday, 27 February 2010 01:49 (sixteen years ago)
"spinoff" jokezhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TJowaMer7BI&feature=player_embedded
― "I get through more mojitos.." (bear, bear, bear), Saturday, 27 February 2010 02:45 (sixteen years ago)