lol ghost world
― pro bono publico (history mayne), Wednesday, 10 February 2010 20:01 (sixteen years ago)
rock and roll baby!! freedom of speech!!
― goole, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 20:01 (sixteen years ago)
didn't vote for it but 'ghost world' was alright, i also figured it had to be a 90s film. enid def reminded me of one of my high school 'friends,' also i suppose i kind of dressed like that from about 94 to 97
― kicker conspiracy (b. favre ha ha) (daria-g), Wednesday, 10 February 2010 20:01 (sixteen years ago)
The original comic came out in the 90s, maybe that's why.
― Tuomas, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 20:03 (sixteen years ago)
I think I still make Blueshammer jokes every few years.
― Darin, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 20:03 (sixteen years ago)
reggae and Blueshammer are worthwhile legacies imo
― Freddy 'The Wonder Chicken' (Gukbe), Wednesday, 10 February 2010 20:03 (sixteen years ago)
yeah I totally forgot Memento and Ghost World came out in the 00s lolz.
Ghost World is okay but Thora Birch's character is such a loathsome bitch
― mark kerfuffalo (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 10 February 2010 20:04 (sixteen years ago)
yeah the problem with the film is that rebecca was so bland that you couldn't figure out why enid would be so heartbroken about the deterioration of their relationship. they seemed more like co-conspirators in the first half of the comic that came slowly out of sync.
admittedly this may be more the fault of scarjo than the script.
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 20:05 (sixteen years ago)
lol the fucking INCREDIBLES? jesus christ ilx you crypto-randian fucks.
― pro bono publico (history mayne), Wednesday, 10 February 2010 20:05 (sixteen years ago)
Shakey, I think it's intentional that Enid is unlikable.
― Tuomas, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 20:05 (sixteen years ago)
like she seemed bored with their antics before the movie even began.
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 20:06 (sixteen years ago)
finally, a discussion about whether the incredibles is randian
― iatee, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 20:06 (sixteen years ago)
tuomas is right, shakey
― caek, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 20:07 (sixteen years ago)
Has Scarlett Johansson ever been good in any movie? Do people like her only because she does indie flicks and has big boobs?
― Tuomas, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 20:07 (sixteen years ago)
I don't think the indie flicks part even matters
― iatee, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 20:07 (sixteen years ago)
man i cant wait for the mass pants-shitting when lost in translation shows up.
scarlett johansson is a worse actress than lindsay lohan. there, i feel better for having said it.
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 20:08 (sixteen years ago)
― iatee, Wednesday, February 10, 2010 12:07 PM (7 seconds ago)
― sarahel, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 20:08 (sixteen years ago)
I think it does, because she's clearly wank fodder for "cool" people who don't want to drool over the movies of Pamela Anderson.
― Tuomas, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 20:09 (sixteen years ago)
Was just thinking that. (I just drew up a list of what I imagine the top 16 will be -- I'll be surprised if one of them doesn't make it.)
― Hoisin Murphy (jaymc), Wednesday, 10 February 2010 20:09 (sixteen years ago)
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Wednesday, February 10, 2010 12:08 PM (22 seconds ago)
i think you and i were the only ones who hated it at the time it was released.
― ┌∩┐(◕_◕)┌∩┐ (Steve Shasta), Wednesday, 10 February 2010 20:09 (sixteen years ago)
show us yr list man xp
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 20:10 (sixteen years ago)
watched it again recently and hated it even more. the loss of all those sweeping screen-sized shots of tokyo just makes you realize how empty it is even faster.
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 20:11 (sixteen years ago)
its a movie abt stuff being empty tho rite
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 20:11 (sixteen years ago)
I thought LiT was watchable but nt particularly original. Like Jim Jarmusch lite. I remember having big arguments about it with my friends though, who all seemed to inexplicably love it.
― Tuomas, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 20:13 (sixteen years ago)
enid is so awful that she hangs on to whoever actually puts up with her basically
also, i don't have a prob with scarlett johansson.. uh you do realize women also watch movies and thus half the population probably doesn't like a certain movie only because they have a crush on the actress or appreciate that she has big boobs.
― kicker conspiracy (b. favre ha ha) (daria-g), Wednesday, 10 February 2010 20:13 (sixteen years ago)
Caché placing above superbad makes me believe in justice - a totally trivial form of justice that applies to nothing significant and meaningful - but justice nonetheless. Yay ILX.
― sarahel, Wednesday, February 10, 2010 6:53 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark
stop posting about movies
― pro bono publico (history mayne), Wednesday, 10 February 2010 20:13 (sixteen years ago)
lindsey lohan is a p good actress tho
― ^ now ya head is like *http://img88.imageshack.us/img88/3310/volcanoqa2* (Lamp), Wednesday, 10 February 2010 20:13 (sixteen years ago)
I think it's fortunate that Lost in Translation came out 7 years ago, because I think it took about three years for me to get over my loathing and annoyance with that movie, now I'm on to the acceptance stage where I just shrug and roll my eyes.
― sarahel, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 20:13 (sixteen years ago)
hate the hell out of lost in translation
― SMALL BONES, SMALL BODIES (jjjusten), Wednesday, 10 February 2010 20:13 (sixteen years ago)
― pro bono publico (history mayne), Wednesday, February 10, 2010 12:13 PM (21 seconds ago)
Stop posting
― sarahel, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 20:14 (sixteen years ago)
sto
― vag gangsta (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 10 February 2010 20:14 (sixteen years ago)
so what you're trying to say is women can have bad taste in movies too?
― iatee, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 20:14 (sixteen years ago)
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v212/etienne_saint/lostintranslation-1.jpg
tim ernst's gaijin cartoon books adapted to film, featuring two vapid, xenophobic, ugly americans. "japan is a wacky country! they reverse their Rs and Ls! haha engrish!" if this was set in let's say New York, the characters would stand out as even more unlikable, but as is, the setting steals the show, diverting the attention wisely away from the characters and plot. sofia provides visuals and her soft camera tone carries over seamlessly from the 70s suburban michigan of her last film which is impressive, but there is a real lack of depth here, these losers aren't very lovable or redeemable. kevin shields's new songs are pretty good, especially the one early in the film (the 2nd song on the score). i'm gonna get a pirated copy on dvd and see it again, but as is, i was pretty disappointed.
― gygax! (r.i.p.)
I'm not really sure how I feel about it. On the one hand, yeah, it's a beautiful movie to look at (we saw it because Nancy is going to Tokyo this winter and didn't really need an excuse to drool over the landscape for two hours), but also yeah, it's a deeply shallow movie. It seemed to suck any of Scarlett J's actual life right out of her (check out her interview in Mass Appeal from a few months back if any of you are still harboring more of a crush on Thora Birch), and just replaced it with this blanked out gauziness, the uber-Trust Fund Hipster. You don't feel sorry for her treatment at the hands of her husband because he's just so fucking awful to begin with; you want to shake and say "what the fuck are you doing here in the first place??" (Yes, I guess the subtext is that their marriage is slowly falling apart - "I don't know who he is anymore" - but why the fuck would she end up with such a awful "arty" hipster schlub in the first place. And why should we care when she's such a tabula rasa! If I wanted to watch something that focused at least 50% of the time on viewing the vacuous, shallow lives of twentysomething BFA's desperately trying to enter into show biz at a distance well...I could have never left NYC.) The laughs are few and far between and usually, like gygax sez, at the expense of those wacky foreigners and their keeerazy habits. Bill Murray's character is the character he played in Rushmore stripped of any remaining will to live (and personality.) He is rapidly approaching a kind of apothesis of "the sad clown"; soon his face is going to be frozen in that kind of winsome grin with the saggy eyes. Still, with my fragile emotional state these days (and the fact that I AM Bill Murray), it was hard not to feel a little twinge at the end. More tellingly, however, I didn't even remember I saw it when I first opened this thread.
― dubplatestyle
I think I liked it. I'm still not sure - or I'm not sure if I hated it, at least. Bits of it were genuinely nice or effective, but I found myself noting that I might normally be turned off by the blinkered tone if it weren't so... innocuous. I dunno. There's something almost vaguely charming about how self-obsessed the movie is, like a really long and very nearly interesting blog entry. Coppola certainly isn't unskilled, but the movie almost seems like uh, a love-letter to *herself*. And the fact that I can identify strongly with some of her aesthetic probably make it easy for me to give the movie some slack.
I guess my problem is that it felt a little too Roman Coppola at times. (I still think the movie is ace though, mostly for the bizarre realization that came to me during it, which is that Bill Murray suddenly reminds me a LOT of Takeshi Kitano..)
― Adrian Langston
I thought it was very sweet and charming and amusing (the joke is on Bill Murray more than the good people of Tokyo really although it's a shame the joke was so laboured so often), just as Bill and Scarlet's characters were. I am quite mystified by the opening shot but enjoyed it despite thinking it was gratuitous and pointless. It (and the numerous shots of gorgeous SJ pottering around in her pants) reminded me of countless French films I've never seen. Really I was so taken with SJ and Bill that any problems the film has pale into insignifance. It certainly made me want to visit Japan (the Fujiyama and Neon Tokyo shots were awesome as i guess they could only be) which must be a good thing. Very cute but not Amelie-twee. I sensed a biographical element for Sofia (with Gio as Spike obv.) which is fair enough. I think Bill Murray is better in this than in Rushmore but of course he was only a supporting character in that and has more to do here (doing sod all mainly). Cinema and audience helped, nice relaxed mood and lots of laughter (fax machine, blinds, walking machine etc.)
― stevem[/i]
lost in translation
#16
Lost In TranslationSofia Coppola2003United States(597.5 points, 28 votes)
― ('_') (omar little), Wednesday, 10 February 2010 20:14 (sixteen years ago)
There are some Todd Solondz movies that are more accurate Ghost World adaptations than Ghost World. (like the one with the clowes-illustrated poster for it)
― Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 20:15 (sixteen years ago)
lolll
― iatee, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 20:15 (sixteen years ago)
ha
― Mr. Que, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 20:15 (sixteen years ago)
lol TIMING
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 20:15 (sixteen years ago)
oh hahaha no way foreshadowing
― SMALL BONES, SMALL BODIES (jjjusten), Wednesday, 10 February 2010 20:15 (sixteen years ago)
I hated LiT when it came. First ILX film thread I remember, aside from Kill Bill.
― FIST FIGHT! FIST FIGHT! FIST FIGHT IN THE PARKING LOT! (milo z), Wednesday, 10 February 2010 20:15 (sixteen years ago)
Ghost World is pretty easily the best movie of all the movies revealed today so far.
― queen frostine (Eric H.), Wednesday, 10 February 2010 20:15 (sixteen years ago)
i mean what the hell, i really did think 'ghost world' was interesting & sort of realistic in portraying these two teenage girls messed up friendship, um, i took it as not only being created based on whether or not guys were into one/both of the actresses
― kicker conspiracy (b. favre ha ha) (daria-g), Wednesday, 10 February 2010 20:15 (sixteen years ago)
uh you do realize women also watch movies and thus half the population probably doesn't like a certain movie only because they have a crush on the actress or appreciate that she has big boobs.
LiT was made by a woman, and it starts with a closeup of Johansson's ass... ;) I get your point though, but I've never heard a woman give any praise for her, except maybe for her looks.
― Tuomas, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 20:15 (sixteen years ago)
lunchtime + meeting for me, back with 11-15 later this afternoon.
― ('_') (omar little), Wednesday, 10 February 2010 20:16 (sixteen years ago)
re LiT: fuck you guys btw
― SMALL BONES, SMALL BODIES (jjjusten), Wednesday, 10 February 2010 20:16 (sixteen years ago)
sooooo trolly to leave us w/ LoT
― iatee, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 20:16 (sixteen years ago)
Nothing offensive about Lost in Translation except ScarJo's flat butt in the opening shot.
― Inculcate a spirit of serfdom in children (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 10 February 2010 20:17 (sixteen years ago)
hahahaha oh MAN
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 20:17 (sixteen years ago)
er LiT
xp
― iatee, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 20:17 (sixteen years ago)
i go off to re-read the original ile LiT thread and...
everyone is welcome to have bad taste in movies! this thread is proof of that, i don't particularly mind, but i do think maybe i ought to speak up & say there is another perspective in the audience that isn't men ogling actresses.. find it annoying when it's suggested that's the only reason anyone might sort of like a movie, is all.
― kicker conspiracy (b. favre ha ha) (daria-g), Wednesday, 10 February 2010 20:17 (sixteen years ago)