No one is impressed by their knowledge of Jane Austen.
NO ONE!!!!!
― that sex version of "blue thunder." (Mr. Que), Thursday, 7 January 2010 19:24 (sixteen years ago)
actually it doesn't describe my situation very well, it describes the academia bubble certain people are content to remain within. my problem has been wanting to get ahead in the real world and finding myself unable.
― Electric Universe (wherever that is) (acoleuthic), Thursday, 7 January 2010 19:25 (sixteen years ago)
I read that article a while back. I don't agree with its argument. I agree that if you have any doubts about whether going to grad school in the humanities is right for you, you shouldn't go, but that's because the stress in achieving at a level adequate for hope at getting a job and ultimately a promotion is so high that you need to love this more than you love anything else; and doubt is a sign that you don't.
― Euler, Thursday, 7 January 2010 19:25 (sixteen years ago)
also, LJ it describes the situation in America.
― that sex version of "blue thunder." (Mr. Que), Thursday, 7 January 2010 19:25 (sixteen years ago)
yeah in england they use jane austen as money
― super sexy psycho fantasy world (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Thursday, 7 January 2010 19:36 (sixteen years ago)
whereas here in the usa we party in the usa
― super sexy psycho fantasy world (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Thursday, 7 January 2010 19:37 (sixteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QmKnQjBf8wM
― super sexy psycho fantasy world (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Thursday, 7 January 2010 19:38 (sixteen years ago)
yeah caek posted that article back in november (and other people have also sent it to me, apparently assuming everyone goes to graduate school to escape the "real world" and never ever considers what their career prospects might be afterwards, so this is at LEAST the fifth time i've seen it).
― Maria, Thursday, 7 January 2010 20:02 (sixteen years ago)
(also, graduate school on fellowship does not just "sound like" a good place to ride out the recession, it IS if you're not leaving a good job to do it. i have several friends who are unemployed or have only been able to find part-time or temp work over the last year after losing their jobs, most of them are either living with or living off their parents again in their mid-20s, and yes, two of them are applying to go back to school in different fields - i have a really hard time finding anything to criticize there.)
― Maria, Thursday, 7 January 2010 20:10 (sixteen years ago)
Guys, I gotta remove my bookmark from this thread. Way too depressing.
― Mordy, Thursday, 7 January 2010 23:31 (sixteen years ago)
For me, though, I'm not sure whether I'll end up with a tenure job somewhere, but I love my studies. So I don't see myself as ducking out of a bad economy. I see myself as studying what I love for a few years. If I end up with a career from it, great. And if I don't, I'll still be leaving school with two (or three) extra languages, tons of writing skills, and some teaching experience, and I can't imagine that'll hurt no matter what I go into next.
― Mordy, Thursday, 7 January 2010 23:33 (sixteen years ago)
haha that article. kamerad first posted it here in february '09. nothing new under the sun.
― caek, Thursday, 7 January 2010 23:48 (sixteen years ago)
ha jesus i didn't even notice it was a year old
― chartres (goole), Thursday, 7 January 2010 23:50 (sixteen years ago)
grad school is still the same
― caek, Thursday, 7 January 2010 23:51 (sixteen years ago)
no one has said anything on this thread that wasn't already in the groening cartoon ned read in high school
― caek, Thursday, 7 January 2010 23:52 (sixteen years ago)
Mordy you do have an excellent point about school itself being worthwhile, I have to admit I fucking love it most of the time (and am really glad I worked after college to fully appreciate it).
― Maria, Friday, 8 January 2010 01:24 (sixteen years ago)
I'm getting close to the time when I'll have to be applying to funding bodies for PhD monies. In the humanities. Lols. I am considering it very unlikely, but I really don't know what I'll do if I don't get anything, since the "take three years off to work full-time and save up enough to be able to study part-time, while working to pay the bills, over, ooh, seven years?" option sounds... less than ideal. Ayayayay.
― FC Tom Tomsk Club (Merdeyeux), Friday, 8 January 2010 01:40 (sixteen years ago)
Applying for grad school is expensive if you went to four universities. (Total cost of sending these four transcripts = $55, Boise State charging $15 extra if I want them to mail instead of fax.) (Also did not help that my mom lost my childhood immunization records & had to get MMR titers for $110 to prove to U. of Arizona that my parents weren't crazy in the '80s altho they are forgetful now.)
― girl moves (Abbott), Friday, 8 January 2010 02:09 (sixteen years ago)
not to mention application fees and gres. some people take the gre multiple times but damn, that's $120 (or was it $140? don't remember!) a pop! are you doing applications now abbott?
― Maria, Friday, 8 January 2010 03:19 (sixteen years ago)
gre hee hee
― caek, Friday, 8 January 2010 03:26 (sixteen years ago)
GRE was $150 (plus the $40 taxi ride there & back to the weird-ass non-bus-route strip- mall the place was in). I am doing apps right now & so is my husband + sick dog = defs emptying the pantry of pasta type of month.
― girl moves (Abbott), Friday, 8 January 2010 04:28 (sixteen years ago)
geez, they've raised the price again. best of luck to you and your husband (and your dog ;)
― Maria, Friday, 8 January 2010 14:21 (sixteen years ago)
Oh shit man this is all worth it bcz if nothing else I got to see this letter one of my faves people, a dude who I just respect & love so much, wrote for me. The kind of praise that will sustain you for a few years. I'm like almost in tears here.
― girl moves (Abbott), Friday, 8 January 2010 22:00 (sixteen years ago)
:D
― into the young coconuts (gbx), Saturday, 9 January 2010 01:40 (sixteen years ago)
haha i have trouble reading those letters! had a rec written weeks ago and the guy attached the letter to an email to me and i still haven't read it. even though i know it's very good.
― jortin shartgent (harbl), Saturday, 9 January 2010 01:44 (sixteen years ago)
http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/files/2010/01/educationalattainment.png
― max, Monday, 11 January 2010 15:27 (sixteen years ago)
fml
― the charmless but occasionally brilliant Dom Passantino (history mayne), Monday, 11 January 2010 15:28 (sixteen years ago)
gonna fucken treasure my half-percent
― Inspiration for the sex robot sprang from the September 11 attacks (acoleuthic), Monday, 11 January 2010 15:29 (sixteen years ago)
max, i'm guesing that factors in loss of earnings from loan payments? or is that the type of work taken with advanced degrees forgoes income from more profitable jobs elsewhere?
― uncle spam w4nts u (m bison), Monday, 11 January 2010 15:36 (sixteen years ago)
finding it hard to credit those as absolute figures, certainly.
― Not a reactionary git, just an idiot. (darraghmac), Monday, 11 January 2010 15:39 (sixteen years ago)
i think they mean a person with a doctoral degree made 10% more in 1999 than in 2008, it's not decline in the same individual's earnings. right?
― harbl, Monday, 11 January 2010 15:40 (sixteen years ago)
ok, got you.
― Not a reactionary git, just an idiot. (darraghmac), Monday, 11 January 2010 15:40 (sixteen years ago)
so in real income terms the higher qualifications are becoming less of a relative advantage over time?
― Not a reactionary git, just an idiot. (darraghmac), Monday, 11 January 2010 15:41 (sixteen years ago)
oic now
― uncle spam w4nts u (m bison), Monday, 11 January 2010 15:45 (sixteen years ago)
I take it that the meaning of that chart hinges on what "real" means in "real mean earnings".
― Euler, Monday, 11 January 2010 15:45 (sixteen years ago)
earnings are real mean lately ; )
― harbl, Monday, 11 January 2010 15:46 (sixteen years ago)
that is a microsoft graphs-authored chart i found on a blog post and thought might validate my "decision" to not apply to grad school
― max, Monday, 11 January 2010 15:47 (sixteen years ago)
man I'll tell you though that when the doctoral life is good, it's very very good.
― Euler, Monday, 11 January 2010 15:47 (sixteen years ago)
well it would be more helpful to look at the mean earnings of people with grad degrees over bachelors but since i think u prob want some liberal arts degree maybe it would be just too depressing :/
― harbl, Monday, 11 January 2010 15:48 (sixteen years ago)
oh wow ppl are making relatively less now than ten years ago when the economy wasn't in the shitter
― everybody's into weirdness right now (gbx), Monday, 11 January 2010 16:05 (sixteen years ago)
well people with bachelor's degrees and master's degrees are making relatively more..........
― harbl, Monday, 11 January 2010 16:07 (sixteen years ago)
"relatively more" lol
― harbl, Monday, 11 January 2010 16:08 (sixteen years ago)
i mean just sayin that plotting the change in earnings isn't as useful for grad school or no grad school decision making as, say:
difference in earnings between levels of educational accomplishment v. difference in cost (both $$/time) for achieving levels of education
― everybody's into weirdness right now (gbx), Monday, 11 January 2010 16:16 (sixteen years ago)
and that only holds water if you're making your educational decisions based on earning potential, which anyone considering an advanced degree in the humanities likely isn't doing
― everybody's into weirdness right now (gbx), Monday, 11 January 2010 16:17 (sixteen years ago)
i make all decisions based on my earning potential
― max, Monday, 11 January 2010 16:17 (sixteen years ago)
no, you should do it for the sweet robes:
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2009/05/14/us/18obama2blog.jpg
from my alma mater (I didn't buy the robes b/c lol @ $2,000 but my mom said she would buy them (before she knew the cost); one day I'll take her up on it).
― Euler, Monday, 11 January 2010 16:20 (sixteen years ago)
i thought the school you teach at pays for those when you get tenure, guess it depends on the school
― harbl, Monday, 11 January 2010 16:22 (sixteen years ago)
Bear in mind the period encapsulates a time where there has been an expansion in the number of advanced degrees that lead to less lucrative outcomes. (MFAs, english literature phds etc.). There's also be a massive expansion in MBAs at the lower end in the spectrum.
but at the end of the day, greater supply means prices will fall.
― American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Monday, 11 January 2010 16:23 (sixteen years ago)
They rent them for you if you want to wear them at graduation or convocation, though you still have to pay a bit each time. At least it's been that way at the two places I've taught since grad school.
― Euler, Monday, 11 January 2010 16:24 (sixteen years ago)
OKAY:
so i get back from a little relaxation, did a bit of writing (project specific) over the period...
and i found out that A ROUGH DRAFT OF MY THESIS IS DUE TO MY COMMITTEE TODAY.
and i though i had two more weeks.
wtf, thanks for being explicit with deadlines, shit-ass janky grad school.
― And now my dick is where? Oh, this is too rich (the table is the table), Monday, 11 January 2010 22:29 (sixteen years ago)