A strange and gorgeous film. Not at all the sappy inspirational tale that someone else might have generated using the same material.
― Dorian (Dorianlynskey), Thursday, 4 February 2010 19:22 (sixteen years ago)
When people say "well-made comic book" I don't think it's a slander against comic books, rather an expression that it's something that doesn't transcend the genre.
― Philip Nunez, Thursday, 4 February 2010 19:22 (sixteen years ago)
I don't really understand ppl who can't make themselves watch the LOTR movies.
I saw the first one in the theater. Was kind of into the Hobbit mythology at the beginning, but then about halfway through, it became a series of endless scenes with characters marching someplace or doing battle with this or that, and I found it hard to stay interested.
― Hoisin Murphy (jaymc), Thursday, 4 February 2010 19:23 (sixteen years ago)
I really did think the did an excellent job of distilling 98% of what made the books
That's why I can't make myself watch the movies.
― smashing aspirant (milo z), Thursday, 4 February 2010 19:24 (sixteen years ago)
rather an expression that it's something that doesn't transcend the genre.
why do you hate genres
― The Tommy Westphall Universe Hypothesis (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 4 February 2010 19:24 (sixteen years ago)
LOTR movies are awesome and fun, and i don't really care for fantasy
― that sex version of "blue thunder." (Mr. Que), Thursday, 4 February 2010 19:25 (sixteen years ago)
like, why are genres bad and why is "transcending" them desirable
x-post
― The Tommy Westphall Universe Hypothesis (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 4 February 2010 19:25 (sixteen years ago)
xp - maybe it would be better to say "medium" as opposed to "genre"?
― sarahel, Thursday, 4 February 2010 19:25 (sixteen years ago)
i like some genres just fine, but if someone suggests a movie in a genre I don't have much affection for, man that movie better transcend the hell out of it!
― Philip Nunez, Thursday, 4 February 2010 19:26 (sixteen years ago)
I always thought the Diving Bell would be better as a super-realistic version of the publishing world where dude is put through 80 rounds of rewrites and edits until he loses it, furiously blinks "fuck you" and the movie ends.
― Darin, Thursday, 4 February 2010 19:26 (sixteen years ago)
yeah I seriously bet 80% of the audience who hadn't read the books would have a difficult time explaining the plot of the film(s) they just saw beyond "he has to destroy the ring, also, gollum is evil...also there are lots of big battles"
― iatee, Thursday, 4 February 2010 19:26 (sixteen years ago)
*watch out for orcs
― that sex version of "blue thunder." (Mr. Que), Thursday, 4 February 2010 19:28 (sixteen years ago)
either way you're insulting the medium... do people praise films for "transcending" the genre of film?
― The Tommy Westphall Universe Hypothesis (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 4 February 2010 19:29 (sixteen years ago)
It had been 20 years since I'd read the books when I saw the films - and pretty much I would have explained the plot as "he has to destroy the ring, also, gollum is evil ... also there are lots of big battles and they march around a lot, plus elves that are supposed to be hot that are just kinda goofy looking"
― sarahel, Thursday, 4 February 2010 19:29 (sixteen years ago)
like "wow, 2001 was an amazing movie - so amazing it made me forget I was watching something as lame as a movie"
― The Tommy Westphall Universe Hypothesis (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 4 February 2010 19:30 (sixteen years ago)
if the source is video, i dont see the problem with using it for the home video transfer.
― brews before HOOS (s1ocki), Thursday, February 4, 2010 1:07 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark
i mean i guess it comes down to your preference for a 24p fake-film look but it doesn't sound like it was a technical screwup
― brews before HOOS (s1ocki), Thursday, February 4, 2010 1:08 PM (1 hour ago)
well, the frame rate was off, which caused a discernible speedup of people's movements and threw off the rhythm of the film. plus, you wouldn't have known it was shot on video from watching the film in a theatre, there was a lot of praise for the cinematography at the time.
― 鬼の手 (Edward III), Thursday, 4 February 2010 19:30 (sixteen years ago)
actually pretty otm...
― iatee, Thursday, 4 February 2010 19:30 (sixteen years ago)
Mathieu Amalric's general appeal is stomping around being obnoxious, couldn't bring myself to watch him in bed for 2 hours.
― Rage, Resentment, Spleen (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 4 February 2010 19:30 (sixteen years ago)
'do people praise films for "transcending" the genre of film?'
ad copy for event movies do. "this isn't just a movie, but an EXPERIENCE"
― Philip Nunez, Thursday, 4 February 2010 19:31 (sixteen years ago)
^ this
― 鬼の手 (Edward III), Thursday, 4 February 2010 19:31 (sixteen years ago)
so, yeah I think they transcend their genre
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v212/etienne_saint/teamamerica_800.jpg
Yeah, confusion over the film's contradictions seems to me to be it's most salient benefit. But at the same time, they could've delved into the contradictions a whole lot more and the film would've been stronger for it. For instance, the fact that most of those actors have, y'know, actually played the Team America roles at various points in their real careers (which is a much more interesting hypocrisy, especially if we're supposed to believe that this movie is a satire of the Bruckheimer propogandae) is never really delved into at all, aside from Helen Hunt weilding a sword and purring "I've done a few action movies."
― Eric H.
Just saw this for the first time last night (July 4th AMERICA FUCK YEAH - seemed appropriate) after many misgivings and hemmin and hawin, but a friend insisted. Overall - great looking sets/funny puppets, pretty funny songs, fairly shitty script, completely loathsome politics. The Kim Jong Il thing, for example, is a funny concept - the lonely dictator wandering around his palace - but the inexplicable weirdly racist voice almost ruins it, its so unnecessary and distracting... I find much of Stone/Parker's ouevre does this to me, there are lots of funny ideas, often well executed, but then there's these subtexts and underlying ideas that are really obnoxious and stupid.
Plus they run a non-union shop. Fuck that shit.
― Shakey Mo Collier
It's a shame though, for at least the 1st half the straight faced use of blockbuster action devices applied to current symbols of "terrorism" gave the film an energized sense of danger. The opening sequence of the little boy walking into a shadowy terrorist had a weirdly fun sense of manifesting peoples worst fears w/r/t terrorism. The exploding titles credit sequence that preceded this was also a nice gesture of mocking such spectacle while respecting the fun power of the form.
― theodore fogelsanger
#79
Team America: World PoliceTrey Parker2004United States(237.5 points, 8 votes)
― ('_') (omar little), Thursday, 4 February 2010 19:32 (sixteen years ago)
kinda interested in watching m&c now - had written it off as a russell crowe garbage and nvr really even tht about watching it. always meant 2 see diving bell but something abt that blonde chick's face made me not want to watch it. also i think mb overly art-directed. will probably nvr watch lotr or almost famous.
lol morbz
― Lamp, Thursday, 4 February 2010 19:32 (sixteen years ago)
taking ad copy literally = lolz
― The Tommy Westphall Universe Hypothesis (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 4 February 2010 19:33 (sixteen years ago)
I'm pretty sure Mel Gibson's street team was out there hyping Passion as more than a movie also. Like it's not enough to just be a good movie about torture, but a necessary component for spiritual communion.
― Philip Nunez, Thursday, 4 February 2010 19:34 (sixteen years ago)
interesting 2 stats nerds: team america has the highest points/vote so far
― Lamp, Thursday, 4 February 2010 19:34 (sixteen years ago)
that is a high per vote avg 4 team america wow xp
― johnny crunch, Thursday, 4 February 2010 19:34 (sixteen years ago)
Team America was weak tea. Must be a few libertarians around.
― Rage, Resentment, Spleen (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 4 February 2010 19:35 (sixteen years ago)
Team America is so boring.
― Your body is a spiderland (polyphonic), Thursday, 4 February 2010 19:35 (sixteen years ago)
yeah that's almost an average of #10
― iatee, Thursday, 4 February 2010 19:36 (sixteen years ago)
xp Shakey - I don't see how that's necessarily insulting the medium - "as lame as a movie," "only a comic book" - it's that different media have different formal properties. What makes a compelling comic book doesn't necessarily make for a compelling movie, and vice versa. Like - what if they made a movie of one of your favorite comic books that was basically just shots of the book and someone off-screen turning the pages with voice-over narration by one person reading in different voices, and a slightly distorted-sounding home stereo playing in the background? Most people would think that that would not make for a good movie, but it would - theoretically - replicate the experience of reading the comic book.
― sarahel, Thursday, 4 February 2010 19:36 (sixteen years ago)
i never saw team america looked pretty dumm
― max, Thursday, 4 February 2010 19:36 (sixteen years ago)
I forgot I used to actually have intelligent thoughts about movies and would post them on ILX. Thanks for the reminder, omar.
― queen frostine (Eric H.), Thursday, 4 February 2010 19:36 (sixteen years ago)
is there a sword n sorcery fantasy film that "transcended the genre" better than LOTR?
please to name
― 鬼の手 (Edward III), Thursday, 4 February 2010 19:37 (sixteen years ago)
this is the last film with a single digit # of votes
gotta run for awhile, be back later for 71-78...
― ('_') (omar little), Thursday, 4 February 2010 19:37 (sixteen years ago)
best thing about Team America was the "montage" song. definitely a filmic device that I've grown to hate, and well-parodied.
but yeah, MOVIE SO RACIST
― The Tommy Westphall Universe Hypothesis (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 4 February 2010 19:37 (sixteen years ago)
Was "Sin City" nominated for this? lol
― PIES! PIES! PIES! PIES! PIES! (HI DERE), Thursday, 4 February 2010 19:37 (sixteen years ago)
what if they made a movie of one of your favorite comic books that was basically just shots of the book and someone off-screen turning the pages with voice-over narration by one person reading in different voices, and a slightly distorted-sounding home stereo playing in the background
wait this was called Watchmen
xp E3 - Clash of the Titans - better acting
― sarahel, Thursday, 4 February 2010 19:38 (sixteen years ago)
lol
― that sex version of "blue thunder." (Mr. Que), Thursday, 4 February 2010 19:38 (sixteen years ago)
LORDS WILL RING
― 鬼の手 (Edward III), Thursday, 4 February 2010 19:39 (sixteen years ago)
but yeah movies + comic books are obviously vastly different media, I don't think that's the problem... its when you say one medium is inherently better than another that I get pretty WTF
x-posts
― The Tommy Westphall Universe Hypothesis (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 4 February 2010 19:39 (sixteen years ago)
didn't they just re-use a song from a south park episode? I forgot which one came first, but I'm pretty sure it was the south park episode. anyway parker and stone have an amazing eye for genre-parody type stuff but their politics are so retarded that I have trouble watching basically anything they do anymore.
― iatee, Thursday, 4 February 2010 19:39 (sixteen years ago)
yep
― The Tommy Westphall Universe Hypothesis (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 4 February 2010 19:40 (sixteen years ago)
"Clash of the Titans" is one of my favorite movies in the world and the idea of seriously championing the idea that the acting in it was better than the acting in LOTR is possibly the most ludicrous thing ever, more ludicrous than a beach ball balancing a seal on its nose.
― PIES! PIES! PIES! PIES! PIES! (HI DERE), Thursday, 4 February 2010 19:40 (sixteen years ago)
uh - we're talking about a movie with Laurence Olivier and Maggie Smith vs. one where the best acting was done by a CGI mutant?
― sarahel, Thursday, 4 February 2010 19:43 (sixteen years ago)
I think it was Burgess Meredith who said there was a really wide exterior shot of the gods in "Clash of the Titans," filmed w/out sound in the spatial equivalent of a conga line, and when they rolled the actors just started chanting "We're gonna make some money!"
― Rage, Resentment, Spleen (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 4 February 2010 19:43 (sixteen years ago)
anyway parker and stone have an amazing eye for genre-parody type stuff but their politics are so retarded that I have trouble watching basically anything they do anymore.
I'm a couple of years behind on South Park, but unless they've grown really odious and overbearing w/r/t their politics, I'd like to continue to say that I think they're great strongly in spite of their politics (although their not-so-subtle racism makes me pretty :/ on the unfortunate occasion when it pops up). It's clear where their politics lie, but they're pretty good about delivering a blow to pretty much everyone across the spectrum.
― SNEEZED GOING DOWN STEPS, PAIN WHEN PUTTING SOCKS ON (Deric W. Haircare), Thursday, 4 February 2010 19:45 (sixteen years ago)
yeah everybody knows laurence olivier's best paycheck work was in clash of the titans
― 鬼の手 (Edward III), Thursday, 4 February 2010 19:45 (sixteen years ago)
To this day, people talk about Maggie smith's star-making turn as Thetis.
― PIES! PIES! PIES! PIES! PIES! (HI DERE), Thursday, 4 February 2010 19:46 (sixteen years ago)