Ken vs. Boris: It's So On

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1874 of them)

it was silly ... but it's as if a kind of showmanship and silliness has taken over from all else.

the pinefox, Thursday, 1 May 2008 23:48 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rh3UlZcRQrY

William Bloody Swygart, Thursday, 1 May 2008 23:51 (eighteen years ago)

"things are hotting up in blogland"

Frogman Henry, Thursday, 1 May 2008 23:52 (eighteen years ago)

Lib Dem blog commenters not down with Vine. Maitlis "distancing herself from those... blog... comments..."

William Bloody Swygart, Thursday, 1 May 2008 23:55 (eighteen years ago)

it's the drummer from blur!

DG, Friday, 2 May 2008 00:11 (eighteen years ago)

This is some crap spinning from Southampton dude, here.

William Bloody Swygart, Friday, 2 May 2008 00:17 (eighteen years ago)

Jeremy Vine is now manning a graphic whereby the best result for Gordon Brown is that he is perceived as Stalin.

William Bloody Swygart, Friday, 2 May 2008 00:22 (eighteen years ago)

BNP pick up three in Rotherham, their first ever seats in South Yorkshire.

William Bloody Swygart, Friday, 2 May 2008 00:37 (eighteen years ago)

Conservatives lose Colchester and hold Plymouth.

Is there really no Labour-controlled council in the south of England?

James Mitchell, Friday, 2 May 2008 00:45 (eighteen years ago)

Reading?

caek, Friday, 2 May 2008 01:11 (eighteen years ago)

(labour since 97)

caek, Friday, 2 May 2008 01:13 (eighteen years ago)

LOL OMFG!!!! BORIS DONE A GUFF!!!! ROFL!!!!!!! THE MAN IS A LEGERND I TELL YOU LOL!!!!! I CARNT WAIT 2 SEE HIM RUNNING THE INTIRE CITTY!

http://img216.imageshack.us/img216/4910/ptr13bo3.jpg

James Mitchell, Friday, 2 May 2008 01:50 (eighteen years ago)

bunch of kunts. boris heading for victory.

Frogman Henry, Friday, 2 May 2008 02:02 (eighteen years ago)

Lots of Toryboys on TV going "prrp prrp prrp" smugly.

I'd forgotten what THEY looked like.

Mark G, Friday, 2 May 2008 05:20 (eighteen years ago)

WTF

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7379267.stm

Ed, Friday, 2 May 2008 06:42 (eighteen years ago)

This is what we was referring to above. Not only a stupid presentation with robo Clegg graphics, but absolutely pointless in terms of content to boot.

Pete, Friday, 2 May 2008 06:56 (eighteen years ago)

Gutted to the core about the BNP in Rotherham (where I grew up) - a sad sad sad day.

This is not boding well at all for Ken, is it? Or is that the point of Ken, that he can be seen as a non-labour thing entirely with his purple campaign and generally disassociation from the party? I can only frickin hope.

Zoe Espera, Friday, 2 May 2008 07:02 (eighteen years ago)

R4 suggesting labour in third place based on the local results ... 160+ seats lost? luckily, everyone's saying: "yeh, but the tories are still cunts." (well, not in so many words at 7.30am, but you get the idea.)

labour's lost hartlepool!

grimly fiendish, Friday, 2 May 2008 07:02 (eighteen years ago)

R4 also v quiet about rotherham ... four minutes into the 8am bulletin and it's not been mentioned.

grimly fiendish, Friday, 2 May 2008 07:04 (eighteen years ago)

Can't believe I'm on this thread this early. How's life in bold new Tory Britain?

Matt DC, Friday, 2 May 2008 07:05 (eighteen years ago)

bn-cunting-p have gained 8 seats, according to BBC news website.

cameron surprisingly and mercifully unsmug about tory gains, which is something, i guess.

grimly fiendish, Friday, 2 May 2008 07:09 (eighteen years ago)

Fucking depressing (x-post)

One of the main problems Labour's now got is that business/media/anyone influential doesn't see any point in engaging with it.

With that background, trying to take forward any major policies that might make a difference will be virtually impossible for Gordon B.

Bob Six, Friday, 2 May 2008 07:10 (eighteen years ago)

Personally, I'm starting to feel precislely the opposite of whatever it was I was feeling on 2/5/1997. May have intensified considerably by dinner time.

Can v easily envisage Tories winning next gen election now.

Zoe Espera, Friday, 2 May 2008 07:12 (eighteen years ago)

I wonder if Ken wonders if he should have simply have apologised to that Standard journalist at the outset and avoided a long-term personalised campaign against him.

Bob Six, Friday, 2 May 2008 07:15 (eighteen years ago)

john humphrys to nick robinson: "so, labour will have lost london too?"

i'd like to think that's not a given; that ken transcends labour; that boris's pointlessness transcends protest voting (and indeed zany student pranking). but i fear the worst.

grimly fiendish, Friday, 2 May 2008 07:15 (eighteen years ago)

fucking stupid england.

Ned Trifle II, Friday, 2 May 2008 07:27 (eighteen years ago)

Can't believe I'm on this thread this early. How's life in bold new Tory Britain?

Same as it was yesterday.

Ned Trifle II, Friday, 2 May 2008 07:32 (eighteen years ago)

Oh good grief.

I think that's all I can manage.

a passing spacecadet, Friday, 2 May 2008 08:14 (eighteen years ago)

If voting actally changed anything, it would have been banned years ago!

Mark G, Friday, 2 May 2008 08:19 (eighteen years ago)

I just watched Vine's Shootout Saloon again and - yes, it's utterly daft - but it actually kind of impresses me, the way he remembers the script and delivers it, and keeps his silly accent as long as he has his hat on.

I'm afraid that jokes about Stalin are in terrible taste: how about graphics of Cameron as Hitler, wondering if he can make a big push? No good.

People on this thread are lamenting the (local) results, as though a Tory Britain is a terrible thing, and Labour / Lib Dem losses are sad. I agree entirely. But were you all saying the same thing for the last 10 years, or disdaining Labour and ignoring the Tory threat? Have we perhaps been complacent about the prospect that faces us now? (Not that our complacency, if it exists, makes much practical difference one way or the other.)

the pinefox, Friday, 2 May 2008 08:29 (eighteen years ago)

i've been rather more concerned about what's going on up here than in england. and, y'know, we managed to get rid of labour WITHOUT USHERING IN THE MOTHERFUCKING TORIES, for fuck's sake :)

grimly fiendish, Friday, 2 May 2008 08:33 (eighteen years ago)

also: tory "britain"? no, i don't think so.

really, as if i wasn't pro-independence enough already. fuck me, bring on the woad.

acc R4: turnout in liverpool central <10%. i'm speechless on that one.

grimly fiendish, Friday, 2 May 2008 08:34 (eighteen years ago)

If only the SNP had put forward a candidate for Mayor of London.

xp

James Mitchell, Friday, 2 May 2008 08:35 (eighteen years ago)

(in all seriousness: a tory england is one of the best selling points scottish independence could have: this has been discussed by iain macwhirter and others at some length now.)

If only the SNP had put forward a candidate for Mayor of London

i think salmond might have quite relished that, just for shits and giggles.

grimly fiendish, Friday, 2 May 2008 08:36 (eighteen years ago)

a tory england is one of the best selling points scottish independence could have

OTM. However Rangers reaching the final of the UEFA Cup might have given support for the Union a little shot in the arm.

Tom D., Friday, 2 May 2008 08:52 (eighteen years ago)

The top four recommended comments are actually scary.

James Mitchell, Friday, 2 May 2008 09:09 (eighteen years ago)

National share something like Con/LD/Lab: 44/25/24? Amazing(ly awful). I mean, you can lop off 10 from the LibDems in a General Election, maybe divvy it up 6/4 to Lab, and perhaps Con have a 3pt swing over Lab at local level, and then there's Scotland to factor in - but anyway you slice it, this maps to at least a 1979-level Tory GE win. Lot of work to do in the next two years.

Jeremy Vine stuff last night was just beyond parody. I think it may have been beyond Pluto. You can take your Day Today DVDs and throw them in the bin. They're useless now.

Michael Jones, Friday, 2 May 2008 09:10 (eighteen years ago)

Jeremy Vine = Fake Plastic Snow

Tom D., Friday, 2 May 2008 09:11 (eighteen years ago)

The top four recommended comments are actually scary.

'Socialist fascists' eh!

Ed, Friday, 2 May 2008 09:14 (eighteen years ago)

Those people on that BBC thread are the people we share a country with. Perhaps I am too often apt to forget that in a haze of fellow feeling for my compatriots.

They write so badly - it's amazing what people will happily stick online, for the world to see, under their own names.

But it's amazing that people would vote BJ, and they do, in hundreds of thousands (or is it millions)?

JOIN ME.

the pinefox, Friday, 2 May 2008 09:17 (eighteen years ago)

.. and that's a 'moderated' board.

How did that "if Ken wins, it's the biggest voting rigging scandal ever, RMugabe would be proud" comment pass, legally standing?

Mark G, Friday, 2 May 2008 09:20 (eighteen years ago)

Those BBC favourite comments give me the fear. The Bee En Pee messageboard must have coach trips there to vote anything mentioning them up, right? Ugh.

go Boris! Those of us in greater London cannot wait to see the smirk wiped off the face of Red Ken as he faces having to work for a living!

Ah, good old hard-working Boris, kicked out of a succession of first jobs (Times reporter/management consultancy - yr average working person's early-20s jobs, obviously) for reasons like "found it all terribly dull" or "oh, just make it all up, who cares?".

Er, yeah, I have to stop now or I'd be spitting bile at all of them ("aren't poor people disgusting" in same post as "oh noes 10p tax rate debacle", etc).

a passing spacecadet, Friday, 2 May 2008 09:46 (eighteen years ago)

I've long thought that 'comments', as with other communications to newspapers by readers, should be screened for spelling, grammar and general coherence before appearing in any forum of any newspaper of record.

suzy, Friday, 2 May 2008 09:48 (eighteen years ago)

by whom, and who is going to pay them?

Ed, Friday, 2 May 2008 09:49 (eighteen years ago)

Ed, newspaper sites are moderated so someone's already basically being paid to filter comments; what's wrong with spiking those which don't come up to x standard of written English, and making it clear when people register to leave comments that this is the case?

suzy, Friday, 2 May 2008 09:56 (eighteen years ago)

The fascists are probably just recommending each others comments to drive them to the top.

The last few times I've visited London, it's been wholly pleasant, I felt it would be a good place to live. Glad I don't live there now.

People on some musician's board I post on (probably take a step back from it a bit now TBH) are all "haha those thieving labour cunts deserve a good kicking" WTF GAZE INTO THE ABYSS FOOLS.

Pashmina, Friday, 2 May 2008 10:03 (eighteen years ago)

Unfortunate timing of lead review on Pitchfork.

Pete, Friday, 2 May 2008 10:19 (eighteen years ago)

Moderated yes, subedited no

xposts

Ed, Friday, 2 May 2008 10:21 (eighteen years ago)

what's wrong with spiking those which don't come up to x standard of written English

Conversely, however, that would also filter out comments from immigrants for whom English is a second language.

Dingbod Kesterson, Friday, 2 May 2008 10:22 (eighteen years ago)

I really felt like wearing a black armband today.

Dingbod Kesterson, Friday, 2 May 2008 10:23 (eighteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.