What would people buy? They all wear the same thing.
― Philip Nunez, Thursday, 10 December 2009 23:11 (sixteen years ago)
A do-it-yourself midi-chlorian kit.
― Hell is other people. In an ILE film forum. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 10 December 2009 23:15 (sixteen years ago)
My sister told me it works like an insulin injection.
"ALDERAAN... never forget"
Pretty harsh, true, but what else are they gonna do with a Death Star?
― Philip Nunez, Thursday, December 10, 2009 5:50 PM (54 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
very true - that's what people never understood about nazi concentration camps
― donde está mia farrow, fa la la la la, la la la la (s1ocki), Thursday, 10 December 2009 23:45 (sixteen years ago)
Death Star analog isn't concentration camps; it's Enola Gay.
Well it would have been if they'd won the war.
― Philip Nunez, Thursday, 10 December 2009 23:49 (sixteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FxKtZmQgxrI
― krampus activities (latebloomer), Friday, 18 December 2009 09:35 (sixteen years ago)
^^^
http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/12/17/watch-this-70-minute-video-review-of-star-wars-the-phantom-menace/
this is way too long and kind of annoying but also kind of amazing
― akira goldsman (s1ocki), Saturday, 19 December 2009 07:01 (sixteen years ago)
I turned it off after 5 minutes - is there anything worth watching in the other 65
the main thing I took away from it was that this guy has an awesome voice and I wish I could speak like that
― 囧 (dyao), Saturday, 19 December 2009 07:11 (sixteen years ago)
I just watched the whole thing, it's devastating - you should at least watch to the end of the first one before giving up. Found the guy's persona pretty annoying at first but came round to it pretty quickly.
― poster x (ledge), Saturday, 19 December 2009 10:25 (sixteen years ago)
haha I just gave this a second chance and now that I'm getting a sense of his attitude it is getting better (also helps by keeping it on the background while I waste time on ilx)
― =皿= (dyao), Saturday, 19 December 2009 11:20 (sixteen years ago)
lool at the basement scene
― =皿= (dyao), Saturday, 19 December 2009 11:25 (sixteen years ago)
amazingly funny line-for-line considering how long it is
― jabba hands, Saturday, 19 December 2009 11:33 (sixteen years ago)
the slashfilm article treats this like found art
― abanana, Saturday, 19 December 2009 12:57 (sixteen years ago)
How come every fucking scene in these movies involves someone standing in front of a window with a million fucking things happening in the background.― Your heartbeat soun like sasquatch feet (polyphonic), Wednesday, July 15, 2009 2:22 PM Bookmark
― Your heartbeat soun like sasquatch feet (polyphonic), Wednesday, July 15, 2009 2:22 PM Bookmark
^^ this is one of those posts where, after you've read it, you can never see the movies in the same way again. So OTM it's not funny.
― Doctor Casino, Thursday, 24 December 2009 14:50 (sixteen years ago)
watching the long review - - similar to Angry Video Game Nerd it kinda drags when he's trying to be funny external to the movies....but when he's just going on and on dissecting in detail all the inane crap that adds up to the boring pointlessness of the movie, the LOLs kinda just rack up.
― Doctor Casino, Friday, 25 December 2009 07:13 (sixteen years ago)
The Times quoted an associate of George Lucas, saying the Star Wars director will spend $10 million to update his 1977 movie into 3-D.
“George cannot leave it alone,” said the unnamed source. “He is salivating at the opportunity to play with it again. This time the Death Star is really going to explode all over the audience and leave them gasping.”
― CATBEAST 7777 (ledge), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 16:19 (sixteen years ago)
gross
― living like the Na'vi will never happen (HI DERE), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 16:19 (sixteen years ago)
explode all over the audience and leave them gasping.
― NotEnough, Tuesday, 12 January 2010 16:27 (sixteen years ago)
He is salivating at the opportunity to play with it again.
Well, there you go.
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 12 January 2010 16:27 (sixteen years ago)
http://sur-net.com/www/coollinks/images/GALLAGHER.gif
― ┌∩┐(◕_◕)┌∩┐ (Steve Shasta), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 16:31 (sixteen years ago)
After a few years of complying with Gallagher’s conditions, Ron began blurring the line between his act and that of his brother. He would often promote his act as “Gallagher Too,” a moniker Gallagher felt was insufficiently informative. In some instances, Ron’s act was promoted in a way that provided no clue to prospective attendees that they were seeing someone other than Gallagher himself.Gallagher initially attempted to get his brother to stop these activities by requesting that he stop using Gallagher’s well-known Sledge-O-Matic routine. These efforts proved futile, and Ron kept touring as “Gallagher Too” (often spelled "Gallagher Two") while using the Sledge-O-Matic routine his older brother had made famous. In August 2000 Gallagher sued his brother for trademark violations and false advertising. The courts ultimately sided with Leo Gallagher, and an injunction was granted prohibiting Ron from performing any act that impersonates his brother in small clubs and venues.
― Who Makes the Na'vis? (s1ocki), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 17:03 (sixteen years ago)
Yeah, but it's Noel who really got screwed - i mean his act is nothing without the Sledge-o-Matic.
― Doctor Casino, Tuesday, 12 January 2010 20:49 (sixteen years ago)
seriously will someone send Lucas a neverending stream of hookers so that he will be too tired to continue ruining the original Star Wars movies
― living like the Na'vi will never happen (HI DERE), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 20:53 (sixteen years ago)
with our luck the new 3-D Star Wars will have 3-D hookers
― that sex version of "blue thunder." (Mr. Que), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 20:55 (sixteen years ago)
this 3-d version is gonna put the "oo!" in tatooine"!
― da croupier, Tuesday, 12 January 2010 20:57 (sixteen years ago)
makes me wonder who will carry on George's legacy of endlessly remaking Star Wars after he's gone
― shake hands with Gongo? (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 20:58 (sixteen years ago)
ihttp://scrapetv.com/News/News%20Pages/Entertainment/Images/michael-bay.jpg
only 44
― da croupier, Tuesday, 12 January 2010 20:59 (sixteen years ago)
this is roxxxy, she will escort you to your seat
http://www.bestweekever.tv/bwe/images/2010/01/worlds-first-sex-robot.jpg
― 鬼の手 (Edward III), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 21:00 (sixteen years ago)
Whoa -- Lucas is inserting Justice Kennedy into his new 3-D sploogefest?
― Hell is other people. In an ILE film forum. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 21:00 (sixteen years ago)
i meant 3-D jawa hookers
― that sex version of "blue thunder." (Mr. Que), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 21:00 (sixteen years ago)
oh that's not creepy at all
if I were Karen O I would be constantly looking over my sholder for that dude
― living like the Na'vi will never happen (HI DERE), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 21:01 (sixteen years ago)
lolz Alfred you are WAY too into the supreme court
― shake hands with Gongo? (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 21:01 (sixteen years ago)
with our luck the new 3-D Star Wars will have 3-D hookers?
http://blogs.laweekly.com/westcoastsound/Star%20Wars%20Girls_-40-1.jpg
― Sebastian (Royal Mermaid Mover), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 21:01 (sixteen years ago)
is that the droid i'm looking for or are you just happy to see me?
― da croupier, Tuesday, 12 January 2010 21:02 (sixteen years ago)
still roffling at freudian PR
― 鬼の手 (Edward III), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 21:07 (sixteen years ago)
will this settle the debate once and for all of who shot first
― dyao, Wednesday, 13 January 2010 02:39 (sixteen years ago)
good god that sex doll looks like an old friend of mine. creepy!
― la última intimidad (latebloomer), Wednesday, 13 January 2010 04:23 (sixteen years ago)
"old friend"
― nutrition na'vi (s1ocki), Wednesday, 13 January 2010 04:33 (sixteen years ago)
hahaha
― la última intimidad (latebloomer), Wednesday, 13 January 2010 06:25 (sixteen years ago)
The sex doll's on the left, latebloomer.
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 13 January 2010 06:33 (sixteen years ago)
http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/filmblog/2010/jan/28/star-wars-george-lucas-avatar
― piscesx, Thursday, 28 January 2010 21:00 (sixteen years ago)
I don't understand how the success of Avatar is a demonstration of how 1977 Star Wars can be made 3D. They had to invent new cameras and shit for Avatar; is GL planning on reshooting the entire series again or something?
If not, I'm trying to think of how you could make it all 3D. In at least the first 3 films I think you could pull of a 2.5D. Certainly the effects shots would be doable and in most shots you could simply cut out the actors and backgrounds and have them on separate planes. He could even re-create in 3D CGI all the backgrounds in the original series and place the actors over those, also ala 2.5D, but a true 3D experience derived from 2D would be impossible.
Not even with all of Lucas's money.
― Adam Bruneau, Thursday, 28 January 2010 23:49 (sixteen years ago)
is GL planning on reshooting the entire series again or something?
don't give him any ideas
― The Tommy Westphall Universe Hypothesis (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 28 January 2010 23:50 (sixteen years ago)
in fact, please take away all the ideas he has now and lock them in a box and then set that box on fire and throw the ashes into the ocean
There's talk of 3d Raiders and Titanic too. I don't get how it works, either. I guess you could take the 2d images and then just guess at their 3d shape? Seems like it would end up wonky.
― Matt Armstrong, Friday, 29 January 2010 00:15 (sixteen years ago)
has to be said despite everything, 3-D Raiders = yum!
― piscesx, Friday, 29 January 2010 01:25 (sixteen years ago)
I would rather him gussy up his old bullshit instead of making new abominations.
― Your body is a spiderland (polyphonic), Friday, 29 January 2010 01:30 (sixteen years ago)
But for chronic tinkerer Lucas, old bullshit becomes new abominations.
― Blue Fucks Like Ben Nelson (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 29 January 2010 01:32 (sixteen years ago)
Sorry to be the one to break this to you, then:
http://ca.reuters.com/article/entertainmentNews/idCATRE60R19C20100128
In short: he's making a 3D CGI musical about fairies
― Adam Bruneau, Friday, 29 January 2010 01:34 (sixteen years ago)
Anyone see the 3D Toy Story re-releases? They're meant to look pretty good although not as good as dedicated 3D.
― Number None, Friday, 29 January 2010 01:47 (sixteen years ago)