Defend the indefensible - Thomas Kinkade

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (534 of them)
At least Taylor attempts something besides landscapes, even just for that he's better.

Rotgutt (Rotgutt), Monday, 6 March 2006 23:53 (twenty years ago)

I can understand if your granny likes this shite, but what bothers me is the fact that some young people are into him (young meaning under 35). I have met 2 guys who were arbiters of taste in many ways, but who had TK prints and a TK COFFEE TABLE BOOK!

They had these things not for any kitsch value, but because it was pretty stuff. While their appreciation of good food seemed geniune and refined, their concept of art was based in its being a commodity, another decorative aspect of their home, like wall paper.

Bleh.

unclejessjess, Monday, 6 March 2006 23:59 (twenty years ago)

I would not put Taylor in the same class as Kinkade. Taylor's paintings are pretty bad all around, but they are at least showing some interest in thinking about starting to be curious about trying something challenging for a viewer. TK is about carefully avoiding engaging a viewer's brain.

unclejessjess, Tuesday, 7 March 2006 00:02 (twenty years ago)

"something challenging for a viewer"

http://www.highlandarts.co.uk/cjohntaylor/paintings/girlsth.jpg

Ned T.Rifle (nedtrifle), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 00:07 (twenty years ago)

I know what you mean though. I've actually been to his art gallery (in fact there are about five or six shops around Scotland selling the stuff) and some of the paintings do have a curious edge. And he did poetry as well.

Ned T.Rifle (nedtrifle), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 00:09 (twenty years ago)

Anyone who wastes time hating on this charming artist needs to reassess his priorities in life (& probably they definition of kool while they at it).

I think his style is really neat & i would for sure want to live in one of them villagez.

UL® (blastocyst), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 00:22 (twenty years ago)

Who are we talking about now - Kincade or Taylor?

Ned T.Rifle (nedtrifle), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 01:17 (twenty years ago)

TK

UL® (blastocyst), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 01:57 (twenty years ago)

http://www.somethingawful.com/articles.php?a=1928

Lovely parodies. Metafilter had TK as a subject today. Weird?

unclejessjess (unclejessjess), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 03:28 (twenty years ago)

apparently next year a collection of academic essays about TK will be published by duke

anthony easton (anthony), Thursday, 9 March 2006 10:56 (twenty years ago)

two weeks pass...
More trouble in the Kinkade camp.
http://arts.guardian.co.uk/news/story/0,,1739383,00.html

Ned T.Rifle (nedtrifle), Sunday, 26 March 2006 00:50 (twenty years ago)

"You've got to remember, I'm the idol to these women who were there. They sell my work every day, you know. They're enamoured with any attention I would give them."

Ned T.Rifle (nedtrifle), Sunday, 26 March 2006 00:52 (twenty years ago)

two months pass...
i called the office of kincaide and company last week, cause i wanted some deer paintings for a show im curating, and he has only shown in one gallery, and it was a semi ironic california retrospective, its impossible to get his work in a gallery setting...the woman i spoke to seemed kind and genuine, but still slightly off

anthony easton (anthony), Monday, 19 June 2006 10:54 (nineteen years ago)

two months pass...
Entertainment.

The FBI is investigating allegations that self-styled "Painter of Light" Thomas Kinkade and some of his top executives fraudulently induced investors to open galleries and then ruined them financially, former dealers contacted by agents said.

Investigators are focusing on issues raised in civil litigation by at least six former Thomas Kinkade Signature Gallery owners, people who have been contacted by the FBI said. Among other things, the ex-owners alleged in arbitration claims that the artist known for his dreamily luminous landscapes and street scenes used his Christian faith to persuade them to invest in the independently owned stores, which must sell Kinkade's work exclusively.

Oh please let this go to court, please please please...

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 29 August 2006 03:29 (nineteen years ago)

used his Christian faith to persuade them

this is an odd bit of writing. "The power of Christ compels you!"

kingfish high command (kingfish 2.0), Tuesday, 29 August 2006 05:56 (nineteen years ago)

i'll defend this great man

http://pegasus.cc.ucf.edu/~bmauer/PARTFAM1.JPG

timmy tannin (pompous), Tuesday, 29 August 2006 06:15 (nineteen years ago)

great thread! i love thomas kinkade. as in, i love the idea. we spent a good three hours discussing him in a philosophy of art seminar course once.

He is like some sort of bad delillo-esqe near-future satire of american society.
this is a good comment.

i'm sad to hear that the empire is crumbling because it changes the context. there's incredible schadenfreude, naturally, and i don't begrudge such a horribly smug man this wonderful comeuppance, but his continued success is an important part of what he is and represents. i guess i'm generally sad about the end of the myth. thomas kinkaide, painter of light big jerk.

derrick (derrick), Tuesday, 29 August 2006 06:26 (nineteen years ago)

T minus 5 minutes until the "Thomas Kinkaide, painter of indictments/fraud/whatever" wanna-be-clever headlines appear.

Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Tuesday, 29 August 2006 16:11 (nineteen years ago)

that new yorker article is priceless. those "highlighters" are certainly scam artists of the highest degree. and they go to classes to learn about kinkade himself. what a bunch of douches.

t0dd swiss (immobilisme), Wednesday, 30 August 2006 02:25 (nineteen years ago)

one month passes...
http://www.grandcentralartcenter.com/gcacImages/mainGallery/kincade/u10_98983_001truck.jpg

and what (ooo), Saturday, 28 October 2006 21:42 (nineteen years ago)

Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Saturday, 28 October 2006 23:30 (nineteen years ago)

Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Saturday, 28 October 2006 23:32 (nineteen years ago)

Just pokin' around in the Leanin' Tree site.

Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Saturday, 28 October 2006 23:33 (nineteen years ago)

Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Saturday, 28 October 2006 23:34 (nineteen years ago)


When Ron York and his wife, Linda, moved into their new home last summer, they had no idea that hundreds of people would stop their cars to look and take photographs.

"All of the attention has caught us off guard," York said. "We didn't set out to build a show house, but we consider it a compliment that people consider it interesting."

York has been the general contractor on small apartment projects and single-family homes throughout Whatcom County for more than 15 years. When the Yorks decided to build a home for themselves, they bought six acres on east Axton Road.

They built a 3,100-square-foot stone house with a thatched roof, a swooping roofline, cobblestone pavers for the driveway, and garage doors decorated with handles and strap hinges to give the illusion of opening out like carriage doors.

Question: What inspired the design?

Answer: I've always wanted to build a stone house, and Linda has always wanted a thatched roof. We both loved the painter Thomas Kinkade. We were looking at one of his paintings one day and we thought it would be great to live in a place like that. It's so homey and inviting.

Q: Was it hard to figure out how to build it?

A: We hired Mark Ouellette, a Lynden-based building designer. We supplied him with a number of Thomas Kinkade pictures and a sketch of the floor plan on a piece of notebook paper. It took about three months of trading ideas back and forth because it was an unusual design. We got so much help that we really appreciated from so many people along the way. I'm not a custom-home builder - this is my first - and I understand the value of listening to people's ideas. I worked with some contractors who were used to working on million-dollar homes, and they came with a wealth of ideas that I was able to tap into. We built this house to last a couple hundred years.

gear (gear), Sunday, 29 October 2006 01:54 (nineteen years ago)

whatcom county is just the other side of the border from vancouver! do you have an address or at least a town?

derrick (derrick), Sunday, 29 October 2006 01:57 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.grandcentralartcenter.com/gcacImages/mainGallery/kincade/CustomVisaROC.jpg

he's everywhere you want to be.

am0n (am0n), Sunday, 29 October 2006 02:02 (nineteen years ago)

whatcom county is just the other side of the border from vancouver! do you have an address or at least a town?

-- derrick (briochesqu...), October 28th, 2006 9:57 PM. (derrick)

they say "east Axton Road", looks like it might be bellingham?
http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&q=E+Axton+Rd,+Bellingham,+WA&ie=UTF8&z=14&ll=48.850428,-122.433872&spn=0.024286,0.083342&om=1&iwloc=addr

am0n (am0n), Sunday, 29 October 2006 02:09 (nineteen years ago)

this dude writes books too! I just saw some at the library!

teeny (teeny), Sunday, 29 October 2006 11:05 (nineteen years ago)

two years pass...

Roffle.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 18 November 2008 19:16 (seventeen years ago)

This is one of my favorite threads.

Abbott of the Trapezoid Monks (Abbott), Tuesday, 18 November 2008 19:16 (seventeen years ago)

In his memo to the film crew, Kinkade twice cites Stanley Kubrick’s Barry Lyndon as a working template and volunteers an idea for keeping spirits high during the shoot: “Perhaps we could make large posters that simply say ‘Love this movie’ and post them about.”

To get an expert opinion on Kinkade’s manifesto, I showed it to cinematographer Ellen Kuras, best known for her work with director Spike Lee. She points out that he confuses focal length and depth of field, and questions his overall approach.

“I’ve never seen any of his paintings, but I have to say, he’s very cheesy in his descriptions,” Kuras says. “The whole gauzy, cozy feeling, darkening the edges to make your vision more myopic, I think is about trying to draw the larger metaphor for the way to heaven. But reading all of this, it’s a prescription for a bad ’60s porn movie.”

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 18 November 2008 19:19 (seventeen years ago)

6) Hidden details whenever possible, References to my children (from youngest to oldest as follows): Evie, Winsor, Chandler and Merritt. References to my anniversary date, the number 52, the number 82, and the number 5282 (for fun, notice how many times this appears in my major published works). Hidden N's throughout -- preferably thirty N's, commemorating one N for each year since the events happened.

Weird. Maybe he's a numerologist? That's disturbing that he has a movie..

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 18 November 2008 20:22 (seventeen years ago)

http://mtblog.vanityfair.com/online/culture/2008/11/14/christmascottage.jpg

I like O'Toole's expression. "I'm in this movie? Really?"

Shacknasty (Frogman Henry), Tuesday, 18 November 2008 20:31 (seventeen years ago)

oh marcia gay, hope you got something nice

goole, Tuesday, 18 November 2008 20:32 (seventeen years ago)

loooooooooooool

most important concept of all -- THE CONCEPT OF LOVE (donna rouge), Tuesday, 18 November 2008 20:33 (seventeen years ago)

“In the age of Photoshop, anybody can do this kind of crap.”

⊂⊃ ⊂⊃ ⊂⊃ ⊂⊃ ⊂⊃ ⊂⊃ (Pleasant Plains), Tuesday, 18 November 2008 20:35 (seventeen years ago)

trailer!

I'M ACTUALLY FINE (I DIED), Tuesday, 18 November 2008 20:39 (seventeen years ago)

holy shit it's got Chris Elliott!

I'M ACTUALLY FINE (I DIED), Tuesday, 18 November 2008 20:40 (seventeen years ago)

Kinkade twice cites Stanley Kubrick’s Barry Lyndon as a working template
Kinkade twice cites Stanley Kubrick’s Barry Lyndon as a working template
Kinkade twice cites Stanley Kubrick’s Barry Lyndon as a working template
Kinkade twice cites Stanley Kubrick’s Barry Lyndon as a working template
Kinkade twice cites Stanley Kubrick’s Barry Lyndon as a working template
Kinkade twice cites Stanley Kubrick’s Barry Lyndon as a working template

The Five-Dollar Footlong Song (Pancakes Hackman), Tuesday, 18 November 2008 20:46 (seventeen years ago)

Gyah! The only possible redemption would be a remixed trailer ala "Shining" right?

There is no Grodd but Mallah and Congorilla is His Prophet. (Oilyrags), Wednesday, 19 November 2008 01:05 (seventeen years ago)

This thread is supposed to be "defend the indefensible" so let me just say that as terrible as Kinkade's 16 directions sound in general, they seem perfectly appropriate for the kind of movie this obviously is. They're selling the movie with Kinkade's name on the front -- what, you thought he was going to reboot the franchise and make it look like Eraserhead?

Guayaquil (eephus!), Wednesday, 19 November 2008 01:23 (seventeen years ago)

Kinkade Kills

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 19 November 2008 01:30 (seventeen years ago)

I like O'Toole's expression. "I'm in this movie? Really?"

the head werewolf's girlfriend (latebloomer), Wednesday, 19 November 2008 03:46 (seventeen years ago)

oh shit that was supposed to be the phantoms trailer, fuck

the head werewolf's girlfriend (latebloomer), Wednesday, 19 November 2008 03:48 (seventeen years ago)

the head werewolf's girlfriend (latebloomer), Wednesday, 19 November 2008 03:52 (seventeen years ago)

three months pass...

http://www.thomaskinkade.com/htmlroot/tk/images/daytona/daytona_500_painting.jpg
Would hang

Bonobos in Paneradise (Hurting 2), Tuesday, 24 February 2009 04:02 (seventeen years ago)

I mean yeah it'd be really predictable "irony" but come on, it's like a highlights for children "spot the popular subject matter" game.

Bonobos in Paneradise (Hurting 2), Tuesday, 24 February 2009 04:03 (seventeen years ago)

oh shit that was supposed to be the phantoms trailer, fuck

― the head werewolf's girlfriend (latebloomer), Wednesday, 19 November 2008 03:48 (3 months ago
your text

Well frankly I'm in your debt for introducing me to SHAKMAAAAAAAAAA, and of couse the respected actor bemused to find himself in this picture theme could apply to Roddy McDowell, so..

Henry Frog (Frogman Henry), Tuesday, 24 February 2009 05:13 (seventeen years ago)

Haha, I kind of love that image.
So he's painted a view from the crowd at a Nascar event.
But the image still needs some pizazz. Ah! Add FIREWORKS!
No, still not good enough, still not fast enough! JET PLANES!
<3

Øystein, Tuesday, 24 February 2009 09:39 (seventeen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.