lol at americans trying to figure out texting.
― caek, Friday, 4 December 2009 14:34 (sixteen years ago)
no, don't go find the "conversation", just start a new text, UR DOIN IT WRONG. If you want to save drafts, find the conversation and add to it.
How are you starting these things? Whatever way you're doing it is slower than just opening the SMS app, finding their thread and adding to it.
― stet, Friday, 4 December 2009 14:35 (sixteen years ago)
lol at iPhone rage
― 囧 (dyao), Friday, 4 December 2009 14:36 (sixteen years ago)
you're basically using the SMS app in the only way you can use it so that it won't save a draft and then complaining that it won't save a draft.
― stet, Friday, 4 December 2009 14:37 (sixteen years ago)
open SMS, hit the "write" icon in top right, what a weirdo i fucking am jesus christ
― Tracer Hand, Friday, 4 December 2009 14:38 (sixteen years ago)
if you cancel by pressing the home button or wtf it's called, rather than pressing cancel, it's still there when you go back.
― poster x (ledge), Friday, 4 December 2009 14:39 (sixteen years ago)
The only time you should do that is if you're texting someone for the first time. Otherwise just find them in the list and it'll save the draft. Please? xp
― stet, Friday, 4 December 2009 14:39 (sixteen years ago)
You're not a weirdo, Tracer; it's a really stupid usability flaw that only people who have trained themselves away from it don't get.
ftr this is why I am completely single-threaded while texting
― Huckabee Jesus lifeline (HI DERE), Friday, 4 December 2009 14:40 (sixteen years ago)
yeah just hit the home button tracer
― max, Friday, 4 December 2009 14:41 (sixteen years ago)
it automatically adds to old threads anyway dan
also, dan is wrong, you are a weirdo, i just want to point out, you are all weirdos, stop writing such long text messages, i guarantee you, the person who is receiving them, hates you
you guys are forgetting that i might have been interrupted by ANOTHER TEXT TO WHICH I NEED TO RESPOND.
and practically any time you are addressing a text to multiple recipients it counts as a "stranger" in that there is no particular "conversation" that contains that exact constellation of contacts so there is not even the option to scroll through your list first and find the conversation just so that, possibly, if something happens, you are hedged against having what you wrote simply ERASED because you weren't thinking ahead.
god damn.
― Tracer Hand, Friday, 4 December 2009 14:42 (sixteen years ago)
So if you are in the middle of texting someone and you need to respond to someone else's text, you have to exit the application and re-enter it in order to keep from losing what you just wrote? Really? No one thinks that is counter-intuitive?
Also yeah, the failure to support texting multiple people is also stupid.
― Huckabee Jesus lifeline (HI DERE), Friday, 4 December 2009 14:43 (sixteen years ago)
yes and my point is if you are writing texts of a proper length it will take you literally less than 20 seconds to finish the text you are working and then respond to the new text
― max, Friday, 4 December 2009 14:43 (sixteen years ago)
it does support texting multiple people
max no one is writing "long" text messages except the elves which are turning the cranks in your brain
― Tracer Hand, Friday, 4 December 2009 14:44 (sixteen years ago)
it's hardly "training yourself away" -- it's the difference between just hitting reply and hitting "new message" in email every time, even when you're replying. Why type the address again? xxp
and practically any time you are addressing a text to multiple recipients it counts as a "stranger" oh come on this is totally just looking for the edge cases now. if you're doing this double-tap the text, hit "copy", do your other thing, come back, hit paste fuggedaboutit
― stet, Friday, 4 December 2009 14:44 (sixteen years ago)
So if you are in the middle of texting someone and you need to respond to someone else's textIf you're doing this is as a reply, just hit "back", go to the other text, reply, come back to your original thread and VOILA your draft has been saved
― stet, Friday, 4 December 2009 14:45 (sixteen years ago)
yes and my point is if you are writing texts of a proper length it will take you literally less than 20 seconds to finish the text you are working and then respond to the new text― max, Friday, December 4, 2009 2:43 PM (41 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― max, Friday, December 4, 2009 2:43 PM (41 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
yes, but it would take apple less than 20 seconds to fix this (i checked), thus saving millions of man hours.
― caek, Friday, 4 December 2009 14:46 (sixteen years ago)
well as stet points out there isnt really anyhting to "fix"
― max, Friday, 4 December 2009 14:46 (sixteen years ago)
You guys are amazing
― ENERGY FOOD (en i see kay), Friday, 4 December 2009 14:46 (sixteen years ago)
I mean seriously <3 this conversation
― ENERGY FOOD (en i see kay), Friday, 4 December 2009 14:47 (sixteen years ago)
there isn't anything to fix if your standards are really low, sure.
― caek, Friday, 4 December 2009 14:47 (sixteen years ago)
holy shit are we really arguing about this
― 囧 (dyao), Friday, 4 December 2009 14:47 (sixteen years ago)
And when one of them responds, it doesn't connect the message to the original thread and it doesn't show you if the person responding is also responding to everyone else on your original message; I have had multiple irritating text conversations amongst my family that turn into relaying messages back and forth because I'm the only one whose phone can't actually support a multi-participant text thread.
Again, the Treo does this.
― Huckabee Jesus lifeline (HI DERE), Friday, 4 December 2009 14:47 (sixteen years ago)
you want to know what you sound like to me--this sounds like people complaining that you cant save drafts of your instant messages
― max, Friday, 4 December 2009 14:47 (sixteen years ago)
there isn't anything to fix if your standards are really low, sure.hit "cancel" ... it cancels. uh, fail?
― stet, Friday, 4 December 2009 14:48 (sixteen years ago)
Have you ever used another smartphone, max?
― Huckabee Jesus lifeline (HI DERE), Friday, 4 December 2009 14:48 (sixteen years ago)
no? but? im not sure how thats relevant?
― max, Friday, 4 December 2009 14:49 (sixteen years ago)
cos if you had you would try to use the iphone as if it was some other phone and then be mad that it wasn't the same
― stet, Friday, 4 December 2009 14:49 (sixteen years ago)
max, everyone else seems to agree that saving unsent texts is a useful thing, and is trying to figure out how best to do it.
― caek, Friday, 4 December 2009 14:50 (sixteen years ago)
not cutty
― max, Friday, 4 December 2009 14:50 (sixteen years ago)
also--the iphone saves unsent texts, except in this one very specific situation that tracer is talking about
completely fine with iphone rethinking text messages like they're not emails, but if you can't start a text without a recipient and come back to it later then that is lame imo.
― caek, Friday, 4 December 2009 14:51 (sixteen years ago)
"one very specific situation" = any time i need to write another text before i have finished the one i'm writing.
it is interesting to see the vigor with which this STEP BACKWARD in SMS usability to like 1998 is being defended! sorry d00ds it simply SUX! every other phone does this!
― Tracer Hand, Friday, 4 December 2009 14:52 (sixteen years ago)
^^^^^
― Huckabee Jesus lifeline (HI DERE), Friday, 4 December 2009 14:53 (sixteen years ago)
Although it's funny watching fanboys cry when you tell them their baby isn't perfect.
"one very specific situation" = any time i need to write another text, to someone i have never written a text to before, before i have finished the one i'm writing
― max, Friday, 4 December 2009 14:54 (sixteen years ago)
sigh
any time i need to write another text before i have finished the one i'm writing.but this isn't true! It's not "any time"; it's "only when you've just started a blank text, which you do every time and make your life unnecessarily harder"
sure there's no reason they couldn't (or shouldn't) add a "back" button on the new text form and save its contents, but i think this is really a much more edge case than you guys are making out. 9 times out of 10 the app will try to save what you're doing. Just use it like it was designed and don't try to use like it was every other phone and a lot of the problems go away
― stet, Friday, 4 December 2009 14:56 (sixteen years ago)
fwiw, i don't care that every other phone does this. i care that it is useful and would not be hard to integrate into the UI without clutter. seems to me like that just haven't gotten round to it and it will happen eventually, rather than they've made a strategic decision about how people are texting wrong and it should suck for them until they learn to do it properly.
― caek, Friday, 4 December 2009 14:57 (sixteen years ago)
i suppose i will need to start getting into the habit of NOT using the "write a text" button with which i am presented on the main SMS screen. silly silly fucking me. and instead will start scrolling around to find the last text someone sent me BEFORE writing my text to them. handy! and then most of my problems will be taken care of. (though not the problem with sending texts to multiple recipients.) but frankly i think that is LAMENTABLE STUPIDNESS.
― Tracer Hand, Friday, 4 December 2009 14:58 (sixteen years ago)
also I AM RIGHT.
― Tracer Hand, Friday, 4 December 2009 14:59 (sixteen years ago)
I remember when the iPhone came out and they basically said "MMS is unimportant and will go away once people have a easier email integration on their phones" Guess what actually happened?
Not everything Apple does is actually right, guys.
― Huckabee Jesus lifeline (HI DERE), Friday, 4 December 2009 14:59 (sixteen years ago)
to be fair, i think that was more a bullshit smokescreen for at&t's benefit rather than apple trying to reinvent portable telephones.
― caek, Friday, 4 December 2009 15:01 (sixteen years ago)
yeah at&t admitted later that lack of mms functionality was their fault
― max, Friday, 4 December 2009 15:01 (sixteen years ago)
no one i know has a phone that uses mms anyway so
You never need to respond to a text.
― exploding angel vagina (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 4 December 2009 15:02 (sixteen years ago)
i dont even know what tracer does but it sounds like a very high stress job
― max, Friday, 4 December 2009 15:02 (sixteen years ago)
Text me and see if I respond. I dare you.
Oh seven ate seven too klondike for seven six.
― exploding angel vagina (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 4 December 2009 15:03 (sixteen years ago)