ATTN: Copyeditors and Grammar Fiends

The treatment for asthma and that for pulmonary disease are not identical.

I r a medical editor. Therefore you must do as I say and use 'The treatments.'

xpost jaymc I love you but that is horrible.

yes, esp as it also has to go in a callout.

wait asthma IS a pulmonary disease!

Sentence is too long. Consider simply going with "Fixin' lungs is tough."

Asthma is treated differently than other pulmonary diseases.

xpost jaymc I love you but that is horrible.

Well, if it were up to me, I'd probably use "treatments," but the good Dr. Morbius seemed like he wanted to avoid that.

"The treatment for asthma is not identical to the treatment for pulmonary disease."

I shortened it, quincie; the other disease is actually COPD, but I didn't wnat to confuse the civilians...

I dunno. "The love I have for Berlin and for Paris are quite different."
You wouldn't want "loves" there, would you? The second love is simply understood without being written out.

Asthma and COPD are treated differently.

DO I WIN OR WHAT?

no, I can't rewrite it that much. It's not my decision, I merely (feebly) suggest. Also the AMA stylebook NEVER has the example I'm looking for, ever!

my mom works with COPD patients!

Zelda, that sentence is weird either way. That "are" is like a cyst on that sentence. Why wouldn't you say something like, "I love Berlin and Paris in different ways" or something? Also, active voice, because you're talking about yourself (not as easy with the COPD/Asthma sentence since the treater of diseases is mostly irrelevant to the sentence).

what about my suggestion morbius

I have no power over what the Krell -- I mean, my editor -- will decide. I've added an "s" query and moved on.

I still think the original sentence with "treatments" instead of "treatment" doesn't read unclearly, btw, Morb.

xpost yay :)

<i>Zelda, that sentence is weird either way.</i>

Yeah, I guess you're right!

You really have to query something as small as that? God, I'd go nuts.

I don't have to; I simply don't want to decide.

Morbius the Scrivener

hahaha

full stops at the end of bullet-pointed sentences, yay or nay?

I say nay, unless you have more than one sentence per bullet point.

(I don't know why, other than it feels somehow right so somebody else will have to give you a proper answer).

Tends to depend on style guide/consistency, with yes/no/only-last-one all possible.

I think I would punctuate it as I would a sentence if I'd chosen to break up the thing with commas instead of bullet points, so if you have three partial ends to a sentence it could end:

+ like this, or
+ like that, or
+ like something else entirely.

This is mostly because I like things to look nice and logical, not because I know lots about the "right" way of doing things.

I hate it when people end them with 'or', 'and' or (worst of all) semicolons. We are sophisticated readers who understand how lists work.

It makes me think of leaflets about social security benefits.

i have thusly been fullstopping because i just think a full sentence should be fully punctuated but most places seem not to. i can't handle the conflict.

dos and don'ts
do's and don'ts
do's and don't's

?

First one. Though I'm pretty sure the second one is acceptable as well.

I agree, but "dos" still somehow looks a bit wrong...

I remember asking somewhere else about the expression fair dos/fair does/fair do's and being told the former and latter were both acceptable as a pluralisation of do. Don't like it much though.

ooh can you do former/latter with a triple option? is the 2nd a... middler?

Probably not, heh, I am keeping this thread on its toes and reminding you all that I am just an amateur pedant so my advice is not to be taken seriously.

google tells me it shouldn't be used formally, but is used conversationally as it still conveys what is meant fairly clearly.

Re the plural of BBS:

An article just landed on my desk that uses the abbreviation SNS (social networking site) and its plural SNSs. I'm going to query it.

Do's appears in many dictionaries as an independent word, because dos and don'ts may look suspiciously like Spanglish for "two and don'ts."

Thus: do's and don'ts

(You can trust me, because I got totally burned on trying to "correct" that a couple years back.)

sort of a follow-up on my question about outsourcing copyediting.

I thought it was "do's and don't's"? Looks kind of retarded, sure.

it would never, ever, ever be "do's and don't's". ever. in any possible universe.

I thought whatsherface from the shoots and leaves book had said it was? But my copy is at home. Anyway, I was checking b/c we publish a book by that title and it gets done all different ways in the systems.

I thought whatsherface from the shoots and leaves book had said it was?

if she did (and i doubt it), she's an even bigger cock-end than i think she is.

I think the apostrophe in do's is a special case, for clarity/disambiguation -- there is no reason to do the same for don'ts, which perfectly clear in its natural no-apostrophe plural.

it would never, ever, ever be "do's and don't's". ever. in any possible universe.

What about that universe of yours where 2+2 != 4?

hah, i was discussing that with F on saturday, believe it or not.

but no, not even in that one.