WTF?: "Seinfeld"'s Michael 'Kramer' Richards in Weird-o-Rama Onstage Meltdown

Message Bookmarked

Bookmark Removed

Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1647 of them)

View Previous Page...

My attempt at playing Jaymc: you're Australian, right? (Or NZ?)

― nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 11 January 2007 17:49 (nineteen years ago)

that's not true

― RJG (RJG), Thursday, 11 January 2007 17:54 (nineteen years ago)

Get your hand off the pancake you wench!

― Latham Green (mike), Thursday, 11 January 2007 18:45 (nineteen years ago)

http://img.4chan.org/b/src/1169577285509.gif

― UART variations (ex machina), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 20:29 (nineteen years ago)

btard

― friday on the porch (lfam), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 20:37 (nineteen years ago)

imageshack.us

― trans pacific donkey cell phone (sleep), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 20:44 (nineteen years ago)

damn

― UART variations (ex machina), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 21:05 (nineteen years ago)

tripod.angelfire.pwn3d.n00b.org

― Steve Shasta (Steve Shasta), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 21:53 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.cnn.com/2007/SHOWBIZ/TV/01/25/tv.greys.anatomyfeud.ap/index.html

― UART variations (ex machina), Thursday, 25 January 2007 19:20 (nineteen years ago)

Whether Washington was receiving outpatient counseling or had entered a facility was not specified, and the statement did not indicate whether he would miss work on the show.

they have facilities for this sort of thing?

― roger goodell (gear), Thursday, 25 January 2007 19:30 (nineteen years ago)

two months pass...

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/10/business/media/10imus.html

― Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 02:37 (nineteen years ago)

Good thread-collapsing idea.

Also OMG hahaha --

I think what makes a difference, a crucial difference is: What was my intent?”

Umm ...

― nabisco, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 04:38 (nineteen years ago)

"what i'd really like to talk about is how this affects ME"

― Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 09:31 (nineteen years ago)

Sharpton always brings the roflz

― Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 15:51 (nineteen years ago)

Two weeks?

― nabisco, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 16:36 (nineteen years ago)

sharpton was pretty sharp there i thought.

― s1ocki, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 16:38 (nineteen years ago)

Unless his intent was to offend black people, women, women's sports, and rutger's university all in a few economical syllables, his intentions failed.

― kenan, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 16:39 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah two weeks. Shows you where the real clout is. Why kill the golden goose? It's just shameless. What does he have to do? Actually physically hurt one of those girls?

Sharpton's always the sharp, the guy is a true leader these days.

― Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 16:41 (nineteen years ago)

i don't have too much of an opinion on this in particular but i'm glad he's finally getting called out for being an asshole and what took so long and why have so many pols cowered to the dude?

the guy is a true leader these days

of whom/what?

― gabbneb, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 16:41 (nineteen years ago)

Imus has always been an asshole. Career-destruction couldn't happen to a more deserving guy.

― Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 16:43 (nineteen years ago)

Sharpton's "so you repent once every 10 years?" = OH SNAPS

― Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 16:43 (nineteen years ago)

hahaha Tracer this is an xpost!

Seriously, what would Imus have to add to his long history of denigrating black women to actually encounter any consequences? It's like he'd actually have to shoot Gwen Ifill before anyone did more than express disappointment.

― nabisco, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 16:43 (nineteen years ago)

cynical interpretation: sharpton's ensuring hillary doesn't have to go on the show

― gabbneb, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 16:44 (nineteen years ago)

[em]of whom/what?[/em]

his constituents?

― Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 16:46 (nineteen years ago)

bah

― Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 16:46 (nineteen years ago)

NBC will have to get that mouthbreather Chris Matthews on some other morning cavefest now.

― Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 16:48 (nineteen years ago)

gabbneb why are you playing dumb about the fact that al sharpton has constituents and is a broker for them? and when i said "true leader" i mean that the actions he urges people to take seem usually grounded in a morality that i identify with, and i think he expresses his vision convincingly

― Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 16:50 (nineteen years ago)

i'm not playing dumb, i'm being a pedant. a constituent is someone who elects/appoints someone as their agent/representative. even if you deem a non-officeholder to have constituents, i don't think there are too many people when talking about the country at large for whom al sharpton is their moral agent/representative, and for those for whom he is, it may in many cases be for only a limited rather than a general purpose, perhaps even specific to a single dispute. does he really stand out for you in the category of persons who urge others to take action from a moral base that you identify with?

― gabbneb, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 16:58 (nineteen years ago)

I really want to see the New York Times forbid Frank Rich and Maureen Dowd from going on Imus anymore, also would enjoy reading either columnist try to ~~weasal their way out of this mess~~ justify the I-man's pathetic shtick. longtime New Yorkers will remember Bob Grant and his comments about David Dinkins as washroom attendent.

on tv this am James Carville was honest enough to say that while he condemned Imus' remarks he thought Imus shouldn't be fired because his show "sells lots of books for his guests." 1 big media cluster fuck

― m coleman, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 16:59 (nineteen years ago)

first Sharpton, now Carville. what third would indicate a trend?

― gabbneb, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 17:00 (nineteen years ago)

oh, he wasn't really taking him down was he?

― gabbneb, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 17:01 (nineteen years ago)

xpost yes! i agree with sharpton more than i agree with anybody else who has ever run for president in my lifetime, for instance.

― Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 17:02 (nineteen years ago)

ok, my proposition is that you belong to a very small minority there

― gabbneb, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 17:03 (nineteen years ago)

al sharpton is an amoral opportunist and as long as he's considered a legit representative of african-americans their second-class political status in this race-challenged country won't change.

― m coleman, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 17:03 (nineteen years ago)

i agree in advance about his funny hair though. maybe it's hard to see past that.

btw you weren't being a pedant, because i hadn't even used the word "constituents" yet at that point. so um.

amoral, wow

opportunist i can see but that applies to just about every politician ever

― Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 17:04 (nineteen years ago)

its funny (okay not really) how white dudes making glaringly racist comments is just something that routinely happens in broadcasting. its like clockwork. Remember Jimmy the Greek? ("look at that monkey run!")

btw blaming Sharpton for the social position of black people seems ass-backwards to me.

x-post

― Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 17:05 (nineteen years ago)

al sharpton is an amoral opportunist and as long as he's considered a legit representative of african-americans their second-class political status in this race-challenged country won't change.

aren't you quoting someone here? I swear i've read this before. many times.

― deej, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 17:06 (nineteen years ago)

gabbneb wants very small minorities to shut up and vanish. Be a joiner!

Maybe less amoral folks should step forward on corrupt media circlejerks like the Imus Industry, then, and the Rev Al wouldn't hafta fill the vacuum.

― Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 17:08 (nineteen years ago)

btw you weren't being a pedant, because i hadn't even used the word "constituents" yet at that point. so um.

I was being a pedant about what a leader is with constituency used to illustrate in the same fashion you did.

― gabbneb, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 17:09 (nineteen years ago)

I don't blame Sharpton for that, but his being embraced by the mass media is a symptom of liberal condescension. this isn't worth discussing with me, he makes me insane, I'll never forgive him the for Tawana Brawley hoax -- set back race relations in NYC for years.

― m coleman, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 17:09 (nineteen years ago)

gabbneb wants very small minorities to shut up and vanish

pls

― gabbneb, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 17:10 (nineteen years ago)

anyway Imus' voice is so craggy and weird I'm surprised anyone can understand what the fuck he's saying

― m coleman, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 17:12 (nineteen years ago)

gabbneb surely you must acknowledge that there are leaders who are not elected (or appointed) officials

the Brawley thing is pretty inexcusable its true. that's my earliest memory of Sharpton - isn't that pretty much what got him on the national stage? I wonder what he has to say about that nowadays.

― Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 17:13 (nineteen years ago)

Rosie O'Donnell on The View this morning = "Well this guy's on the air XX hours a week for XX years, and so he said just one thing..."

Joy Behar = "~~ching chong, Rosie, ching chong~~ umm here's a LIST"

Barbara Walters = "ooo but he's so respected ooo y'all aren't serious political journalists like me, you don't understand Imus is grown up and stuff"

That younger woman whose head looks like a balloon = "he needs a time out! he should be suspended until next Black History Month!"

Me = "OMG why am I watching the beginning of The View? just finish getting dressed and go to work!"

― nabisco, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 17:15 (nineteen years ago)

gabbneb surely you must acknowledge that there are leaders who are not elected (or appointed) officials

of course, but they don't have constituents, strictly-speaking

― gabbneb, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 17:16 (nineteen years ago)

URGH I HATE ROSIE O'DONNEL SO MUCH

― Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 17:17 (nineteen years ago)

i mean, i think leadership sort of speaks for itself and can't really be called into question where it exists

― gabbneb, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 17:19 (nineteen years ago)

time wasted looking for screen cap of the Family Guy's View renedetion: 4 minutes.

― Ms Misery, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 17:20 (nineteen years ago)

I don't see how it's at all fucking possible to interpret "nappy-headed hos" as abominably racist and sexist; nor do I see how it could be construed as "humor" in any sense of the word that I understand.

― max, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 17:22 (nineteen years ago)

really

― Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 17:22 (nineteen years ago)

Skipping 1547 messages at this point... Click here if you want to load them all.

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.