Who will have the last word on this thread ?

Message Bookmarked

Bookmark Removed

Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (268 of them)

View Previous Page...

Given that one of my wishes is to not see misused apostrophes, they aren't being granted.

― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 4 January 2003 17:50 (twenty-three years ago)

oh well, maybe some of your more interesting wishes will come true !!

― baggy (baggy), Saturday, 4 January 2003 17:57 (twenty-three years ago)

haha good point!

― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 4 January 2003 18:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm not trying to have the last word on this thread, since I know that's quite impossible.

― Rockist Scientist, Saturday, 4 January 2003 18:52 (twenty-three years ago)

it'll go on longer than any of my threads, that's for sure...

i could start talking about ass, that would kill it 4 sure. except i think my new ironic crush is on a young keith emerson...

― masonicboom, Saturday, 4 January 2003 19:06 (twenty-three years ago)

*drive by posting*

― Kim (Kim), Saturday, 4 January 2003 19:21 (twenty-three years ago)

kate stepping out with her new ironic bf...

http://www.echonyc.com/~cleo/concert.jpeg

― masonicboom, Saturday, 4 January 2003 19:29 (twenty-three years ago)

SOMBRERO

― jel -- (jel), Saturday, 4 January 2003 20:02 (twenty-three years ago)

fringe...

― masonicboom, Saturday, 4 January 2003 21:15 (twenty-three years ago)

lunatic...

― jel -- (jel), Saturday, 4 January 2003 21:16 (twenty-three years ago)

as in lunatic fringe! (lets turn this into word association!)

frost...

― jel -- (jel), Saturday, 4 January 2003 21:18 (twenty-three years ago)

frost-ed lipstick

― sand.y, Saturday, 4 January 2003 21:19 (twenty-three years ago)

frosty dipstick... goes back to the 'how cold is too cold to snow...' argument.

when will ed com back so we can eat xmas cake...

― masonicboom, Saturday, 4 January 2003 21:22 (twenty-three years ago)

Is it not better to eat cake without Ed? He'll only want a share of it! Or is he bringing the cake?

― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 4 January 2003 21:45 (twenty-three years ago)

ed came back, we ate the cake. i had the heel w/all the marzipan, yum. thoug i've decided i like fruitcake better w/butter because marzipan is so yummy tht eveything pales by comparison.

― masonicboom, Saturday, 4 January 2003 21:52 (twenty-three years ago)

I'll tell you something that's been bugging me lately...that mobile phone ad, with that woman who wants to do this and that, like get rid of pigeons, bring back bob marley and ban beards. Hold on there! Bob Marley had a beard, what you gonna bring him back and make him shave off his beard?!?

― jel -- (jel), Saturday, 4 January 2003 22:42 (twenty-three years ago)

now we know how 2 get rid of nick... start perving on circa '94 photos of bobby's scottish knob...

― masonicboom, Saturday, 4 January 2003 23:34 (twenty-three years ago)

you lot have just given up, haven't you... will i really win...

― masonicboom, Monday, 6 January 2003 00:57 (twenty-three years ago)

yes, and you deser . . . doh!

― felicity (felicity), Monday, 6 January 2003 01:01 (twenty-three years ago)

thank. i knew i wasn't that sad... d'oh!!!

― masonicboom, Monday, 6 January 2003 01:05 (twenty-three years ago)

Yes, here I am again. Do I win yet?

― Sarah McLusky (coco), Monday, 6 January 2003 13:29 (twenty-three years ago)

Nope.

― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 6 January 2003 16:55 (twenty-three years ago)

Disregard DP. You won, Sarah! But only in an unsatisfying, theoretical way.

― Aimless, Monday, 6 January 2003 16:56 (twenty-three years ago)

DO NOT DISREGARD ME. Send me money instead.

― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 6 January 2003 16:59 (twenty-three years ago)

Ok. Stop bickering. I win for sure now.

― Sarah McLusky (coco), Monday, 6 January 2003 17:41 (twenty-three years ago)

― rosemary (rosemary), Monday, 6 January 2003 17:51 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm still waiting for that money...

― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 6 January 2003 17:51 (twenty-three years ago)

I win for today, But have to go home now......anougher day, anougher stress related headache.

― baggy (baggy), Monday, 6 January 2003 18:01 (twenty-three years ago)

there can be no winner surely?

― jel -- (jel), Monday, 6 January 2003 18:05 (twenty-three years ago)

yeah, but it's a fun game!!

― baggy (baggy), Monday, 6 January 2003 18:07 (twenty-three years ago)

me.

― Curtis Stephens, Monday, 6 January 2003 18:13 (twenty-three years ago)

no.

― jel -- (jel), Monday, 6 January 2003 18:15 (twenty-three years ago)

next time.

― baggy (baggy), Monday, 6 January 2003 18:17 (twenty-three years ago)

ME!

― Aaron W, Monday, 6 January 2003 18:18 (twenty-three years ago)

no.

― baggy (baggy), Monday, 6 January 2003 18:19 (twenty-three years ago)

WHERE'S MY MONEY GODDAMMIT???

― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 6 January 2003 19:00 (twenty-three years ago)

in the bank.

― jel -- (jel), Monday, 6 January 2003 20:04 (twenty-three years ago)

WHERE'S MY ACCOUNT NUMBER GODDAMMIT???

― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 6 January 2003 20:08 (twenty-three years ago)

in the drawer.

― jel -- (jel), Monday, 6 January 2003 20:08 (twenty-three years ago)

WHERE'S MY (ha you're not going to get me that easily)

― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 6 January 2003 20:10 (twenty-three years ago)

there should be a magic word which locks threads

― naked as sin (naked as sin), Monday, 6 January 2003 20:12 (twenty-three years ago)

And that magic word is...

― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 6 January 2003 20:13 (twenty-three years ago)

Hitler?

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 6 January 2003 20:40 (twenty-three years ago)

Titties!

― jel -- (jel), Monday, 6 January 2003 20:42 (twenty-three years ago)

HITLER-TITTIES!

― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 6 January 2003 21:12 (twenty-three years ago)

b@ngbus

― Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Monday, 6 January 2003 21:14 (twenty-three years ago)

(I really thought "hitler-titties" would stop the thread cold.)

― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 6 January 2003 22:02 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm winning!

Jeez you guys suck at this game

― Curtis Stephens, Monday, 6 January 2003 22:07 (twenty-three years ago)

I heard you guys were talking about Hitler-titties in here!

― Aaron W, Monday, 6 January 2003 22:10 (twenty-three years ago)

Boobies!

― jel -- (jel), Monday, 6 January 2003 22:51 (twenty-three years ago)

Skipping 168 messages at this point... Click here if you want to load them all.

oy.

― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Monday, 10 February 2003 20:32 (twenty-three years ago)

Senator BRUSHES. Begot surrounds, abuses of old hall, and accelerated to maturity by necessities economic and enthusiasm uncalculating of world war, and by use prodigal of money and of threats political by league of Against-Hall, prohibition national entered effect legal upwards does of six years, but truth can to be this which, unless a highly qualified degree, never _ has entered practical effect all appetite for drink, that to have to be one main great impulse human mass to be since then Jesus in Grey hair to show ahead its glory, to use word st. Juan, to turn water six water pote in wine, to have, in its extensive fight with repressive agency to fix to movement by eighteenth amendment and Volstead act, to equip another illustration truth, that neither moralistic nor statesman to always have to forget, uniforms in his the more fervid moment disinterested or abundant sensation, that man to be one creature who power to be to regulate and to improve, but to be able not to be to do above. Once, during the agitation for the abolition of the human slavery, the Brougham henry denigrated what it called "the wild and guilty fantasy that the man can carry out the characteristic in man." Wild and then guilty it is the fantasy that the energy of the federal government even can prevail totally to man of its hot clothes of the sensations, desires, and the appetites animals. Since then the tenth eighth amendment and Volstead the act became parts of the legislation of our earth the human instinct of the personal freedom, directed by a correct sense of the limits within which the natural right can be controlled by municipal ordinances, it has maintained an intact resistance to them; and nothing can be more unjustifiable than the declaration often heard that this resistance is limited a single social class one sameone. It is not continued reason why they call prohibitionists, vainly search to excite disaffection and social jealousy, the elegant social system, that it is in favor more bravely of the members of the American federation of the work. Any social class or sect is not limited. It has brought near relations of work around between bootlegger and the thousands of the most intelligent and more virtuous members of American society that does not feel not more of remorse on the violation of the act of Volstead that the free Soiler did on the violation of the law of the slave of the fugitive one, or the southern target did on annulling to ignorante black, suffrage, the federal constitution in each case on the contrary in spite of and the file whenever it mounted of the haltings for the embriaguez in all our American cities since the promulgation of the act of Volstead indicates only too much perceivably that the humblest members and less lucky people of the society they also have illicit his purveyors of the drink. Jewish the recent elocutions of rabbis, protestant bishops and ministers, and of you bark catholics has taste of cardinals ÓConnell and Hayes, demonstrates to the existence of a sensation every greater time, uniform between the American clergy, who the absolute prohibition is not the ally but the enemy of the human morality.

― Amateurist (amateurist), Monday, 10 February 2003 21:17 (twenty-three years ago)

Dang I was just thinking the other day that I should revive this and indeed get the last word.

― Aaron W (Aaron W), Monday, 10 February 2003 21:19 (twenty-three years ago)

Aaron, you're obviously missing the axiom here.

― Amateurist (amateurist), Monday, 10 February 2003 21:20 (twenty-three years ago)

ALL POSTS BELOW THIS ONE SHOULD BE ONLY BE MADE BY CHILD MOLESTERS AND MOMMY KILLERS

― Oops (Oops), Monday, 10 February 2003 21:24 (twenty-three years ago)

With the exception of this one...
And I am not a dumbass!

― Sarah McLusky (coco), Monday, 10 February 2003 21:27 (twenty-three years ago)

(you mommy killer!)

― Oops (Oops), Monday, 10 February 2003 21:30 (twenty-three years ago)

oops thats not fair.

― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Monday, 10 February 2003 22:35 (twenty-three years ago)

me?

― Chewshabadoo (Chewshabadoo), Tuesday, 11 February 2003 04:51 (twenty-three years ago)

B-b-but I'm Tha Threadkilla! ILX threads are the only things I ever kill! (Well, those and vodka bottles.)

― j.lu (j.lu), Tuesday, 11 February 2003 05:21 (twenty-three years ago)

shut UP!!!

― Sarah McLusky (coco), Tuesday, 11 February 2003 14:09 (twenty-three years ago)

― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Thursday, 13 February 2003 07:38 (twenty-three years ago)

Naughty Sterling.

― Graham (graham), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:31 (twenty-three years ago)

Thanks, Graham. Back to business as usual!

― Sarah McL (coco), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:32 (twenty-three years ago)

Yo yo, MC L is in the muthafuckin' hizzouse!

― oops (Oops), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:37 (twenty-three years ago)

This is a really short thread, all things considered. 250-odd posts in over a month. If people really cared it'd be much longer.

So we might as well finish it now.

― James Ball (James Ball), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:40 (twenty-three years ago)

yes, might as well.

Sarah???

― oops (Oops), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:42 (twenty-three years ago)

Yes, oops?

― Sarah McLusky (coco), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:43 (twenty-three years ago)

Hm.

― Amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:44 (twenty-three years ago)

Hm.

― Amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:45 (twenty-three years ago)

Wow, the lights were too bright there.

― Amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:45 (twenty-three years ago)

Let's try again.

― Amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:46 (twenty-three years ago)

Much better. Soft lighting.

― Amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:46 (twenty-three years ago)

Never mind

― oops (Oops), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:47 (twenty-three years ago)

Amateurist you've turned "Contribute an answer" yellow. Fix it, right now!

― smee (smee), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:48 (twenty-three years ago)

Arrrghgh! THis yellow is not very soothing!

ARrrghhgh! I am a pirate!

― Sarah McLusky (coco), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:49 (twenty-three years ago)

You prefer?

― Amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:49 (twenty-three years ago)

Lovely.

― Sarah McLUsky (coco), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:49 (twenty-three years ago)

Amatuerist I'm gonna count to three.....

― smee (smee), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:50 (twenty-three years ago)

One

Two

Three

― Amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:51 (twenty-three years ago)

OK, sorry

― Amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:55 (twenty-three years ago)

What an amateur

― oops (Oops), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:56 (twenty-three years ago)

― Amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:57 (twenty-three years ago)

Now look what you've done!

― smee (smee), Thursday, 13 February 2003 16:01 (twenty-three years ago)