>probably because you only get one shot at animating those scenes...
I don't know about that - unless Cameron works with CGI very differently than other (big budget action film) directors then he's got almost infinite control over the shots before they go through the final rendering process.
(I didn't read the whole of l'bloomer's link so may be missing the point here, though)
― Bill A, Sunday, 27 December 2009 12:17 (sixteen years ago)
I was reading that with the camera/tech/whatever he's got, he could film the actors in the empty space and through the viewfinder see an xbox-quality rendering of the fx of whatever he was pointing at.
boy that wasn't explained well at all.
― moron oil (Gukbe), Sunday, 27 December 2009 16:06 (sixteen years ago)
no, no. made perfect sense and it's true.
― all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Sunday, 27 December 2009 17:30 (sixteen years ago)
i have purchased my ticket for an 11 pm 3d/imax avatarification. big blue people better bring it.
― hellzapoppa (tipsy mothra), Sunday, 27 December 2009 17:35 (sixteen years ago)
some of the stuff in that article def does seem like it would have made for a better movie. but a lot of it, you can tell why it was changed.
― reagan & sarah (s1ocki), Sunday, 27 December 2009 18:14 (sixteen years ago)
avatar 2: tsu'tey tang
― cozwn, Sunday, 27 December 2009 18:19 (sixteen years ago)
estimated 2nd weekend gross: $75M, down from $77M. usually blockbusters will almost halve their box office in the second week. in comparison titanic made more on its second week than its first (largely because it opened on the same day as a bond movie).
it will definitely make its money back.
― abanana, Sunday, 27 December 2009 19:02 (sixteen years ago)
i now cannot escape papyrus.
― straightola, Sunday, 27 December 2009 23:40 (sixteen years ago)
do you think cameron will point at the audience and say "i see you" during his acceptance speech?
― This part of the sentence is even dumber. (lukas), Sunday, 27 December 2009 23:51 (sixteen years ago)
followed swiftly by him raising his oscar and ululating
― hear shart attack (latebloomer), Sunday, 27 December 2009 23:59 (sixteen years ago)
well, that wasn't bad ... but it did ultimately make me feel guilty for spending $13.50 on an imax movie instead of, like, trekking in patagonia or the amazon or something. or hell, even being outside.
― moonship journey to baja, Monday, 28 December 2009 00:48 (sixteen years ago)
i guess i was really feeling the ecomessages maaaaaaan
dud my imax ticket cost $17.50
― ice cr?m, Monday, 28 December 2009 02:54 (sixteen years ago)
chew on that 4 a min
Is it only when people are at death's door that the Na'vi all have to sit around the tree and spin and hold each others' shoulders and chant? If you had to do that every time someone got, say, a major injury, that would be a real pain in the ass.
― just a moonful of sugar (Abbott), Monday, 28 December 2009 04:00 (sixteen years ago)
^^ this qn should be part of the health care debate
― reagan & sarah (s1ocki), Monday, 28 December 2009 04:28 (sixteen years ago)
this was a good time and the story/dialogue is really not worse than hollywood norms. tons of movies have plots at least as ridiculous, and almost none of them ever make me feel like i'm dodging missiles on dragonback. and all the gaia worship stuff is hokey as hell but hokey gaia worship isn't really like a moral flaw imo. plus i liked how the whole planet seemed designed to be seen under a black light. i think cameron is kind of a suburban-basement stoner at heart.
― hellzapoppa (tipsy mothra), Monday, 28 December 2009 08:02 (sixteen years ago)
yeah i kinda liked the hippy-dippy roger dean look of a lot of it.
― hear shart attack (latebloomer), Monday, 28 December 2009 08:30 (sixteen years ago)
The whole biolumescent look of Pandoran was inspired by the coral sea beds he witnessed during all the scuba dives he took between Titanic and this, wasn't it?
― DavidM, Monday, 28 December 2009 08:46 (sixteen years ago)
Toys
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7JWk_JIE3Ow
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XMAaOxjTKMI
http://www.empireonline.com/images/image_index/hw800/35110.jpg
― DavidM, Monday, 28 December 2009 09:18 (sixteen years ago)
http://www.collider.com/2009/12/27/weekend-box-office-avatar-edges-out-sherlock-holmes-on-the-biggest-christmas-weekend-ever/
― DavidM, Monday, 28 December 2009 09:25 (sixteen years ago)
those videos are confusing
― =皿= (dyao), Monday, 28 December 2009 09:27 (sixteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=knH_rf0UxMU
― shartin jort (am0n), Monday, 28 December 2009 18:43 (sixteen years ago)
promising young vlogger
― ice cr?m, Monday, 28 December 2009 18:51 (sixteen years ago)
*bookmarks youtube channel*
― my girl wants to sharty all the time (s1ocki), Monday, 28 December 2009 18:52 (sixteen years ago)
*buys james cameron directed happy meal*
― shartin jort (am0n), Monday, 28 December 2009 18:57 (sixteen years ago)
*records vlog response based on own impressions of happy meal*
― my girl wants to sharty all the time (s1ocki), Monday, 28 December 2009 18:57 (sixteen years ago)
http://i45.tinypic.com/wlb1ud.jpg
― ice cr?m, Monday, 28 December 2009 19:01 (sixteen years ago)
*creates happy meal action figure of vlogger that lights up when u vlog*
― shartin jort (am0n), Monday, 28 December 2009 19:02 (sixteen years ago)
*acquires rights to amon's prototype*
― my girl wants to sharty all the time (s1ocki), Monday, 28 December 2009 19:10 (sixteen years ago)
dude sounds like a remix
― lazy cold meat and chocolate seasonal mentality (forksclovetofu), Monday, 28 December 2009 19:30 (sixteen years ago)
Did it freak anyone else out how much Na'vi Sigourney Weaver looked like human Sigourney Weaver? The others it was like 'oh yeah I can see how that's an avatar of him' and Sigourney's was like 'oh my fucking god Sigourney what did they do to your face did we learn nothing from ANTZ.'
― just a moonful of sugar (Abbott), Monday, 28 December 2009 20:13 (sixteen years ago)
i lold repeatedly @ blue sigourney
― ice cr?m, Monday, 28 December 2009 20:18 (sixteen years ago)
like big hearty barrel laughs whenever she was on screen?
― my girl wants to sharty all the time (s1ocki), Monday, 28 December 2009 20:19 (sixteen years ago)
giggling more like - particularly @ her scrunched up smiley face when jake graduated to alien manhood
― ice cr?m, Monday, 28 December 2009 20:20 (sixteen years ago)
is barrel laugh a thing or did i mean belly laugh
― my girl wants to sharty all the time (s1ocki), Monday, 28 December 2009 20:21 (sixteen years ago)
it freaked me out more that Sam W looked like Ben Affleck at times
― mdskltr (blueski), Monday, 28 December 2009 20:21 (sixteen years ago)
xp a belly of laughs
― mdskltr (blueski), Monday, 28 December 2009 20:22 (sixteen years ago)
the whole experience was a belly full of monkeys imo
― ice cr?m, Monday, 28 December 2009 20:23 (sixteen years ago)
also lold @ her cutoffs n stanford croptop look
― ice cr?m, Monday, 28 December 2009 20:24 (sixteen years ago)
blueski the Ben Affleck thing freaked me out too, when his hair was not buzzed & he had a few days of beard on him.
― just a moonful of sugar (Abbott), Monday, 28 December 2009 20:25 (sixteen years ago)
do a barrel lol
― abanana, Monday, 28 December 2009 20:28 (sixteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=thsc60UTUIE&feature=player_embedded
― hear shart attack (latebloomer), Monday, 28 December 2009 22:00 (sixteen years ago)
i'm gonna chime in to say that i totally agree with deej upthread. no props to jake sully for talking the na'vi into a suicide mission.
― moonship journey to baja, Monday, 28 December 2009 22:12 (sixteen years ago)
tried to see this today at 1PM...shit was sold out!!
― jealous ones sb (M@tt He1ges0n), Monday, 28 December 2009 22:31 (sixteen years ago)
Maybe if you did two cam shots using the tripod in the exact same place both times, and shot it through one lense at a time on those 3d glasses they gave you. It's easy to combine two video images in AE to get an anaglyph 3d (red-blue). Would be dark as hell but i bet you could do it!
― Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 29 December 2009 00:48 (sixteen years ago)
lo-fi 3D for owls is the next big thing
― I X Love (Abbott), Tuesday, 29 December 2009 00:50 (sixteen years ago)
farts
― doomed... to fart (cankles), Tuesday, 29 December 2009 12:55 (sixteen years ago)
sorry just testing
― doomed... to fart (cankles), Tuesday, 29 December 2009 12:56 (sixteen years ago)
its weird but the more distance i get from this the more i like it. saw it in imax 3d on saturday (it owned) (some of the decisions probably make more sense in this format, like the abundance of aerial scenes - the sense of height is dizzying at times), usually the further i get from seeing a movie the more i pick it apart, my initial reaction was 'glad i went but i won't be rushing to see it again' but right now i'd really like to see it again. the quality of the facial animation was probably the most startling thing effects-wise, that was some next level shit imo
my other initial reaction was that one of cameron's bigger gambles (getting people to care about the navi and all the new age hokum about the spirit of the planet) failed, but again in retrospect it kinda works. still i wished there were more moments like the one where the floaty jellyfish seeds are swarming around sully and he swats one away - that got the biggest laugh of the movie.
still wondering how the hell those floating islands had waterfalls
also michelle rodriguez has some fine-ass titties
ribisi & weaver owned tho like jsbhorglb i was str8 gigglin at blue sigourney
― doomed... to fart (cankles), Tuesday, 29 December 2009 12:57 (sixteen years ago)