Dogville is hated by me not just because it is a pile of wank, but because it is a 3 hour pile of wank.
― Freddy 'The Wonder Chicken' (Gukbe), Wednesday, 3 February 2010 20:14 (sixteen years ago)
is it ok if i hate dancer in the dark?
― caek, Wednesday, 3 February 2010 20:14 (sixteen years ago)
I vowed never too see any Lars von Trier movie again after that emotional torture porn extravaganza Dancer in the Dark, but several of my friends have told me I should see Dogville. I'm still not sure though...
― Tuomas, Wednesday, 3 February 2010 20:14 (sixteen years ago)
Lol, xpost!
It's a trap!
― Freddy 'The Wonder Chicken' (Gukbe), Wednesday, 3 February 2010 20:15 (sixteen years ago)
von trier just strikes me as one of those trolls who is clever but not very clever, more momus than cankles for instance
― caek, Wednesday, 3 February 2010 20:16 (sixteen years ago)
I can see extreme reactions to DitD and Dogville following naturally.
I'm assuming the "terrible person" line is a joke, one I'd reserve for Gaspar Noe fans.
― Rage, Resentment, Spleen (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 3 February 2010 20:17 (sixteen years ago)
I absolutely do not agree with the end conclusions NK's character makes in Dogville, and I think Lars Von Trier is irredeemable as a human being, but the whole thing radiates a glowing rongness I imagine some others (obviously terrible people) get from Haneke.
― queen frostine (Eric H.), Wednesday, 3 February 2010 20:17 (sixteen years ago)
Also, Von Trier is usually aware of its own ridiculousness.
― queen frostine (Eric H.), Wednesday, 3 February 2010 20:18 (sixteen years ago)
i was just gonna say that's how i feel abt haneke
― johnny crunch, Wednesday, 3 February 2010 20:18 (sixteen years ago)
xpost And if not, the payoff is the greatest closing credits sequence of. all. time.
o noes im a terrible person
― johnny crunch, Wednesday, 3 February 2010 20:19 (sixteen years ago)
Liked the comedy, knockout woman falling for socially impaired shlub not so much.
― Rage, Resentment, Spleen (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, February 3, 2010 7:06 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark
pretty much what st peter said to me at the gates
― the highest per-vote vag so far (history mayne), Wednesday, 3 February 2010 20:20 (sixteen years ago)
i didn't vote so i have no right to complain but Sideways, guys?
― horseshoe, Wednesday, 3 February 2010 20:21 (sixteen years ago)
― queen frostine (Eric H.), Wednesday, February 3, 2010 12:18 PM (43 seconds ago)
Exactly - a lot of it has to do with challenging the audience, and what the audience wants and expects from film - denying them the conventional pleasures. I actually think Von Trier is very clever, in that you can appreciate/read his films on different levels, and there are interesting formal/structural parallels with the theme and narrative - more so than Haneke, who I feel is a bit more heavy-handed.
― sarahel, Wednesday, 3 February 2010 20:22 (sixteen years ago)
over on the ilm tracks poll are people rolling their eyes and sighing loudly about every single entry?
― brews before HOOS (s1ocki), Wednesday, 3 February 2010 20:25 (sixteen years ago)
Uh, yes?
― emil.y, Wednesday, 3 February 2010 20:25 (sixteen years ago)
ok, what were the photos behind the end-credits of Dogville? All I remember is "Young Americans."
My "anti-American" bonafides are fairly strong, but I don't need some shallow, glib Danish brat to ilm a sub-Brechtian, ugly pageant about it. (how about denying us ANY pleasures?)
― Rage, Resentment, Spleen (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 3 February 2010 20:25 (sixteen years ago)
I dunno, Cache didn't feel nearly as heavy-handed to me as Dogville
― Dan S, Wednesday, 3 February 2010 20:26 (sixteen years ago)
to film, lol
― Rage, Resentment, Spleen (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 3 February 2010 20:26 (sixteen years ago)
have you never read ilm before, slocki?
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Wednesday, 3 February 2010 20:26 (sixteen years ago)
I absolutely do not agree with the end conclusions NK's character makes in Dogville
neither does von trier, which is where i think people get that movie backward.
― hellzapoppa (tipsy mothra), Wednesday, 3 February 2010 20:26 (sixteen years ago)
pretty sure the photos were Walker Evans/Dorothea Lange WPA type photos from the Depression
― sarahel, Wednesday, 3 February 2010 20:26 (sixteen years ago)
i mean endless carping is wearying but i'll take the good doctor over, say, the lex any day because at least he attempts to explain what's irritated and way.
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Wednesday, 3 February 2010 20:28 (sixteen years ago)
This sounds wrong to me. I think Haneke is much more about denying the audience conventional pleasures (this is the whole point of Funny Games, isn't it?), whereas the von Trier movies I've seen are clearly more conventional and heavy-handed. DitD has all the conventional pleasures of a weepie movie, only taken to an (irritating) extreme. And I know a lot of people who like it a lot exactly because of that cathartic pleasure, even though it's built on nothing but catharsis itself. Whereas Haneke certainly avoids providing the viewer such an easy catharsis.
― Tuomas, Wednesday, 3 February 2010 20:29 (sixteen years ago)
what's irritated and way is the new "dewey cheatham and howe"
― brews before HOOS (s1ocki), Wednesday, 3 February 2010 20:29 (sixteen years ago)
― caek, Wednesday, February 3, 2010 3:16 PM (11 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
lool
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 3 February 2010 20:29 (sixteen years ago)
Middlebrow indie has become such an easy target for so many critics - Anthony Lane and Peter Bradshaw, to name just two, love to use it as a punching bag. Most of the time I agree, but it can be done well - it's not de facto A Terrible Thing. Incredibly unfashionable to defend, obviously.
― Dorian (Dorianlynskey), Wednesday, February 3, 2010 7:19 PM (57 minutes ago) Bookmark
yeah but they're both feebs, and p-brads especially gets things REALLY wrong when he tries to go lowbrow. it's a punchbag for a reason tho.
'together' is moodysson's bestest film.
a lot of it has to do with challenging the audience, and what the audience wants and expects from film - denying them the conventional pleasures. I actually think Von Trier is very clever, in that you can appreciate/read his films on different levels, and there are interesting formal/structural parallels with the theme and narrative - more so than Haneke, who I feel is a bit more heavy-handed.
― sarahel, Wednesday, February 3, 2010 8:22 PM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark
er, what? LVT viewers are not "challenged" in the least: they get exactly what they pay for, ie a woman slicing her clit or what-have-you. they don't WANT conventional pleasures, they want unconventional ones, because they are highly educated, sensitive people. haneke is more heavy-handed but they're both useless.
― the highest per-vote vag so far (history mayne), Wednesday, 3 February 2010 20:29 (sixteen years ago)
a lot of it has to do with challenging the audience, and what the audience wants and expects from film - denying them the conventional pleasures.
come on von trier gives his audience the greatest and most conventional pleasure of all - feeling superior
― Lamp, Wednesday, 3 February 2010 20:31 (sixteen years ago)
haneke has crazy skills, deployed in the service of utter obnoxiousness
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 3 February 2010 20:32 (sixteen years ago)
<3 him btw
The model for yr well-crafted posts!
jeez, feel so conflicted when nrq is OTM.
― Rage, Resentment, Spleen (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 3 February 2010 20:33 (sixteen years ago)
lol
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 3 February 2010 20:36 (sixteen years ago)
― Lamp, Wednesday, February 3, 2010 12:31 PM (1 minute ago)
-- Do you feel superior when you see Von Trier films? I don't. I feel like I'm implicated in them - that's part of what I meant by challenging the audience.
xp Tuomas - Dancer in the Dark is the one Von Trier film I disliked.
― sarahel, Wednesday, 3 February 2010 20:37 (sixteen years ago)
loved dancer in the dark, courteney cox is v cute in that
― max, Wednesday, 3 February 2010 20:39 (sixteen years ago)
― Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 3 February 2010 20:42 (sixteen years ago)
Okay, like I said I've refused to watch any von Trier movies after DitD, but this "suffering women" trilogy (Breaking the Waves, Idiots, Dancer in the Dark) is certainly much more about conventional pleasures than any Haneke movie I've seen. Like I said, they're all about catharsis, which is as conventional as a cinematic pleasure can be, and Haneke certainly doesn't want to provide the audience anything like that.
― Tuomas, Wednesday, 3 February 2010 20:43 (sixteen years ago)
(x-post to Sarah)
Do you feel superior when you see Von Trier films? I don't. I feel like I'm implicated in them - that's part of what I meant by challenging the audience.
lol sux 2 be u. i know you're *supposed to be* implicated, because that's what brechtian dramturgy is *supposed* to do. but does it? not ime.
feel so conflicted when tuomas is otm.
― the highest per-vote vag so far (history mayne), Wednesday, 3 February 2010 20:44 (sixteen years ago)
picking it up again, taking it down to #86 and then continuing with 85-71 tomorrow...
― ('_') (omar little), Wednesday, 3 February 2010 20:44 (sixteen years ago)
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v212/etienne_saint/lives-1.jpg
I wasn't really that fussed about it until the epilogue section, and then I found it very affecting. But the final scene went over my schmaltz limits, yes.
Before all that, there was a good sense of claustrophobic paranoia evoked, I guess, and it did sort of make me see how a man could get into the mindset of justifying torture to himself, but other than that, yes, the main body of the film I found a bit disappointing, given the hype.
― Alba
I think a bigger influence on his change of heart was supposed to be him realising that his colleagues were corrupt. He was an idealist who believed in the communist project and had come to justify brutality in its defence. When he saw others being cynical andd using the party system for personal gain, the whole thing started to unravel for him, and that allowed him to start to see his victims as real humans rather than counter-revolutionaries.
Sure, I think that's definitely true - maybe my issue was more that I was never truly convinced of Spacey's absolute faith in the Stasi project. I wanted to understand why this guy had total faith in the system that was keeping him living in a shitty apartment, eating gnarly frozen dinners, and ordering mega-boobed prostitutes.
― Ben Boyerrr
i thought this was pretty great.
my favorite detail was the naievete of the GDR writers when they got serious about being defiant -- it was the editor from the West that knew more about what their government can do and will do and is doing.
― gff
#89
The Lives of OthersFlorian Henckel von Donnersmarck2006Germany(221 points, 12 votes, 1 first place)
― ('_') (omar little), Wednesday, 3 February 2010 20:45 (sixteen years ago)
suckd fat commie dik
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 3 February 2010 20:47 (sixteen years ago)
Watching vt films, I get the impression I'm watching someone who thinks he's clever by being outrageous and saying nothing at all. "look at these half-assed ideas I've got aren't they challenging and provocative? Jokes bruv I didn't really mean any of it or did I?" thanks for wasting my time, asswipe.
― Freddy 'The Wonder Chicken' (Gukbe), Wednesday, 3 February 2010 20:48 (sixteen years ago)
TLoO maybe the worst yet.
― Rage, Resentment, Spleen (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 3 February 2010 20:48 (sixteen years ago)
i hope morbs is going to do a worst 10 of these 100
― caek, Wednesday, 3 February 2010 20:49 (sixteen years ago)
The Lives of Others is one of my favorites - it wasn't my #1 pick - the people that disliked it, why do you think it's awful?
― sarahel, Wednesday, 3 February 2010 20:50 (sixteen years ago)
xpost I can see how Haneke tries (and fails) to implicate bourgeois viewers in Cache but I can't see how Von Trier's doing that. BTW and DID are just absurd, sadistic rituals which leave me completely estranged. Haven't seen Dogville though, so maybe he gets implicatin' there, but I can't imagine ever wanting to see one of his movies again.
― Dorian (Dorianlynskey), Wednesday, 3 February 2010 20:51 (sixteen years ago)
the words "yeah you like that doncha" should flash on the screen at the end of every von trier movie
― 鬼の手 (Edward III), Wednesday, February 3, 2010 1:24 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
^ I'm gonna make this every 10th post in the thread if you ppl don't stop talking about lvt
― 鬼の手 (Edward III), Wednesday, 3 February 2010 20:52 (sixteen years ago)
Lives is sentimental twaddle, but i'm sure the film's thread has my contemporary thoughts.
― Rage, Resentment, Spleen (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 3 February 2010 20:52 (sixteen years ago)
my contemporary thoughts by dr morbius
― 鬼の手 (Edward III), Wednesday, 3 February 2010 20:53 (sixteen years ago)