Though to be fair, tt would be less than $120 a month in reality though, since at least half of what I read is old and prob. public domain.
― she is writing about love (Jenny), Sunday, 31 January 2010 18:24 (sixteen years ago)
yeah, i see what you mean. i guess the way i look at it is: am i willing to spend 15 bucks on dinner? i do that all the time, without even thinking about it. (although, to use your example, I don't usually eat dinner out twice a week.) i'm just saying, i get hours and hours or enjoyment from a book, even if i pay 15-30 dollars for it, and the satisfaction i get out of a meal i pay the same amount for is what, 8 hours?
― that sex version of "blue thunder." (Mr. Que), Sunday, 31 January 2010 18:26 (sixteen years ago)
Thanks Que! I knew you could send text files and such to the Kindle, but I forgot you could load non-Kindle books on there too.
Since there's no way I'm going to be buying an iPad for a while, maybe I'll save up for one of these and just deal with DRM. Even if I switched to an iPad later, I could still use the Kindle App to access whatever books I buy from the Kindle store.
― ksh, Sunday, 31 January 2010 18:28 (sixteen years ago)
Jaq, where else can you buy books from?
I get books from google books, but also anything available in doc, txt, pdf, ePub, mobi, etc can be put on a Kindle.
― Jaq, Sunday, 31 January 2010 18:30 (sixteen years ago)
That's awesome.
If you guys don't already use it, Instapaper works on the Kindle too: http://www.instapaper.com/
I use Instapaper all the time, and can testify to the fact that the iPod Touch/iPhone app is so useful for queing blog posts and articles from the internet to read when you're away from your computer.
― ksh, Sunday, 31 January 2010 18:32 (sixteen years ago)
Especially useful if you have an iPod Touch and are going somewhere without Wifi. After it syncs with the Instapaper server, all of your articles are downloaded to your device and you can read them without any internet connection.
― ksh, Sunday, 31 January 2010 18:34 (sixteen years ago)
TechCrunch: "Amazon Caves To Macmillan’s eBook Pricing Demands"
http://www.techcrunch.com/2010/01/31/amazon-caves-to-macmillans-ebook-pricing-demands/
― ksh, Monday, 1 February 2010 00:59 (sixteen years ago)
Nicest interface to well formatted free books for kindle: point your kindle Web browser to www.feedbooks.com, and you'll land on a download page for a kindle guide which, when downloaded, is a convenient directory to the feedbooks catalogue of several thousand public domain titles in kindle friendly .prc form (click a title, and the kindle downloads it over whispernet). It doesn't have all of project gutenberg or google books, but what they do have tends to not have odd formatting issues with carriage returns that you'll find in a lot of those other sites.
― strange obsession was for certain vegetables and fruit (Derelict), Monday, 1 February 2010 04:24 (sixteen years ago)
“We want you to know that ultimately, however, we will have to capitulate and accept Macmillan’s terms because Macmillan has a monopoly over their own titles, and we will want to offer them to you even at prices we believe are needlessly high for e-books.”
God, what bitches. OH HORRORS, THEY HAVE A MONOPOLY ON PRODUCTS THEY THEMSELVES DEVELOPED AND PRODUCED? QUICK SOMEBODY CALL THE ANTI-TRUST COMMITTEE.
― Reading makes my ovaries hurt (Laurel), Monday, 1 February 2010 16:03 (sixteen years ago)
I believe that is what's known as "selling a product". Not "having a monopoly". And amazon.com is known as "a whiny baby".
― Reading makes my ovaries hurt (Laurel), Monday, 1 February 2010 16:04 (sixteen years ago)
hahah that is so ridiculous. pot -> kettle
― brews before HOOS (s1ocki), Monday, 1 February 2010 16:06 (sixteen years ago)
I think part of the rationale for the $15 pricing is to protect the print book sales area, ie making the ebooks closer to them in price and maybe not offering the ebook for sale when an original hardcover first is released.
Also consider that for any smaller or less-known authors, the profit made on an ebook edition could make a giant difference in the P&L, enough to allow the editor to justify acquiring the project in the first place. Yes, CEOs just want to make money, but editors actually want to discover new authors and publish good books, so they have a lot of incentive to find ways to make the $$ work.
― Reading makes my ovaries hurt (Laurel), Monday, 1 February 2010 16:07 (sixteen years ago)
Sorry, that doesn't read right but you can probably extrapolate: pricing ebooks higher protects the print book market, as does delaying ebook releases until the shine is off the hardcover -- probably only by a month or two, though -- not nearly as long as you'd have to wait for a paperback edition of the same title.
― Reading makes my ovaries hurt (Laurel), Monday, 1 February 2010 16:09 (sixteen years ago)
Instead of thinking of ebook sales as cream on top of the publisher already making a profit on the print sales of a book, think about the print sales as not making enough to justify bring out a new author.
As pubs are getting more and more consolidated and "big media" and shareholder expectations keep expanding above and beyond what a respectable "literary" house used to be required to do, ebooks might be what keeps young/new authors in print in some fashion...
I'm sure I'm like person number 45,678,934,583 to suggest this.
― Reading makes my ovaries hurt (Laurel), Monday, 1 February 2010 16:12 (sixteen years ago)
Anyway, we distro our ebooks through the Sony Reader.
― Reading makes my ovaries hurt (Laurel), Monday, 1 February 2010 16:13 (sixteen years ago)
I don't plan on getting an e-reader any time soon (I'm too cheap and the technology doesn't seem great yet) but something I wonder about is: you know all those stories about how easy access to mp3s of music have reduced the listener's attention span and they don't give new music as much of a chance to sink in before moving on to the next thing? I don't know if that's a b.s. trend or what but if I had an e-reader and e-books were cheap or easy to illegally download, I wonder if I would read much more superficially? I already get most of my books for free from the library and I think I already tend to give up on books that don't hold my interest because I didn't pay for them, but just the fact that I have to travel to the library and return them and find something else to read maybe keeps me reading longer than I would if all I had to do was download something new.
― congratulations (n/a), Monday, 1 February 2010 16:22 (sixteen years ago)
that is a great point
― that sex version of "blue thunder." (Mr. Que), Monday, 1 February 2010 16:24 (sixteen years ago)
Well, if the bar to getting a book produced & distributed becomes lower and there's an extremely broad range of stuff avail for no or little cost...you could say that ditching out early on a book that doesn't suit you is a valid approach to a greater variety...? At least you gave something different a try.
Dependent on the reader's individual selectivity of course.
― Reading makes my ovaries hurt (Laurel), Monday, 1 February 2010 16:24 (sixteen years ago)
Yeah, I don't think ditching out early is necessarily a bad thing but also some books just require a little more work and concentration.
― congratulations (n/a), Monday, 1 February 2010 16:25 (sixteen years ago)
how long b4 people are uploading kindle books to ysi
― ♖♕♖ (am0n), Monday, 1 February 2010 16:26 (sixteen years ago)
I mean you probably could scan over Elementary Aeronautics for 10 minutes and learn something you didn't know, even if you immediately forgot the other 94% of the material. If it didn't cost you anything, so what if you ditched out? xp to self
xp to Nick: Yeah, I dunno? I still am not reading the Gormenghast Trilogy whether it sits on my shelf being overdue or not.
― Reading makes my ovaries hurt (Laurel), Monday, 1 February 2010 16:28 (sixteen years ago)
i feel like i go through phases in my reading. sometimes i finish everything i start, not because i feel like it, but because i feel genuinely engaged with the material. sometimes i can't stick with anything beyond a few pages. and it's all basically the same stuff. i don't know if i'll ever get an e-reader until the technology itself (not the e-books) goes down in price. if i had one, who knows, i'd probably go crazy downloading stuff
― that sex version of "blue thunder." (Mr. Que), Monday, 1 February 2010 16:30 (sixteen years ago)
Yeah I just find myself on some conceptual level being really annoyed by the price of the devices themselves more than the books. The great thing about books has always been (to me) the universal availability of other worlds to live in/experience, assuming basic literacy. Anyone who can read can partake.
The basic set-up that goes "anyone who has $300-400 for some fancy electronics and doesn't mind replacing it after a trip to the beach/bath tub/public transit can enjoy these unique ideas...isn't it great that knowledge is free & shared?!" just rubs me the wrong way. Creating a higher-tier class of readers, maybe? And that doesn't have anything to do with content or literary value or difficulty of the ideas, simply expendable income, which feels like an even more fake distinction.
― Reading makes my ovaries hurt (Laurel), Monday, 1 February 2010 16:37 (sixteen years ago)
― congratulations (n/a), Monday, February 1, 2010 11:25 AM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
ya but do u find (as i do) that mp3ing has given u access to all sorts of weird music u would have never heard, some of which u now love?
― brews before HOOS (s1ocki), Monday, 1 February 2010 16:52 (sixteen years ago)
yes
― congratulations (n/a), Monday, 1 February 2010 16:54 (sixteen years ago)
QED imo
― brews before HOOS (s1ocki), Monday, 1 February 2010 16:56 (sixteen years ago)
Kindle app for Mac is here
http://arstechnica.com/apple/reviews/2010/03/hands-on-with-kindle-for-mac.ars
time for me to go try it out
― ksh, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 04:57 (sixteen years ago)
Interface blows, Amazon can't design a desktop app worth anything. The iPhone one is marginally better.
― mh, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 18:07 (sixteen years ago)
man, i am with you on the interface O_O
at this point, i'm just glad that the thing exists, but i definitely won't be buying too much from the Kindle store as things are
― ksh, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 18:30 (sixteen years ago)
nice to see the whole internet thinks this kindle thing sucks :D
― DG, Tuesday, November 20, 2007 3:02 PM
― ☀☃ (am0n), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 18:53 (sixteen years ago)
My parents just bought me a kindle and I have no idea what to do with it.
― kate78, Thursday, 29 July 2010 21:47 (fifteen years ago)
read things!
― janice (surm), Thursday, 29 July 2010 21:47 (fifteen years ago)
can't u get magazines on it or something?
― janice (surm), Thursday, 29 July 2010 21:48 (fifteen years ago)
I just got a Kindle. Got a subscription to the Atlantic. $1.25 a month. Lots of free classics too.
― President Keyes, Thursday, 29 July 2010 22:53 (fifteen years ago)
Thinking about getting one of these (just released in UK for £110) but I haven't played around with one yet, so I was wondering:do anyone use one for reading a lot of journal article pdfs? It seems like with a 6" screen, even in landscape mode you would have to zoom and scroll a lot considering the usual format of said pdfs.
― Vasco da Gama, Saturday, 31 July 2010 23:08 (fifteen years ago)
I've got a bunch of work pdfs on mine, mostly text stuff. It's okay for reading them with just paginating.
― Jaq, Sunday, 1 August 2010 00:26 (fifteen years ago)
anyone here have both a kindle AND an ipad and wish to comment on what is better for reading? i think i want an e-reader.
― cutty, Monday, 2 August 2010 21:12 (fifteen years ago)
am i wrong to suspect these will be at pocket calculator prices in a few years?
― Mosquepanik at Ground Zero (abanana), Monday, 2 August 2010 21:27 (fifteen years ago)
If the retail big box I work at is any indication, you are VERY wrong. These things fly off the shelves still, we can barely keep them in stock.
― he's always been a bit of an anti-climb Max (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Monday, 2 August 2010 21:29 (fifteen years ago)
cutty, I know two people with both - they both prefer reading on the iPad, but use the Kindle app on it.
― Jaq, Monday, 2 August 2010 21:30 (fifteen years ago)
Why e-readers will soon cost less than $100.http://www.slate.com/id/2263787/
― Mosquepanik at Ground Zero (abanana), Thursday, 12 August 2010 22:31 (fifteen years ago)
REAL BOOKS ARE STILL BETTER.
this is seriously my only hold-out— i won't ever fucking buy one of these things. books belong on paper.
― a repulsive person and/or a repulsive sphincter (the table is the table), Thursday, 12 August 2010 22:33 (fifteen years ago)
how much do books cost on these things? What are the selections like?
― stop staring at my daughter (slight return) (admrl), Thursday, 12 August 2010 22:34 (fifteen years ago)
http://www.amazon.com/Kindle-Books/b/ref=sa_menu_kbo3?ie=UTF8&node=1286228011
― schwantz, Thursday, 12 August 2010 22:47 (fifteen years ago)
And Jaq - I think your friends are lying. No way would I rather read on an iPad.
― schwantz, Thursday, 12 August 2010 22:49 (fifteen years ago)
friend of mine is thinking of getting one since he's gonna be going to africa for a few months and wants to bring hell of books with him― i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Friday, May 8, 2009 2:33 AM (1 year ago) Bookmark
― i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Friday, May 8, 2009 2:33 AM (1 year ago) Bookmark
still think travel is the A#1 selling point on these things---def gonna get one if/when i'm abroad for any substantial amount of time again
― pies. (gbx), Thursday, 12 August 2010 22:53 (fifteen years ago)
I think so too - I held an iPad the other day, so much bulkier and heavier. The Kindle is light, easy to turn pages or hold w/ one hand, no glare problems, etc.
― Jaq, Thursday, 12 August 2010 23:12 (fifteen years ago)
I checked out the B&N Nook the other day - pretty cool except the contrast really sucks, everything you read feels like it's printed on cheap grayish recycled paper, like standardized test paper. wonder how much improved the new Kindle is.
I like my iPad just fine for longform reading, especially cause in landscape mode it gives you the full 'spread'. but yeah it's kind of heavy and only good for at home etc.
― dyao, Friday, 13 August 2010 00:04 (fifteen years ago)
No way would I rather read on an iPad.
― Kindle hardware designer, Thursday, August 12, 2010 6:49 PM
― am0n, Friday, 13 August 2010 01:10 (fifteen years ago)
haha
― perfectamente borracho (admrl), Friday, 13 August 2010 01:12 (fifteen years ago)