Mel Gibson's APOCALYPTO!

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (242 of them)
Apparently Mel might still have anger management issues.

Ned Raggett, Saturday, 24 March 2007 20:08 (nineteen years ago)

that article is ridiculously vague. surely they could have gotten some specifics, like uh what exactly the question was?

s1ocki, Saturday, 24 March 2007 20:13 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah, I'd want to hear/see some more. Surprised there's nothing on YouTube yet!

Ned Raggett, Saturday, 24 March 2007 20:14 (nineteen years ago)

six months pass...

Saw this the other night. Thought I was going to be bored because the capture scene went on a bit, but as it got going it ruled. The city scene is amazing. Costumes deserved triple oscars. Those people with the elaborate headdresses and shaved foreheads!

Beth Parker, Tuesday, 16 October 2007 00:39 (eighteen years ago)

the movie i hate to love!

s1ocki, Tuesday, 16 October 2007 02:00 (eighteen years ago)

four months pass...

yeah so this basically fucking ruled. I watched it through twice yesterday, once with commentary. gibson is, uh, kind of a crypto-bigot, wow.

El Tomboto, Monday, 25 February 2008 23:34 (eighteen years ago)

Hahah, any choice phrases?

Ned Raggett, Monday, 25 February 2008 23:34 (eighteen years ago)

“Sharp-toothed Lithuanians armed with baseball bats are crawling across the beach into your house. What should we do with them? We have to fight back.”

da croupier, Monday, 25 February 2008 23:35 (eighteen years ago)

"crypto"

latebloomer, Monday, 25 February 2008 23:35 (eighteen years ago)

"kind of"

Jordan, Monday, 25 February 2008 23:36 (eighteen years ago)

i will say this once more:

TAPIR BALLZ

latebloomer, Monday, 25 February 2008 23:36 (eighteen years ago)

this was all in all a pretty enjoyable action flick. certainly better than that shitty jesus movie.

latebloomer, Monday, 25 February 2008 23:39 (eighteen years ago)

so who are the people on the boat at the end of the film?

christopher columbus, played by the set designer, and a franciscan monk played by the film's armorer. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voyages_of_Christopher_Columbus#Fourth_voyage

El Tomboto, Monday, 25 February 2008 23:40 (eighteen years ago)

I just thought it was funny that mel could only remember like three of his actors' names from the whole movie. I mean he did remember a lot of details about so many of the people who worked on the film but clearly in his brain everybody was probably pedro 1, pedro 2, frank, pedro 8, carlito, pedro 26, fast pedro, old pedro, etc.

El Tomboto, Monday, 25 February 2008 23:42 (eighteen years ago)

I checked this out of the library and watched it the other night, up to the point where the hero escapes and clambers through the pit of corpses. Right there I could see the entire remainder of the film would be an extended chase scene, so I bailed out.

Mel's POV as a writer and director is simple, simple, simple. The whole plot could be written on a napkin. However, the costumes for this film were utterly, jaw-droppingly fabulous! I can't rave enough about the costumes. The set design, cinematography and editing were all pretty darn good, too, but the costumes were mesmerizing. Loved 'em all.

Bottom line: I still couldn't finish watching the movie. Too reductive and too predictable.

Aimless, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 01:41 (eighteen years ago)

you missed some amazing, amazing sequences from the chase, though.

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 01:42 (eighteen years ago)

but if I didn't love, love, love well-filmed pursuit action I probably wouldn't rate stuff like the warriors and behind enemy lines in my top x for all time

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 01:44 (eighteen years ago)

i forgot about this!
i will like all chase stuff, i'm sure

rrrobyn, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 02:39 (eighteen years ago)

is this sort of like The Naked Prey?

gershy, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 03:15 (eighteen years ago)

Is it going to disgust me with all its "lol mayan empire collapse under own perversion!"?

Laurel, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 03:22 (eighteen years ago)

Bottom line: I still couldn't finish watching the movie. Too reductive and too predictable.

-- Aimless, Tuesday, February 26, 2008 1:41 AM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Link

pretty rich to call a movie predictable when you didn't watch it all the way through.

s1ocki, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 03:23 (eighteen years ago)

Maybe he predicted he was going to stop watching.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 03:26 (eighteen years ago)

this film plays like a tribute to the color green. the nonstop lush action on acid worth any melophobia. loved it.

Cosmo Vitelli, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 04:20 (eighteen years ago)

Laurel it's more like "lol mayan empire collapse under own fixation on building stuff out of cement"

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 04:23 (eighteen years ago)

pretty rich to call a movie predictable when you didn't watch it all the way through.

slocki, you don't seem to appreciate how simple-minded Mel is as a storyteller. When the storyline is laid out like a plank road for an hour, you can predict it's not going to suddenly change into a cloverleaf freeway exchange.

Aimless, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 19:36 (eighteen years ago)

this asshole does not deserve any of your money

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 20:11 (eighteen years ago)

did they harvest the organs of their prisoners for transplant? because this guy calls it the mayan protocol.

Hunt3r, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 20:14 (eighteen years ago)

xxx-post

hahaha you didn't make it to the twist!

*SPOILERS*it's all a hallucination being experienced by Jesus on the cross at the end of the Passion*SPOILERS*

latebloomer, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 20:19 (eighteen years ago)

four months pass...

Hey dudes. I'm watching this now. It's kinda not bad, but not so great that I'm too enthralled to be posting while watching. I like the imaginative rendering of Mayan civ, although there's plenty of stuff that's hard to buy (doing dozens of sacrifices one after the other, for example.)

It's a boilerplate macho man epic, but not without its fun.

Hurting 2, Sunday, 13 July 2008 04:13 (seventeen years ago)

there's something amateurish-looking about some of the cinematography, like parts of it look like a tv mini series or something

Hurting 2, Sunday, 13 July 2008 04:18 (seventeen years ago)

i didn't find. elaborate?

s1ocki, Sunday, 13 July 2008 09:30 (seventeen years ago)

two weeks pass...

Ending was a bit Lord of the Flies-sy.

Pleasant Plains, Monday, 28 July 2008 16:35 (seventeen years ago)

I thought it was a pretty good historical action movie. Mel knows how to film action scenes - I guess he's worked with some of the best in the business, and he was apparently paying attention. The historical color was interesting and the vision of the Maya as a bloodthirsty, decadent civilization ripe for overthrow was intriguing. Bears comparison to "Road Warrior" for its extended chase scene and costume design.

o. nate, Monday, 28 July 2008 18:44 (seventeen years ago)

I read that last sentence three times wondering to myself, "what scene had a bear in it?"

Pleasant Plains, Monday, 28 July 2008 18:49 (seventeen years ago)

Sorry, there was an implicit "It" at the beginning of that sentence.

o. nate, Monday, 28 July 2008 18:54 (seventeen years ago)

tim curry's in this too? omg does he wrestle the bears!?

latebloomer, Monday, 28 July 2008 18:55 (seventeen years ago)

Dude, he IS the bear.

Pleasant Plains, Monday, 28 July 2008 19:05 (seventeen years ago)

Bears comparison to the Bad News Bears.

s1ocki, Monday, 28 July 2008 19:33 (seventeen years ago)

Saw this last night, thought it was pretty good if a little naive.

The non-fight/chase-scene cinematography was pretty epic.

Steve Shasta, Monday, 4 August 2008 22:17 (seventeen years ago)

five months pass...

this film is coming up on Behind Enemy Lines in my will absolutely watch this anytime anywhere top ten list. it's on some cable movie channel right now and I have just decided that my ideal technique for daydream violence needs to be me showing up covered in mud and pitching a nest full of hornets at whomever (former "bosses," former "colleagues," friedman, brooks, norquist, etc)

TOMBOT, Saturday, 10 January 2009 07:28 (seventeen years ago)

I mean really why try to be all kill bill fancy ninja sword shit when there's free mud and stingmaster bug bombs all over the place

TOMBOT, Saturday, 10 January 2009 07:30 (seventeen years ago)

pretty dope movie imo

and what, Saturday, 10 January 2009 07:33 (seventeen years ago)

how long do you think you have to spend running around and hunting in forests before you learn how to pluck your own dud arrows out of tree trunks on the jog?

TOMBOT, Saturday, 10 January 2009 07:37 (seventeen years ago)

the army is a pretty bullshit institution if u cant get some funding to answer that very question

Lamp, Saturday, 10 January 2009 07:40 (seventeen years ago)

haha lamp I almost added a line about how I think that exact kind of thing is why nugent-flavored white guys always seem to fill the ranks of delta, seals et al.

TOMBOT, Saturday, 10 January 2009 07:42 (seventeen years ago)

if I started a thread devoted to the discussion of films wherein the protag is basically a schmo who must use resourcefulness and luck to evade a pursuing cadre of elite(s) killers through foreign territory, would it get any posts

TOMBOT, Saturday, 10 January 2009 07:46 (seventeen years ago)

Might degenerate into arguments about that genre v schmo who turns tables on his assailants (Straw Dogs, 28 Days Later, etc...)

Gukbe, Saturday, 10 January 2009 09:15 (seventeen years ago)

if I started a thread devoted to the discussion of films wherein the protag is basically a schmo who must use resourcefulness and luck to evade a pursuing cadre of elite(s) killers through foreign territory, would it get any posts

― TOMBOT, Saturday, January 10, 2009 7:46 AM (9 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

i'd hit it

s1ocki, Saturday, 10 January 2009 16:57 (seventeen years ago)

I admit I find it hard to think of the title character in Predator as a schmo.

Ned Raggett, Saturday, 10 January 2009 17:00 (seventeen years ago)

he's probably a schmo to the other predators... that's why he's stuck hunting humans and doesn't even win

s1ocki, Saturday, 10 January 2009 17:06 (seventeen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.