up was more inventive, more imaginative and more cinematic in pretty much every single respect than FMF, whether you prefer WA's taste in clothing and fonts or not
― mod only knows who i'd ban without u (s1ocki), Monday, 7 December 2009 06:06 (sixteen years ago)
no i pretty much just enjoy anderson's taste in clothing and fonts
agree about up being, well ... being none of the things you mention, but it was much more moving than the fantastic mr. fox, which flirted with a lot of ache but never dove into it headfirst. foxes being all sly like that. if up's villain and third act had been as strong as the rest, i'd probably rate it the best animated film of the year.
― a dimension that can only be accessed through self-immolation (contenderizer), Monday, 7 December 2009 06:30 (sixteen years ago)
loved up's 3rd act, but by then the story had got so structurally and tonally incoherent that i was pretty much just enjoying the roller-coaster value.
― a dimension that can only be accessed through self-immolation (contenderizer), Monday, 7 December 2009 06:31 (sixteen years ago)
Because we're now just spouting off subjectivisms, FMF is just straight up more entertaining than Up and that's it and that's all.
― really senile old crap shit (Eric H.), Monday, 7 December 2009 06:31 (sixteen years ago)
my subjectivisms are elevated by lucid reasoning and good taste. so they're different from other people's.
― a dimension that can only be accessed through self-immolation (contenderizer), Monday, 7 December 2009 06:35 (sixteen years ago)
this film still shit
― conrad, Monday, 7 December 2009 06:48 (sixteen years ago)
for example
― a dimension that can only be accessed through self-immolation (contenderizer), Monday, 7 December 2009 06:50 (sixteen years ago)
whistle click this film still shit
― conrad, Monday, 7 December 2009 07:16 (sixteen years ago)
you guys should listen to conrad
― mod only knows who i'd ban without u (s1ocki), Monday, 7 December 2009 07:42 (sixteen years ago)
this was def not shit - easily better than the last coupla Anderson movies - but in no way touches the awesomeness of prime Pixar/Miyazaki. it lacks that sense of wonder that the best family films (including The Iron Giant) tend to evoke.
― Simon H., Monday, 7 December 2009 09:50 (sixteen years ago)
Saw this yesterday, in a virtually empty cineworld, and found it to be a laugh-free zone - entire film seemed VERY disjointed, poorly paced/structured, boring, even. Hated the way the foxes were animated, thought that Clooney, Streep and Murray were all coasting - meh
― Ward Fowler, Monday, 7 December 2009 10:12 (sixteen years ago)
I was thoroughly lost in a sense of wonder throughout, mostly that anything this crafty and visionary can still get spat out by the Hollywood Machine. It's been awhile.
Liked Coraline but it wasn't in this film's neighborhood; haven't caught Up and Ponyo so far.
― Feingold/Kaptur 2012 (Dr Morbius), Monday, 7 December 2009 12:25 (sixteen years ago)
and, yeah, Clooney is better looking as an animated fox than as rumpled Vanity Fair cover boy.
― Hell is other people. In an ILE film forum. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 7 December 2009 12:27 (sixteen years ago)
wasn't Fox's whistle/click an old film quote? Bugging the hell outta me.
(Way better Leone-Morricone vibe in the showdown than anyone else has managed btw)
― Feingold/Kaptur 2012 (Dr Morbius), Monday, 7 December 2009 12:27 (sixteen years ago)
u haven't seen Inglorious Basterds, opening sequence of which has a MUCH more convincing Leone vibe imho
― Ward Fowler, Monday, 7 December 2009 12:31 (sixteen years ago)
Perhaps I'll go to a screening and walk out after 15 mins, then.
― Feingold/Kaptur 2012 (Dr Morbius), Monday, 7 December 2009 13:30 (sixteen years ago)
yeah morbs, i'd bet even you could appreciate the opening scene while hating the rest of it...the pacing/style/everything is way more focused
― being being kiss-ass fake nice (gbx), Monday, 7 December 2009 14:27 (sixteen years ago)
wasn't Fox's whistle/click an old film quote?
Hawkeye in MASH.
― really senile old crap shit (Eric H.), Monday, 7 December 2009 15:03 (sixteen years ago)
I don't think Ponyo really rates with these, it was alright but it was some substandard Miyazaki.
― akm, Monday, 7 December 2009 15:14 (sixteen years ago)
thx Eric, of course
― Feingold/Kaptur 2012 (Dr Morbius), Monday, 7 December 2009 16:46 (sixteen years ago)
i think i would have liked this better if all the voices were british, not just the bad guys a la star wars
― mod only knows who i'd ban without u (s1ocki), Monday, 7 December 2009 16:51 (sixteen years ago)
I thoroughly enjoyed this.
― l'homme moderne: il forniquait et lisait des journaux (Michael White), Monday, 7 December 2009 16:55 (sixteen years ago)
in my mind you basically are the fantastic mr fox so that doesnt surprise me tbh
― mod only knows who i'd ban without u (s1ocki), Monday, 7 December 2009 17:00 (sixteen years ago)
haw
― being being kiss-ass fake nice (gbx), Monday, 7 December 2009 17:02 (sixteen years ago)
lolz
― Feingold/Kaptur 2012 (Dr Morbius), Monday, 7 December 2009 19:42 (sixteen years ago)
which is why his best roles are as sort of shifty characters (out of sight, three kings, mr. fox).
how could you forget michael clayton, where his climactic monologue is basically a therapeutic rant serving for a sting job (and then he climbs into a cab and pays the driver to leave him alone for $50 worth of driving, lol. which I originally thought might go the way of The Long Good Friday but didn't)?
my favorite parts were the miniature motorcycle behind the larger motorcycle and every scene where kylie plays dead in the middle of a conversation
― El Tomboto, Monday, 7 December 2009 20:49 (sixteen years ago)
wish there was more of owen wilsons character
― just sayin, Monday, 7 December 2009 20:50 (sixteen years ago)
surprised at the Morbz love! If both Eric and Morbz like it it must be some kind of miracle.
― unobtaintium (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 7 December 2009 21:16 (sixteen years ago)
Or it's totally inaccessible pretentious crap, obv.
Just kidding. I really did love this.
― really senile old crap shit (Eric H.), Monday, 7 December 2009 21:34 (sixteen years ago)
Is this movie okay for 8-year olds?
I'd think so (given ads, animation), but it's rated PG.
― Daniel, Esq., Monday, 7 December 2009 21:35 (sixteen years ago)
Yes. They swap out all the swear words with the word "cuss."
― really senile old crap shit (Eric H.), Monday, 7 December 2009 21:41 (sixteen years ago)
it's not exactly a kids' film, but there's enough kid-appeal to it. a guy i know took his 8- and 4-yr-old kids, said they liked it pretty well but not as much as he and his wife did. there's stuff that will go over kids' heads, and a few things that might be a little unsettling, but i suppose no more so than in a lot of actual kids' movies.
― hellzapoppa (tipsy mothra), Monday, 7 December 2009 21:43 (sixteen years ago)
Good. I can't stomach going to Alvin and the Chipmunks 2, or whatever it's called.
― Daniel, Esq., Monday, 7 December 2009 21:45 (sixteen years ago)
(my other kids movie option)
― Daniel, Esq., Monday, 7 December 2009 21:47 (sixteen years ago)
I liked what Ebert had to say re: this movie's kid appeal:
Like the hero of "Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory," also based on one of his books, the creatures of Dahl's valley seem to know more than they're letting on; perhaps even secrets we don't much want to know. Children, especially, will find things they don't understand, and things that scare them. Excellent. A good story for children should suggest a hidden dimension, and that dimension of course is the lifetime still ahead of them. Six is a little early for a movie to suggest to kids that the case is closed. Oh, what if the kids start crying about words they don't know? -- Mommy, Mommy! What's creme brulee?" Show them, for goodness sake. They'll thank you for it. Take my word on this.
― mascara and ties (Abbott), Monday, 7 December 2009 22:02 (sixteen years ago)
whistle click this film still cuss
― conrad, Monday, 7 December 2009 22:11 (sixteen years ago)
Ebert's right.
(xp)
― Daniel, Esq., Monday, 7 December 2009 22:14 (sixteen years ago)
no, james and the giant peach, which i saw yesterday, is some cuss.
― bitter about emo (Hunt3r), Monday, 7 December 2009 22:15 (sixteen years ago)
I liked the scene in town that showed a wall or building in the far distance onto which had been painted, in neon graffiti, CUSS.
― Nuyorican oatmeal (jaymc), Monday, 7 December 2009 22:18 (sixteen years ago)
Will be freeze-framing my screener copy a lot. (I did go to a hi-def screening.)
If both Eric and Morbz like it it must be some kind of miracle.
We aren't THAT divergent, aside from Eric's hatred of classic comedy.
― Feingold/Kaptur 2012 (Dr Morbius), Monday, 7 December 2009 22:20 (sixteen years ago)
what attention to funny detail again
― conrad, Monday, 7 December 2009 22:23 (sixteen years ago)
ok morbs but what about you + eric h. + ME all really liking a movie
I'd go see this again in the theater for sure
― El Tomboto, Tuesday, 8 December 2009 00:36 (sixteen years ago)
Add me, tipsy, and amateurist, s1ocki (did HE like it?), and you got the closest thing to a consensus among the ILE Film Crew as I've ever seen.
― Hell is other people. In an ILE film forum. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 8 December 2009 00:40 (sixteen years ago)
saw this last night. this film redeemed w anderson for me in a big way. cannot understand some of the haters in this thread. smart, funny, tirelessly inventive, and entertaining. what's not to like ?
― oscar, Tuesday, 8 December 2009 00:50 (sixteen years ago)
for me it felt flat, fussy, forced and tiresomely quirky
I know I keep posting on this thread
― conrad, Tuesday, 8 December 2009 01:19 (sixteen years ago)
s1ocki (did HE like it?)
Doesn't seem like it.
― Nuyorican oatmeal (jaymc), Tuesday, 8 December 2009 01:37 (sixteen years ago)
we can just stipulate your comments from here on out if you want. like "every 40 posts, insert conrad not liking the movie."
― hellzapoppa (tipsy mothra), Tuesday, 8 December 2009 01:52 (sixteen years ago)
make it every 25
― conrad, Tuesday, 8 December 2009 02:17 (sixteen years ago)
― Nuyorican oatmeal (jaymc), Monday, December 7, 2009 8:37 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
i feel like arguing my points against the 99.999% of filmgoers has radicalized me a bit.. i certainly didnt HATE this movie, it just left me a little cold
― mod only knows who i'd ban without u (s1ocki), Tuesday, 8 December 2009 02:39 (sixteen years ago)
that was my dad's criticism of it. he thought it was too "cool." but he also said, "i think i just don't understand wes anderson. i liked rushmore pretty well, but every movie since then, i've understood less and less what he's trying to do."
― hellzapoppa (tipsy mothra), Tuesday, 8 December 2009 03:06 (sixteen years ago)