I wonder sometimes if I am the victim of a malicious rumour

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (330 of them)

none of his friends will talk to him?

(▀▄▀▄) (Lamp), Wednesday, 17 February 2010 00:21 (sixteen years ago)

Could it be that the only people stressing about omgz is it sockage for pwnage are perhaps guilty of indulging in their own ventriloquism on other occasions? Or a sad substitute for artfulness by the creatively blocked or bereft? My temptation is to say that if you are indulging in ILX overanalysis, CONGRATS for genetically engineering a monkey for your own back.

extra awesome blossom (suzy), Wednesday, 17 February 2010 00:22 (sixteen years ago)

grant singer has clearly never heard of yahoo! answers

united arab amirites (samosa gibreel), Wednesday, 17 February 2010 00:23 (sixteen years ago)

this thread has struck to the heart of ilxs own anxiety about its identity

max, Wednesday, 17 February 2010 00:23 (sixteen years ago)

could it be that we think it's funny to spread malicious rumours in a thread entitled "I wonder sometimes if I am the victim of a malicious rumour."?

sarahel, Wednesday, 17 February 2010 00:24 (sixteen years ago)

Could it be that the only people stressing about omgz is it sockage for pwnage are perhaps guilty of indulging in their own ventriloquism on other occasions? Or a sad substitute for artfulness by the creatively blocked or bereft? My temptation is to say that if you are indulging in ILX overanalysis, CONGRATS for genetically engineering a monkey for your own back.

ummmmm

67 (history mayne), Wednesday, 17 February 2010 00:24 (sixteen years ago)

history mayne: Could it be?

sarahel, Wednesday, 17 February 2010 00:25 (sixteen years ago)

i have never had a sockpuppet.

El GarBage (M@tt He1ges0n), Wednesday, 17 February 2010 00:27 (sixteen years ago)

I was popular at school,

yeah no

67 (history mayne), Wednesday, 17 February 2010 00:27 (sixteen years ago)

if he never read ILX why would he ask us such a personal an unanswerable question for his first post? if he lurks ILX, why didn't he know there would be 100 posts before the first attempt at a serious response? isn't it some kind of internet golden rule to read a forum for at least a week before posting to it?

richie aprile (rockapads), Wednesday, 17 February 2010 00:35 (sixteen years ago)

There's something very weird about the phrase 'malicious rumour' that I keep misreading it.
These are my favorite misreadings so far:
Malicious Murmur
Delicious Rumen

Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 17 February 2010 00:37 (sixteen years ago)

Nutritious Ramen

Man or Austro-Hungarian? (Pillbox), Wednesday, 17 February 2010 00:38 (sixteen years ago)

delicious demon--sugarcubes song

the poster is Bjork

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 17 February 2010 00:39 (sixteen years ago)

Oh, silly me: swap out 'if' for 'when'.

Let's not get into the Paul Frank monkey for the back of the terminally style-challenged.

extra awesome blossom (suzy), Wednesday, 17 February 2010 00:40 (sixteen years ago)

BRIAN YOU ARE FUCKING SHIT FOR NOT TAKING A PLANE TO FLY OVER TO REYKJAVIK IN THE MIDDLE OF YOUR TRIP TO MAKE BEEYOOTIFUL MOOZIK WEET ME!
― Bjork, Monday, January 28, 2002 5:00 PM

velko, Wednesday, 17 February 2010 00:40 (sixteen years ago)

the guy who started this thread doesn't write like Bjork

sarahel, Wednesday, 17 February 2010 00:43 (sixteen years ago)

Bjork got Matthew Barney to post for her

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 17 February 2010 00:45 (sixteen years ago)

I am genuinely at a loss. I was not the nicest dude at school, a bit cocksure to be honest, but so were lots of my friends. I can't see why I am being slighted by my past. I sometimes wonder if my old friend said some unfair or untrue things about me, because I know that he saw a lot of my old friends after I went to University. But how can I find this out? Or is there any point? It just makes me feel a bit low...Help with perspective would be welcome!

http://postdash.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/matthew-barney-c-31.gif

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 17 February 2010 00:46 (sixteen years ago)

a good determinative factor w/r/t sockspotting is how quickly they show up on another thread--with a thread title that doesn't mention or hint at the topic--on another board in which their sock status is debated.

('_') (omar little), Wednesday, 17 February 2010 00:49 (sixteen years ago)

maybe they're just really bored and use Site New Answers

kshighway (ksh), Wednesday, 17 February 2010 00:52 (sixteen years ago)

j0hn d. otm, yall are kinda depressing at times

call all destroyer, Wednesday, 17 February 2010 00:56 (sixteen years ago)

I have one (1) sockpuppet

forksclovetofu, Wednesday, 17 February 2010 01:00 (sixteen years ago)

I like how a major indictment of this person not being legit is that they didn't post again (or twice more) in the thread, because, you know, being told to fuck off in the first post and then a 180+ message discussion about sockpuppets and the etymology of the word is really conducive to the question posed.

Department of Epidemic Prevention and Water Purification (S-), Wednesday, 17 February 2010 01:11 (sixteen years ago)

yeah, he's going to be surprised when he makes it back to the thread

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 17 February 2010 01:14 (sixteen years ago)

if gear showed up with the couch story now, instead of six years ago, everyone - well, sarahel mostly - would be too busy sockspotting for any lols to come of it

eau de humanity (haitch), Wednesday, 17 February 2010 01:15 (sixteen years ago)

Grant S-nger

velko, Wednesday, 17 February 2010 01:16 (sixteen years ago)

if gear showed up with the couch story now, instead of six years ago, everyone - well, sarahel mostly - would be too busy sockspotting for any lols to come of it

― eau de humanity (haitch), Tuesday, February 16, 2010 7:15 PM (3 minutes ago)

truth bomb of epic proportions

blow it out your bad-taste hole (WmC), Wednesday, 17 February 2010 01:20 (sixteen years ago)

i wasn't the only one calling "sock" here, why am I getting all the blame here?

sarahel, Wednesday, 17 February 2010 01:23 (sixteen years ago)

I like how a major indictment of this person not being legit is that they didn't post again (or twice more) in the thread, because, you know, being told to fuck off in the first post and then a 180+ message discussion about sockpuppets and the etymology of the word is really conducive to the question posed.

― Department of Epidemic Prevention and Water Purification (S-), Tuesday, February 16, 2010 7:11 PM (10 minutes ago) Bookmark

gawd quit lecturing me/us and just provide the poor guy with his desperately-needed "perspective" if you feel it is so freakin warranted already for sheesh's sake :)

newayz i got a hot chick waiting for me in my bed (meme) so i am seriously peacin on this thread, see yall wouldn't wanna b yall

iiiijjjj, Wednesday, 17 February 2010 01:24 (sixteen years ago)

bullshit, gear was a well established poster

sir ilx-a-lot (cutty), Wednesday, 17 February 2010 01:29 (sixteen years ago)

love u haitch but it's not a good comparison

sir ilx-a-lot (cutty), Wednesday, 17 February 2010 01:30 (sixteen years ago)

Mordy gave him perspective in one of the earlier posts, the "guy" said thanks. The rest of this thread is just us entertaining ourselves, and other people tut-tutting at our method of entertainment, this really isn't worth all the hand-wringing

sarahel, Wednesday, 17 February 2010 01:30 (sixteen years ago)

i guess we're just glorified yahoo answers + handwringing now

sir ilx-a-lot (cutty), Wednesday, 17 February 2010 01:40 (sixteen years ago)

i think it's fine to build a moat around our community, it's the internet, and it's fucking CRAZAY out there

sir ilx-a-lot (cutty), Wednesday, 17 February 2010 01:41 (sixteen years ago)

i guess we're just glorified yahoo answers + handwringing now

― sir ilx-a-lot (cutty), Tuesday, February 16, 2010 5:40 PM (8 minutes ago)

and jjusten's dog

sarahel, Wednesday, 17 February 2010 01:49 (sixteen years ago)

jjusten's dog is awesome

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 17 February 2010 01:50 (sixteen years ago)

it was at the top of site new answers - nothing personal, in case jjusten thinks i'm baiting or attacking him again

sarahel, Wednesday, 17 February 2010 01:52 (sixteen years ago)

the dog is cocksure

sir ilx-a-lot (cutty), Wednesday, 17 February 2010 01:54 (sixteen years ago)

i still want the sock eating its toe drawring

malicious humor victim (Hunt3r), Wednesday, 17 February 2010 01:55 (sixteen years ago)

nothing personal, in case jjusten thinks i'm baiting or attacking him again

uh what the hell?

3:16 (jjjusten), Wednesday, 17 February 2010 01:55 (sixteen years ago)

it's sarahel's world we're just living in it

call all destroyer, Wednesday, 17 February 2010 01:56 (sixteen years ago)

xp - dude you got pretty over the top defensive a few weeks back and made my dumb joke into some dramatic thing, that was totally not my intent. I don't want to start anything up again.

sarahel, Wednesday, 17 February 2010 01:57 (sixteen years ago)

It certainly doesn't seem like you're trying to start anything.

ô_o (Nicole), Wednesday, 17 February 2010 01:58 (sixteen years ago)

who the fuck makes fun of another person's dog

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 17 February 2010 01:59 (sixteen years ago)

on an internet message board for fuck's sake

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 17 February 2010 01:59 (sixteen years ago)

it's sarahel's world we're just living in it

― call all destroyer, Tuesday, February 16, 2010 5:56 PM (2 minutes ago)

CAD isn't my sock btw

sarahel, Wednesday, 17 February 2010 01:59 (sixteen years ago)

she was joking

sir ilx-a-lot (cutty), Wednesday, 17 February 2010 01:59 (sixteen years ago)

facepalming

Möbius dick (╓abies), Wednesday, 17 February 2010 02:00 (sixteen years ago)

get a life

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 17 February 2010 02:01 (sixteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.