i don't count how many movies i see but i only go to ones i think i will like so i might have seen only 50-100 from the nominations list, and i think i would trust my own vote more than someone who saw hundreds of mediocre or shitty movies. i watch a lot of older stuff though. i think i would have voted for like 5 of those that have placed so far.
― harbl, Wednesday, February 10, 2010 9:05 PM (19 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
^^same here but have seen fewer from the noms list, quite easy to ditch the 10 needed to have a shortlist, then odd to think some here have seen a great deal more and me be ordering a whole lotta shit that they don't have time for.
― do you want to be happier? (whatever), Wednesday, 10 February 2010 21:07 (sixteen years ago)
closer to 50 than 100 i think, just guessing
― harbl, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 21:09 (sixteen years ago)
also watched at festivals a fair amount of stuff that was new, but didn't get much/any release otherwise, no one was going to vote for it - african films, french films, hong kong films at the smithsonian, etc.
― kicker conspiracy (b. favre ha ha) (daria-g), Wednesday, 10 February 2010 21:10 (sixteen years ago)
looking at the poll so far the bottom quarter looks far more interesting than some of the shite in the 40-25. whole thing still missing some better ferrell than burgundy though.
― do you want to be happier? (whatever), Wednesday, 10 February 2010 21:15 (sixteen years ago)
hey what the hell is CQ that yall keep talking about
― SMALL BONES, SMALL BODIES (jjjusten), Wednesday, February 10, 2010 9:04 PM (12 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
congressional quarterly, the movie
― harbl, Wednesday, February 10, 2010 9:05 PM (11 minutes ago) Bookmark
yeah this is definitely what i keep imagining
― 69, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 21:18 (sixteen years ago)
i watched a lot of movies in the past decade but very many of them weren't new, it was when i first got sort of nerdy about cinema
^ This. Although I'm not terribly nerdy about cinema, I probably did (for example) see as many '70s movies in the past decade as I did '00s movies. Many of which overshadowed any number of movies in my '00s ballot by some degree.
Probably also worth noting that I felt kinda compelled to use all 40 of my slots, even though I'd probably never count some of the movies in the bottom half of my ballot among my favorites of the last decade under other circumstances.
― SNEEZED GOING DOWN STEPS, PAIN WHEN PUTTING SOCKS ON (Deric W. Haircare), Wednesday, 10 February 2010 21:19 (sixteen years ago)
marie antoinette was better than lost in translation― vag white band (history mayne), Wednesday, February 10, 2010 8:37 PM (32 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
by miles; adaptation sux tho sorry
― chris nibbs (cozen), Wednesday, 10 February 2010 21:20 (sixteen years ago)
u suck
― horseshoe, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 21:20 (sixteen years ago)
everyone sucks
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 10 February 2010 21:21 (sixteen years ago)
mainly because it's more much vivien westwood than it is roman coppola
― chris nibbs (cozen), Wednesday, 10 February 2010 21:22 (sixteen years ago)
adaptation is a film for ppl who like charlier brooker
charlie*
― chris nibbs (cozen), Wednesday, 10 February 2010 21:23 (sixteen years ago)
*charlier
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 10 February 2010 21:23 (sixteen years ago)
vivienne(sorry, spelling nazi)
― kicker conspiracy (b. favre ha ha) (daria-g), Wednesday, 10 February 2010 21:24 (sixteen years ago)
and charlier brooker is a person for ppl who don't like ppl
― chris nibbs (cozen), Wednesday, 10 February 2010 21:24 (sixteen years ago)
thank you for explaining your insult as i am american
― horseshoe, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 21:25 (sixteen years ago)
can someone explain history mayne to me, as i am american?
― sarahel, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 21:25 (sixteen years ago)
He's a british.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 10 February 2010 21:26 (sixteen years ago)
you gotta go here:
http://www.freefoto.com/images/1214/03/1214_03_65---Center-for-Maine-History-Museum--Portland--Maine--USA_web.jpg
― some dude, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 21:27 (sixteen years ago)
CQ - isn't this roman coppola's film?
― 鬼の手 (Edward III), Wednesday, 10 February 2010 21:32 (sixteen years ago)
also, finally got around to reading upthread, wish there was more discussion of o brother + battle royale, but thx for quoting me on the former omar, not too many passionate defenders of it on ILX
― 鬼の手 (Edward III), Wednesday, 10 February 2010 21:33 (sixteen years ago)
o brother is probably my favourite film to place here that i didn't vote for. great ending esp.
― caek, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 21:36 (sixteen years ago)
were in a tight spot fellas
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 21:37 (sixteen years ago)
and v. quotable indeed
― caek, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 21:37 (sixteen years ago)
looking forward to this western they're doing next year
― caek, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 21:38 (sixteen years ago)
lol yes CQ is one case where it's the title itself rather than ppl using initials of a longer title
― zvookster, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 21:38 (sixteen years ago)
still 2 matrices & 3 spider men to place rite
― johnny crunch, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 21:40 (sixteen years ago)
Trying to catch up with this thread, really surprised about LiT considering how much hate it got from the get-go. I found it ok, would never have voted for it tho.
― Not the real Village People, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 21:41 (sixteen years ago)
http://szwayabrown.com/BeerAndMud/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/airplane-lloyd-bridges-sniff-glue.jpglooks like i picked a bad time to still be waiting on the Tonetta777 oeuvre to show up...
― ┌∩┐(◕_◕)┌∩┐ (Steve Shasta), Wednesday, 10 February 2010 21:42 (sixteen years ago)
I only remember one thing from CQ tbh
http://ferdyonfilms.com/CQ14.jpg
― 鬼の手 (Edward III), Wednesday, 10 February 2010 21:44 (sixteen years ago)
hey, I see I didnt miss nuthin.
On the plus side, odds this poll won't have anything by the Dardennes are pretty good.
I'm glad they won't be sullied by an appearance (not an Avatar ref).
Rosetta is likely their worst film tho
― Fusty Moralizer (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 10 February 2010 21:44 (sixteen years ago)
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v212/etienne_saint/lettherightonein.jpg
saw this tonight, liked it a lot. the filmmaking was imaginatively low-key (big scene at the end is the obvious example, but all the way through the choice of what's shown and how, plus really terrific sound design -- a lot of the movie happens on the soundtrack). kids were great. i didn't read the ending as exactly deterministic. obviously oskar could end up like the previous keeper, but i don't think the movie is cynical about eli's affection for him.
anyway after watching 30 days of night and i am legend last month i was bitching about how there were no new angles left in vampire movies, so it's nice to be proven wrong.
― tipsy mothra
saw this yesterday. not a masterpiece but really really good. i loved how it was part vampire/part bully revenge/part teen romance. my heart almost sank in that scene at the end and even tho i knew what was gonna happen i liked how they filmed it from a slightly unusual POV. i loved how sweet/kinda cherubic oskar looked too. really good film. prob only 2nd to the wrestler for films i liked the most this year.
― titchy
I'd never even heard of the book before seeing the film, so approached these in the reverse order. Leaving aside the possibility that the english translation could be partly to blame for the clumsiness of some of the book (and I think it probably is), it seems to me that Lindqvist's own screenplay is so much more elegant and focused; maybe the process of having to review, and edit and strip down his book and turn it into a script helped to unlock its potential.
― Bill A
I can hardly be the first to say that this is The Hunger remade by Lukas Moodysson - from the former, the sense of the vampires as being a little bit sad and lonely, while from the later all the stuff about children in Sweden. It seemed like at least some of the dialogue between Eli and Oskar was straight out of Together.
Great film though.
― The Real Dirty Vicar
i liked how the blood sucking was this intensely private act. for all the vampires it's this uncontrollable urge that demands some privacy. when oskar's blood drips onto the floor eli is like "go AWAY!!" and when lacke's wife first smells her own blood, it's like she loses herself for a second.
otm about it feeling "scandinavian" at least if wallander episodes are anything to go by. all is calm and deliberate. the characters were often made tiny against these giant landscapes.
― Tracer Hand
Lat den ratte komma in / Let The Right One In (Swedish Vampire Film)
#15
Let the Right One InTomas Alfredson2008Sweden(627 points, 29 votes)
― ('_') (omar little), Wednesday, 10 February 2010 21:46 (sixteen years ago)
possibly lengthy meeting in a few minutes, don't expect more updates for a little while...
― ('_') (omar little), Wednesday, 10 February 2010 21:47 (sixteen years ago)
nearly fell asleep on this one. Liked the climax in the pool tho, mostly for one shot.
― Fusty Moralizer (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 10 February 2010 21:47 (sixteen years ago)
rules
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 21:47 (sixteen years ago)
dislike intensely
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 21:49 (sixteen years ago)
this is absolute crap.
― jed_, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 21:50 (sixteen years ago)
awesome to see that place!
xposts for some of us more than others obv
― SMALL BONES, SMALL BODIES (jjjusten), Wednesday, 10 February 2010 21:51 (sixteen years ago)
horror flick for people "not usually into that sort of thing" = PASS
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 21:51 (sixteen years ago)
i gotta say, the entire horror film contingent in l.a. seemed to get behind this one, which was unusual to me seeing as how they're more ready to slobber over super-twisted french or japanese horror than anything this comparatively subtle or quiet.
― ('_') (omar little), Wednesday, 10 February 2010 21:53 (sixteen years ago)
i'm not usually into that sort of this and i definitely wasn't into this. it doesn't make a lick of sense.
― jed_, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 21:53 (sixteen years ago)
neither does yr post!
― karl...arlk...rlka...lkar..., Wednesday, 10 February 2010 21:54 (sixteen years ago)
i was under the impression that "horror film for those not into" didn't really stick as a criticism of this, cos it wasn't really meant to be a horror film in the 1st place?
(still have not seen, btw)
― goole, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 21:54 (sixteen years ago)
makes far too MUCH sense. compendium of vampire cliches shoved clunkily through brooding euro filter.
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 21:54 (sixteen years ago)
sign me up!
― goole, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 21:55 (sixteen years ago)
pool sequence really was all that, though. maybe i'm just bitter it was wasted on the preceding hour-plus.
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 21:56 (sixteen years ago)
Boring.
― Inculcate a spirit of serfdom in children (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 10 February 2010 21:57 (sixteen years ago)
i didn't finish it, not remotely scary or interesting. maybe i should've stuck it out for the "pool sequence."
― karl...arlk...rlka...lkar..., Wednesday, 10 February 2010 21:57 (sixteen years ago)
really, what does a Pulse need to do to satisfy horrorwise?
― Fusty Moralizer (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 10 February 2010 21:58 (sixteen years ago)
lol "likely", a rare moment of uncertainty from this guy
― zvookster, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 21:58 (sixteen years ago)