― Ed (dali), Friday, 2 May 2003 21:09 (twenty-three years ago)
My point's simply that it's alloted based on what you or "your family" can afford; the more you have, the less you get.
― nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 2 May 2003 21:20 (twenty-three years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 2 May 2003 21:25 (twenty-three years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 2 May 2003 22:40 (twenty-three years ago)
I'm not following, nabisco -- if it's something obvious, blame the heavy drinking I've done today/tonight. Not everyone who went to Hampshire was a wealthy kid -- the ones who got the major aid, for instance, weren't. Hampshire's essential approach was to sprinkle small amounts of work-study over a large portion of the student body, and then to take a small number of kids from non-wealthy families and give them full- or close-to-full scholarships. That way they could point both to "oh, 75% of our students have financial aid" and "we gave out such-and-such number of full scholarships last year," even while the bulk of the student body was paying tuition, room, board, and expenses out of pocket.
It's a large reason why the freshman attrition rate was as high as two-thirds.
― Tep (ktepi), Saturday, 3 May 2003 03:13 (twenty-three years ago)
no offense, Nabisco, I like you and yer posts generally ... but the above is pretty darn ignorant. the above is only true only if you went to one of the top law schools (like Harvard, Yale, Stanford, or Chicago) -- if you went anywhere else, and didn't graduate in the top 10% of yer class and/or got onto law review, the law firms that pay top dollar nowadays will tell you to go pound sand. i went to an OK public law school, did OK but not spectacular (i.e., graduated top half of class and made a journal), graduated when the market was still hot, i didn't get a job with any Wall Street/Big Law firm, and i don't make anywhere near what folks in those firms make. nor do most freshly-minted attorneys.
― Tad (llamasfur), Saturday, 3 May 2003 03:32 (twenty-three years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Saturday, 3 May 2003 03:59 (twenty-three years ago)
While I was earning my economics degree, for the first two years of my college education, I went to a private, "well-regarded" university (I don't know how truly well-regarded it is -- it was Trinity University, fyi). Then, when the loans multiplied so scarily fast that I didn't see myself catching up to them in the five year period I had set up at the beginning, and when my dad's health started deteriorating to the point where I was starting to be responsible for a hell of a lot of things, I finished up my degree at a public university (the University of Texas at San Antonio). Well, what I found was that the education I got at the private institution was really not that top-notch, and I actually had better professors, better facilities, and a generally better education at the public university.
Just to break it all down to you: The tuition at the private university I was attending was $20,000/year. I got a scholarship at the end of my high school career that covered half that tuition, while a series of loans I took out paid for the rest. It's simple math really -- I owed $20,000 by the time I transfered to a public university. Tuition at the public university was $2,000/year. In exchange for taking special care of my father, my parents paid for the tuition as we went along (and my family's not wealthy -- we're probably on the borderline between "working class" and "middle class", so it's not as though I was being spoiled by this, and besides, I decided to be a commuter student because I had to stay in a dorm for the first year of college and it sucked).
I have a job that could be considered a career now, so with the money I'm earning I can pay off my student loans and help out with utilities around the house. (I'm still living here because my mother certainly couldn't take care of my father alone and I'm not about to do what's expected of me by society and leave my parents in the lurch. Besides, it allows me to save bigtime money-wise and thus be able to tackle my student loans, which in just one year are already halfway paid off.) What I'm discovering right now, being Out There in the Real World, is that most employers don't really care that much where you graduate from. What they look for is whether the school's accredited by the usual suspects, what your GPA is/was, what your extracurricular activities was (so thank God my private university had us do volunteer work and my public university had a couple of organizations I got involved with). I know that when the HR director at my job looked at my collegiate history, she was more impressed with my GPA than with my choice of college.
I think that if you're looking out for your finances while you pursue the dream of higher education, you should stick with a good public university or a less expensive private university, and make sure you get really good grades. Then, when finding a place of employment, search for one that will pay for a graduate education, and go to a good school then. I'm going with a degree that has more of a chance to earn me more money and that I somehow feel is more suited to me (the computer science degree), but while I'm an undergrad I'm quite happy to go to a public university. However, it would be very nice to earn my master's at MIT or Stanford, so that's what I'll be angling for, and I'm convinced I will be able to swing it when the time comes. Hopefully my mother can come with me wherever I go, so I can help take care of her (her health is fairly bad, too).
Or you could take out multiple loans to go to wherever you want to go to. Whichever, really. It depends on how much you want to work to get your degree. And believe me, those people who goof off during college and don't take education seriously will really suffer in the long run. As one of my old advisors said, "You can either choose to have fun for four years and work hard for the rest of your life, or work hard for four years and have fun for the rest of your life."
― Dee the Calmer, Less Insistent Lurker (Dee the Lurker), Saturday, 3 May 2003 17:30 (twenty-three years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 3 May 2003 18:37 (twenty-three years ago)
I really can't contribute anything to this discussion in practical terms -- my parents set aside college money for me starting at birth, and a combination of regular payments to the fund and some shrewd investing meant my entire experience at UCLA was paid for and then some, as I also received some academic scholarships as well. My graduate experience was covered by a four-year fellowship that handled all costs and guaranteed TA work as well; it was when this ended, in combination with other reasons, that I realized the academic life just wasn't one for me, and so I left rather than accumulate debt in pursuit of something that was driving me nuts. I may not be getting the high-flying job or anything, but I am comfortable, I can indulge myself as needed and I have no debt hanging over my head from schooldays -- but I also realize that this was initially as a result of a combination of particular factors that I had no control over, and I am grateful for it. Some of the stories I've read here just plain anger me, the more so because people I consider friends are suffering as a result.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 3 May 2003 18:44 (twenty-three years ago)
At any length... *hugs*, and Ned, your parents were s-m-a-r-t.
Delurking a bit more now, obv.
― Dee the Sensitive Semi-Lurker (Dee the Lurker), Sunday, 4 May 2003 01:04 (twenty-three years ago)
I think student loans suck ass in general. Only if you pay more than what the statements say you owe can you actually find anything advantageous about them.
I didn't qualify for jack when it came to financial aid the first go around. All I had to pay the tuition were my scholarship and the loans I took out. I found that only the super-poor and those who knew how to work the system (e.g. lying on their tax returns) got all the benefits. Maybe some of you who've posted before could've qualified for a lot more than what you're getting. Ally, you seem to me to be an individual who would qualify for tons of stuff, if not now, then a bit later. There are tons of scholarships out there -- get someone in the financial aid office on your side! I had a good friend in financial aid who found for me some loans with low interest rates. (It was the best she could do for me at the time.)
I'm not bitter about any of it, though. I value my education now, and would choose a degree over no loans any day of the week.
*hugs to everyone*
― Dee the Sensitive Semi-Lurker (Dee the Lurker), Sunday, 4 May 2003 01:15 (twenty-three years ago)
I must confess that my parents had a college fund for me too, but they blew it all on furniture when I was 6. Oh, we'll pay it back some day. And then they got a divorce. So, maybe if they hadn't bought that furniture and had stayed together, I would have been one of those kids whose parents paid their way. Life's just funny like that.
― Sarah McLUsky (coco), Monday, 5 May 2003 12:07 (twenty-three years ago)
So, whatever else you do, I'd say pay them as much as you possibly can while you're attending. It also made me study much harder as screwing up a class doesn't seem real practical when you know that each class session is actively costing you two hundred and fifty dollars.
― J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Monday, 5 May 2003 12:22 (twenty-three years ago)
― Sarah McLusky (coco), Monday, 5 May 2003 12:29 (twenty-three years ago)
Anyway, back to the discussion of student loans. I'm still waiting to hear from Eugene Lang to see what the damage is going to be... I can hardly stand the anticipation.
― justin s., Monday, 5 May 2003 20:26 (twenty-three years ago)
― justin s., Monday, 5 May 2003 20:27 (twenty-three years ago)
― Tad (llamasfur), Monday, 5 May 2003 21:43 (twenty-three years ago)
― Mary (Mary), Tuesday, 6 May 2003 21:13 (twenty-three years ago)
― Maria (Maria), Tuesday, 6 May 2003 22:01 (twenty-three years ago)
― justin s., Wednesday, 7 May 2003 03:27 (twenty-three years ago)
― Mary (Mary), Wednesday, 7 May 2003 03:58 (twenty-three years ago)
― gareth (gareth), Thursday, 31 July 2003 13:02 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 31 July 2003 13:05 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ally (mlescaut), Thursday, 31 July 2003 13:12 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sarah McLUsky (coco), Thursday, 31 July 2003 14:32 (twenty-two years ago)
― Mary (Mary), Thursday, 31 July 2003 14:59 (twenty-two years ago)
― Orbit (Orbit), Thursday, 31 July 2003 16:29 (twenty-two years ago)
I've deferred the hell out of mine. Course, all I want to do is keep consolidation, then give them a huge check. While watching their faces drop in shock.
― Nichole Graham (Nichole Graham), Thursday, 31 July 2003 22:39 (twenty-two years ago)
― Matt (Matt), Friday, 1 August 2003 00:17 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tad (llamasfur), Friday, 1 August 2003 00:52 (twenty-two years ago)
i know it has been a long time ago, but as i read your comments,ithink back when my husband and i first started. we thought whenwe finally made 10k a year, we were rich. i wish we had the opportunites that you young people have today. the information isout there, read, research, talk to successful people. own up toyour responsibilites. you made the debt, pay it. stop whinning.
― Doris H. Daniel, Thursday, 13 May 2004 03:41 (twenty-two years ago)
― @d@ml (nordicskilla), Monday, 24 May 2004 22:20 (twenty-two years ago)
does "refinancing" just mean getting a consolidation loan? If you do this, can you still defer if you lose your job? who is the best person to do this through, or are they all basically the same (ie: what is the difference b/w salle mae, direct loans (government run) and collegeloans.com?)
sorry for all the questions.
― kyle (akmonday), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 17:00 (twenty-one years ago)
My loans are gonna default in a few weeeks because then it will be 270 days past due.
― ian, Monday, 30 July 2007 21:50 (eighteen years ago)
dude get one (1) forbearance, otherwise it'll be a pain in the ass
― daria-g, Monday, 30 July 2007 22:14 (eighteen years ago)
i don't think you can get a forebearance for longer than 6 months
― remy bean, Monday, 30 July 2007 23:14 (eighteen years ago)
Not true at all -- there are lots of forbearance types, lots of them up to 12 months, depending on your lender.
I doubt Ian would be sharing this bummer if he hadn't exhausted most of the obvious options, so there's not much to say except that that REALLY sucks, and I'm REALLY sorry...
...but on the other hand, dude, don't let it happen! Defaulting on a student loan will screw you thoroughly and for a long time, practically like a minor bankruptcy. Like potential wage-garnishing, can't get certain jobs in certain states, credit-fucked, can't apply for loans for any future schooling, government won't give you any money (even your tax refunds), royally screwed, PLUS -- more serious than any of that -- you'll suddenly owe the entire balance of your loans on a pay-right-now COLLECTION basis, so in addition to the original credit-screwing, you'll also have collection agencies calling you up and demanding what I assume will be thousands of dollars on the spot.
That probably doesn't help with the bummer, so, you know ... that so sucks!
Okay, but dude: seriously, spend every second of the next two weeks bugging and begging the crap out of everyone involved to avoid it! They're actually pretty helpful with keeping you from defaulting, in part because they don't want to sell your debt at a loss, and in part because the law makes them be. So:
1) go after ANY forbearance time you have left, even if it's only a few months -- that still sets back the clock on default 2) see if you have any options with consolidating the debt off to another lender, even if it's kind of a crap deal -- you're WAY better off starting over on worse terms than defaulting! and I'm guessing your mailbox is stuffed full of offers: check to see if any of them aren't too skeezy 3) your mailbox is probably also full of letters from student assistance non-profits. call every one of them and see what they can do for you.
Honestly, if you set aside a weekday and spend the entire day on the phone calling everyone you possibly can ... you will spend a lot of time on hold and maybe have to swallow a shit interest rate, but I'm pretty confident you can keep from defaulting! Just don't get all stressed out and figure you're screwed -- I've kinda screwed myself up assuming that in the past, but if you just keep on everyone's ass, you can get out of it.
P.S. Thank you for reminding me to double-check that my stuff is in order!
― nabisco, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 00:30 (eighteen years ago)
PPS -- Sorry, I said COLLECTION agencies, but that may not actually be true, and instead you will have THE GOVERNMENT on your ass about this stuff. I do not know exactly how it works, and I don't ever want to know exactly how it works, and I don't ever want YOU to know how it works, seriously.
― nabisco, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 00:32 (eighteen years ago)
ian: IF you can, can you make at least ONE payment to them by the deadline? i am not entirely sure if this is so, but if you can do that then that MAY delay the loan servicer from defaulting (for another month, perhaps).
― Eisbaer, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 03:07 (eighteen years ago)
nabisco... (you guessed it) otm!
there is usually something you can do. if you call them and explain and show that you would like to work something out so they eventually get paid, they should work with you. i don't have firsthand experience with this exact situation, but i think they are generally willing to help when you step forward and ask what you can do to keep this from getting worse.
― tehresa, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 03:20 (eighteen years ago)
all that scary forbearance/loan collection stuff doesn't apply to people in the uk does it?
is it worth signing this: http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/student-loans-98/ or would i just be wasting my time? i mean, do online petitions ever achieve anything and does the premise of this petition have any basis in law?
― NI, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 14:57 (eighteen years ago)
one of the best days of my life was the day the nz government decided to make student loans interest-free (about 2 years ago, i think). there are conditions - they only remain interest-free if you live in nz. but my loan was skyrocketing with interest, esp because the first time round i didn't qualify for an allowance, and my parents could in no way afford to help me out. the second time, when i went back at 23, i qualified for an 'independent circumstances' allowance which made my life a whole lot easier.
i'm basically just living in denial of the $35-40k loan i'm going to one day have to repay.
― Rubyredd, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 15:13 (eighteen years ago)
just in case anyone was wondering, i dropped a check in the mail today for about half the amnt owed. i sold most of my remaining CDs. e_e
― ian, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 17:47 (eighteen years ago)
i think i'm gonna pay mine off within the next 18 months - that'd be ten years after graduating by then.
― blueski, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 17:50 (eighteen years ago)
Congrats, Ian. You're better off.
Umm, also: where are you getting decent money for used CDs? I'm tempted to sell off a whole stack of mine, mostly because I've become SO LAZY that instead of getting up from my computer and spending 10 minutes finding an album on the shelf, I tend to just download it.
― nabisco, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 17:55 (eighteen years ago)
i sold em to the store i work at. academy in williamsburg. we don't really pay particularly more for CDs than anywhere else. they're not really our main source of business and we only have limited space. academy on 18th street might be better suited to your needs.
― ian, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 18:12 (eighteen years ago)
ian: does your loan servicer offer income-contingent/sensitive repayment plans? if they do then it won't solve your problem with any payments that you have already missed, but it MAY help with future payments.
― Eisbaer, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 18:23 (eighteen years ago)
I paid mine off last month, fantastic.
Worst experience was when I was teaching. The state legislature offered to wipe clean all the loans of teachers in schools like ours (bad ones). However, there was one year when if you had originally received your loan you were shut out. (something to do with the legislature not approving funding that year.) Guess when I had gotten mine?
― Ms Misery, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 18:25 (eighteen years ago)
xpost: they're sending me some forms to fill out to see if i qualify for any kind of low scheduled payment plan. but i am not optimistic cuz i make more than 1100/month.
i really have no excuse for this, and i vow never to get this far behind my payments EVAR again.
― ian, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 18:27 (eighteen years ago)