http://www.progressive.org/mag_reed0508
similar claims about obama. and some really bad calls.
― goole, Friday, 29 January 2010 08:59 (sixteen years ago)
oh, "calls" as in 'predictions.' BAD political sportswiter.
Fuck us all.
― Rage, Resentment, Spleen (Dr Morbius), Friday, 29 January 2010 12:16 (sixteen years ago)
Morbs can I get you a T-shirt that says that
― Tracer Hand, Friday, 29 January 2010 12:30 (sixteen years ago)
for a political science prof, he totally misread the underlying situation. that was the whole story of 08, it didn't matter, really, whether HRC of BHO won, either of them was going to be president. it's not calls about the future, but about the then-present that he got wrong. about BHO's status as an ambitious black bourgeois liberal, of course!
this is an interesting claim:
2) his horribly opportunistic approach to the issues bearing on inequality—in which he tosses behaviorist rhetoric to the right and little more than calls to celebrate his success to blacks—stands to pollute debate about racial injustice whether he wins or loses the Presidency
i don't know what to make of it, or how to evaluate it now. has the debate about racial injustice been polluted by obama's rhetoric? not trying to be snide here, it really is a possibility, but i can't tell exactly what reed means. which debate, for instance?
but this?
3) he can’t beat McCain in November... there’s no way that Obama will carry most of the states in November that he’s won in the primaries and caucuses... Obama’s style of being all things to all people threatens to melt under the inescapable spotlight of a national campaign against a Republican... Obama’s campaign has been very clever in carving out a strategy to amass Democratic delegate votes, but its momentum is in some ways a Potemkin construction—built largely on victories in states that no Democrat will win in November—that will fall apart under Republican pressure.
this is channeled right from mark penn
― goole, Friday, 29 January 2010 15:22 (sixteen years ago)
i don't know if he is a vacuous neoliberal or not but i'd like to see him run some more offense against supply-side economics. the sotu the other night could have used more of it
― kamerad, Friday, 29 January 2010 15:29 (sixteen years ago)
otm
― u b ilxin' (Hunt3r), Friday, 29 January 2010 15:59 (sixteen years ago)
also more owl city references
― Tracer Hand, Friday, 29 January 2010 16:00 (sixteen years ago)
TH, my "Fucked" t shirt isnt worn out yet
― Rage, Resentment, Spleen (Dr Morbius), Friday, 29 January 2010 16:06 (sixteen years ago)
times was you just notched your bedpost
― genial anarchy (darraghmac), Friday, 29 January 2010 16:12 (sixteen years ago)
neoliberal
Not quite sure what this means. Unless it is 'convenient political boogeyman for neocons that under pressure doesn't really pose the threat of promoting truly progressive legislation'.
― Adam Bruneau, Friday, 29 January 2010 16:18 (sixteen years ago)
"Neoliberal" = "triangulating" Democrat.
― Blue Fucks Like Ben Nelson (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 29 January 2010 16:19 (sixteen years ago)
talks a lot, does shit
― Rage, Resentment, Spleen (Dr Morbius), Friday, 29 January 2010 16:21 (sixteen years ago)
*talks a lot, does shit*
― free the charmless but occasionally brilliant Dom Passantino (history mayne), Friday, 29 January 2010 16:25 (sixteen years ago)
Maybe someday, calling a black man a 'smooth talker' in print won't seem racist or patronizing to me, but I doubt it.
― gnothi sautée (suzy), Friday, 29 January 2010 16:28 (sixteen years ago)
how disingenuous can you get, you don't know what neoliberal is?
― Rage, Resentment, Spleen (Dr Morbius), Friday, 29 January 2010 16:29 (sixteen years ago)
suzy, how about if you're a black writer like Adolph Reed Jr? I guess you made an assumption.
― Rage, Resentment, Spleen (Dr Morbius), Friday, 29 January 2010 16:31 (sixteen years ago)
neoliberal is a slippery term, but it doesn't exactly mean "triangulating democrat" although plenty of the latter are the former
― goole, Friday, 29 January 2010 16:36 (sixteen years ago)
liberal as in 19th cent liberal not US liberal
― goole, Friday, 29 January 2010 16:37 (sixteen years ago)
^^^yes
neoliberal predates neocon
― The Tommy Westphall Universe Hypothesis (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 29 January 2010 16:37 (sixteen years ago)
(at least, the terminology does afaict)
― The Tommy Westphall Universe Hypothesis (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 29 January 2010 16:38 (sixteen years ago)
it means a belief in the market, deregulatin' and privatizin' shit imo. so the clints was a neoliberal.
― free the charmless but occasionally brilliant Dom Passantino (history mayne), Friday, 29 January 2010 16:38 (sixteen years ago)
Really? I first saw it used by The New Republic in the eighties about Gary Hart types.
― Blue Fucks Like Ben Nelson (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 29 January 2010 16:38 (sixteen years ago)
neoliberal like that accomodationist sellout booker t washington?
― u b ilxin' (Hunt3r), Friday, 29 January 2010 16:39 (sixteen years ago)
neocon is a sort of bewildering term, the way its used. but i think they happened almost simultaneously, from the late 1960s. neocons are guys like podhoretz and kristol. neoliberals are like milton friedman and hayek. i guess they'd existed before then, but so had strauss. they began to catch impt ppl's ears in the 1970s -- thatcher, pinochet, reagan's guys.
― free the charmless but occasionally brilliant Dom Passantino (history mayne), Friday, 29 January 2010 16:40 (sixteen years ago)
yeah that might be coincidental! xp to alfred
― goole, Friday, 29 January 2010 16:42 (sixteen years ago)
i always thought neo-liberal meant the modern strain of Liberalism, with laissez faire free market connotations. not like clintonian dems.
― u b ilxin' (Hunt3r), Friday, 29 January 2010 16:43 (sixteen years ago)
all the words "neoliberal" and stuff--they basically just mean "political view i dont agree with" right?
― max, Friday, 29 January 2010 16:44 (sixteen years ago)
Long before Hitchens left the reservation he derided "neoliberalism" as the thinking of exhausted sixties pols who couldn't figure out how to beat the Reagan Revolution, so they supported "national defense," public anti-Soviet belligerence, and tax relief.
― Blue Fucks Like Ben Nelson (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 29 January 2010 16:46 (sixteen years ago)
no! it's like neocon, there is a precise meaning. or a few of them. xp
― goole, Friday, 29 January 2010 16:46 (sixteen years ago)
― u b ilxin' (Hunt3r), Friday, January 29, 2010 4:43 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
clinton believed in laissez faire economics tho. maybe a bit less rabidly than reagan, but still.
― max, Friday, January 29, 2010 4:44 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark
up to a point, but they have some irl meaning.
― free the charmless but occasionally brilliant Dom Passantino (history mayne), Friday, 29 January 2010 16:47 (sixteen years ago)
i mean i know there is some kind of "dictionary definition" but
― max, Friday, 29 January 2010 16:47 (sixteen years ago)
yall i did graduate from college
people using them sloppily is a problem.
The prefix is accurate: a "new conservative," which is why so many former Democrats (especially those in Scoop Jackson's orbit) claim the title: Krauthammer, Perle, Podhoretz, the two Kristols, Jeanne Kirkpatrick.
― Blue Fucks Like Ben Nelson (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 29 January 2010 16:48 (sixteen years ago)
i don't know shit but, to me:
neoliberal---"right winger" whose prevailing interest is in free marketsneoconservative---"right winter" whose prevailing interest is in "values" (which can range widely from the economic to the moral)
― in Lakota you are now Snow Tubes With Gangbangers (gbx), Friday, 29 January 2010 16:48 (sixteen years ago)
lol typ
o
eoconservative---"right winter" whose prevailing interest is in "values" (which can range widely from the economic to the moral)
Not quiet true. Most neocons are "moderate" on social issues; their bugaboo is defense.
― Blue Fucks Like Ben Nelson (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 29 January 2010 16:49 (sixteen years ago)
*quite
hey max, the two root words are "neo" meaning new, and "liberal", which may refer to any one of a few different political movements. do you see the confusion? i hope i helped you out!
― goole, Friday, 29 January 2010 16:50 (sixteen years ago)
sigh
― max, Friday, 29 January 2010 16:51 (sixteen years ago)
maybe we can go over the difference between the american and european uses of the word "liberal" next
Not quiet true. Most neocons are "moderate" on social issues; their bugaboo is defense.― Blue Fucks Like Ben Nelson (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, January 29, 2010 10:49 AM (30 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― Blue Fucks Like Ben Nelson (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, January 29, 2010 10:49 AM (30 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
yeah that actually sounds more accurate. i guess it's kind of a rhombus/square thing to me: neocons are very likely to be neoliberal, but not necessarily vice versa
― in Lakota you are now Snow Tubes With Gangbangers (gbx), Friday, 29 January 2010 16:51 (sixteen years ago)
― Blue Fucks Like Ben Nelson (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, January 29, 2010 10:49 AM (20 seconds ago) Bookmark
i dunno, they talk about defense the most, in a "war makes societies great" kind of way, but the kristol's wrote all kinds of shit about how a victorian shame and propriety is some kind of ideal iirc. they weren't southern-style racists, is the thing.
(max i was trying to be funny)
― goole, Friday, 29 January 2010 16:52 (sixteen years ago)
god I fucking hate the Kristols
apropos of nothing...
― The Tommy Westphall Universe Hypothesis (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 29 January 2010 16:52 (sixteen years ago)
ugh extra apostrophe there
xp
― goole, Friday, 29 January 2010 16:53 (sixteen years ago)
I guess you made an assumption about what I know! Which I'm sure you never, ever do to anyone who contributes here.
My complaint was that the description could seem 'racist OR patronizing' (and I was trying not to throw the skin of the writer in the game to prove a point/bait you).
― gnothi sautée (suzy), Friday, 29 January 2010 16:53 (sixteen years ago)
― goole, Friday, January 29, 2010 11:52 AM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
dude
― max, Friday, 29 January 2010 16:54 (sixteen years ago)
success?
― goole, Friday, 29 January 2010 16:55 (sixteen years ago)
Republicans Ready to Spar With ObamaBy CARL HULSE
BALTIMORE — It’s the rumble in Baltimore as House Republicans take on President Obama today.
Gathered for a retreat in the Renaissance Hotel overlooking the blue-collar city’s famous harbor and historic Fort McHenry, members of the conservative Republican House Conference say they are itching to quiz the president and present their policy ideas rather than listen to another lofty presidential address.
“House Republicans welcome any opportunity to present our better solutions,” said Representative Mike Pence of Indiana, the No. 3 House Republican and the organizer of the House retreat.
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/01/29/republicans-ready-to-spar-with-obama/?partner=rss&emc=rss
Obama's biggest flaw is that he's going to be taking Mike Pence seriously.
― Adam Bruneau, Friday, 29 January 2010 16:55 (sixteen years ago)