The Power Of Nightmares/Adam Curtis

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (881 of them)
But that article also says AQ doesn't exist! It just says that it did for a while, before being subsumed back into the "militant jihadist ideological movement"

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Thursday, 4 August 2005 09:15 (eighteen years ago) link

But there are cells and there are cells. Cells deliberately set up that way to avoid people bringing down the whole organisation. And cells that are only 'cells' in the sense that we are all living in cells. You can't see an organisation? Call it a 'cell-like' one and it starts to look devious and scary etc.

The third episode again repeats a lot of what's gone before, steve. But at the end, it has interesting stuff about Blair et al. being obsessed with the verdict of history, in the sense of being neurotic about not having dealt with something (ie. Islamist terrorism) that later is shown to engulf our society. An obsession with the worst case scenario. Fear of getting it wrong isn't a motor of confident and successful leadership.

Alba (Alba), Thursday, 4 August 2005 09:15 (eighteen years ago) link

i have certainly heard the 'AQ is a phantasy' thing repeated.

What's wrong with repeating things? Have you investigated al Qaeda at first hand yourself? No - you are repeating other things (that it is "cell-like" etc.) And that's fine.

Alba (Alba), Thursday, 4 August 2005 09:17 (eighteen years ago) link

there's probably some crossover in, well, everything, there, andrew.

alba -- yeah, i can see that but there are links between the cells, example: funding, and training camps. 'follow the money' and that.

N_RQ, Thursday, 4 August 2005 09:18 (eighteen years ago) link

The obsession with wanting to have an omniscient view from the future so that we don't get things wrong is a defining tendency of our times, I think. I definitely have it myself, in some respects. I kind of feel like it comes from people not having seen the dangers of fascism before the holocaust. But I'm off on a tangent now.

Alba (Alba), Thursday, 4 August 2005 09:22 (eighteen years ago) link

Isn't the basic premise of the NEW AQ that it isn't a phantasy, but that it has changed enough to make it possible for it to look like a phantasy? Or something like that anyway.

I'm ever so hungry.

PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Thursday, 4 August 2005 09:23 (eighteen years ago) link

lots of people saw the dangers of fascism before the holocaust, though.

xpost

N_RQ, Thursday, 4 August 2005 09:24 (eighteen years ago) link

Incidentally, the Prospect version of that article differs slightly from The Nation one in that it also looks at the current series discussed upthread and the London bombs. it's worth forking out for.

Pete W (peterw), Thursday, 4 August 2005 09:25 (eighteen years ago) link

lots of people saw the dangers of fascism before the holocaust, though.

But overall, as a society, we didn't. Not enough to do anything about it. And I'm thinking about how eugenics was such a respectable and popular notion among intellectuals etc.

Alba (Alba), Thursday, 4 August 2005 09:30 (eighteen years ago) link

in france a lot of regular people were concerned enough to form apopular front against fascism in '36-8; there was a pretty large 'body of opinion' against it in england, the intelligentsia was predominantly anti-fascist, etc. no-one thought that the holocaust would happen, to my knowledge. of course, most of this meant alliance with the soviet union -- perhaps the equivalent of anti-islamist figures like christopher hitchens allying with the bush administration today. the *real* orwellian move, then, is refusing both bush [stalin] *and* islamism.

N_RQ, Thursday, 4 August 2005 09:37 (eighteen years ago) link

the intelligentsia was predominantly anti-fascist

Really? Most of the literary intelligentsia seem to have been pretty much on the Right.

Vicious Cop Kills Gentle Fool (Dada), Thursday, 4 August 2005 09:39 (eighteen years ago) link

Really? Most of the literary intelligentsia seem to have been pretty much on the Right.

really? orwell, connolly, isherwood, auden, day lewis, spender, fucking leavis, greene, green, the left book club...?

N_RQ, Thursday, 4 August 2005 09:43 (eighteen years ago) link

"fucking leavis alone, ya bass!"

Just a little humour there, to lighten our load.

Prospect is £4.50! Is the rest of it any good? Last time I got it it was Billy Bragg and Gordon Brown talking about Britishness. I thought it poor.

PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Thursday, 4 August 2005 09:55 (eighteen years ago) link

Oh, I was thinking more of Wyndham Lewis, Eliot, Pound, that bunch of clowns

Vicious Cop Kills Gentle Fool (Dada), Thursday, 4 August 2005 09:57 (eighteen years ago) link

who? never heard of 'em.

N_RQ, Thursday, 4 August 2005 09:59 (eighteen years ago) link

All monthly magazines are £4.50 these days aren't they? I subscribe and think it's worth it. The arts stuff is a bit iffy, but it's very good on politics.

Pete W (peterw), Thursday, 4 August 2005 10:00 (eighteen years ago) link

I'm always too indignant to actually pay for online text, though if I was comfortable enough with reading lengthy articles online as opposed to in print (much easier on the peepers) I could be persuaded to make a donation if invited to do so.

Sociah T Azzahole (blueski), Thursday, 4 August 2005 10:00 (eighteen years ago) link

The Intellectuals and the Masses

Alba (Alba), Thursday, 4 August 2005 10:00 (eighteen years ago) link

But anyway, I was really talking about leaders who actually made decisions, not the Bloomsbury set. Fear of being another Chamberlain.

Alba (Alba), Thursday, 4 August 2005 10:02 (eighteen years ago) link

Inside the Whale

I like the Carey book, but it's about a slightly earlier generation.

Sure, mainstream politicians in england were culpable, but the popular movement here was big -- in France, it had real potential (although things got fucked-up over Spain). In any case, the popular movement against fascism in Western Europe was far more of a genuine presence than, say, the Stop The War movement is now. People like Stafford Cripps in the Labour Party were sympathetic, and it definitely formed cadres for the reformed Labour Party of 1945.

N_RQ, Thursday, 4 August 2005 10:08 (eighteen years ago) link

capital A makes it seem like a person. Al's a name with cuddly connotations in US culture (er, Al Bundy...Alfalfa...Paul Simon..that's it).

I've heard there is a guy in the US called Al Nino, and people periodically ring him up and complain about the weather.

DV (dirtyvicar), Thursday, 4 August 2005 10:13 (eighteen years ago) link

I have a feeling that Al Qaida exists in the same way that the Animal Liberation Front does - if you want to do something that falls into the realm of what the "organisation" does, you just do it (with your mates, or whatever), and then either claim it as an Al Q act or let the media do this for you.

DV (dirtyvicar), Thursday, 4 August 2005 10:17 (eighteen years ago) link

Al's a name with cuddly connotations in US culture (er, Al Bundy...Alfalfa...Paul Simon..that's it

Animal Liberation Front = ALF. Alf seems a pretty cuddly British name.

Vicious Cop Kills Gentle Fool (Dada), Thursday, 4 August 2005 10:22 (eighteen years ago) link

five months pass...
watched all this last night, there's a lot of great stuff in it. especially episodes 1 & 2.

episode 3 i thought was the weakest... i almost thought the doc should've gone right up to sept. 11 and no further, as all the post-9/11 stuff seemed quite rushed, and most of it i'd seen before. also weak: when it suddenly became about the UK--i know this is a bbc doc, but i didn't get ANY sense of how britain got involved, or how neo-conservatism got a foothold there (while neo-c's ascension in the states was clearly and patiently spelled out). it seemed like an abrupt change.

also interesting that the word 'oil' wasn't used once in the program. obv i understand that curtis wasn't taking the syriana approach and that he didn't want to open a whole other kettle of words... but it still begged the question.

s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, 7 January 2006 17:15 (eighteen years ago) link

yes, quite; it could have done with an additional episode tracing Britain's position in all of this... looking at the legacy of the Thatcher-Regan years/'relationship', and examining New Labour's relation to 'neo conservatism'.

Tom May (Tom May), Saturday, 7 January 2006 17:26 (eighteen years ago) link

Has anyone who has seen the 3 episodes seen the film? Worth watching?

MitchellStirling (MitchellStirling), Saturday, 7 January 2006 17:27 (eighteen years ago) link

what's the difference? (or is that exactly the question you're asking?)

also: century of the self is available on archive.org, in mpeg4 format. that's next on my list!

s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, 7 January 2006 19:39 (eighteen years ago) link

Adam Curtis is interesting bcz his different series sometimes cover the same events from alternative perspectives. Power of Nightmares sticks closely to neo-con/islamism whilst The Mayfair Set covers some of the same events but from the point of view of the expansion of the idea of 'the market' and Century of the Self covers some of the same ground from the p.o.v of psychoanalysis/public relations. Then his series about scientific positivism (that I can't recall the title of right now) does the same thing. It's best to try to see them all.

The only thing I haven't seen by him (I think) is his one off documentary abot WWII and how history is written. If anyone knows where I can get it I'd love 'em forever.

Raw Patrick (Raw Patrick), Saturday, 7 January 2006 22:56 (eighteen years ago) link

Has anyone who has seen the 3 episodes seen the film? Worth watching?

I think the film is just composed of stuff culled from the three episodes.

[tuvan throat singer's profound lyric sheet-must read again] (nordicskilla), Saturday, 7 January 2006 22:58 (eighteen years ago) link

I also totally agree with s1ocki w/r/t the British stuff.

[tuvan throat singer's profound lyric sheet-must read again] (nordicskilla), Saturday, 7 January 2006 22:59 (eighteen years ago) link

What I meant by my question is that I've seen the 3 episodes, I wanted to know if the film is worth watching if get the chance or should I not bother. I know that it's culled from the footage. Just wondering if anyone who had seen both had a preference.

MitchellStirling (MitchellStirling), Sunday, 8 January 2006 17:23 (eighteen years ago) link

watching the three episodes back to back gets a little repetitive due to the "let's review, class, shall we?" imperative of the weekly format the orig. had, as i think someone mentions above, so i'd probably prefer the film (not having seen it)

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Sunday, 8 January 2006 18:53 (eighteen years ago) link

oooh i would kill to see the mayfair set thing.

Theorry Henry (Enrique), Monday, 9 January 2006 10:49 (eighteen years ago) link

Theorry - you can b1t-torrent it from UK N0va or email me and I can put it on some CDs and post it to you.

Raw Patrick (Raw Patrick), Monday, 9 January 2006 18:39 (eighteen years ago) link

three months pass...
According to The Guardian yesterday Adam Curtis is an associate editor type deal for Popbitch! Odd.

Raw Patrick (Raw Patrick), Sunday, 7 May 2006 15:39 (eighteen years ago) link

what is it with websites that have seriously gone off the boil getting big press notices? popbitch *and* popjustice recently.

the Enrique who acts like some kind of good taste gestapo (Enrique), Sunday, 7 May 2006 18:41 (eighteen years ago) link

three months pass...
the episodes are now on youtube in half hour segments.

someone else also posted the first episode in 6-8 minute segments. the section with young 70's rumsfeld is on the third segment.

and as elvis mentioned, archive.org still has a 4.4 GB complete download.

have only finished episode 1 so far. I think I'm going to space my viewing out to one per night.

milton parker (Jon L), Monday, 28 August 2006 21:16 (seventeen years ago) link

the half hour segments have been up for a while, it just only recently occured to me to search

the use of Charles Ives' music was devastating for me. I usually hear joy, pride, strength, courage in the way he used dissonance, but in this context it's all just monstrous.

milton parker (Jon L), Monday, 28 August 2006 21:19 (seventeen years ago) link

Try to space it out more than a day if possible - they were originally designed to be seen with a week gap between them

Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Monday, 28 August 2006 21:24 (seventeen years ago) link

six months pass...
Tonight on BBC2 at 9PM is the first part of http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbctwo/noise/?id=trap, Adam Curtis's follow-up to The Power of Nightmares and The Century of the Self. The documentary argues that 'http://www.guardian.co.uk/saturday/story/0,,2025578,00.html'.

James Mitchell, Sunday, 11 March 2007 12:55 (seventeen years ago) link

Damn links.

James Mitchell, Sunday, 11 March 2007 12:56 (seventeen years ago) link

Dude James I had no idea! Timer recording = SET.

Tracer Hand, Sunday, 11 March 2007 13:30 (seventeen years ago) link

According to my DVR guide thingie, the first episode is called "F*ck You, Buddy" and the second is called "The Lonely Robot."

Tracer Hand, Sunday, 11 March 2007 13:31 (seventeen years ago) link

The Trap: What Happened to Our Dreams...
BBC2, Sun 11 March, 9pm, 60mins

Part 1: F**k You Buddy. A series of films by BAFTA-winning producer Adam Curtis that tells the story of the rise of today's narrow idea of freedom. It will show how a simplistic model of human beings as self-seeking, almost robotic, creatures led to today's idea of freedom. This model was derived from ideas and techniques developed by nuclear strategists during the Cold War. It was then taken up by genetic biologists, anthropologists, radical psychiatrists and free market economists, until it became a new system of invisible control.

Tracer Hand, Sunday, 11 March 2007 13:35 (seventeen years ago) link

Well, Curtis makes beautiful, gripping programmes, but there was lots to disagree with in the first episode. Perhaps he'll develop a fuller argument over the course of the series, but I thought some of the ideas tonight were weak or, simple pessimist that I am, dishonest.

Noodle Vague, Sunday, 11 March 2007 22:14 (seventeen years ago) link

The programme is worth watching for the wonderful editing and composition alone. Yo La Tengo was a bit jarring, though.

I have quibbles and questions as well, but I thoroughly enjoyed it and even if I don't wind up agreeing with a lot of it in the end, I'm glad he's made it.

Gukbe, Sunday, 11 March 2007 22:44 (seventeen years ago) link

Agreed. He's a great stylist, and he makes you want to engage with what he's saying.

Noodle Vague, Sunday, 11 March 2007 22:48 (seventeen years ago) link

It very much had the feeling of an opening slavo, I'm sure he'll elucidate more in later episodes.

chap, Sunday, 11 March 2007 22:51 (seventeen years ago) link

He didn't really do anything to counteract or disprove this idea of the bleak and paranoid human psyche - I think I came away more convinced by the game theorists!

Interesting version of the prisoners' dilemma too, where mutual betrayal is rewarded - I've only ever seen the one where mutual betrayal leads to the worst outcome for both parties.

ledge, Sunday, 11 March 2007 23:08 (seventeen years ago) link

Yeah, I'm still seeing the alternative of total trust and collectivism as dangerous, although I'm sure he's not pushing some kind of communism. At least I hope that isn't where this is going.

Not to say he should be coming up with an alternative. The important thing is to put the argument of the current situation out there.

Then again, I assume the worst in people, and would generally try to betray everyone for my own gains. Or even just for fun.

Game theory was successfully dealt with in Wargames already.

Gukbe, Sunday, 11 March 2007 23:14 (seventeen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.