2008 Primaries Thread 2: THE QUICKENING

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (7160 of them)

</gym coach>

M@tt He1ges0n, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 20:18 (eighteen years ago)

gym coach OTM

Rock Hardy, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 20:23 (eighteen years ago)

right? god my generation is so stupid sometimes

deej, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 20:28 (eighteen years ago)

somewhere in a dorm room is excitable red-eyed chatter comparing the relative merits of Bob Marley, Che, Scarface, and Obama.

Cosmo Vitelli, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 20:38 (eighteen years ago)

what a douche

deej, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 20:58 (eighteen years ago)

I've been out of the loop (FOR YEARS NOW, HAHA), but when I came up for air, I saw that Wisconsin is all of a sudden a dead-heat. What happened?

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 19 February 2008 20:59 (eighteen years ago)

http://images.huffingtonpost.com/gen/12159/thumbs/r-OBAMAMOMENTUM-huge.jpg

jhøshea, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:02 (eighteen years ago)

not sure, really, though i guess obama's lead was never really that significant - usually hovering around 6 or 7 points.

Mark Clemente, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:02 (eighteen years ago)

krugman is "worried"

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:02 (eighteen years ago)

More like Doucheman amirite.

Nicole, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:03 (eighteen years ago)

Every time pundits have declared a frontrunner in the Democratic race so far, that frontrunner stumbles. I'm concerned about Wisconsin tonight.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:06 (eighteen years ago)

"Concerned" is too strong a word. I'd be happy if HRC is our nominee. I just think her chances against McCain are far worse than Obama's.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:07 (eighteen years ago)

stupid liberals always voting for the underdog

deej, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:07 (eighteen years ago)

Don't worry. Be happy. xpost

Aimless, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:07 (eighteen years ago)

so i'm worried a little about the negative stuff - as i mentioned upthread it seems i keep reading tons of headlines about how clinton keeps slamming obama with criticisms -- but i don't hear much coming back from him.

i know obama claimed early on that he didn't want to run a negative campaign, and for the most part, i don't think he has, apart from campaign memos here and there ("hillary say/will do anything to get elected," etc), but i'm wondering if he'll need to cave in and go full throttle as clinton seems to be doing right now.

Mark Clemente, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:10 (eighteen years ago)

there's not a huge pool of data to extrapolate any trends from, but with that caveat in mind, hillary did very poorly in SC after she was seen 'going negative' while campaigning there -- though obviously there are huge differences between SC and WI

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:13 (eighteen years ago)

god, David Brooks is such a douche. Apparently now the tactic -- on both the left and right -- is to write about Obama "fatigue."

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:13 (eighteen years ago)

I think Obama fatigue is a result of primary fatigue, and since Obama is the interesting story of the primary, primary fatigue has become Obama fatigue.

Euler, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:15 (eighteen years ago)

There's definitely been a rush of articles lately about Obama "cresting."

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:15 (eighteen years ago)

Too much excitement; you know how it is. The man needs a nap.

Aimless, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:16 (eighteen years ago)

Me, too.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:16 (eighteen years ago)

Euler OTM, the Clinton campaign was unprepared for a post Super-Tuesday primary campaign, but then, neither was the press.

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:17 (eighteen years ago)

she was smart to "focus" on TX and OH like WI was a lost cause.

Cosmo Vitelli, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:17 (eighteen years ago)

i thought she really tried to step up efforts in the state, though, after her campaign finally realized that basically conceding the post-2/5 february contests was a dumb idea

Mark Clemente, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:20 (eighteen years ago)

ooh yeah now she can declare UPSET when really the state has been a close call

deej, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:20 (eighteen years ago)

YES, SHE IS A TACTICAL GENIUS.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:22 (eighteen years ago)

cunning, cold, calculated

Mark Clemente, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:22 (eighteen years ago)

haha

Mark Clemente, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:22 (eighteen years ago)

If Clinton does pull a WI victory tonight, it likely won't be a sound victory (1-4 points, maybe), this could actually work out in Obama's favor. His momentum seems to ebb and flow and there's no question it's been ebbing the last week. A loss, even though it'll be a statistical tie, would only serve to kick enthusiasm back in gear.

Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:25 (eighteen years ago)

HE IS ALSO A TACTICAL GENIUS.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:26 (eighteen years ago)

Democratic Presidential Candidates: Win by Losing.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:26 (eighteen years ago)

not saying her team didn't make post 2/5 mistakes, just that I wouldn't be surprised if they looked at the calendar, saw WI as their next possible victory, and set the benchmark for the following round, using WI as lead time.

Cosmo Vitelli, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:26 (eighteen years ago)

D, Esq. whats your take on karl rove??

deej, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:27 (eighteen years ago)

this 'winning by losing' theory could explain the republican party's current platform! quick the dems need to throw their candidate under a bus, nominate biden!

deej, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:27 (eighteen years ago)

stupid liberals always voting for the underdog

Not when they held their noses (or were just deluded) and voted for Billy!

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:27 (eighteen years ago)

D, Esq. whats your take on karl rove??

Who is this Karl Rove of whom you speak?

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:29 (eighteen years ago)

I just want to mention how much I want to slap the "WHY CAN'T THE OBAMA BE HILLERY'S VICE PRINCIPAL OR VICE VERSER" crowd

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:29 (eighteen years ago)

wrong answer, Daniel

Cosmo Vitelli, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:31 (eighteen years ago)

Oh, that Karl Rove. He's also a tactical genius.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:32 (eighteen years ago)

I just want to mention how much I want to slap the "WHY CAN'T THE OBAMA BE HILLERY'S VICE PRINCIPAL OR VICE VERSER" crowd

i know, right?

Mark Clemente, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:35 (eighteen years ago)

certainly a tentacled genius xpost

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:35 (eighteen years ago)

i get so sick of this, i just want obama to win okay? fuck i've been a vikings fan my whole life just give me this one god ok????

M@tt He1ges0n, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:57 (eighteen years ago)

^^^^^^^ this

HI DERE, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 22:00 (eighteen years ago)

i get so sick of this, i just want obama to win okay? fuck i've been a vikings cubs fan my whole life just give me this one god ok????

fixed for my purposes

en i see kay, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 22:03 (eighteen years ago)

does anyone honestly give a fuck about these lame "plagiarism" attacks? is that really the best Hillary can do?

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 22:05 (eighteen years ago)

Best she can do? She's pulled to, what, within a point of Obama in WI in a week's time? She's doing okay.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 19 February 2008 22:07 (eighteen years ago)

But, yes, please just let Obama wrap this thing up soon, for 1000 reasons I've set forth above.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 19 February 2008 22:08 (eighteen years ago)

plagiarism hits harder than kindergarten ambitions. as soon as he's charged with stealing lunch money this thing is over.

Cosmo Vitelli, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 22:14 (eighteen years ago)

Most LULZ I've had this week:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kjrXhbQA2Jk

Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 22:15 (eighteen years ago)

wow, that needs to be put in a time capsule.

Cosmo Vitelli, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 22:19 (eighteen years ago)


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.