have NO CLUE what this has to do with obama
Nothing, at the time of the film.'s release Now it has to do w/ the way the American antiwar movement has shut up, completely, incl about that war-defending Nobel-acceptance vomit (let's see that evoked in the next Alfonso Cuaron film).
You guys should check out Life of Brian, some intriguing Christ parallels.
― Fusty Moralizer (Dr Morbius), Friday, 12 February 2010 15:04 (sixteen years ago)
oh yeah forgot abt charlie k too true lamp
― chris nibbs (cozen), Friday, 12 February 2010 15:05 (sixteen years ago)
Just finished watching a blitz of all three Bourne movies thx to this thread. They're so badass!! I think Ultimatum is my favorite (though what's the significance of the title? is it the ***SPOILER ALERT*** ultimatum of him having to kill some random dude as Black Briar gang inititation)
MORE SPOILERS** - I think my favorite parts were the way they tied in the ending of Supremacy in a completely different and awesome context and the reveal of Stiles as a love interest without actually making us watch them fuck or anything***END SPOILERS***
― Fetchboy, Friday, 12 February 2010 15:12 (sixteen years ago)
no he h8s animes & loves goddam charlie kaufman fuck him
It's NRQ's hatred of other critical apparatuses that makes me hate him.
― queen frostine (Eric H.), Friday, 12 February 2010 15:22 (sixteen years ago)
I can't imagine hating anyone for their taste in movies or lack.
xpost I wouldn't go looking for significance in the titles of Robert Ludlum novels tbh.
― gotanynewsstory? (Dorianlynskey), Friday, 12 February 2010 15:26 (sixteen years ago)
― Fetchboy, Friday, February 12, 2010 10:12 AM (11 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
THUMBS UP!
― ice cr?m, Friday, 12 February 2010 15:26 (sixteen years ago)
guy in his 30s who looks like a high-school jock /= my kinda superspy
― Fusty Moralizer (Dr Morbius), Friday, 12 February 2010 15:31 (sixteen years ago)
nqr is a quality poster u guys need to cio w/all the heaveyhanded handwringing
― ice cr?m, Friday, February 12, 2010 9:47 AM (43 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
hm is a stand-up dude wtf
― chris nibbs (cozen), Friday, February 12, 2010 9:56 AM (34 minutes ago) Bookmark
― t(o_o)t (ENBB), Friday, 12 February 2010 15:32 (sixteen years ago)
u jus h8 sexinaz xp
― ice cr?m, Friday, 12 February 2010 15:33 (sixteen years ago)
Also the Bournes (and Damon) rule.
― t(o_o)t (ENBB), Friday, 12 February 2010 15:33 (sixteen years ago)
what a weird thread
― caek, Friday, 12 February 2010 15:34 (sixteen years ago)
might end up with
/nqr is a quality poster u guys need to cio w/all the heaveyhanded handwringing― ice cr?m, Friday, February 12, 2010 9:47 AM (43 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalinkhm is a stand-up dude wtf― chris nibbs (cozen), Friday, February 12, 2010 9:56 AM (34 minutes ago) Bookmark/
― chris nibbs (cozen), Friday, February 12, 2010 9:56 AM (34 minutes ago) Bookmark/
no. just... no.
― dyao, Friday, 12 February 2010 15:34 (sixteen years ago)
and fwiw as far as my limited exposure to intelligence industry types seems smart high school jock is not an unusual irl type
― ice cr?m, Friday, 12 February 2010 15:35 (sixteen years ago)
Oh come on! He's at his best when he's kind of a prick!
ice cr?m otm, at my high school there were quite a few of them.
― Fetchboy, Friday, 12 February 2010 15:35 (sixteen years ago)
(was doing my best nrq impression btw)
― dyao, Friday, 12 February 2010 15:36 (sixteen years ago)
lol i dont really h8 nrq - think hes a top 10 poster iibrr - but ppl who have different taste in movies than me are barely even human
bang
― Lamp, Friday, 12 February 2010 15:37 (sixteen years ago)
Why isn't this thread here?
― Roomful of Moogs (C. Grisso/McCain), Friday, 12 February 2010 15:38 (sixteen years ago)
― dyao, Friday, February 12, 2010 3:34 PM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark
u jus h8 sexinaz
― V-E-R-Y (history mayne), Friday, 12 February 2010 15:38 (sixteen years ago)
damon for ILX actor of the decade
― quiz show flat-track bully (darraghmac), Friday, 12 February 2010 15:38 (sixteen years ago)
farrell, any fule know
― caek, Friday, 12 February 2010 15:39 (sixteen years ago)
clooney
― quiz show flat-track bully (darraghmac), Friday, 12 February 2010 15:40 (sixteen years ago)
wahlberg
― ice cr?m, Friday, 12 February 2010 15:40 (sixteen years ago)
YESSSSSSSSS
― t(o_o)t (ENBB), Friday, 12 February 2010 15:41 (sixteen years ago)
Audrey tatou
― dyao, Friday, 12 February 2010 15:41 (sixteen years ago)
cruise
― max, Friday, 12 February 2010 15:43 (sixteen years ago)
weren't there zero Clooney movies PLACING?
would love to see icey watching Gerry, Ludovico Treatment style
― Fusty Moralizer (Dr Morbius), Friday, 12 February 2010 15:48 (sixteen years ago)
oh yeah, the mediocre Coens chain gang escape farce
― Fusty Moralizer (Dr Morbius), Friday, 12 February 2010 15:49 (sixteen years ago)
morbs weve been through this ive seen and enjoyed gerry
― ice cr?m, Friday, 12 February 2010 15:51 (sixteen years ago)
i mean if gvs is yr icon of harcore unfrivolous quality i just dont know man smh
― ice cr?m, Friday, 12 February 2010 15:52 (sixteen years ago)
He certainly isnt
― Fusty Moralizer (Dr Morbius), Friday, 12 February 2010 15:53 (sixteen years ago)
ok then why the torture fantasies!
― ice cr?m, Friday, 12 February 2010 15:54 (sixteen years ago)
i'm just funnin w/ you j0e, lets drink sometime eh
― Fusty Moralizer (Dr Morbius), Friday, 12 February 2010 15:54 (sixteen years ago)
the abu ghraib/rendition stuff in CoM was overt, but i don't know if i'd say heavy-handed. and i didn't mind it then / don't mind it now. all good scifi is about "now" anyway.
i might have objected to it if i didn't like the larger context it was set in, but the movie was so good i thought it made it worked. "references to things" aren't objectionable on their own.
― snoocki (s1ocki), Friday, 12 February 2010 15:55 (sixteen years ago)
yeah i know and yes itd be my pleasure but still why did u choose gerry as yr torture delivery device
― ice cr?m, Friday, 12 February 2010 15:56 (sixteen years ago)
the 2000s: most consistent actor/actor with the best choice in projects
― max, Friday, 12 February 2010 15:56 (sixteen years ago)
it's just the opp of Bourne kineticism -- you know, like the way you guys caricature my taste all the time.
― Fusty Moralizer (Dr Morbius), Friday, 12 February 2010 15:57 (sixteen years ago)
lol ok whatevs - btw gerry is near the top of my excellent bostonisms list even if it doesn actually take place in the boston - of course those guys are like from boston so its not thaaat impressive
― ice cr?m, Friday, 12 February 2010 15:59 (sixteen years ago)
CoM doesn't really strike me as allegorical as basically mechanical, as in, ok, let's say female fertility left the planet, and no one knew why? what would happen? and then, with one woman, it came back? how would that go.
i mean, it's more like those alternate history nerds who wonder what would happen if rommel had a bad cold in 1936 or whatever.
i'm not saying it doesn't play around with a LOT of ideas about the makeup and current state of western society or whatev -- it totally does -- but "fertility" equalling "mary" is only there as a very rough echo imo
― goole, Friday, 12 February 2010 16:04 (sixteen years ago)
movies from my ballot I thought had a chance of making top 100, but didn't9. No Man’s Land - 32pts29. Birth - 12pts33. Wrestler, The - 8pts35. Secretary - 6pts
movies that might have made top 100 if more than 10 ppl had seen them
2. Atanarjuat: The Fast Runner (Zacharias Kunuk, 2001) - 39pts10. Sympathy for Lady Vengeance - 31pts21. Paprika - 20pts24. Oasis - 17pts30. A Tale of Two Sisters (Kim Ji-woon, 2003) - 11pts38. Proposition, The - 3pts
movies I personally would've like to see make top 100 but had no chance tbh5. Decasia - 36pts6. Martyrs - 35pts11. A Good Lawyer’s Wife (Im Sang-soo, 2003) - 30pts
― 鬼の手 (Edward III), Friday, 12 February 2010 16:05 (sixteen years ago)
i think we can all agree (well except u i guess) that there is obviously a deliberate mythical undercurrent to the movie (look at the way every animal in the movie nuzzles up to clive owen - great touch). what i think we're disagreeing on is whether that takes away from the film. imo it IS the film.
― snoocki (s1ocki), Friday, 12 February 2010 16:05 (sixteen years ago)
wasn't sure whether to put that on ballot thread or not but thought you guys needed a break from personal attacks
i think you're underestimating how many people saw "sympathy for lady vengeance" - truth was it was no damn good
― snoocki (s1ocki), Friday, 12 February 2010 16:06 (sixteen years ago)
imo
I think CofM is a fine film, wouldnt have been on my ballot. I tried to say this on the thread about it when I complained it wasnt "radical" enough (a ridiculous thing to say but i'll stick with it). The film would have actually been more interesting to me if it had pursued the religious angle MORE, as it is, it's just standard humanism (as max said upthread) and it's kinda embarrassing and heavy-handed in THAT respect. maybe you could see the film as humanizing the christ parable...and that's the point, the gap that creates the meaning of the film as Lamp said.
― ryan, Friday, 12 February 2010 16:06 (sixteen years ago)
s1ocki, did you not like lady vengeance?
― 鬼の手 (Edward III), Friday, 12 February 2010 16:06 (sixteen years ago)
cuz I can't post about it without you following on w/ "it sucked!"
― 鬼の手 (Edward III), Friday, 12 February 2010 16:07 (sixteen years ago)
I used to be in a band w/two dudes from the CIA, no joke, and they were . . . not this.
― El Poopo Loco (Pancakes Hackman), Friday, 12 February 2010 16:07 (sixteen years ago)
― 鬼の手 (Edward III), Friday, February 12, 2010 11:07 AM (14 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
my actual point is that i do think more than "10 people" saw it as it was the follow-up to a super-popular movie. sorry i just needed to twist the knife there
― snoocki (s1ocki), Friday, 12 February 2010 16:08 (sixteen years ago)
after "thirst" i really had to just completely wash my hands of that guy.