The (Now-Overrated) ILX Top 100 Films of the 2000s Poll Results

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (7166 of them)

exactly why i stopped at 20

strongohulkingtonsghost, Thursday, 11 February 2010 14:55 (sixteen years ago)

I sort of wish I had as well. Most films in my 21-40 have some kind of significant flaw. I only see a couple of films a year that I think are close to faultless.

gotanynewsstory? (Dorianlynskey), Thursday, 11 February 2010 14:57 (sixteen years ago)

volcano was the last film I watched that was faultless

dyao, Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:00 (sixteen years ago)

as A. Elk said about her theory in a Python sketch, "it's mine."

But Anne Elk (Miss)'s theory that she had was a theory anyone could've had.

queen frostine (Eric H.), Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:02 (sixteen years ago)

darko, lynch, werner and wong

would like to see the offices of this law firm tbh

鬼の手 (Edward III), Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:08 (sixteen years ago)

the one you just invented?

I didn't invent the quote in that post- it was a direct quote from iatee?

the point of voting in a poll is to get stuff you liked on that poll

quiz show flat-track bully (darraghmac), Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:10 (sixteen years ago)

In no way suggesting that Omar should cook up any more screencaps, but I'd be interested to see 101-150 just in list form.

pretty sure he's planning to do this IIRC, mentioned on the noms thread maybe?

鬼の手 (Edward III), Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:14 (sixteen years ago)

right but you're assuming that doesn't overlap with your pov

right but you're assuming that tactical voting =

'i hated this but just wanted it to place higher on the list'

when really tactical voting (for me) was voting for a bunch of movies I liked, only skipping the ones that had 0 chance of making it and giving preference to stuff that might not get enough support from ilx cause everyone is busy voting for david lynch. I dunno, the difference between tactical voting and not tactical voting isn't actually that big.

iatee, Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:17 (sixteen years ago)

how long does it take to get honey nut cornflakes

nakhchivan, Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:17 (sixteen years ago)

like why the f would somebody vote for a movie they hated?

xp

iatee, Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:17 (sixteen years ago)

I wrote some software to decide my voting. It asked me a bunch of y/n questions about which film was better than which other film, and then ranked the films accordingly.

Tactical voting on a film poll? Wha? It's a poll, not a contest.

NotEnough, Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:18 (sixteen years ago)

oops, delete the second 'right but'

iatee, Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:18 (sixteen years ago)

It's a poll, not a contest.

haha call it what you want

iatee, Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:18 (sixteen years ago)

s'ok, i kinda forgot that i'd written 'i hated this but just wanted it to place higher on the list'

quiz show flat-track bully (darraghmac), Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:20 (sixteen years ago)

I only voted for stuff that I knew would annoy people on this thread.

gotanynewsstory? (Dorianlynskey), Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:20 (sixteen years ago)

how long does it take to get honey nut cornflakes

― nakhchivan, Thursday, February 11, 2010 11:17 PM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark

honey nut cheerios, man, honey nut cheerios

dyao, Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:21 (sixteen years ago)

tbh I would be more interested in a poll where people only voted for stuff that they hated but they wanted to place high on the list

iatee, Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:21 (sixteen years ago)

i just voted for the 40 movies i liked the best for the nominations list, and tried to do that in order of how much i liked them. other people's opinions of them, or speculation of where they'd finish on the list didn't enter into it.

quiz show flat-track bully (darraghmac), Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:21 (sixteen years ago)

I wrote some software to decide my voting. It asked me a bunch of y/n questions about which film was better than which other film, and then ranked the films accordingly.

Tactical voting on a film poll? Wha? It's a poll, not a contest.

― NotEnough, Thursday, February 11, 2010 11:18 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark

hot or not: film edition?

dyao, Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:22 (sixteen years ago)

honey nut cheerios

no accounting for taste

nakhchivan, Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:22 (sixteen years ago)

and tried to do that in order of how much i liked them.

which is where the absurdity comes in, as someone mentioned earlier, cause how much did you really prefer #34 to #35? might as well get the most out of your ballot imo.

iatee, Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:23 (sixteen years ago)

'which of these would i prefer to watch again right now' i guess? it was thrown together tbh.

quiz show flat-track bully (darraghmac), Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:25 (sixteen years ago)

i agree with whoever said tactical voting is as silly as getting upset at the results.

wall•egina (s1ocki), Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:31 (sixteen years ago)

but like history mayne, i think at most maybe 1 or 2 people on this board have seen my #1, and i'm positive that a couple others in my top 10 aren't going to "place" at all.

wall•egina (s1ocki), Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:32 (sixteen years ago)

Looks like the only movie from my top 10 to place is Happy-Go-Lucky. Somehow I kinda doubt Innocence or The Isle or Lilo & Stitch would've made it this far.

Tuomas, Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:35 (sixteen years ago)

no don't worry tuomas, I tactical voted lilo & stitch into the top 10

iatee, Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:35 (sixteen years ago)

Great!

Tuomas, Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:36 (sixteen years ago)

we ah doolee appointed feduhral mahshulls

― V-E-R-Y (history mayne), Thursday, February 11, 2010 8:18 AM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

but during yr stay, you will obey protocol.

ice cr?m, Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:37 (sixteen years ago)

i tactically voted it OUT

wall•egina (s1ocki), Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:37 (sixteen years ago)

just voted for 40 movies i couldn't care less about to block lilo & stitch iirc

quiz show flat-track bully (darraghmac), Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:38 (sixteen years ago)

i know that morbs has seen my number one and maybe a couple of others have. i thought there was a slim chance of it making the list, in the very lowest reaches, until i saw the number of votes that the 100th place film garnered.

jed_, Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:38 (sixteen years ago)

ya me too haha

wall•egina (s1ocki), Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:40 (sixteen years ago)

i was like ok... not gonna happen.

wall•egina (s1ocki), Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:40 (sixteen years ago)

would like to see a list of #1s that didnt make it at all.

wall•egina (s1ocki), Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:40 (sixteen years ago)

or most #1s/not placing

wall•egina (s1ocki), Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:41 (sixteen years ago)

i've long since given up on any tsai at all, which means my #2 won't place. there's at least a few more in my top 10 that i'm sure won't either, but otoh i fully expect my #1 to be the actual #1.

because i like to vote for WINNERS.

hellzapoppa (tipsy mothra), Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:42 (sixteen years ago)

i think at most maybe 1 or 2 people on this board have seen my #1

namely?

nakhchivan, Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:43 (sixteen years ago)

would like to see a list of #1s that didnt make it at all.

lilo & stitch

鬼の手 (Edward III), Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:43 (sixteen years ago)

I think these polls would be sorta fascinating if the tactical voting was organized and people traded votes for stuff they liked, agreed on movies to support etc.

in a weird way the results would be a lot more representative of ilx's taste...something like LOTR, for example, probably has a lot more support on ilx than the results suggest. split votes for less popular genres/directors wouldn't be as big of a problem.

iatee, Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:43 (sixteen years ago)

namely?

― nakhchivan, Thursday, February 11, 2010 10:43 AM (33 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

namely me and some other dude

snoocki (s1ocki), Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:44 (sixteen years ago)

the film

nakhchivan, Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:45 (sixteen years ago)

me and some other dude: the film

snoocki (s1ocki), Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:46 (sixteen years ago)

21/85 for me. Of the latest batch: The Departed, 4M/3W/2D, Lost in Translation, Grizzly Man.

Lusty Mo Frazier (jaymc), Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:48 (sixteen years ago)

Oops, I mean: 21/90.

Lusty Mo Frazier (jaymc), Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:49 (sixteen years ago)

is that miranda july film gonna be top 10?

velko, Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:49 (sixteen years ago)

dear God I hope not

Mr. Que, Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:51 (sixteen years ago)

me and some dude: the film

would watch

strongohulkingtonsghost, Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:52 (sixteen years ago)

me and some other dude: the film

never distributed outside of bluetooth has surpassed single am festival showing as signifier of impeccable realness

nakhchivan, Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:52 (sixteen years ago)

c'mon omar gimme at least number ten before i have to go to work

strongohulkingtonsghost, Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:53 (sixteen years ago)

xp Sounds like mumblecore.

Lusty Mo Frazier (jaymc), Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:53 (sixteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.