Taking Sides: Liverpool vs Everton

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1610 of them)
Is that so?

Baaderonixx and the choco-pop babies (baaderonixx), Friday, 16 September 2005 09:39 (twenty years ago)

So they keep telling us

Raymond Douglas Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 16 September 2005 09:40 (twenty years ago)

Well it may come as a shock to you to know that they sometimes have no-score draws in La Liga as well.

I suppose excitement is relative though e.g. Exeter fans will be finding the Conference v exciting at the mo.

Sociah T Azzahole (blueski), Friday, 16 September 2005 09:51 (twenty years ago)

The conference is exciting all the time.

Also nil-nil draws are very often fascinating, you philistines.

Also fizz it up long to the big lad ect ect.

Tim (Tim), Friday, 16 September 2005 09:54 (twenty years ago)

I never said 0-0 draws were boring, I said the Premiership was

Raymond Douglas Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 16 September 2005 09:57 (twenty years ago)

I'm finding the Conference very exciting at the mo' - I read the Non-League paper in the Sydenham Sainsbury's the other day and I might even buy a copy in the near-future. It is mostly cos of Exeter though.

xpost (I'm sure some of the Prem 0-0s have been good value [Spurs-Lpool f'instance] but I suspect that there's a fairly high level of tedium in The Best League In The WorldTM at the mo'. Football should've ended in 1970 anyway).

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Friday, 16 September 2005 09:57 (twenty years ago)

I don't find the Conference exciting, but I wish Exeter well. I find the Premiership exciting often. I am excited about Charlton now - it would be great to see them challenging for a CL place. West Ham also look to be full of surprises. The quality of football is as ever depending on what side of their bed individual players got out of and the price of feesh.

Sociah T Azzahole (blueski), Friday, 16 September 2005 10:01 (twenty years ago)

Roman and Malcolm have killed teh Premiership TM.

manner the whirled, Friday, 16 September 2005 10:03 (twenty years ago)

At least Roman has made it a three horse race as opposed to two.

Sociah T Azzahole (blueski), Friday, 16 September 2005 10:04 (twenty years ago)

Dada it was MJ and SteveM who made the link between 0-0 and dull. So you're in the clear. And Jonesy is in the clear because he had an upsetting night last night. SteveM, I'm going to get you later.

The good thing about the Conference is that any team has the capacity to have a very bad off day and blow it horribly against apparent no-hopers. This is still no reason to buy The Bad Paper though, Mike. They still hate us, btw.

Tim (Tim), Friday, 16 September 2005 10:04 (twenty years ago)

Polanski and McDowell? Maybe football did end in 1970.

Raymond Douglas Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 16 September 2005 10:04 (twenty years ago)

At least Roman has made it a three horse race as opposed to two.

No, he's made it a one-horse 'race'.

manner the whirled, Friday, 16 September 2005 10:09 (twenty years ago)

0-0 draws are often very boring. There is nothing wrong with this statement. I have not claimed that they ALL are however, though you are forgiven for believing that I implied this.

The last Premiership game I went to was a 0-0 and it pissed down with rain, so maybe I'm still just bitter about that (and paying £40 for the privilege). But still the most exciting league in the universe!

Sociah T Azzahole (blueski), Friday, 16 September 2005 10:10 (twenty years ago)

DON'T BUY THE BAD PAPER, it is the start of a decline that can see you, without realising it, becoming interested in step four promotion and relegation issues and even, in worse case scenarios, becoming a GROUND-HOPPER!!

CarsmileSteve (CarsmileSteve), Friday, 16 September 2005 10:12 (twenty years ago)

Well, OK, not just 0-0s, but an extraordinary shortage of goals all round, Tim. And, yes, if a 0-0 can be thrilling, so can a 1-0 or a 1-1, but as a general indication of excitement, several weeks of low- or no-scoring games suggests a slight drabness to proceedings.

Just my perception - I'm not very engaged by things in the top flight of Engish football at the mo' (= I can't be bothered watching MOTD) because (a) my team is doing badly, (b) we all know who's going to win the thing, (c) there aren't many goals about.

Maybe this is the best season yet cos the defences are all playing like gods, I dunno.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Friday, 16 September 2005 10:17 (twenty years ago)

i often wish it were 1970. nothing to do with football though

terry lennox. (gareth), Friday, 16 September 2005 10:48 (twenty years ago)

It's not 0-0's that are boring; it's that fact that too many teams are playing crap 0-0s, trying to get points on the board through fear. Teams are picking their matches to try and win, such as West Brom against Chelsea. The vogue for 4-5-1 is the very epitome of this - the new percentage football, calculated to restrict the opposition and nick goals when you can.

The idea that the Premiership is the best in the world though is fucking laughable. Really is. On every level, apart from misplaced nationalistic fervour and myopia, it's bobbins. For every world class player, there's 3 donkeys getting the best gig in their lives.

Dada OTM - It's now a 1.5 horse race, when it was two. Left to its own devices, it'd now be a 3.5 horse race, but that's gone out the window. The stadiums are designed with little vision or sense of history, the prices are obscene, the wages equally so. Ant it doesn't know what it's for. It has no sense of itself except as a blob like entity who must keep on taking, taking taking lest, like a fish that stops moving, it sinks to the bottom. It's entire raison d'rtre is like aan amoeba - it reproduces year-on-year.

I was at a reception last night for the Racial Equality Standard, where 5 premiership club s were awarded this kite mark which showed how they were actively working toi improve the diversity of their non-playing staff. But in the midst of the rather obscene backslapping, no-one dared point out the rather obvious point that the biggest barrier to participation in the lives of clubs is the ticket barrier, which is the biggest problem young ethnic kids and families in inner cities have. But lets not talk about common or garden economics. That's so old labour isn't it?


Dave B (daveb), Friday, 16 September 2005 11:04 (twenty years ago)

There's a good thread on this on the When Saturday Comes messageboard

Dave B (daveb), Friday, 16 September 2005 11:08 (twenty years ago)

I largely agree with your sentiments DB but there is a strong argument which says that (at the top end of football at least) the need to actually be at games in order to "participation in the life of a club" is a thing of the past.

Tim (Tim), Friday, 16 September 2005 11:09 (twenty years ago)

The idea that the Premiership is the best in the world though is fucking laughable. Really is. On every level, apart from misplaced nationalistic fervour and myopia, it's bobbins. For every world class player, there's 3 donkeys getting the best gig in their lives.

I know we all have this argument every three months but...Where is this NOT the case? I'm still sceptical that La Liga or Serie A really contain an overall better class of players/football - and you can't seriously be claiming any other league to be up there. Notice I've not said 'best league' re the Premiership anyway, only most 'exciting'.

Name other leagues where it's not a 1.5 horse race too. Presumably only Barcelona and Real pending some managerial miracle can win the Spanish league, as usual. In Italy it will doubtless come down to Milan or Juve once again. All the top tier divisions are 'predicatable' in this regard.

Sociah T Azzahole (blueski), Friday, 16 September 2005 11:14 (twenty years ago)

But in the midst of the rather obscene backslapping, no-one dared point out the rather obvious point that the biggest barrier to participation in the lives of clubs is the ticket barrier, which is the biggest problem young ethnic kids and families in inner cities have.

I said this here before, compare the percentage of black faces on the pitch to black faces in the crowd - well, no comparison really

Raymond Douglas Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 16 September 2005 11:14 (twenty years ago)

Yes the crowd wins, statistically, clearly.

Sociah T Azzahole (blueski), Friday, 16 September 2005 11:16 (twenty years ago)

What exactly is exciting about the Premiership? Apart from occasional flashes from genius from exceptional players? I honestly would much rather be watching Scottish football week in, week out (absence makes the Hearts grow fonder)

Raymond Douglas Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 16 September 2005 11:17 (twenty years ago)

So circa 40% of the Chelsea team on Tuesday was black and over 40% of the crowd was black?

Raymond Douglas Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 16 September 2005 11:18 (twenty years ago)

Oh right I see! Semantic slippage on my part.

Raymond Douglas Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 16 September 2005 11:19 (twenty years ago)

Yes, I didn't expect you meant percentages, that's just silly!

You're obviously not going to be convinced by any pro-Premiership argument so why bother? ;) There remain as many pros as cons I think. I would be surprised if it was deemed to necessary to list all these pros and cons once again.

Sociah T Azzahole (blueski), Friday, 16 September 2005 11:19 (twenty years ago)

I admit the fact that I don't care about any of the teams or who wins it rather mitigates against me criticising it!

Raymond Douglas Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 16 September 2005 11:21 (twenty years ago)

What exactly is exciting about the Premiership?
OTM

Instead of pointing out how other euopean leagues are "as bad" as the english one, you should be explaining what exactly makes it "more exciting". Suspense? Nope. Big names? Not really. Glitzy technical prowess? Definitely not.

Baaderonixx and the choco-pop babies (baaderonixx), Friday, 16 September 2005 11:27 (twenty years ago)

The Premiership can be very exciting indeed but the title race is not one of those reasons right now. How quickly we forget the four-way relegation battle on the last day of last season. Tsk, it's Big Clubbism gone mad, Mr Boyle.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Friday, 16 September 2005 11:28 (twenty years ago)

Then again I support a team capable of putting four goals past Arsenal and still losing, so maybe I'm not a reliable barometer here.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Friday, 16 September 2005 11:30 (twenty years ago)

Instead of pointing out how other euopean leagues are "as bad" as the english one, you should be explaining what exactly makes it "more exciting". Suspense? Nope. Big names? Not really. Glitzy technical prowess? Definitely not.

There is no point in me pointing out why I think the Premiership is more exciting because excitement, like boredom, is relative. The Premiership has suspense (will Psycho Pearce lose all his hair by March?), big names (Ruud Van Nistelrooy = 17 characters), glitzy technical prowess (the new floodlights at the Reebok stadium are sensational).

Sociah T Azzahole (blueski), Friday, 16 September 2005 11:32 (twenty years ago)

Most leagues have big beast who win things, but most leagues have teams who can have great seasons and win things , and can certainly upset the direction of the big title through .

In Italy, Roma and Nazio are traditionally weaker than Milan or Juve, but can occasionally win the thing, and can beat those teams on their day. IN Germany, Bayern are usually there or thereabouts, but they lose matches, and have several rivals and always have. There's a steady stream of challengers over the years - Gladbach, Hamburg, Bremen, Cologne, Schalke, Dortmund etc. In Spain, Depor and Valencia are decent teams, and the big two don't get their own way.

The Premiership is actually worse than the SPL. The SPL has games where the result is not in doubt, loike here. But the problem with games between, say Killie and Motherwell is not that the result is predictable but that no-one gives a shit. They usually try to play football though. Too many games here, where the result is in doubt, still have shite football.

And then there's the sheer jaw dropping tedium of the hype. Where Sky can bill the game between Chelsea and Arsenal - in advance of kick-off - as having been a classic. Really? To quote Brendan Burns, it makes me want to shit blood out of my eyes. I can't buy into this utter bollocks about best league in the world when the markers of a great league are just not present. You've qualified 'best' to 'exciting' but even that I struggle to see. What's exciting about the premiership tomorrow? What's fun about it? It's stadium where the self-created culture is being drowned out by a screaming tannoy announcer, where everyone must get in their regimented seat, where music replaces celebratory cheering and chanting, where crowds get older and duller because prices get higher and higher, where players cast as demigods have average games and get paid obscene amounts for it and kick some back to a retinue of moneygrabbing hangers on, where the press and media cynically avoid anything that might take the gloss of, as they're part of the very beast they should be exercising critical distance from. It's irredeemably awful.

Dave B (daveb), Friday, 16 September 2005 12:03 (twenty years ago)

I think it's the really poor quality dull-as-fucking-ditchwater football played by teams outside the Top 6 (with a few exceptions) that I object too, in what Hell would anyone want to watch any game involving Middlesborough?. There should only be 16 teams in the League, get rid of the chaff

Raymond Douglas Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 16 September 2005 12:09 (twenty years ago)

The Premiership is actually worse than the SPL. The SPL has games where the result is not in doubt, loike here. But the problem with games between, say Killie and Motherwell is not that the result is predictable but that no-one gives a shit. They usually try to play football though. Too many games here, where the result is in doubt, still have shite football.

There's more teams in England and more big money places (UEFA CUp etc.) up for grabs, so I don't think this holds up. There might be a particular game between Kilmarnock and Motherwell which proved to be more exciting than another particular game between Middlesbrough and Man City, but the same is true in reverse at another time. You can't measure quality or excitement in this way surely, it's too speculative.

Where Sky can bill the game between Chelsea and Arsenal - in advance of kick-off - as having been a classic.

Why were you watching this anyway? Sky pre-match build-up is always annoying crap, and this goes for Auld Firm games and Barca vs Real as much as anything else.

Sociah T Azzahole (blueski), Friday, 16 September 2005 12:14 (twenty years ago)

I think quality wise, sure, the Prem isn't the best in the world. But for entertainment I do find it the best. Though actually I'd make a case for the CL as being about the most entertaining competition these days, perhaps opening another can of worms!

I don't know if that's due to mass advertising and it being kind of in your face 24/7 but I know I seldom if ever have enjoyed Italian or Spanish football, Italian in particular reminds me of being bored out of mind on Sundays watching Channel 4.

This Premiership season may not have been thrilling so far, but there still are good games. It is kind of sickening that Chelsea seem such a shoe in to win it but it used to be like that with Man U anyhow, surely it was the same with Liverpool in the 70s and 80s?

Correct me if you are actually saying the Premiership has been shit for 30 years!

Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 16 September 2005 12:14 (twenty years ago)

One difference could be that a Chelsea are boring team to watch and Liverpool and Man Utd (and Arsenal) weren't

Raymond Douglas Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 16 September 2005 12:20 (twenty years ago)

**And then there's the sheer jaw dropping tedium of the hype. Where Sky can bill the game between Chelsea and Arsenal - in advance of kick-off - as having been a classic. Really? To quote Brendan Burns, it makes me want to shit blood out of my eyes. I can't buy into this utter bollocks about best league in the world when the markers of a great league are just not present. You've qualified 'best' to 'exciting' but even that I struggle to see. What's exciting about the premiership tomorrow? What's fun about it? It's stadium where the self-created culture is being drowned out by a screaming tannoy announcer, where everyone must get in their regimented seat, where music replaces celebratory cheering and chanting, where crowds get older and duller because prices get higher and higher, where players cast as demigods have average games and get paid obscene amounts for it and kick some back to a retinue of moneygrabbing hangers on, where the press and media cynically avoid anything that might take the gloss of, as they're part of the very beast they should be exercising critical distance from. It's irredeemably awful. **

Yes,

**in what Hell would anyone want to watch any game involving Middlesborough?.**

Or Bolton. And I'd rather have my eyes gouged out with hot knives than have to watch a Blackburn game. (Although I have sympathy with Andy Todd's one man campaign to bring a bit of old-skool guileless thuggery back into the game a la Mark Dennis).

Dr. C (Dr. C), Friday, 16 September 2005 12:38 (twenty years ago)

Dave its all very well you criticising negative tactics against the top teams but didn't everyone get very excited when Greece won Euro2004? Thought so...

Matt DC (Matt DC), Friday, 16 September 2005 12:38 (twenty years ago)

(x-post)I meant "Yes!" not "Yes," I was agreeing with Dave B (again).

Greece - well it's nice to see an outsider win. Maybe it's too much to hope that they'll play football too.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Friday, 16 September 2005 12:41 (twenty years ago)

Name one way in which they didn't "play football" and I'll give you a prize.

Thay might not have played the kind of football *you* like, I'll grant.

Tim (Tim), Friday, 16 September 2005 12:45 (twenty years ago)

Would I rather watch Greece than Middlesbrough, Bolton, Blackburn Rovers, West Brom etc etc etc? What do you think?

Raymond Douglas Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 16 September 2005 12:48 (twenty years ago)

One difference could be that a Chelsea are boring team to watch and Liverpool and Man Utd (and Arsenal) weren't

Even against Barcelona and Bayern Munich last season?

Sociah T Azzahole (blueski), Friday, 16 September 2005 12:49 (twenty years ago)

Around me no-one was particularly pleased to see Greece win.

Baaderonixx and the hedonistic gluttons (baaderonixx), Friday, 16 September 2005 12:50 (twenty years ago)

but didn't everyone get very excited when Greece won Euro2004?

I for one was mortified ;)

Sociah T Azzahole (blueski), Friday, 16 September 2005 12:51 (twenty years ago)

Greece vs England would be pretty tedious to watch right now presumably.

Sociah T Azzahole (blueski), Friday, 16 September 2005 12:51 (twenty years ago)

Greece are even worse than England at the moment

Raymond Douglas Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 16 September 2005 12:52 (twenty years ago)

x-post Tim - yes, they did play football, you're right. It wasn't scintillating, but good on 'em, they won.

x-post Dada - me too.

I think Charlton play some good stuff.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Friday, 16 September 2005 12:53 (twenty years ago)

I was delighted when Greece won, but 90 minutes of heroic defending to get through a tricky quarter- or semi-final is for me a different proposition to 90 minutes of cautiously balanced play to decide who is 13th or 12th in a league.

Tom (Groke), Friday, 16 September 2005 12:54 (twenty years ago)

Where Sky can bill the game between Chelsea and Arsenal - in advance of kick-off - as having been a classic. Really?... What's exciting about the premiership tomorrow?

Charlton are going to beat Chelsea 4-3, with three goals in the last five minutes. It's going to be quite a stormer, and the other games won't be bad either. I know because a Sky announcer told me so.

This is actually turning into taking side: The Premiership is not exciting vs. No games in the Premiership are exciting - clearly not one and the same thing.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Friday, 16 September 2005 12:56 (twenty years ago)

TEH PREMIERSHIP IS DEAD

manner the whirled, Friday, 16 September 2005 12:59 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.