The (Now-Overrated) ILX Top 100 Films of the 2000s Poll Results

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (7166 of them)

omar should just not post the top 10 imo

quiz show flat-track bully (darraghmac), Thursday, 11 February 2010 14:50 (sixteen years ago)

yes, i made a post saying the exact same thing up thread. but if people do that on purpose it does it even worse. i'm not complaining because the results of this poll are not important to my life so had i voted i would have voted for stuff i actually thought was good posts

I voted for stuff that I thought was good (?? duh?) I just also ordered my ballot so that my favorite stuff that might be slightly outside of the top 100 might manage to make it. (as happened w/ harold and kumar.)

iatee, Thursday, 11 February 2010 14:52 (sixteen years ago)

ok cool

harbl, Thursday, 11 February 2010 14:52 (sixteen years ago)

i really don't 'get' the other POV

the one you just invented?
probably nobody just writes in random stuff for shit and giggles but these things often contain an element of negotiation (cf keynesian beauty contest) especially among people with less usual choices, or probably a lot of people for whom the notion of a 34th favourite film is absurd

nakhchivan, Thursday, 11 February 2010 14:53 (sixteen years ago)

or probably a lot of people for whom the notion of a 34th favourite film is absurd

lol exactly

iatee, Thursday, 11 February 2010 14:53 (sixteen years ago)

omar should just not post the top 10 imo

― quiz show flat-track bully (darraghmac), Thursday, February 11, 2010 10:50 PM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark

a subtle comment on the ambiguous ending that movies seem to favor nowadays

99. The Juggalo Teacher (dyao), Thursday, 11 February 2010 14:54 (sixteen years ago)

After you get out of the top 10 of your personal list, doesn't the ranking become rather arbitrary anyway? I'm damned if I can say why my number 32 is better than my number 33 and probably if I lost my ballot and had to do it again from memory they'd be in slightly different positions. So sure, why not be a little tactical on that level.

gotanynewsstory? (Dorianlynskey), Thursday, 11 February 2010 14:55 (sixteen years ago)

exactly why i stopped at 20

strongohulkingtonsghost, Thursday, 11 February 2010 14:55 (sixteen years ago)

I sort of wish I had as well. Most films in my 21-40 have some kind of significant flaw. I only see a couple of films a year that I think are close to faultless.

gotanynewsstory? (Dorianlynskey), Thursday, 11 February 2010 14:57 (sixteen years ago)

volcano was the last film I watched that was faultless

dyao, Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:00 (sixteen years ago)

as A. Elk said about her theory in a Python sketch, "it's mine."

But Anne Elk (Miss)'s theory that she had was a theory anyone could've had.

queen frostine (Eric H.), Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:02 (sixteen years ago)

darko, lynch, werner and wong

would like to see the offices of this law firm tbh

鬼の手 (Edward III), Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:08 (sixteen years ago)

the one you just invented?

I didn't invent the quote in that post- it was a direct quote from iatee?

the point of voting in a poll is to get stuff you liked on that poll

quiz show flat-track bully (darraghmac), Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:10 (sixteen years ago)

In no way suggesting that Omar should cook up any more screencaps, but I'd be interested to see 101-150 just in list form.

pretty sure he's planning to do this IIRC, mentioned on the noms thread maybe?

鬼の手 (Edward III), Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:14 (sixteen years ago)

right but you're assuming that doesn't overlap with your pov

right but you're assuming that tactical voting =

'i hated this but just wanted it to place higher on the list'

when really tactical voting (for me) was voting for a bunch of movies I liked, only skipping the ones that had 0 chance of making it and giving preference to stuff that might not get enough support from ilx cause everyone is busy voting for david lynch. I dunno, the difference between tactical voting and not tactical voting isn't actually that big.

iatee, Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:17 (sixteen years ago)

how long does it take to get honey nut cornflakes

nakhchivan, Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:17 (sixteen years ago)

like why the f would somebody vote for a movie they hated?

xp

iatee, Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:17 (sixteen years ago)

I wrote some software to decide my voting. It asked me a bunch of y/n questions about which film was better than which other film, and then ranked the films accordingly.

Tactical voting on a film poll? Wha? It's a poll, not a contest.

NotEnough, Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:18 (sixteen years ago)

oops, delete the second 'right but'

iatee, Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:18 (sixteen years ago)

It's a poll, not a contest.

haha call it what you want

iatee, Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:18 (sixteen years ago)

s'ok, i kinda forgot that i'd written 'i hated this but just wanted it to place higher on the list'

quiz show flat-track bully (darraghmac), Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:20 (sixteen years ago)

I only voted for stuff that I knew would annoy people on this thread.

gotanynewsstory? (Dorianlynskey), Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:20 (sixteen years ago)

how long does it take to get honey nut cornflakes

― nakhchivan, Thursday, February 11, 2010 11:17 PM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark

honey nut cheerios, man, honey nut cheerios

dyao, Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:21 (sixteen years ago)

tbh I would be more interested in a poll where people only voted for stuff that they hated but they wanted to place high on the list

iatee, Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:21 (sixteen years ago)

i just voted for the 40 movies i liked the best for the nominations list, and tried to do that in order of how much i liked them. other people's opinions of them, or speculation of where they'd finish on the list didn't enter into it.

quiz show flat-track bully (darraghmac), Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:21 (sixteen years ago)

I wrote some software to decide my voting. It asked me a bunch of y/n questions about which film was better than which other film, and then ranked the films accordingly.

Tactical voting on a film poll? Wha? It's a poll, not a contest.

― NotEnough, Thursday, February 11, 2010 11:18 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark

hot or not: film edition?

dyao, Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:22 (sixteen years ago)

honey nut cheerios

no accounting for taste

nakhchivan, Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:22 (sixteen years ago)

and tried to do that in order of how much i liked them.

which is where the absurdity comes in, as someone mentioned earlier, cause how much did you really prefer #34 to #35? might as well get the most out of your ballot imo.

iatee, Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:23 (sixteen years ago)

'which of these would i prefer to watch again right now' i guess? it was thrown together tbh.

quiz show flat-track bully (darraghmac), Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:25 (sixteen years ago)

i agree with whoever said tactical voting is as silly as getting upset at the results.

wall•egina (s1ocki), Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:31 (sixteen years ago)

but like history mayne, i think at most maybe 1 or 2 people on this board have seen my #1, and i'm positive that a couple others in my top 10 aren't going to "place" at all.

wall•egina (s1ocki), Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:32 (sixteen years ago)

Looks like the only movie from my top 10 to place is Happy-Go-Lucky. Somehow I kinda doubt Innocence or The Isle or Lilo & Stitch would've made it this far.

Tuomas, Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:35 (sixteen years ago)

no don't worry tuomas, I tactical voted lilo & stitch into the top 10

iatee, Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:35 (sixteen years ago)

Great!

Tuomas, Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:36 (sixteen years ago)

we ah doolee appointed feduhral mahshulls

― V-E-R-Y (history mayne), Thursday, February 11, 2010 8:18 AM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

but during yr stay, you will obey protocol.

ice cr?m, Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:37 (sixteen years ago)

i tactically voted it OUT

wall•egina (s1ocki), Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:37 (sixteen years ago)

just voted for 40 movies i couldn't care less about to block lilo & stitch iirc

quiz show flat-track bully (darraghmac), Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:38 (sixteen years ago)

i know that morbs has seen my number one and maybe a couple of others have. i thought there was a slim chance of it making the list, in the very lowest reaches, until i saw the number of votes that the 100th place film garnered.

jed_, Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:38 (sixteen years ago)

ya me too haha

wall•egina (s1ocki), Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:40 (sixteen years ago)

i was like ok... not gonna happen.

wall•egina (s1ocki), Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:40 (sixteen years ago)

would like to see a list of #1s that didnt make it at all.

wall•egina (s1ocki), Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:40 (sixteen years ago)

or most #1s/not placing

wall•egina (s1ocki), Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:41 (sixteen years ago)

i've long since given up on any tsai at all, which means my #2 won't place. there's at least a few more in my top 10 that i'm sure won't either, but otoh i fully expect my #1 to be the actual #1.

because i like to vote for WINNERS.

hellzapoppa (tipsy mothra), Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:42 (sixteen years ago)

i think at most maybe 1 or 2 people on this board have seen my #1

namely?

nakhchivan, Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:43 (sixteen years ago)

would like to see a list of #1s that didnt make it at all.

lilo & stitch

鬼の手 (Edward III), Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:43 (sixteen years ago)

I think these polls would be sorta fascinating if the tactical voting was organized and people traded votes for stuff they liked, agreed on movies to support etc.

in a weird way the results would be a lot more representative of ilx's taste...something like LOTR, for example, probably has a lot more support on ilx than the results suggest. split votes for less popular genres/directors wouldn't be as big of a problem.

iatee, Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:43 (sixteen years ago)

namely?

― nakhchivan, Thursday, February 11, 2010 10:43 AM (33 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

namely me and some other dude

snoocki (s1ocki), Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:44 (sixteen years ago)

the film

nakhchivan, Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:45 (sixteen years ago)

me and some other dude: the film

snoocki (s1ocki), Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:46 (sixteen years ago)

21/85 for me. Of the latest batch: The Departed, 4M/3W/2D, Lost in Translation, Grizzly Man.

Lusty Mo Frazier (jaymc), Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:48 (sixteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.