TWBB stands up far better than In the country of old men.
― do you want to be happier? (whatever), Thursday, 11 February 2010 20:44 (sixteen years ago)
disagree with this. twbb is more visceral but i think there's less to it ultimately.
― caek, Thursday, 11 February 2010 20:45 (sixteen years ago)
in a country
of old men
there is a place
where there will be blood
― ('_') (omar little), Thursday, 11 February 2010 20:46 (sixteen years ago)
how the hell can you hate on Paul Dano in TWBB
― Michael Steele, the first black Superman (HI DERE), Thursday, 11 February 2010 20:46 (sixteen years ago)
Hey, did you know Mulholland Drive might be one of the movies surprisingly left off? It's still closed, according to authorities.
http://laist.com/2010/02/11/what_happened_to_mulholland_drive.php
― queen frostine (Eric H.), Thursday, 11 February 2010 20:46 (sixteen years ago)
Soundtrack is the best thing about TWBB, Jonny Greenwood was shafted by the academy.
― The Man With the Magic Eardrums (Billy Dods), Thursday, 11 February 2010 20:47 (sixteen years ago)
I bet he liked it
― 鬼の手 (Edward III), Thursday, 11 February 2010 20:47 (sixteen years ago)
how the hell can you love Paul Dano in TWBB
― da Condom FATHER (some dude), Thursday, 11 February 2010 20:47 (sixteen years ago)
That soundtrack took me out of the movie to be honest. no country didn't have a soudntrack did it?
― Philip Nunez, Thursday, 11 February 2010 20:48 (sixteen years ago)
J0rdan OTM about DDL as Bill the Butcher.
xp - Alfred: the problem is that I was paying attention, and it just seemed structured and edited incompetently, and the ending just seemed like a piss-take, almost cowardly. I don't think it "needed" six or seven hours to understand the character's arc, it wasn't that complex, but getting that feeling shows the flaws of the filmmaker more than anything.
― sarahel, Thursday, 11 February 2010 20:48 (sixteen years ago)
yeah i hated the overbearing score, i'm sure he was trying to blow minds by sidestepping film score cliche on purpose and all but the random horror movie string stabs over scenes that didn't call for them at all really ruined a lot of the movie for me
― da Condom FATHER (some dude), Thursday, 11 February 2010 20:49 (sixteen years ago)
i posted this in the TWBB thread i think, but he wasn't originally cast for that role, and i think it's obvious that he wasn't able to handle it. i just find his shrieking canned & unbelievable.
― birdman mumia (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 11 February 2010 20:49 (sixteen years ago)
my take is that NCFOM is the interesting but annoyingly arsey person who turns up to a party, the sense of self-importance is too pervasive.
TWBB is the interesting and slightly alarming person in the kitchen at the same party who doesn't talk to people that much.
― do you want to be happier? (whatever), Thursday, 11 February 2010 20:49 (sixteen years ago)
no country didn't have a soudntrack did it?
I was completely oblivious to it in the theater but re-watched recently and there are a handful of (very, verrrrry quietly) scored scenes
― Wrinkles, I'll see you on the other side (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 11 February 2010 20:50 (sixteen years ago)
re: bad editing, are you talking about when she's learning sign language and 10 seconds later they're getting married?
― Philip Nunez, Thursday, 11 February 2010 20:50 (sixteen years ago)
TWBB was my #1. ^_^
― mellow, dramatic (WmC), Thursday, 11 February 2010 20:51 (sixteen years ago)
I thought Dano was fine as Eli. He's such a smug, shrill unlikeable little pipsqueak, the perfect foil for Plainview IMO.
― da Wesley CRUSHER (latebloomer), Thursday, 11 February 2010 20:51 (sixteen years ago)
Just had a(nother) long argument with my wife about TWBB. She wants everybody who had anything to do with it to spontaneously combust into a pile of ash.
"Enough to wipe out "The powerrr of the ssssssssinema is going to BRING DOWN THE THIRD REICH!" (hatchet-faced geek on promo tour smiles smugly)? Doubtful."
For a guy who likes to pretend everyone else is a mental midget you sure do pop off with the most juvenile reductionist film interpretations.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Thursday, 11 February 2010 20:52 (sixteen years ago)
i was THIS close to putting Magnolia on my ballot just as a challopy way to thumb my nose at Blood
― da Condom FATHER (some dude), Thursday, 11 February 2010 20:52 (sixteen years ago)
xp - Philip - that, and the way it jumps around and doesn't seem to invest enough in character development or exploration of the social context/issues. It just felt like the people making the movie were bored and impatient.
― sarahel, Thursday, 11 February 2010 20:52 (sixteen years ago)
why wd you watch a pta movie for 'exploration of the social context/issues'
― nakhchivan, Thursday, 11 February 2010 20:53 (sixteen years ago)
TWBB was at its finest before DDL started talking
(that was a direct quote from "QT," Yakuza Fanboy)
― Fusty Moralizer (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 11 February 2010 20:54 (sixteen years ago)
Tarantino only used five S's though
― da Condom FATHER (some dude), Thursday, 11 February 2010 20:55 (sixteen years ago)
No Country For Old Men is well made I guess but it's ultimately kinda glib and doesn't really say or do anything that interesting except for the villain, who is basically the Terminator with a funny haircut.
― da Wesley CRUSHER (latebloomer), Thursday, 11 February 2010 20:55 (sixteen years ago)
ya, I kind of thought that the point of the character was that he was an irredeemable creepy whose storytelling function was to distract you from the level of pathological awfulness inherent in DDL's character until the confrontation at the end of the movie, where your sympathies are fully and rudely inverted
I liked this movie so much more than "Magnolia", it was kind of amazing.
― Michael Steele, the first black Superman (HI DERE), Thursday, 11 February 2010 20:55 (sixteen years ago)
(btw: "the character" = Paul Dano in TWBB)
― Michael Steele, the first black Superman (HI DERE), Thursday, 11 February 2010 20:56 (sixteen years ago)
xp nakhcivan - because it was an adaptation of an Upton Sinclair novel.
― sarahel, Thursday, 11 February 2010 20:56 (sixteen years ago)
TWBB was my #1
― Your body is a spiderland (polyphonic), Thursday, 11 February 2010 20:57 (sixteen years ago)
You sure do a lot of research into a movie you never plan on seeing, then.
― queen frostine (Eric H.), Thursday, 11 February 2010 20:58 (sixteen years ago)
that's probably right, if anything the oddity of the performance adds something to what is basically a cipher for 'organised religion!'
― nakhchivan, Thursday, 11 February 2010 20:59 (sixteen years ago)
"(that was a direct quote from "QT," Yakuza Fanboy)"
Oh so let him do your thinking for you now. That explains a lot.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Thursday, 11 February 2010 21:01 (sixteen years ago)
i don't have a very idealized vision of what ilx's demographic or sensibility is to be actually disappointed or shocked by any of these placements, but somehow i really hoped y'all movie buffs would find a lot more stuff to champion than these Gritty Epics of the '08 Oscars
― da Condom FATHER (some dude), Thursday, 11 February 2010 21:01 (sixteen years ago)
You sure do a lot of research into a movie you never plan on seeing
guy being unavoidably in the media for 2 weeks in October = "research"
― Fusty Moralizer (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 11 February 2010 21:02 (sixteen years ago)
I didn't vote, tho; I'm just periodically shooting the shit about some of the flicks on here.
― Michael Steele, the first black Superman (HI DERE), Thursday, 11 February 2010 21:02 (sixteen years ago)
i went into twbb not really too excited about the whole thing, because tbh i don't really like PTA's other films *that* much (magnolia annoys me, punch-drunk love is forgettable for me, boogie nights is entertaining but just makes me want to watch goodfellas, hard eight isn't bad but doesn't really do much for me) but i loved this film for the most part. totally fantastic, totally OTT, & DDL was insane in the best possible manner.
― ('_') (omar little), Thursday, 11 February 2010 21:02 (sixteen years ago)
where your sympathies are fully and rudely inverted
see - the problem I had with TWBB, and which I have with all of this director's movies, is that I don't have sympathy for any of his characters, because there is this, for lack of a better phrase, posturing postmodern distance that isn't played for enough laughs to be funny.
― sarahel, Thursday, 11 February 2010 21:02 (sixteen years ago)
I'm with you guys that Dano doesn't come off as mythic as Daniel Day Lewis, but that's cause he doesn't have a mythic face! The man can't help that he looks like a venture bros.
― Philip Nunez, Thursday, 11 February 2010 21:03 (sixteen years ago)
lol
― da Condom FATHER (some dude), Thursday, 11 February 2010 21:04 (sixteen years ago)
i love that the last scene turns into an episode of itchy and scratchy, too.
― ('_') (omar little), Thursday, 11 February 2010 21:04 (sixteen years ago)
It's as if we're supposed to have sympathy for his characters because we've seen enough other movies with similar characters that are sympathetic/that make you actually care about them.
― sarahel, Thursday, 11 February 2010 21:04 (sixteen years ago)
Now I'm kinda hoping that out of the 4 movies to come, Children of Men will be the winner. That one felt more fresh and daring and innovative to me than ESotSM or Mulholland Drice (haven't seen No Country for Old Men). MD is a fine film, but there isn't anything in it Lynch hadn't already done (sometimes better) in the 80s/90s, so it doesn't much feel like "best of the 00s" to me.
― Tuomas, Thursday, 11 February 2010 21:05 (sixteen years ago)
sympathy for film characters is overrated
― do you want to be happier? (whatever), Thursday, 11 February 2010 21:05 (sixteen years ago)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
― da Wesley CRUSHER (latebloomer), Thursday, 11 February 2010 21:06 (sixteen years ago)
i never got the impression we were supposed to have sympathy for anyone but his bastard in a basket, and i did, even though he's a rich oil tycoon!
― Philip Nunez, Thursday, 11 February 2010 21:07 (sixteen years ago)
Sympathy For Film Characters Is Overrated fav Chan Wook-Park.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Thursday, 11 February 2010 21:07 (sixteen years ago)
Dano definitely the worst thing in TWBB. Very distracting. Dude was just severely out of his depth actor-wise.
― circa1916, Thursday, 11 February 2010 21:07 (sixteen years ago)
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v212/etienne_saint/nocountry.png
Dear sweet Jesus is this good. I just saw it this morning and I'm resisting the urge to run back to the theater right now.
The one thing about this film that's been pissing people off is the ending, in which all the building tension dissipates (rather than climaxing). The more I think about it, the more I really love the Coen's desicison to keep a pivotal death offscreen. It allows us to judge their fate more objectively, and to be shocked by the matter-of-factness of their demise.
And the lack of music. One Mariachi joke and like two stings in the whole film. I can't believe how fucking awesome this is.
― Cosmo Vitelli
iuvd it - unsurprisingly mccarthy's dialog is perfect for the screen.
strange i was totally at the mercy of suspense for the whole thing, then after i realized the pace and style was calming - a seeming contradiction that somehow totally made sense - quite unique!
and javier bardem is is the a++++++ dog as usual.
― jhøshea
another thing I liked about this movie was all the silent scenes of Llewelyn and Chigurh doing stuff with their hands .... hiding the satchel, cleaning a bullet wound, cutting up tent poles ..... reminded me of those Hemingway stories that are all guy builds a fire and ties fly-fishing lures (not exactly a huge revelation since McCarthy gets the Hemingway thing all the time)
― dmr
I saw it this afternoon. So much of it was exactly as I had pictured it in my head when I read the book in January. Lots of it felt very Coen brothers even though the film as a whole didn't feel a whole lot like their others to me.
I thought that Sheriff Bell eating the exact same breakfast in two different scenes did a lot for the character - he's the same dude, doing the same stuff, while all this other craziness happens around him. I thought it was a nice touch.
― joygoat
I think that, overall, this movie really captured McCormack's tone and mood - I was especially impressed by the way in which they nailed the landscape of the opening scenes so well. The silhouetted images of the hunters coming upon Llewellyn's truck and slashing the tires was just great - faceless threats. The subsequent chase was alright, but could have gone on a bit longer. Still, they had more pressing matters...
If Bardem doesn't get nominated for an Academy Award for this, I will be so disappointed. Chigur was just so over-the-top awesome, but also full of little touches that drove home that, if you've met this guy, you're probably dead - the one that really springs to mind is the crazed look he gives Woody Harrelson during their scene in the hotel room; A sort of ecstatic glee in the way things are unfolding.
Tommy Lee Jones gets into this role like few others that I've seen - and it could have been BAD. When you read the book, both his interactions with other people - his deputy and his wife, most notably, and Mrs. Moss - and his monologues, you get this sense that, if read with one type of accents or emphasis, these parts could be horribly hackneyed and cliched. But, upon thinking about it, that's kind of the point - Jones IS a cliche. And his time, at least from his standpoint, is over. Given that understanding, I enjoyed Jones' performance as a pretty nuanced and subdued one. He makes all the right judgment calls and does all the things his job requires him to do - but you never lose this going-through-the-motions feeling. Just kind of tired of doing the right thing, but unwilling to stop.
And Josh Brolin was just great. A plain-spoken guy who gets caught in an undercurrent of life that he has no place being in, and no way of getting out of, but will be damned if he gives up. Despite having a rapidly-widening understanding of what was going down, he's still fighting this great fight, and attempting to get to the end point where he's rich with his wife. But, and this is my one major beef with the movie version, once he steps off the straight and narrow and accepts the invitation of the girl to "have a few beers," his end is sealed. I liked the way that the book dealt with it more - entirely chaste, and ultimately not really affecting the outcome of the story. Once he threw his hat in the ring, there was no way he was getting out alive.
― B.L.A.M.
Finally saw in its last days in NYC theaters ... very good, considering it had nothing esp new to say about crime, violence etc. As for tipsy's "reactionary" accusation, I think they mostly blunted that tendency in the book, most strongly with the geezer saying to Jones at the end "You're not seeing anything new" or whatev (is that even in the novel?).
Bardem was splendid tho he was playing a "ghost"/symbol not a human. The chuckle with "Everybody says the same thing" was perfect.
― Dr Morbius
'No Country for Old Men' - The anticipation thread
#4
No Country For Old MenJoel and Ethan Coen2007United States(1314 points, 52 votes, 1 first place)
― ('_') (omar little), Thursday, 11 February 2010 21:07 (sixteen years ago)
^^^basically an amazing film, on another day could have been my #1
― ('_') (omar little), Thursday, 11 February 2010 21:08 (sixteen years ago)
Guess 'The Ladykillers' isn't going to make it.
― The Man With the Magic Eardrums (Billy Dods), Thursday, 11 February 2010 21:09 (sixteen years ago)