_Avatar_, directed by James Cameron

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (2864 of them)

and then mail everyone special glasses so that the posts are in the foreground with the ashes of dead hometree

did you mean: fart blasters? (nickalicious), Thursday, 24 December 2009 03:39 (sixteen years ago)

thinkin about seeing this again in a dolby 3d theater - biggest problem about IMAX 3d is that the brightness level sucked cause of the polarization. apparently dolby 3d doesn't have this problem.

=皿= (dyao), Thursday, 24 December 2009 03:51 (sixteen years ago)

Just got out of a IMAX 3D theater a couple hours ago. It wasn't nearly as bad as I feared from the trailer and previous experiences with green-screen/cgi hybrid films. The plot is not terribly original, as everyone knows, but there was no egregiously bad dialog, and the design work and facial motion-capture was amazingly good throughout. I consider it $13.50 very well spent.

Overwhelming exquisite feeling (Derelict), Thursday, 24 December 2009 03:55 (sixteen years ago)

just saw this, my sci-fi nerd dad was all excited and had to take me and my brother. maybe it was just my lowered expectations, but it was pretty nice! the dialogue/plotting was more competent than i'd prepared myself for, some cool beasties. basically surpassed my expectation that it would be like a slightly better looking Phantom Menace. (xpost haha)

forkslovecraftcthulhu (some dude), Thursday, 24 December 2009 03:57 (sixteen years ago)

haha ya it's definitely NOT the phantom menace.

j/k and the fa™an (s1ocki), Thursday, 24 December 2009 04:00 (sixteen years ago)

oh this might actually be a good Dad movie for the holidays, huh

deej--nuts, butthurt, and yelly (gbx), Thursday, 24 December 2009 04:02 (sixteen years ago)

my dad definitely called for my $.02 about it

j/k and the fa™an (s1ocki), Thursday, 24 December 2009 04:05 (sixteen years ago)

dad just called to say he loved it and now he needs to drive 1.5 hours to see it in 3d

ice cr?m, Thursday, 24 December 2009 18:28 (sixteen years ago)

tell him to take off the glasses first

j/k and the fa™an (s1ocki), Thursday, 24 December 2009 19:51 (sixteen years ago)

dude he doesnt want to drive all the way to burlington in 2d thats so last paradigm - if u want to maintian yr critical relevancey youre really gonna have to keep up - jeez

ice cr?m, Thursday, 24 December 2009 19:56 (sixteen years ago)

i didnt realize avatar had pushed the envelope that far - apologies

j/k and the fa™an (s1ocki), Thursday, 24 December 2009 19:58 (sixteen years ago)

smh

ice cr?m, Thursday, 24 December 2009 19:59 (sixteen years ago)

i dont drive dude how was i supposed to know

j/k and the fa™an (s1ocki), Thursday, 24 December 2009 20:01 (sixteen years ago)

Nobody drives anymore now that we all have our own personal dragon bug things.

real bears playing hockey (polyphonic), Thursday, 24 December 2009 20:02 (sixteen years ago)

posting to this thread via ponytail btw

ice cr?m, Thursday, 24 December 2009 20:04 (sixteen years ago)

fuck I'm connected too via ponytail; how come I can't feel you

=皿= (dyao), Thursday, 24 December 2009 20:48 (sixteen years ago)

pause

=皿= (dyao), Thursday, 24 December 2009 20:48 (sixteen years ago)

i see u man

ice cr?m, Thursday, 24 December 2009 22:07 (sixteen years ago)

WEDNESDAY BOX OFFICE
1. Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel $18,801,277
2. Avatar $16,445,291

abanana, Friday, 25 December 2009 02:47 (sixteen years ago)

psyched for avatar the squeakquel

j/k and the fa™an (s1ocki), Friday, 25 December 2009 07:40 (sixteen years ago)

the sequoial

uttery cuntery (acoleuthic), Friday, 25 December 2009 07:42 (sixteen years ago)

lol

j/k and the fa™an (s1ocki), Friday, 25 December 2009 08:47 (sixteen years ago)

i guess itd be more of a treequel tbh

j/k and the fa™an (s1ocki), Friday, 25 December 2009 08:47 (sixteen years ago)

haha yeah

uttery cuntery (acoleuthic), Friday, 25 December 2009 08:53 (sixteen years ago)

that's not true about alvin & the chipmunks is it??!!!

did you mean: fart blasters? (nickalicious), Friday, 25 December 2009 14:11 (sixteen years ago)

http://boxofficemojo.com/daily/chart/

just sayin, Friday, 25 December 2009 14:32 (sixteen years ago)

it's not gonna happen but if the chipmunks squeakel outgrossed Avatar that would be some all-time lols

ea™e (latebloomer), Friday, 25 December 2009 14:35 (sixteen years ago)

23/12 was Alvin 2's opening day, whereas Avatar has been out for a week, but still... Didn't have to sign an NDA for Alvin, funnily enough.

Avatar's opening weekend wasn't all that amazing, was it?

Michael Jones, Friday, 25 December 2009 15:50 (sixteen years ago)

it was good but not great and needs to continue to perform to be a lol hueg blockbuster - people seem to like it so i could see that happening i guess

http://boxofficemojo.com/news/?id=2632&p=.htm

ice cr?m, Friday, 25 December 2009 16:04 (sixteen years ago)

"dude he doesnt want to drive all the way to burlington in 2d thats so last paradigm"
he's gonna love the way it looks

forks©lovetofu (forksclovetofu), Friday, 25 December 2009 20:53 (sixteen years ago)

okay, so i liked this. grade A+++ hokum imo. kicks all kinds of jurassic park's ass.

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Saturday, 26 December 2009 02:27 (sixteen years ago)

chipmunks is doing well because school is out and aside from Princess and the Frog, which as been out for almost a month, it's the only kid's movie in theaters for some reason (christmas carol I guess, which also stupidly opened ages ago)

akm, Saturday, 26 December 2009 02:38 (sixteen years ago)

cameons films all start out slow at the box office I think

=皿= (dyao), Saturday, 26 December 2009 02:54 (sixteen years ago)

chipmunks is doing well because it is going to change the face of cinema

max, Saturday, 26 December 2009 03:27 (sixteen years ago)

"We're going to take the same 3D technology James Cameron used in AVATAR and stick it up Jason Lee's butt."

forks©lovetofu (forksclovetofu), Saturday, 26 December 2009 03:49 (sixteen years ago)

Somewhere I read (and maybe you did too) is that studios are now going to try re-releasing 3-D Raiders, etc., etc., etc.

The Hood Won't Jump (Eazy), Saturday, 26 December 2009 04:42 (sixteen years ago)

there's nerd shit and there's dork shit.

like raiders of the lost ark and ghostbusters are cool nerd shit, but like babylon 5 and dressing up like sailor moon are like lame dork shit.

Avatar was like a lame dork sandwich of furry-phile "anthropomorphic art" mixed with Ferngully.

kelis navidad (Whiney G. Weingarten), Saturday, 26 December 2009 07:32 (sixteen years ago)

it was really pretty tho and some of the animals were cool, peace out

kelis navidad (Whiney G. Weingarten), Saturday, 26 December 2009 07:33 (sixteen years ago)

dialogue was like something on an EPCOT ride come on now

kelis navidad (Whiney G. Weingarten), Saturday, 26 December 2009 07:42 (sixteen years ago)

this movie was retarded as hell, beyond belief actually

it also looked fucking amazing - kind of unbelievable

stupid fruity crazy jag (J0rdan S.), Saturday, 26 December 2009 08:02 (sixteen years ago)

hell = retarded >>>> belief

deej, Saturday, 26 December 2009 12:48 (sixteen years ago)

avatarded

kelis navidad (Whiney G. Weingarten), Saturday, 26 December 2009 15:56 (sixteen years ago)

giovanni ribisi's charachter should have been played by paul giamatti

kelis navidad (Whiney G. Weingarten), Saturday, 26 December 2009 16:04 (sixteen years ago)

how much does this movie have to make to not be a flop btw? can it lose 200m and still be a... success doesn't seem like the right word but success?

eagle tears was a popular drink and it still is (a hoy hoy), Saturday, 26 December 2009 16:04 (sixteen years ago)

love all the magazine articles about the "hidden messages" in avatar, aka the ones it was hitting you over the head with for 3 hours.

kelis navidad (Whiney G. Weingarten), Saturday, 26 December 2009 16:07 (sixteen years ago)

also, wtf @ "get it done" five times from every retard character

SUBTLE CULTURAL COMMENTARY!

kelis navidad (Whiney G. Weingarten), Saturday, 26 December 2009 16:08 (sixteen years ago)

giovanni ribisi's charachter should have been played by paul giamatti reiser

abanana, Saturday, 26 December 2009 16:55 (sixteen years ago)

okay, so i liked this. grade A+++ hokum imo. kicks all kinds of jurassic park's ass.

― all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Saturday, 26 December 2009 02:27 (15 hours ago) Bookmark

no

HELLO MY NAME IS TWILIGHT AND I AM A DRACULA (acoleuthic), Saturday, 26 December 2009 17:34 (sixteen years ago)

lj in displaying arbitrary preference for "vintage" hokum shocker

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Saturday, 26 December 2009 17:55 (sixteen years ago)

arbitrary preference for film that semi-defined my childhood of movie fandom, a film that has razor-sharp scripting, great characterisation and genuinely gripping action sequences, a film that is full of bits I can remember despite not having seen it for about 10 years (maybe exaggerated) and a film that feels like a film rather than a presentation

and hey I LIKED avatar! i mean your post is OTM until you mention jurassic park

HELLO MY NAME IS TWILIGHT AND I AM A DRACULA (acoleuthic), Saturday, 26 December 2009 17:59 (sixteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.