i'd say 'the informant!' did s.thing p cool re smuggling in radical content, and it did it by completely fucking itself as a story... and no1 saw it ne way lol
― pro bono publico (history mayne), Tuesday, 9 February 2010 21:26 (sixteen years ago)
Chuck and Buck almost made my ballot. Owen Gleiberman's #5 of the decade!
― Hoisin Murphy (jaymc), Tuesday, 9 February 2010 21:26 (sixteen years ago)
what is this, the straits of hormuz? there is no smuggling of anything going on here
― goole, Tuesday, 9 February 2010 21:27 (sixteen years ago)
I think Chuck & Buck being 2 sides of the same person is a plausible reading.
― Fusty Moralizer (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 9 February 2010 21:27 (sixteen years ago)
(that said, I didn't vote for C&B. All the real good gay movies are foreign. TWO DRIFTERS)
― Fusty Moralizer (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 9 February 2010 21:28 (sixteen years ago)
"bourne ultimatum" is gonna be pretty high huh?
"supremacy" is truly amazing, the apartment fight scene is mesmerizing
i love "rachel getting married" so much -- probably my favorite use of digital handheld that i can remember
― birther blood (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 9 February 2010 21:33 (sixteen years ago)
those are two of my... top 8 i think
i am finally going to watch RGM tonight, i think. after this poll is over i will have 20 films i liked enough to vote for, just 2 weeks too late ; )
― harbl, Tuesday, 9 February 2010 21:34 (sixteen years ago)
Calling Chuck & Buck a Hollywood film is bizarre. You joking about it being set in LA?
― chronicles of ridic (zvookster), Tuesday, 9 February 2010 21:35 (sixteen years ago)
/smuggles radical content into a totally conservative style of filmmaking./ --pro bono publico (history mayne)
― queen frostine (Eric H.), Tuesday, 9 February 2010 21:37 (sixteen years ago)
I thought maybe he was referring to that Chuck & Larry movie.
― you gone float up with it (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Tuesday, 9 February 2010 21:39 (sixteen years ago)
what is this, the straits of hormuz? there is no smuggling of anything going on here --goole
― queen frostine (Eric H.), Tuesday, 9 February 2010 21:40 (sixteen years ago)
i enjoyed the first bourne film. years later i saw the second one, having forgotten much of the first, and i didn't understand a moment of it.
― dog latin, Tuesday, 9 February 2010 21:41 (sixteen years ago)
This thread is the Straits of Homoz amirite
― Inculcate a spirit of serfdom in children (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 9 February 2010 21:41 (sixteen years ago)
i couldn't possibly comment
― zvo_Okster (zvookster), Tuesday, 9 February 2010 21:47 (sixteen years ago)
couldn't care less about RGM or any of the Bourne movies, personally. I think I've snoozed through at least a couple of the Bourne movies on TV/plane rides. RGM just doesn't contain any elements that sound enticing or interesting to me at all.
― mark kerfuffalo (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 9 February 2010 21:54 (sixteen years ago)
there you have it folks
― goole, Tuesday, 9 February 2010 21:55 (sixteen years ago)
shakey mo, ridin' the tv/plane.
― hellzapoppa (tipsy mothra), Tuesday, 9 February 2010 21:56 (sixteen years ago)
it's a bird, it's a tv/plane, it's shakey mo!
(sorry. i've been out all afternoon and i come back and have ... nothing to say about any of these movies, really. except i guess that i know a lot of people who liked 24 hour party people despite knowing almost nothing about any of the bands in it.)
― hellzapoppa (tipsy mothra), Tuesday, 9 February 2010 21:58 (sixteen years ago)
interesting, helpful comments
― harbl, Tuesday, 9 February 2010 21:58 (sixteen years ago)
xposts
― harbl, Tuesday, 9 February 2010 21:59 (sixteen years ago)
ladies and gentlemen, dr. morbius mo collier
― wall•egina (s1ocki), Tuesday, 9 February 2010 21:59 (sixteen years ago)
BBM no masterpiece but it's underrated I think. I took it as a very moving depiction of the tragedy of being "gendered" at all (in the Judith Butler sense).
― ryan, Tuesday, 9 February 2010 21:59 (sixteen years ago)
if someone wants to explain what's so unique/interesting about RGM I'm all ears - is there more to it than the "family melodrama at a wedding centering around an uptight, angst-ridden heroine" that all appearances would seem to indicate? is there some auteurism in action because its a Demme vehicle? it just seems horrid to me on the surface.
― mark kerfuffalo (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 9 February 2010 22:02 (sixteen years ago)
just see it or not.
― wall•egina (s1ocki), Tuesday, 9 February 2010 22:04 (sixteen years ago)
hahaha I am also not super-interested in seeing RGM but I also know that "uptight" is not quite what Rachel is supposed to be, just from, you know, watching trailers and reading reviews
― Michael Steele, the first black Superman (HI DERE), Tuesday, 9 February 2010 22:04 (sixteen years ago)
i wasn't that interested because it doesn't look like my kind of movie but a lot of people said it was good, so i will give it a try before i say it's stupid
― harbl, Tuesday, 9 February 2010 22:05 (sixteen years ago)
shakey it's a good movie but i'm not really interested in arguing with your snap judgment based on a poster or something
― wall•egina (s1ocki), Tuesday, 9 February 2010 22:05 (sixteen years ago)
er apparently I didn't know enough to keep from making the obvious mistake re: Anne H's character's name, oops
― Michael Steele, the first black Superman (HI DERE), Tuesday, 9 February 2010 22:05 (sixteen years ago)
hi dere getting pwned
― wall•egina (s1ocki), Tuesday, 9 February 2010 22:06 (sixteen years ago)
So ... is that it for today?
― queen frostine (Eric H.), Tuesday, 9 February 2010 22:07 (sixteen years ago)
sorry guys, just got back from lunch. almost ate at a restaurant that's supposed to be good but i didn't like the sign or the name of the place.
― ('_') (omar little), Tuesday, 9 February 2010 22:08 (sixteen years ago)
more to come, 26-32!
You didn't miss much.
― queen frostine (Eric H.), Tuesday, 9 February 2010 22:08 (sixteen years ago)
only quality posts like the bitching Eric's been doing all day
― Michael Steele, the first black Superman (HI DERE), Tuesday, 9 February 2010 22:08 (sixteen years ago)
but i didn't like the sign or the name of the place.
:D
― jed_, Tuesday, 9 February 2010 22:10 (sixteen years ago)
xpost Bitch.
― queen frostine (Eric H.), Tuesday, 9 February 2010 22:10 (sixteen years ago)
^_^
― Michael Steele, the first black Superman (HI DERE), Tuesday, 9 February 2010 22:10 (sixteen years ago)
BBM is the great american movie of the 00s, and I hated it before I saw it. All these arguments have been about its politics, which I don't give a shit about, and not about the movie and its love story. Love that can't happen and the melodrama and big emotions that naturally follows. It has cowboys and great landscapes and a sweet guitar soundtrack and it's so beautifully done you could cry. I like to compare it to Crouching Tiger, because it shows how well Ang Lee does HUGE emotions that aren't hidden or subtly intertwined with the plot. No, the display of huge emotions is the sole point of these two movies and they succeed masterfully because they take huge, grandiose declarations of love seriously and make them into something touching.
― abcfsk, Tuesday, 9 February 2010 22:10 (sixteen years ago)
You voted The Sound of Music in the '60s poll, didn't you?
― queen frostine (Eric H.), Tuesday, 9 February 2010 22:12 (sixteen years ago)
Well, here's contrarianism at any rate.
― Inculcate a spirit of serfdom in children (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 9 February 2010 22:12 (sixteen years ago)
All these arguments have been about its politics = most of this thread
― gotanynewsstory? (Dorianlynskey), Tuesday, 9 February 2010 22:13 (sixteen years ago)
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v212/etienne_saint/new_world.jpg
I liked it a lot. So beautiful. Some frightening scenes of hunger and madness at the fort, too. I hope Q'Orianka Kilcher makes more of her career than Jim Caviezel. She's equally stunning. Yeah, it's slow, but aren't most people expecting that?
― Arthur
The movie is still simmering in my brain. But I've never found TM to be a great filmmaker, and this one doesn't change my mind. It is visually ravishing, but I think cutting a few of the flying geese shots and the overlong silences between Smith and Pocahontas can only help. (Like Gere in DOH, Colin Farrell has about two facial expressions throughout; he's beautiful and broody, but we need more and don't get it.) Q'Orianka Kilcher is ultimately moving, but it took me two hours to feel that way; she is the heart of the film -- it's about Pocahontas.
The colonists are the most convincingly starving and grotty-looking you've ever seen, which in a couple of instances (religious or rebellious delirium) teeters in the direction of Monty Python.
― Dr Morbius
i saw the new cut yesterday.
having seen both versions, i cant make out much of a difference. it didnt really seem like anything was missing, and i noticed just as many new shots as i remembered shots that were missing. so not really a big change from what i can tell. i hope malick releases the longer version on dvd, since i can watch his movies all day when in the comfort of home.
anyway, it's still glorious.
― ryan
I think more people walked out of this film than any other film I have ever seen (and SOONER too--one girl heard the first voiceover, loudly said "Hell no", grabbed her friend and walked out AND then came back in five minutes later to snatch a soda from her boyfriend who had stayed haha!)
I thought it was fantastic.
― Alex in SF
"the new world" (terrence malick film)
#32
The New WorldTerrence Malick2005United States(444.5 points, 15 votes, 1 first place)
― ('_') (omar little), Tuesday, 9 February 2010 22:13 (sixteen years ago)
Still love that "hell no" story.
― queen frostine (Eric H.), Tuesday, 9 February 2010 22:14 (sixteen years ago)
Better than the movie.
― Inculcate a spirit of serfdom in children (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 9 February 2010 22:15 (sixteen years ago)
Hooray for TNW! Shocked it's here.
― ryan, Tuesday, 9 February 2010 22:16 (sixteen years ago)
I didn't like it, but I think I'm wrong.
― queen frostine (Eric H.), Tuesday, 9 February 2010 22:16 (sixteen years ago)
I don't get Malick: lots of pretty widescreen shots of actors, mouths slightly open, contemplating the Vastness of the Earth. I keep imagining the actors eating grapes.
― Inculcate a spirit of serfdom in children (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 9 February 2010 22:17 (sixteen years ago)
LOL yeah it was pretty great.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 9 February 2010 22:18 (sixteen years ago)
what's wrong with vastness?
― wall•egina (s1ocki), Tuesday, 9 February 2010 22:18 (sixteen years ago)