― jocelyn (Jocelyn), Tuesday, 1 November 2005 04:27 (eighteen years ago) link
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 1 November 2005 09:38 (eighteen years ago) link
― N_RQ, Tuesday, 1 November 2005 09:59 (eighteen years ago) link
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Tuesday, 1 November 2005 19:17 (eighteen years ago) link
And it DID blow goats.
― Austin Still (Austin, Still), Tuesday, 1 November 2005 23:35 (eighteen years ago) link
― miccio (miccio), Tuesday, 1 November 2005 23:39 (eighteen years ago) link
― Dave B (daveb), Friday, 10 February 2006 13:18 (eighteen years ago) link
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Friday, 10 February 2006 14:34 (eighteen years ago) link
― kyle (akmonday), Friday, 10 February 2006 14:36 (eighteen years ago) link
Will Natalie Portman return to her adolescent brilliance? I mean, same basic setup as Leon the Professional. I don't have audio @ work so can't tell if she's being totally boring again or what else is going on.
― TOMBOT, Friday, 10 February 2006 14:53 (eighteen years ago) link
― chap who would dare to be completely sober on the internet (chap), Friday, 10 February 2006 15:37 (eighteen years ago) link
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 10 February 2006 16:21 (eighteen years ago) link
― Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 10 February 2006 16:44 (eighteen years ago) link
― ledge (ledge), Friday, 10 February 2006 17:04 (eighteen years ago) link
― gear (gear), Friday, 10 February 2006 17:26 (eighteen years ago) link
― kingfish has gene rayburn's mic (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 10 February 2006 17:28 (eighteen years ago) link
― s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 10 February 2006 17:38 (eighteen years ago) link
― gear (gear), Friday, 10 February 2006 17:39 (eighteen years ago) link
― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Friday, 10 February 2006 17:40 (eighteen years ago) link
― elmo, patron saint of nausea (allocryptic), Friday, 10 February 2006 17:50 (eighteen years ago) link
― kingfish has gene rayburn's mic (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 10 February 2006 17:52 (eighteen years ago) link
― chap who would dare to be completely sober on the internet (chap), Friday, 10 February 2006 17:55 (eighteen years ago) link
― gear (gear), Friday, 10 February 2006 17:58 (eighteen years ago) link
― Jimmy Mod (I myself am lethal at 100 -110dB) (The Famous Jimmy Mod), Friday, 10 February 2006 17:59 (eighteen years ago) link
― Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 10 February 2006 17:59 (eighteen years ago) link
― elmo, patron saint of nausea (allocryptic), Friday, 10 February 2006 18:02 (eighteen years ago) link
includes this (inadvertantly?) amusing one
― kingfish has gene rayburn's mic (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 10 February 2006 18:03 (eighteen years ago) link
― Paunchy Stratego (kenan), Friday, 10 February 2006 18:59 (eighteen years ago) link
― Dan (Dibs On Anti-Matter) Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 10 February 2006 19:21 (eighteen years ago) link
― gear (gear), Friday, 10 February 2006 21:09 (eighteen years ago) link
― kingfish has gene rayburn's mic (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 10 February 2006 21:16 (eighteen years ago) link
― Lil' Eno (nordicskilla), Friday, 10 February 2006 21:18 (eighteen years ago) link
― Erick Dampier is better than Shaq (miloaukerman), Friday, 10 February 2006 21:25 (eighteen years ago) link
Larry Wachowski in 2003 (in the middle)
― gear (gear), Friday, 10 February 2006 21:33 (eighteen years ago) link
For the record, he's been doing this wrt film projects for 10 years.
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Friday, 10 February 2006 21:43 (eighteen years ago) link
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 10 February 2006 21:44 (eighteen years ago) link
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Friday, 10 February 2006 21:48 (eighteen years ago) link
― Alba (Alba), Friday, 10 February 2006 21:50 (eighteen years ago) link
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 10 February 2006 21:50 (eighteen years ago) link
There was an interesting feature on V for Vendetta in Vanity Fair last month.
― Alba (Alba), Friday, 10 February 2006 21:58 (eighteen years ago) link
― Alba (Alba), Friday, 10 February 2006 22:00 (eighteen years ago) link
From Hell is an okay film. LXG is unwatchable.
― Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 10 February 2006 22:42 (eighteen years ago) link
For the record, this is the first film project he's done this with.
― kit brash (kit brash), Saturday, 11 February 2006 01:52 (eighteen years ago) link
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Saturday, 11 February 2006 02:30 (eighteen years ago) link
― kit brash (kit brash), Saturday, 11 February 2006 04:26 (eighteen years ago) link
― kyle (akmonday), Saturday, 11 February 2006 07:16 (eighteen years ago) link
― elmo, patron saint of nausea (allocryptic), Saturday, 11 February 2006 09:17 (eighteen years ago) link
If the film's look and feel refuse to flee from the real world, its dialogue takes every chance to connect to it. We are told about the recent past, that "America's war grew worse and worse, and eventually came to London." Hot-button terms like "rendition" are sprinkled about; dissidents are handled as in a third-world dictatorship; and our hero (who calls himself V) lectures citizens who have surrendered their liberties to a government that promised to protect them from terrorism.
So it looks like the "what if Nazis won WWII" story might not be the basis for the film after all. If they've actually tried to make the films future sort of a logic continuation of today's situation (just like the comic was), that should prove interesting. Also, the word "terrorist" was used right in the trailer - so if this film actually tries comment on the current world politics too, I think that'd be a better approach than to try to adapt Moore's obsolete dystopy of the early eighties down to every detail. Then again, perhaps I'm placing too much trust on the Wachowski Bros. screenwriting abilities.
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Saturday, 11 February 2006 10:40 (eighteen years ago) link
― Paunchy Stratego (kenan), Saturday, 11 February 2006 15:39 (eighteen years ago) link
― kit brash (kit brash), Sunday, 12 February 2006 03:02 (eighteen years ago) link