Pulp Fiction (the movie)

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (133 of them)
http://www.reel.com/Content/reelimages/reviews/dvd/dvd_131546.jpg

jhoshea (scoopsnoodle), Saturday, 27 January 2007 20:04 (nineteen years ago)

The maxi-pad line is great!

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Saturday, 27 January 2007 20:53 (nineteen years ago)

I have to admit I like Snatch a lot more than Pulp Fiction. May not be a very deep movie, but I enjoy watching it. Never heard of that Destiny movie, but it looks incredibly scary.

Matt Olken (Moodles), Saturday, 27 January 2007 21:02 (nineteen years ago)

u crazy

mothers against celibacy (skowly), Saturday, 27 January 2007 21:07 (nineteen years ago)

May not be a very deep movie, but I enjoy watching it

Pulp Fiction was not directed by Dreyer.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Saturday, 27 January 2007 21:08 (nineteen years ago)

it's really good. never understood the hate. like ned i watched it again for the first time in ages with friends who never had and i forgot loads of bits.

wogan lenin (dog latin), Saturday, 27 January 2007 21:11 (nineteen years ago)

snatch comparison is though not entirely off base still perplexing, what with it being a quasi sequel to lock stock and 2 smoking barrels. though arguably a british response to pulp fic lock stock had much, if not more, in common with the oeuvre of john sullivan.

acrobat (elwisty), Saturday, 27 January 2007 21:21 (nineteen years ago)

For the longest time, this movie and its soundtrack existed in separate spheres for me. The soundtrack served, along with Enter the 36 Chambers, Sublime's 40 oz to Freedom, The Fugee's The Score, and the Resevoir Dogs soundtrack, to the albums most likely to be blared out of a room on my freshman year dorm floor. I was SO tired of hearing the Ezekiel 25:17 intro EVERY SINGLE FRIDAY NIGHT that I stopped listening to it entirely.

Having watched it again for the first time in a long while, it was nice to hear the songs and quotes back in the context of the movie. "Let's Stay Together" is playing in the background while Marcellus is telling Butch to take the fall in the fight, right? I seem to remember thinking, and still do, "What a PERFECT daytime at a bar song. Just chillin'..."

B.L.A.M. (Big Loud Mountain Ape), Saturday, 27 January 2007 21:37 (nineteen years ago)

I'm in the camp that Tarantino isn't really "saying" anything with PF (not a "deep movie"), he's just having fun with genre archetypes and taking us along for the ride.

I enjoy the ride a lot.

Hoosteen (Hoosteen), Saturday, 27 January 2007 22:07 (nineteen years ago)

I was lucky enough to see PF as the surprise movie at the Edinburgh film festival, meaning that I saw it fresh, without any of the hype: 'Fuck, this is LINK FUCKING WRAY!'

Great, great movie, despite all the shite that came in its wake.

Soukesian (Soukesian), Saturday, 27 January 2007 22:48 (nineteen years ago)

Jackie Brown is better.

Mr. Snrub (Mr. Snrub), Saturday, 27 January 2007 22:59 (nineteen years ago)

i agree but PF is still great.

jed_ (jed), Saturday, 27 January 2007 23:02 (nineteen years ago)

as is Kill Bill 1.

Pulp Fiction is entertaining, but I missed the initial impact so it doesn't mean much to me and it suffers from Monty Python syndrome in a bad way (so tired of hearing quotes I don't want to watch it again).

milo z (mlp), Saturday, 27 January 2007 23:03 (nineteen years ago)

OTM. The Python syndrome means I'd rather have the memory than actually go back to it.

Soukesian (Soukesian), Saturday, 27 January 2007 23:11 (nineteen years ago)

i saw it a few times in the theater when it came out. since then, twice i think? i think it's great, but i'm not sure i need to see it again.

roger goodell (gear), Saturday, 27 January 2007 23:20 (nineteen years ago)

I saw Pulp Fiction at least four times in the theater. Seemed like its run at the box office went on for a good six months or so.

I saw it on its opening weekend with a packed house. I'll never forget everyone's reaction at seeing the needle get plunged into Uma as well as everyone holding their breath as Butch makes it back up the stairs and almost out the door. Maybe the closest to an event movie that I've ever been to.

I've been catching it on cable recently. That QT/Keitel segment certainly hasn't aged well (Hello, Julia Sweeny.) I can't help but notice the bullet holes already in the wall before the guy comes out of the bathroom with his gun blazing. But it's still a great movie.

The thirty-second sequence with the toaster might be my favorite part of the movie. The smoke detector still going off as Butch walks back out into the courtyard...

Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Saturday, 27 January 2007 23:38 (nineteen years ago)

I had the same reaction as Pleasant Pains. Its opening night remains the single greatest movie experience of my career (even if I wasn't so fond of the movie itself).

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Saturday, 27 January 2007 23:44 (nineteen years ago)

I saw it a bunch of times as well -- the first two times, in an otherwise empty theater across the street from Mt Holyoke, opening week. I was killing time waiting for my girlfriend to get out of work, and as soon as she did, I said, "You gotta see this Travolta movie," and right back into the theater we went. I hadn't seen any ads because it was the one year when I didn't have a TV. I'd seen Reservoir Dogs but didn't know it was the same director until after the fact.

The next time I saw it was over whatever vacation was next -- Christmas? -- when I went with the friend I'd always seen movies with in high school, and by then it'd been hyped and they'd done SNL skits or whatever, and the theater was packed: it was that moment in a popular movie's theatrical life when there are people in the audience seeing it for the second time and shouting lines out or laughing in anticipation of the joke, alongside people who are only there because it's really popular and they want to know why. The difference in vibe was just really cool to notice -- it's not often I see a movie in the theater in such different circumstances. (Revival theaters seem to be dying off just in time to prevent me from seeing a revival of anything I saw when it was new.)

I went a long time without watching it because my ex got the video and I still don't have it on DVD, but it was on On Demand the other day ... and yeah, I understand the Python effect, but like Ned alludes, the joy of rewatching it is all those moments that haven't been made iconic, weren't relived throughout the nineties. Even the over-familiar parts, in a lot of cases it just demonstrated what a poor job the imitators did.

Though I think my favorite moment might actually be Travolta's apparently arbitrary attitude with Butch in the bar.

Tep (ktepi), Saturday, 27 January 2007 23:51 (nineteen years ago)

i saw it first just as it came out on video. my parents had rented it, and one night i couldn't sleep and went out to the living room and watched it. my 13 year old mind was BLOWN. it was cornily enough a defining cinematic experience of my adolescence.

latebloomer: crapness 2 the Nth degree (latebloomer), Saturday, 27 January 2007 23:59 (nineteen years ago)

"Let's get into character."

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Sunday, 28 January 2007 00:04 (nineteen years ago)

i think the problem with tarantino imitators is they copy the premises of his films but not the style nor the pace, which is fairly leisurely.

roger goodell (gear), Sunday, 28 January 2007 00:34 (nineteen years ago)

I like Reservoir Dogs more.

groovemaan (groove nihilist), Sunday, 28 January 2007 00:36 (nineteen years ago)

PF kept the Hoka Theater in Oxford in business about six months longer than it would have been otherwise. You could bring in your own beer, get a burrito or quesadilla or some turkey nachos from the kitchen, and go into the theater and watch Pulp Fiction just about any night over an 18-month span. I think I saw it four times there, and once in a nicer theater. I agree with the general consensus (great, but aging worse than the other QT films).

do i have to draw you a diaphragm (Rock Hardy), Sunday, 28 January 2007 00:41 (nineteen years ago)

will anyone defend this?
http://coverdivx.altervista.org/Four_Rooms_CDS_DivX.jpg

timmy tannin (pompous), Sunday, 28 January 2007 00:44 (nineteen years ago)

"i think the problem with tarantino imitators is they copy the premises of his films but not the style nor the pace, which is fairly leisurely."

otm, they forget that his movies are essentially comedies-of-manners for underworld types not action movies

latebloomer: crapness 2 the Nth degree (latebloomer), Sunday, 28 January 2007 00:45 (nineteen years ago)

"will anyone defend this?"

The Rodriguez section of that is great! I won't defend any of the rest of it.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Sunday, 28 January 2007 00:49 (nineteen years ago)

i think the problem with tarantino imitators is they copy the premises of his films but not the style nor the pace, which is fairly leisurely.

Would you like to see a leisurely paced Things to Do In Denver When You're Dead or Killing Zoe?

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Sunday, 28 January 2007 01:08 (nineteen years ago)

Hahaha no no the problem with those movies isn't the pace it is that they are the suck.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Sunday, 28 January 2007 01:11 (nineteen years ago)

if leisurely paced KILLING ZOE features more Julie Delpy nudity, the answer is YESSSSSSSS
xpost

timmy tannin (pompous), Sunday, 28 January 2007 01:12 (nineteen years ago)

I saw it on opening night in LA.

And ya gotta remember, almost no one involved was a name at that point - other than Travolta, who was a joke, the biggest names involved were Eric Stoltz, Rosanna Arquette, and (thanks to RES DOGS) Harvey Keitel - and there hadn't been a thousand other movies in which everyday-people gangsters sat around talking about cheeseburgers.

The sheer frequency of short sharp shocks was dizzying, and while I'm firmly in the "it's all surface" camp the surface was particularly brilliant in its offhand explosion of the (generally crypto-essentialist and painfully turgid) contemporary discourse of race and identity.

Also, I will confirm QT's fascination with degreed women and f33tz0rz.

hearditonthexico (rogermexico), Sunday, 28 January 2007 02:02 (nineteen years ago)

Why does everything I see written about this movie call the flock of seagulls guys gay? Even now that totally blows by me. And I'll read gay subtext into anything.

Eric H. (Eric H.), Sunday, 28 January 2007 02:16 (nineteen years ago)

erm bruce willis. he was quite famous in 1994.

xpost

acrobat (elwisty), Sunday, 28 January 2007 02:41 (nineteen years ago)

i love the Jack Rabbit Slims restaurant in this film. it's like Tarantino's idealized version of what a tacky retro-themed restaurant should be rather than how lame they usually are IRL. also Steve Buscemi as the Buddy Holly waiter!

latebloomer: crapness 2 the Nth degree (latebloomer), Sunday, 28 January 2007 02:48 (nineteen years ago)

also, how great is that Christopher Walken Watch monologue?

latebloomer: crapness 2 the Nth degree (latebloomer), Sunday, 28 January 2007 03:35 (nineteen years ago)

I would order a Douglas Sirk sirloin, and I hate steak.

Eric H. (Eric H.), Sunday, 28 January 2007 03:42 (nineteen years ago)

what flock of seagulls guy?

cutty (mcutt), Sunday, 28 January 2007 03:46 (nineteen years ago)

erm bruce willis. he was quite famous in 1994

Famous yes. Bankable, not so much. He'd scored big cast against type in DIE HARD, but he was coming off HUDSON HAWK, LAST BOY SCOUT and STRIKING DISTANCE.

Oh, you don't remember STIKING DISTANCE either? Nope, Willis was another one who PULP FICTION brought back to life.

hearditonthexico (rogermexico), Sunday, 28 January 2007 05:05 (nineteen years ago)

what flock of seagulls guy?

The guy who gets shot on the couch first during the whole Eziekel segment. In the script, it said the character would have a Flock of Seagulls haircut, though that wasn't really the case in the movie.

Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Sunday, 28 January 2007 05:11 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah, he totally didn't, which confused me even more.

Eric H. (Eric H.), Sunday, 28 January 2007 06:45 (nineteen years ago)

I was living in Pasadena during the year that this film came out, and working in an office in Hollywood. It was an amazing year for me, to come from Dublin to LA, and to have such a perfect LA movie to look back on as part of it means that I've always had a special fondness for PF.

That said, this:

I was SO tired of hearing the Ezekiel 25:17 intro EVERY SINGLE FRIDAY NIGHT that I stopped listening to it entirely.

Never have truer words been spoken. I still can't listen to that bit of the film and will switch away until it's over.

accentmonkey (accentmonkey), Sunday, 28 January 2007 09:26 (nineteen years ago)

After seeing it a few times in a campus theater(it played for over a full year, and lasted long after the tape came out), I rented the tape while at the parents' house over Christmas Break 1995 and mistakenly left it out atop the family room tv. I came home to find my rather conservative parents watching it, and none too pleased. "This is GARBAGE!" was the quote, i believe. I told them to stop watching before they got to the 2nd part of the film and then left the house. Never said a word about it ever again.

Also, cosign w/ the soundtrack and undergrad life. Freshman year was 94-95, and EVERY SINGLE FUCKER on my floor would blast this. When I worked the travelling movie poster show that would come to campus twice a year, we sold dozens of related one-sheets every day for years. (full disclosure: i did have a poster of Jules sitting in the cafe)

Jackie Brown I will go back and watch from time to time and enjoy, but I have no interest in seeing this flick again for a very long time.

kingfish moose tracks (kingfish 2.0), Sunday, 28 January 2007 09:39 (nineteen years ago)

love this and i think jackie brown has aged very well

deej.. (deej..), Sunday, 28 January 2007 09:47 (nineteen years ago)

maybe its my badly educated tastes but i love the film, RD & JB

secondhandnews (secondhandnews), Sunday, 28 January 2007 11:04 (nineteen years ago)

"Having watched it again for the first time in a long while" - maybe this has been xxposted, but...you can't do that unless you're Dr. Who!

aimurchie (aimurchie), Sunday, 28 January 2007 13:16 (nineteen years ago)

It's okay. Not my favourite Tarantino (and I'm not even a big Tarantino fan), but it's fun to watch.

One unifying theme I noticed while I rewatched it is that the movie is all about how how little decisions and seemingly irrelevant acts can build up to make a big change. There's two or three occasions when someone's life is either lost or saved because he happens to be in a toilet. Also, there's the Willis character forgetting his watch, him running into Marcellus Wallace on the street, etc etc. I think there are of many of these scenes in the film for it to be unintentional.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Sunday, 28 January 2007 13:53 (nineteen years ago)

Quentin Tarantino is someone who has caught a whiff of it. He wasn't there in the sixties and the seventies, but he knows pretty much what went down, and he knows that peoples reactions to it are fucked, and he knows that psychosis was and is involved, and he feels himself to be the legitimate heir of that, to some extent. I believe he is. I believe he feels in his mind pretty much what sixties and seventies people felt in their minds. He just happens to belong to another generation, and he has every right to tell the story. The point I'm going to make here is that there's one part of the movie that doesn't work, and its the World War II reference. Christopher Walken comes--it's a dream sequence that Bruce Willis is dreaming, and I won't describe the scene, because it's really quite repulsive--I don't mean the scatology of it, but the point of view. It's not from the film. It's from something else. It's something Quentin Tarantino doesn't know about, he didn't know how to deal with it, and he dealt with it in a very simple way. He used a literary template; the template is mostly from Catch-22, say, some sort of absurdist treatment of World War II, earned on the part of Joseph Heller, unearned on the part of Quentin Tarantino, and he's done a very typical sort of directorial thing. He's not familiar with the material, he doesn't have any instinct for the material, but he finds a very good actor, Mr. Walken, to carry it off for him, and to some extent, Walken does. But it's wrong. It stands outside the values of the film, precisely because it stands inside the values of the film.

and what (ooo), Sunday, 28 January 2007 14:11 (nineteen years ago)

Really? I thought that was just part of the whole "pulp" thing. Tarantino doesn't know how WWII soldier feels any more than he knows how a gangster feels - he just takes these cliched, pulpy stories (like a family heirloom kept throughout the war) and expands them to near-ridiculous heights (what happens to the watch).

Tuomas (Tuomas), Sunday, 28 January 2007 14:45 (nineteen years ago)

thats george trow from 'my pilgrim's progress'

and what (ooo), Sunday, 28 January 2007 14:47 (nineteen years ago)

roger avery wrote the whole bruce willis part fwiw. also yes... this is a GREAT "LA" movie!

chaki (chaki), Sunday, 28 January 2007 14:49 (nineteen years ago)

The guy who gets shot on the couch first during the whole Eziekel segment. In the script, it said the character would have a Flock of Seagulls haircut, though that wasn't really the case in the movie.

isn't it alexis arquette--who did have a flock of seagulls haircut in the wedding singer? and in real life he is gay. so yeah.

cutty (mcutt), Sunday, 28 January 2007 15:13 (nineteen years ago)

"Someone said, 'Travolta is SO gay!" (John Travolta has not come out).

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 15 February 2013 20:56 (thirteen years ago)

i love how Travolta came up with the 'Batman' and 'Swim' moves in the dance scene!

piscesx, Friday, 15 February 2013 21:23 (thirteen years ago)

yeah that was awesome. lol at the 9 year old Travolta winning the twist contest

set the controls for the heart of the sun (VegemiteGrrl), Friday, 15 February 2013 21:26 (thirteen years ago)

http://nyookami.tumblr.com/post/43539515046

Jersey Al (Albert R. Broccoli), Wednesday, 20 February 2013 05:02 (thirteen years ago)

aw travolta was awesome Hairspray

k3vin k., Wednesday, 20 February 2013 05:09 (thirteen years ago)

I couldnt stand it any longer. Am watching it right now

set the controls for the heart of the sun (VegemiteGrrl), Wednesday, 20 February 2013 05:18 (thirteen years ago)

Pulp. Not Hairspray

set the controls for the heart of the sun (VegemiteGrrl), Wednesday, 20 February 2013 05:18 (thirteen years ago)

three years pass...

http://i.imgur.com/h8pW41T.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/liajkPb.jpg

, Wednesday, 13 April 2016 13:13 (ten years ago)

and none of them were "bad motherfuckers"

Jerry Lee Lewis: The Total Film-Maker (stevie), Wednesday, 20 April 2016 08:25 (ten years ago)

Worst fairytale ending ever

Daithi Bowsie (darraghmac), Wednesday, 20 April 2016 09:00 (ten years ago)

Watched this last year - it still moves, but time has not been kind to the effect of the "5-dollar milkshake".

Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 20 April 2016 10:13 (ten years ago)

Haha, yeah I remember thinking that didn't sound all that expensive even in 1994.

the joke should be over once the kid is eaten. (chap), Wednesday, 20 April 2016 10:41 (ten years ago)

I worked at a Friendly's back then. One of their milkshakes was about $2. McDonald's was a little over $1.

how's life, Wednesday, 20 April 2016 12:52 (ten years ago)

$5 dollar or 5 euro milkshake would seem a bit pricey to me tbh

i;m thinking about thos Beans (Michael B), Wednesday, 20 April 2016 12:58 (ten years ago)

what if it has bourbon in it

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 20 April 2016 13:06 (ten years ago)

six years pass...

“My name’s Paul and I leave the rest to y’all.”
I like how, besides the dancing, Vincent Vega is a walking disaster through this film. He makes every single situation worse by his actions or inaction!

bit high, bitch (gyac), Wednesday, 21 December 2022 14:25 (three years ago)

two months pass...

Had a boy in a grade 7 class this morning with wild red hair who wouldn't sit down. Was so tempted to go Sam Jackson on him--"You, Carrot Top" (points to desk)--but thought better of it.

clemenza, Monday, 20 March 2023 17:25 (three years ago)

one year passes...

I was trying to find J. Hoberman's review of Natural Born Killers--couldn't, but did scare up Stanley Kauffmann's Pulp Fiction review:

https://newrepublic.com/article/61392/shooting

Found the last couple of paragraphs interesting as a snapshot of an old-guard critic (Kauffmann was 78 at the time) confronted with a sea-change of sorts. If you love the film, and maybe even if you don't, you'll dismiss it as cranky old-guy whining. I have great patience with that perspective. (I wish he were still around, in part because I think he'd be taking a battering ram to the last few Wes Anderson films.)

clemenza, Saturday, 30 March 2024 17:38 (two years ago)

“tried various keys in the lock and had at last picked the right one.”

Ha this is a good metaphor for why I don’t like Reservoir Dogs (and other things as well). Guess it’s just an elaboration on “trying too hard”

brimstead, Saturday, 30 March 2024 17:47 (two years ago)

the last paragraph is pretty awful ad hominem trash though. glad fewer like him are no longer around to spew that shit. Does he just want to go back to the Donna Reed Show? ugh.

brimstead, Saturday, 30 March 2024 17:54 (two years ago)

I wish he were still around, in part because I think he'd be taking a battering ram to the last few Wes Anderson films.

He'd be 108 tho, so he probably wouldn't know what Wes Anderson, a battering ram, or films were by that point.

an icon of a worried-looking, long-haired, bespectacled man (C. Grisso/McCain), Saturday, 30 March 2024 18:55 (two years ago)

Does he just want to go back to the Donna Reed Show?

Kauffmann? I think he wanted to go back to early-'60s Antonioni and Bergman.

clemenza, Saturday, 30 March 2024 20:44 (two years ago)

(xpost) True enough! I really didn't care much for the reviews he wrote the last two or three years he was active. (He kept at it for at least another decade-plus after the Pulp Fiction review.) Battering-ram wasn't his style anyway.

clemenza, Saturday, 30 March 2024 20:48 (two years ago)

Funny to see Pulp Fiction alongside grunge music. Do think the latter was speaking to a younger crowd whereas I am not sure PF will hold up in the same way.

xyzzzz__, Saturday, 30 March 2024 21:02 (two years ago)

For what it's worth, at 78, I'm pretty sure "grungy" to Kauffmann meant grunge meant rock meant hip-hop--all just undifferentiated noise to him. The thing I take from that last paragraph is that the meaning of escapism had completely flipped from the '40s to the '90s. And I think there's at least some truth to that. (Less so today in the superhero epoch.)

clemenza, Saturday, 30 March 2024 21:17 (two years ago)

Very weird how people will say x thing will have nothing to say when it's selling millions!

xyzzzz__, Saturday, 30 March 2024 21:19 (two years ago)

The thing I take from that last paragraph is that the meaning of escapism had completely flipped from the '40s to the '90s. And I think there's at least some truth to that.

Well, to "well actually" this at least a little bit, 40's escapism also included poverty row westerns and crime thrillers alongside the musicals and comedies Kauffman was thinking of - and of course ACTUAL pulp fiction! So I think that escaping into the lives of violent men was as much a thing then as it was in the 90's, just perhaps the level of respectability of this escapism changed, you wouldn't have seen it at Cannes.

Daniel_Rf, Saturday, 30 March 2024 21:44 (two years ago)

Good point.

clemenza, Saturday, 30 March 2024 22:43 (two years ago)

I read this review (and Kauffmann generally) in the pre-internet '90s. When I discovered John Simon a couple years later I often found it difficult telling them apart; I realized Kauffmann was often the better writer.

poppers fueled buttsex crescendo (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 31 March 2024 10:53 (two years ago)

I don’t find the review heinous but calling Tarantino “Tarantino himself, passable in a small role” and expressing that he doesn’t understand why Uma is meant to be desirable are big thumbs down from me. Tarantino cameos are always the worst thing about his films, especially when he’s dropping racial slurs - yeah i know these are seedy underworld characters but the man truly cannot act and it comes across terribly.

I actually watched Reservoir Dogs again for the first time in about fifteen years and had forgotten how much I loved Mr Orange’s whole deal and how fucking dumb everyone is in that film. Nice Guy Eddie’s ability to read people but inability to follow through on his hunches is fatal.

I wish I would have been old enough to have seen Pulp Fiction when it came out. I saw it one night when I was babysitting and I thought it was electric. Over twenty years later, it still had that feel to me despite the fact the film itself has entered mass culture reference hell (and also Keitel doing those ads as the Wolf, yuck) ages ago.

Roman Anthony gets on his horse (gyac), Sunday, 31 March 2024 11:15 (two years ago)

Plummer and Roth are beneath comment.

I remember reading this line at the time and thought, "OK? Elaborate?"

poppers fueled buttsex crescendo (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 31 March 2024 12:29 (two years ago)

That’s not a statement it makes sense to elaborate on tbf

cozen itt (wins), Sunday, 31 March 2024 12:37 (two years ago)

They're below in the comments.

Daniel_Rf, Sunday, 31 March 2024 12:38 (two years ago)

"Keitel doing those ads as the Wolf, yuck"

Lol I really like them

xyzzzz__, Sunday, 31 March 2024 12:39 (two years ago)

he doesn’t understand why Uma is meant to be desirable

Dude was 78 but apparently died at 76. RIP.

il lavoro mi rovina la giornata (PBKR), Sunday, 31 March 2024 13:37 (two years ago)

xp I don't like or hate those ads, but they are in character for the Wolf. Like the Wolf would actually do those ads if he was a real person.

you gotta roll with the pączki to get to what's real (snoball), Sunday, 31 March 2024 13:48 (two years ago)

I probably mentioned this upthread or so, but before this movie came out my friend had a copy of the screenplay. I didn't want it to be spoiled, but made a copy of it for myself for later, though when I was xeroxing it the only word I saw was "chainsaw."

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 31 March 2024 13:49 (two years ago)

xp those ads are like Pulp Fiction, which is a series of little sketches.

xyzzzz__, Sunday, 31 March 2024 14:58 (two years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.