Don't like people who can actively ignore/feel proud for not reading 'real' literature and yet will spend many a day re-reading Twilight or Chucky P. If you have Fight Club in with a bunch of other novels tho, then ok, good for you. Or if you just don't know where to start with something to read and Fight Club/Twilight is just something a friend recommended you like, I'm alright with that. It's the especially ignorant cunts I can't deal with.
― adorable cheese inscription (a hoy hoy), Tuesday, 8 December 2009 11:36 (sixteen years ago)
Nu-crush: I re-met someone on okc that I met IRL two years ago. Uhhhhhmm. Yeah.
― WHY DON'T YOU JUST LICK THE BUS DIRECTLY (Laurel), Friday, 25 December 2009 02:29 (sixteen years ago)
ooh, someone you liked then?
the last straw for me was actually finding someone on OKC whom i'd met IRL through friends and gone on a pretty awkward date with, i was like "OH NO he can SEE ME!" and decided it was about time to disable my profile. i do not have the stomach for online dating at this point in my life, i am better off brazenly hitting on people when drunk.
― Maria, Friday, 25 December 2009 03:54 (sixteen years ago)
Y.
― WHY DON'T YOU JUST LICK THE BUS DIRECTLY (Laurel), Friday, 25 December 2009 04:15 (sixteen years ago)
risk of seeing ppl one knows in real life om okcupid kinda freaks me out tbh. like once i sent a girl a message and it was killy. o-O
― ian, Wednesday, November 4, 2009 2:17 AM (1 month ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
did her status not say she had a boyfriend??
― quaq quao, sweetie (electricsound), Wednesday, November 4, 2009 2:20 AM (1 month ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
she was single iirc
― ian, Wednesday, November 4, 2009 2:23 AM (1 month ago) Bookmark
― ian, Friday, 25 December 2009 04:28 (sixteen years ago)
He wasn't single then, but he is now!
― WHY DON'T YOU JUST LICK THE BUS DIRECTLY (Laurel), Friday, 25 December 2009 04:40 (sixteen years ago)
you should go for it, L.
― ian, Friday, 25 December 2009 05:53 (sixteen years ago)
OKC is confusing me at present.
― uttery cuntery (acoleuthic), Friday, 25 December 2009 06:19 (sixteen years ago)
Either I'm ultra-picky right now with OKC or the pool has shrunk dramatically.
― ljubljana, Friday, 25 December 2009 08:35 (sixteen years ago)
Maybe it's a spring/summer thing. What action there's been of late has been with a nice lass whom I met there but who's deleted her profile. I think it's not a good time of year for internet dating. You'd think it'd be great what with everyone spending more time indoors and perhaps more inclined to actively seek human company rather than let it happen organically but no. Even my own date-drive is down, slightly.
The lesson here is that SAD is a thing, basically.
― uttery cuntery (acoleuthic), Friday, 25 December 2009 08:58 (sixteen years ago)
that is kinda true, holidays make people feel frazzled and spring makes people (well, me) very antsy. maybe even january will be an improvement?
laurel you should get back in touch with the guy, maybe having met before will make things easier
― Maria, Friday, 25 December 2009 19:29 (sixteen years ago)
I did already! It was kissy. Will go out with again when I get back.
― WHY DON'T YOU JUST LICK THE BUS DIRECTLY (Laurel), Friday, 25 December 2009 21:55 (sixteen years ago)
ooooooooooooh!!!
― Maria, Friday, 25 December 2009 22:04 (sixteen years ago)
there are good people on this site...for definite
― I see what this is (Local Garda), Friday, 25 December 2009 22:32 (sixteen years ago)
Ty, Ian & Maria! Counting down the days to flying back, actually. I am such a sucker for wuv.
― WHY DON'T YOU JUST LICK THE BUS DIRECTLY (Laurel), Saturday, 26 December 2009 00:03 (sixteen years ago)
"Kissy"!! <3
― drinking coke in the kitchen with a kid that doesnt know his n (sunny successor), Thursday, 31 December 2009 08:08 (sixteen years ago)
http://i50.tinypic.com/2yunf6a.jpg
― Cunga, Sunday, 3 January 2010 02:53 (sixteen years ago)
― Cunga, Sunday, 3 January 2010 02:54 (sixteen years ago)
lollllll
― t(o_o)t (ENBB), Sunday, 3 January 2010 02:54 (sixteen years ago)
I just found that in a big picture thread on another forum, coincidentally the same page had a funny picture/ad about Tim Finney o_0
― Cunga, Sunday, 3 January 2010 03:10 (sixteen years ago)
"mommy can't have a job anymore, daycare is not part of daddy's fantasy life"
― Maria, Monday, 4 January 2010 03:46 (sixteen years ago)
oh god, that picture lol
------------------------
Either I'm ultra-picky right now with OKC or the pool has shrunk dramatically.― ljubljana, Friday, December 25, 2009 8:35 AM (1 week ago) Bookmark
the pool sucks - always has - and you're probably pickybut I bet straight girls probably have a larger pool to choose from than straight guys
but single people really oughta try online dating more often if only to fill the poolbecause quiet folk don't really get much of a chance to meet someone irl anyways let alone someone compatiblenot to mention that after college you don't really have those ample opportunities to join clubs or whatever
― voluptuous velociraptor rapture (CaptainLorax), Monday, 4 January 2010 04:46 (sixteen years ago)
not to mention that after college you don't really have those ample opportunities to join clubs or whatever
that's not entirely true.
― sarahel, Monday, 4 January 2010 04:50 (sixteen years ago)
"it's easier when you're in college" applies to a lot of social activities.
― Cunga, Monday, 4 January 2010 05:12 (sixteen years ago)
also outside of college, a pilates class would probably have a greater age disparity, and as people get older more and more of them are already taken
― voluptuous velociraptor rapture (CaptainLorax), Monday, 4 January 2010 05:16 (sixteen years ago)
I would have much rather done yoga at college than with the randoms from my suburb. I miss Athens
― voluptuous velociraptor rapture (CaptainLorax), Monday, 4 January 2010 05:18 (sixteen years ago)
wait, Lorax, which Athens? I did my idyllic undergrad-and-on-from-there years in Athens GA.
― Doctor Casino, Monday, 4 January 2010 05:34 (sixteen years ago)
I'm an UGA Alumni in Statistics, go dawgs!
When I go on okcupid I browse the Athens area code as well as my home.I just sent a normal letter to a really interesting person in Atlanta (25 minutes away from home). Hopefully I will get a letter back. That would be pleasant.
― voluptuous velociraptor rapture (CaptainLorax), Monday, 4 January 2010 06:36 (sixteen years ago)
I will be unsubscribing from all this dating services because it worked. Feeling quietly yay about it.
― WHY DON'T YOU JUST LICK THE BUS DIRECTLY (Laurel), Monday, 4 January 2010 14:18 (sixteen years ago)
wd!
― Electric Universe (wherever that is) (acoleuthic), Monday, 4 January 2010 14:22 (sixteen years ago)
Aw, L :D
― t(o_o)t (ENBB), Monday, 4 January 2010 14:26 (sixteen years ago)
Dating site for beautiful people expels 'fatties' after holiday weight gainhttp://www.cnn.com/2010/LIVING/personal/01/04/dating.site.overweight/index.html
― bnw, Tuesday, 5 January 2010 03:07 (sixteen years ago)
http://blog.okcupid.com/index.php/2010/01/20/the-4-big-myths-of-profile-pictures/ This has some good moments.
― Doctor Casino, Saturday, 23 January 2010 00:05 (sixteen years ago)
http://cdn.okcimg.com/blog/four_myths/outdoors_vs_cleavage.png
I mean, even just the IDEA of making such a graph - I've always loved how proudly they show off the incredibly stat-nerdy behind the scenes stuff on this site.
― Doctor Casino, Saturday, 23 January 2010 00:08 (sixteen years ago)
Great link, Dr.
And I never thought I'd see a graph with "body + cleavage pics" being measured either
― Cunga, Saturday, 23 January 2010 00:30 (sixteen years ago)
Of course, we wouldn’t recommend that you meet someone in person without first seeing a full photo of them, that still seems like a recipe for disaster.
Doing this next week.
― Jblujlama (ljubljana), Saturday, 23 January 2010 01:14 (sixteen years ago)
and yet the stats nerdery involves shit like this:
We then lopped the most and least attractive members of the pool, fearing that they would skew our results. So all the data in this post is for “average-looking people;” here’s a graphical representation of that concept for the female pool.
http://cdn.okcimg.com/blog/four_myths/decent_women.png
graphing your personal opinion just makes statistics about your personal opinion, the pretension to objectivity here kills me!
― Maria, Saturday, 23 January 2010 01:18 (sixteen years ago)
Don't they use the personal opinions of their male cohort - i.e. those 'star' attractiveness ratings?
― Jblujlama (ljubljana), Saturday, 23 January 2010 01:25 (sixteen years ago)
lol okcupid
you can log out any time you like but you can never leave
― your favorite toy dinosaur ruined my asshole (acoleuthic), Saturday, 23 January 2010 01:39 (sixteen years ago)
Yeah, I think ljub is right - the "attractiveness" stat is generated from user behavior.
The thing to bitch about with this study is its heterosexist bias. I mean it's just taken from the get-go as a male+female coupling thing.
― Doctor Casino, Saturday, 23 January 2010 01:48 (sixteen years ago)
^^^truth. also it doesn't seem to take into account the possible behaviours of people who take 'myspace shots' - they might be more forthcoming
lol there i go with my stereotypes
i mean there's something to be said for that study, but i'd say it's largely bleeding obvious or irrelevant
― your favorite toy dinosaur ruined my asshole (acoleuthic), Saturday, 23 January 2010 01:50 (sixteen years ago)
Dr C otm. I didn't even think about that :-(
― Jblujlama (ljubljana), Saturday, 23 January 2010 02:04 (sixteen years ago)
and why did I say male cohort? Clearly I think this site and study were designed to help me out personally.
― Jblujlama (ljubljana), Saturday, 23 January 2010 02:14 (sixteen years ago)
you meant consort, clearly
― your favorite toy dinosaur ruined my asshole (acoleuthic), Saturday, 23 January 2010 02:15 (sixteen years ago)
ahahah
― Jblujlama (ljubljana), Saturday, 23 January 2010 02:53 (sixteen years ago)
http://blog.okcupid.com/index.php/2010/02/16/the-case-for-an-older-woman/
^^^ this one is way better
http://cdn.okcimg.com/blog/older_lover/Male-Match-Prefs.png
As you can see, a man, as he gets older, searches for relatively younger and younger women. Meanwhile his upper acceptable limit hovers only a token amount above his own age. The median 31 year-old guy, for example, sets his allowable match age range from 22 to 35—nine years younger, but only four years older, than himself. This skewed mindset worsens with age; the median 42 year-old will accept a woman up to fifteen years younger, but no more than three years older.
http://cdn.okcimg.com/blog/older_lover/Male-Msg-Prefs.png
This next graph is what's called a heat map. It shows messaging concentrations by age; for each vertical age bracket, the greenest areas have the most messages, the reddest have the fewest, and the yellow have the average. As you can see, men tend to focus on the youngest women in their already skewed preference pool, and, what's more, they spend a significant amount of energy pursuing women even younger than their stated minimum. No matter what he's telling himself on his setting page, a 30 year-old man spends as much time messaging 18 and 19 year-olds as he does women his own age. On the other hand, women only a few years older are largely neglected.
― Doctor Casino, Friday, 19 February 2010 14:04 (sixteen years ago)
omg, the sexual peak slider map is awesome
― Doctor Casino, Friday, 19 February 2010 14:08 (sixteen years ago)
that is an astounding page, Dr C
― Tracer Hand, Friday, 19 February 2010 14:16 (sixteen years ago)
yeah, pretty interesting.
intended audience clearly not well-established career men searching for nubile young things to bear their children though.
― Maria, Saturday, 20 February 2010 17:06 (sixteen years ago)
http://www.okcupid.com/profile/fofomag?cf=regular
― Tracer Hand, Saturday, 20 February 2010 23:05 (sixteen years ago)